Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Mac Benchmarks....

Backtothemac

Backtothemac

macrumors 601
Original poster
Well, this has developed out of another discussion, but here goes. Does anyone have any good way to benchmark a Mac. Are there programs that you can download that will do it? Is it just a matter of getting photoshop and a file and running times tests? How do you do it. How do you get the most accurate results?
 
I think Norton Utilities might have have a bench marking program with it, I am not sure if it is OSX complient though (I use TechTools)

Ensign
 
That program looks pretty cool, I am going to register it!

it look really useful, nice bit of Real programming!

Ensign
 
Nice, although I won't know what to compare my benchmarks to (other than the pre-loaded iMac 350).

Here's mine:
24941 - Math
27462 - Memory
29541 - Graphics (ouch)
5691 - Disk

I'm running a G4 400 PCI. I can't wait to see how much some of the newer G4's blow this old thing out of the water... 😛
 
This is from a PowerMac 867 with 1.5gb RAM:

Math 20890
Memory 20890
Graphics 20644
Disk 819

I am not sure if this is good or not 🙂

Ensign
 
Here's one from my Tibook 800 with 512mb RAM

Math: 19584
Memory: 18227
Graphics: 17418
Disk: 658


Don't know what those mean either, but I think smaller numbers are better, or at least the readme said so.
 
Well, here are mine, and yes, they are legit.

10.1.4 Clean install yesterday. Nothing running but finder.
Math 17067
Mem 18044
Graph 41247 (YIKES Nothing like Rage 128 right)
Disk 1468

Now, watch this. X.2

Math 17654
Mem 18322
Graph 28171 (MASSIVE, ABSOLUTLY MASSIVE IMPROVEMENT IN X2)
Disk 1406

I ran the best of three average test. Now, is the G3 dead? This thing is performing with the Ti800 mentioned before. Shorter is better according to the readme file.

iBook 600 with 384 of Ram.
 
Wow.. the G3 is kickin some serious a$$ with this test... I wonder what the scores would be if the program was altivec optimized (or is it already?)?
 
Here's my benchmarks:

Math 19376
Memory 20016
Graph 29743
Disk 1622

Running a Quicksilver 733 without L3 cache. I'll try 10.2 asap to see if the graphics score improves.

Err... I don't think this software is optimized for altivec... Backtothemac's iBook scores are much better than mine and chibianh's TiBook 800 scores. Maybe the G3 has a better integer unit than the G4.
 
Well, here it is. Running on a Dual 1Ghz with 1Gb RAM and GeForce 4 MX (OS 10.1.4)

Math > 15027
Memory > 14554
Graphics > 15514
Disc > 1110

😀
 
iBook500 640MB RAM ...

I just ran it on mine.

Math - 20890
Memory - 21299
Graphics - 58491
Disc - 9947

My Mac - 500mhz G3 iBook/Combo/10GB HD/640MB RAM (3-2-2 on the 512 chip)

Note, I didn't restart or anything prior to running the test. In fact, I don't think I've restarted in over a month.
 
G3 outperforming G4??

that's wacky!!!

I cannot wait to get to my TiBook this evening and run this little app to see how I measure up...😉
 
Here's my TiPB 667, 1 gig of RAM running OS9.2.2

Check out the graphics!!!!!

math> 22912
memory > 22835
graphics > 4623 (and no its 4,623, I didn't forget a nubmer)
disk > 17445

I'll boot to OSX and see what happens. Its amazing how much a hit the graphics takes. When Jaguar becomes available that will definitely help.

D
 
Here's my results:
G3 450, 256MB RAM, X 10.1.4

Math = 26214
Memory = 24576
Graphics= 28180
Disc = 3043

Smaller numbers are better, so the G4s are kicking @ss...as they should.
 
Originally posted by Zenith
no, they aren't... they should kick more ass than to be outperformed by a 600 mhz iBook.
Click to expand...

This is no ordinary iBook. It can leap over 10,000 page word documents in a single bound. Run faster than a Jaguar, and its bullet proof!!!!

Don't ask me how it is, but I will take it. 😉
 
hehe.. yeah, i've got an iBook 600 myself, and it's a nice little machine.

i just think the software isn't optimized to take use of altivec.
 
here it mine
I'm impressed, imac g4 700mhz 512ram
 

Attachments

  • picture 1.jpg
    picture 1.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 298
Thanks to everyone for contributing to this benchmarking thread with their systems. It really is hard to guage what results mean unless someone else backs you up.

I was impressed w/my results on my rig, sometimes I liken it to the Millenium Falcon because it is so pieced together (but that's what I wanted from the start of last summer 🙂).

S900—G4 450 OC'd to 510MHz—512MB RAM (FPM, interleaved)—Acard 133 Controller w/7200 RPM WD Caviar—Radeon Mac Edition w/32 MB DDR—and the list goes on…

Makes me feel good about my investment in all these parts comparing it to some of your other "supported" systems (and I beat some of them too!). Thanks for making a man feel good. 🙂
 

Attachments

  • picture 1.jpg
    picture 1.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 325
And here are the iBooks. Do I have the fastest G3's in the world or what? I wonder how long it will take someone to contact the guy who created this to find out why the G3 will run with and beat the G4.
 

Attachments

  • ibook.jpg
    ibook.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 271
Here's what I got on my PBG4 400. The left image is with shadows on, the right, shadows off:
 

Attachments

  • pbg4_400.jpg
    pbg4_400.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 386
Originally posted by Backtothemac
And here are the iBooks. Do I have the fastest G3's in the world or what? I wonder how long it will take someone to contact the guy who created this to find out why the G3 will run with and beat the G4.
Click to expand...

Not the fastest chip in the world, but maybe fastest X. 🙂

They're just benchmarks. As we all know the G3 and G4 are basically the same, save for the Altivec.

You're playing on a different playing field than most of us, just wait 'till we all get Jaguar… 🙂

I thought these were HW tests, funny how the OS effects the scores on HW.
 
G3 is faster clock for clock..

on unoptimized code. Remember, a G4 is not a G3 with altivec anymore. Ever since the new G4's came out they are on a 7 stage pipeline. The G3's are still on a 4 stage pipeline. So for unoptimized code, it would make sense that a G3 is faster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back