View Full Version : Tripod Weight Capacity
swwack91
Aug 26, 2008, 05:48 PM
I'm buying a new camera that weighs in at 5 lbs. My current tripod has a max capacity of about 6.5 lbs.
Do you think I should get a newer, stronger tripod? Or should the current one hold up?
ChemiosMurphy
Aug 27, 2008, 01:34 AM
Depends. If you just got the Canon in your sig I'd get a new Bogen if you can afford it.
AviationFan
Aug 27, 2008, 08:52 AM
Why not just give it a try with the old tripod first?
Do you have a legs/head combo, or are legs and head separate? I'd be cautious about using a light camera on a head that's designed for much heavier gear, so your 5 pounds on a head designed for 6.5 pounds may work out better than the same camera on a heavy-duty head made for a 20lbs camera. That is, assuming the legs are heavy and sturdy enough to hold everything in place.
- Martin
Griffter
Aug 27, 2008, 10:01 AM
Depends entirely on your current tripod. If you however find that you can get your dealer to throw in a tripod as part of the price (or at a discount) with your new camera, I would get one, otherwise try with old tripod first :)
swwack91
Aug 27, 2008, 11:06 AM
Why not just give it a try with the old tripod first?
Do you have a legs/head combo, or are legs and head separate? I'd be cautious about using a light camera on a head that's designed for much heavier gear, so your 5 pounds on a head designed for 6.5 pounds may work out better than the same camera on a heavy-duty head made for a 20lbs camera. That is, assuming the legs are heavy and sturdy enough to hold everything in place.
- Martin
I have a Sony Lightweight Tripod (http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=11037227&tab=Features).
I just don't think it's sturdy enough. It's never given me problems in the past... but I just don't know.
Griffter
Aug 27, 2008, 01:38 PM
I have a Sony Lightweight Tripod (http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=11037227&tab=Features).
I just don't think it's sturdy enough. It's never given me problems in the past... but I just don't know.
I have exactly that tripod and it works fine with my Z1, I wouldn't want to use anything heavier on it though...
JNB
Aug 27, 2008, 01:51 PM
It's not so much how much the tripod will support, it's more how stable it is. The support limit is a vague indicator of that because of the materials & construction. The sub-$50 Velbons & the like are generally an extruded aluminum, and tend to be less capable of weight as a result. They're also substantially less stable.
I'll second the vote for a nice Bogen along with a good ball head. I got mine used off eBay, paid about 40% of original retail, and it's rock solid. Not terribly fun to lug around the trails, but I never worry about any drooping or vibration-induced blur.
swwack91
Aug 27, 2008, 03:35 PM
I have exactly that tripod and it works fine with my Z1, I wouldn't want to use anything heavier on it though...
alright. based on that i think i'll hold off on the new tripod then.
Consultant
Aug 27, 2008, 04:21 PM
Try it, play video on computer to see whether there is camera shake, if there is, the tripod / head combination is probably not sturdy enough.
I'd be cautious about using a light camera on a head that's designed for much heavier gear, so your 5 pounds on a head designed for 6.5 pounds may work out better than the same camera on a heavy-duty head made for a 20lbs camera. That is, assuming the legs are heavy and sturdy enough to hold everything in place.
That makes no sense. Something designed for heavier camera have havier duty components. Someting with max capacity of 20 pounds can support 0 to 20 pounds, and will be more sturdy than something with max capacity of 6 pounds.
AviationFan
Aug 28, 2008, 09:03 AM
That makes no sense. Something designed for heavier camera have havier duty components. Someting with max capacity of 20 pounds can support 0 to 20 pounds, and will be more sturdy than something with max capacity of 6 pounds.As far as sturdyness goes, you are of course correct. However, good tripod heads have a counter-weight (usually through a spring in the head) that stabilizes the camera as it is being tilted, and that spring or counter-weight must match the camera weidht to work well. Good tripod heads have an adjustable counter-weight, but only within a certain range. This is where it can hurt to have a head that's designed for a heavier load than what you actually mount on it.
- Martin
Consultant
Aug 28, 2008, 10:34 AM
re: ^
He's talking about a tripod with support for 6 pounds, not tripod head. That's bottom of the line stuff.
He is NOT considering a professional one that supports a 50 pound camera, thus counterweight is not an issue.
BTW, tension can be set on most decent tripod heads, at least on a pro tripod / head.
trudd
Aug 28, 2008, 03:14 PM
I used to be very conservative in my budgeting for a tripod. I thought an $80 system was splurging. The camera plate for the tripod I use now costs more than that.
A Bogen will work fine, namely the 503 head (I wouldn't bother with the 501 head...I bought one sometime ago and hate it). You should also look at the Libec LS38 system, or names such as Miller, Sachtler and Cartoni. Hopefully you can find something used for a good deal.
You're going to have to spend money to get a good tripod. I recommend it, seeing as you'll have a good tripod longer than you'll have the camera. I wouldn't trust a $3,200 camera on a $50 tripod from Wal-Mart.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.