PDA

View Full Version : White House Responds to O'Neill's Criticisms




IJ Reilly
Jan 13, 2004, 11:28 AM
WASHINGTON — President Bush once defended Paul H. O'Neill's penchant for speaking his mind, saying his then-Treasury secretary was "refreshingly candid." Now, he is finding out just how candid O'Neill can be.

Bush and his aides have been forced to respond to stinging criticisms from a former member of their inner circle in a new book by a prominent journalist that has been the talk of Washington for several days. In the book, O'Neill, who was fired by Bush in late 2002, portrays the president as disengaged during Cabinet meetings and eager almost from Day One of his administration to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.

The comments have given ammunition to Bush's political opponents at a time when the White House is already facing fire in an intensifying Democratic presidential primary campaign.

In a development Monday, the Treasury Department said it had asked for an investigation of the possible leak of a classified document in connection with O'Neill's criticisms.

The document was shown during a report Sunday on the book by the CBS news program "60 Minutes." It bore the Treasury Department letterhead and was marked "secret."

"Based on the '60 Minutes' segment aired last night, which displayed a document with a classified marking, the department referred the matter to the Office of Inspector General," said Treasury spokesman Rob Nichols. "That's standard operating procedure. I can't comment any further."

[...]


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-oneill13jan13,1,6137673.story



mactastic
Jan 13, 2004, 11:33 AM
Wow, so quick to get an investigation under way here and so slow to get one going over the leaking of Valerie Plame's ID.... I wonder why?[/SARCASM]

IJ Reilly
Jan 13, 2004, 11:36 AM
Yes, I'd noticed that too. Within 24 hours of the broadcast, they were right on it.

zimv20
Jan 13, 2004, 11:42 AM
the story has suddenly gone from bush's wrongdoing to o'neill's wrongdoing. well deflected, WH. you suck, CNN.

mactastic
Jan 13, 2004, 11:57 AM
Notice almost all the attacks are on O'Neil's character and motivations, not on the veracity of the claims themselves.

IJ Reilly
Jan 13, 2004, 09:11 PM
Originally posted by mactastic
Notice almost all the attacks are on O'Neil's character and motivations, not on the veracity of the claims themselves.

Sounds like the debating tactics some use here.

Sayhey
Jan 14, 2004, 12:58 AM
Originally posted by mactastic
Wow, so quick to get an investigation under way here and so slow to get one going over the leaking of Valerie Plame's ID.... I wonder why?[/SARCASM]

O'Neill is quoted by the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3394705.stm) as saying all the documents used in the book were released by Treasury Dept. legal counsel.

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill has denied allegations he used secret documents to support criticisms of the Bush administration made in a new book.

Mr. O'Neill told CBS television that the Treasury Department's chief legal counsel allowed him to take the documents after he asked permission.

It sounds like more of the intimidating tactics used against Plame and her husband. If you go against this WH you are going to pay. In this case at least in the pocketbook of O'Neill - legal counsel to defend yourself against even spurious charges by the government doesn't come cheap.

Waluigi
Jan 14, 2004, 03:05 PM
Originally posted by IJ Reilly
Sounds like the debating tactics some use here.

yea, and, in the general election debates too (pisses the crap out of me when they never answer questions directly)...

--Waluigi