PDA

View Full Version : Has Apple run out of ideas?




neiltc13
Sep 9, 2008, 05:28 PM
I've finished reading up on all the products introduced today and "Let's Rock" was everything I expected it to be. But one difference between this and other keynotes is that there really isn't anything new here at all on the hardware front.

What we're left with is in my opinion a plateauing effect - Apple has revised its iPod line so much that there really is not much more they can do. They're now making changes just for the sake of making changes and that may end up being a bad thing (it's certainly a less exciting thing for us).

This didn't just start today though. It's been going on since the day the Aluminium iMac was introduced. That product was in my opinion a huge step back for the design and didn't really add anything - it does all the same things as its predecessor but just looks uglier as it goes about its business.

My favourite MP3 player was the second generation iPod nano. It was just about perfect and when they decided to replace it with the 'fatty' I literally did a giant facepalm. Today's introduction goes a little way to restoring that iconic design and the genius that was the iPod mini but they've killed it by giving it the "punched in the face" look of the aluminium iMac.

For the first time in as long as I can remember Apple left two iPods completely unchanged. No upgrades whatsoever to them, apart from the removal of a model no one really wanted anyway. They literally didn't have anything more to add to these.

The touch update was mediocre. I'm not sure why the Nike+ thing got such a good reception because I've never seen or heard of anyone using it. They gave it the same ugly round feeling as the iPhone (does anyone REALLY miss the metal on the back of the original iPhone?!) and now it's gonna wobble on the table.

I'm not saying this because I was in any way "disappointed" with today's event - I have an iPhone 3G and had no plans to buy any new iPod or anything like that today.

So what do you guys think, are Apple's designers going a little dry in their old age?



bc008
Sep 9, 2008, 05:32 PM
i think so..

the new nano looks great, and i am glad they brought back the old colors but imho the ipod touch update wasnt needed..

daverso
Sep 9, 2008, 05:40 PM
Well, you can only expect so much from a company so often... The iPhone/iPod touch was just over a year ago... I think there needs to be more down time for them to be considered out of ideas.
The new nano is better than anything Microsoft or any Apple competitors has released in years in my opinion. I think the next conference next month (or whenever it ends up being) will have some pretty interesting releases.
Although i will say they do get into a cycle, they have huge updates to their product line, then they have smaller ones. This one was somewhere in-between the two.

TEG
Sep 9, 2008, 05:44 PM
I want the old 1G shuffle back, it was so much better than the current one.
I really liked the 1G nano as well.

I wouldn't say they've run out of ideas, but there really isn't much more they could add, maybe a TV tuner, but with different standards, it could cause problems, FM radio (but FM radio is crap), AM radio (but the loops would be so small that you would only get the 50,000W stations, or have to be within 3 miles of the transmitter).

Bluetooth with AD2P would be nice for all the iPods, but beyond that, I can't think of anything more to add.

TEG

dizastor
Sep 9, 2008, 06:03 PM
I don't think that they have run out of ideas, they are just at a midpoint in the iPod evolution.

The iPod classic looks to be on it's last legs and Apple seems to be starting to push the iPod touch harder. It might be a few revisions away, but eventually I'm sure there will be a Nano Touch and both the Classic and Traditional Nano will go away.

The real hurdle here is storage space. When they can make a Touch with 100+ gigs of storage so the "I need to carry every album ever recorded in my pocket at all times" people will be satisfied, they will dump the classic.

As always, it looks like they are refining the products based on consumer feedback and the quest to always be the "coolest", "slimmest" and "thinnest" music player on the block.

burningbright
Sep 9, 2008, 06:24 PM
I'd wait until the expected mac updates before losing any faith- they did say that there'd be a 'major product transition' that no rivals could match etc. and it wasn't shown today... This summer Apple seem to have bitten off more than they could chew programming-wise, so I'm glad they're not doing anything too ambitious until the firmware/mobile me problems are completely fixed. The nano got a nice update and is a much more attractive purchase now, I think.

But on a general note the glory years of digital tech as mass items will probably be over in a decade, I think. I can't think of anything digitalisation can do except aid the production, manipulation and consumption of data, text, pictures, sound and video. Most people don't need to process very much data, text doesn't seem too problematic (apart from in a logistical sense-scanning pages etc.), and picture, sound and video quality can already be produced and enjoyed at a level that's about the limit of human senses. Maybe you could have a video editing app that can do the sort of things Photoshop does to photos, and perhaps graphics that could be mistaken for reality, but after that I'm pretty stumped as to what apps could need huge amounts of computing power and be useful to the general public. Already some folks are saying 'nah, I don't need that much power. Just gimme a netbook.' It might be a sign of things to come. In the meantime, all-in-one devices like the iPhone seem the way to go!:cool:

graemesangels
Sep 9, 2008, 06:28 PM
In terms of music playing hardware there isn't much more they can do that would be considered a new idea (at least none that I've thought of, although that could explain why I don't work there).

Their DAP designs have become very refined and they probably stick with them because they work.

The only hardware that I feel is really missing from the line-up is wireless syncing and I would imagine that the iPod Touch could achieve that through a software update.

I have to agree with TEG as far the shuffle goes; the first gen is superior in my eyes which is why I still rock mine regularly.

Muncher
Sep 9, 2008, 06:34 PM
I don't think that they have run out of ideas, they are just at a midpoint in the iPod evolution.

The iPod classic looks to be on it's last legs and Apple seems to be starting to push the iPod touch harder. It might be a few revisions away, but eventually I'm sure there will be a Nano Touch and both the Classic and Traditional Nano will go away.

The real hurdle here is storage space. When they can make a Touch with 100+ gigs of storage so the "I need to carry every album ever recorded in my pocket at all times" people will be satisfied, they will dump the classic.

The "Classic" in iPod Classic says it all; its days are numbered. That said, affordable 1.8" SSDs with capacities above 100 GB are a ways off.

I have seen classics in use, actually. I have quite a few friends that have them because they had over 8 GB of media and thought the 16 GB touch was too expensive. I guess they'll all be getting nanos now.

As always, it looks like they are refining the products based on consumer feedback and the quest to always be the "coolest", "slimmest" and "thinnest" music player on the block.

I think that is exactly what's going on right now; Apple said this event would be big, perhaps they had hoped for a better reception of Genius.

The next big step in mobile tech, IMO, is battery life. I read an article somewhere about silver-(I forget the element) batteries with three times the energy density of Li-ion. Obviously, there are other experimental battery technologies out there. As we shrink the circuitry in our devices, the limiting ingredient will become batteries.

thejadedmonkey
Sep 9, 2008, 06:53 PM
I think so.

Here's my wish list, maybe they can use some ideas.

1) iTunes home server.
2) iPhone nano
3) Top set box

theknightshift
Sep 9, 2008, 11:07 PM
Ehhh, I don't think the iPod classic is going to completely go away. The look has become too iconic. And besides, the beautiful thing about the original iPod design is that it's extremely easy to use without having to actively look at it the entire time... which is particularly good for activities like driving.

I'd love to see the iPod classic migrate to all-flash storage, once it catches up and exceeds hard drive capacity. After that...

1. User-replaceable batteries: Apple is missing a HUGE opportunity for profit with this one. There's no reason not to have this.
2. Built-in Sirius XM Satellite Radio receiver: If GPS can be incorporated into an iPhone, this could likely be implemented in an iPod as well... and would also be a bigtime money-making racket for both Apple and Sirius XM.
3. Wi-Fi streaming iTunes from remote location to your iPod: Already being worked on at Apple, according to reports.

Muncher
Sep 9, 2008, 11:25 PM
Ehhh, I don't think the iPod classic is going to completely go away. The look has become too iconic. And besides, the beautiful thing about the original iPod design is that it's extremely easy to use without having to actively look at it the entire time... which is particularly good for activities like driving.

This is where the iPod Nano comes in; same click wheel interface, less bulk.

I'd love to see the iPod classic migrate to all-flash storage, once it catches up and exceeds hard drive capacity. After that...

1. User-replaceable batteries: Apple is missing a HUGE opportunity for profit with this one. There's no reason not to have this.
2. Built-in Sirius XM Satellite Radio receiver: If GPS can be incorporated into an iPhone, this could likely be implemented in an iPod as well... and would also be a bigtime money-making racket for both Apple and Sirius XM.
3. Wi-Fi streaming iTunes from remote location to your iPod: Already being worked on at Apple, according to reports.

Flash will not catch up to traditional storage any time in the near future.

The problem with user replaceable batteries is that they have to make the ipod in a form factor that allows it.

I would like Sirius/XM integration, but it could be the subject of an anti-trust lawsuit.

All hail streaming iTunes! :p:rolleyes::D:apple:

theknightshift
Sep 10, 2008, 12:42 AM
This is where the iPod Nano comes in; same click wheel interface, less bulk.

Well, some of us also LIKE having something nice and weighty that fits in the palm of or our hands (and I like getting to carry it on my belt too :) ) that we can operate with our thumbs. And we don't care to have a bigger screen that we have to touch with our fingers, either. I mean, those iPhone/iPod touch screens must see some wear and tear, right? How does Apple ever expect 'em to stay clean? Are those things fingerprint-resistant, or something? :confused:

Flash will not catch up to traditional storage any time in the near future.

Give it another year or so. There's some neat stuff regarding flash/solid state storage research happening over in Japan right now :)

The problem with user replaceable batteries is that they have to make the ipod in a form factor that allows it.

I've seen a few designs already, made by pretty sharp folks, that would allow for the iPod to maintain its lean, trim design and provide for easily-replaceable batteries on the fly. The coolest was something like a "micro-hinge" that has the back chassis swinging up then over very slightly to provide ready access to the battery compartment, without having to expose anything else of the iPod's innards.

Steve Jobs has some of the most clever engineers on the planet at his beck and call. He should let them tackle this for sake of the challenge, at least :D

I would like Sirius/XM integration, but it could be the subject of an anti-trust lawsuit.

The other problem is that 2/3rds of the world would hate it 'cuz currently Sirius XM satellites only adequately provide coverage for North America.

All hail streaming iTunes!

Which if Apple can get it to work, it would mean that storage would almost become a moot thing anyway since you could get any song or video sent from your home server to your iPod, whenever you wanted it :)

neiltc13
Sep 10, 2008, 06:29 AM
I was surprised to see that they didn't combine iPod touch and a hard drive to satisfy folks who have a big collection.

Schtumple
Sep 10, 2008, 06:33 AM
I was surprised to see that they didn't combine iPod touch and a hard drive to satisfy folks who have a big collection.

Surely the battery life would suck? So you'd need a fairly chunky battery, which would then make the iPod touch very thick, not apples flow, thin is in.

MowingDevil
Sep 10, 2008, 07:52 AM
User-replaceable batteries:[/B] Apple is missing a HUGE opportunity for profit with this one. There's no reason not to have this.


Why on earth would you ever want this?
Thats a terrible idea for the consumer and a total waste. The power system on iPods is fine the way they are. Just think of the environmental toll it would have on the planet to have every iPod w/ disposable batteries. Thats the only way it would be really profitable for Apple. If they made them rechargeable batteries then that wouldn't be such a bad idea. Still I'm fine w/ them the way they are.

Built-in Sirius XM Satellite Radio receiver:[/B] If GPS can be incorporated into an iPhone, this could likely be implemented in an iPod as well... and would also be a bigtime money-making racket for both Apple and Sirius XM.

This I'd get, commercial radio sucks. I've used Sirius before and like it, not enough to buy a dedicated Sirius receiver but if it was built into an iPod I'd pay a subscription for it.

steviem
Sep 10, 2008, 08:02 AM
Simple answer:

No.

They won't want to give us everything that we want, because in a year or two they won't be able to make us buy a new iPod/iPhone.

Take the 3G iPhone, terrible battery life. When the original iPhone came out, they omitted a 3G chip because the battery wouldn't last too long.

iCantwait
Sep 10, 2008, 08:19 AM
ummmmm, you can stream iTunes - i have the "simplify" app on my iPhone which lets me do it over 3G and wifi.

its sad to see the iPod get further and further away from my beloved 1G 5gb from back in the day.

We need to remember that [almost] everybody wants an iPod and apple dont have to give them everything that other mp3 players have (FM, wifi, speakers (i know)) because they will get sales regardless just on brand name. when i saw an touch screen mp4 player raffle advertised i just thought to myself hahahaha, just get an iPod touch!

So really, apple dont need to go all out to get the same amount of sales.

whooleytoo
Sep 10, 2008, 08:29 AM
There are a number of factors:

- with the iPhone & MobileMe, Apple have been really stretched over the last year or so. It might be a good time to slow down dramatic feature releases, and focus on performance & stability over feature lists.

- The nanos are the low-cost, low-end iPods. Their main purpose is to play music (and some video). If Apple kitted these out with loads of features, there would be less need for the iPod touch.

EthanNixon
Sep 10, 2008, 08:31 AM
The Simplify application for the iPhone and iTouch is seriously one of the worst applications I downloaded. Originally, I am not sure of it now, there was no statement of DRM streaming music. Which to all of the people who actually use iTunes to purchase their music, this means the application is completely useless...

Bubba Satori
Sep 10, 2008, 08:38 AM
The day after the Classic gets reduced fron 160GB to 120GB. Toshiba announce a 240GB drive. Is Apple deliberately trying to *iss us off at every opportunity ? :mad:

Toshiba unveils tiny 240 GB HD

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...tiny-240-gb-hd

Scepticalscribe
Sep 10, 2008, 08:42 AM
Ehhh, I don't think the iPod classic is going to completely go away. The look has become too iconic. And besides, the beautiful thing about the original iPod design is that it's extremely easy to use without having to actively look at it the entire time... which is particularly good for activities like driving.

I'd love to see the iPod classic migrate to all-flash storage, once it catches up and exceeds hard drive capacity. After that...



That would be my wish list too. Actually, I am a bit disappointed about the lack of attention paid to the classic; it's a great design, and it is extraordinarily useful to a lot of people; fantastic for long journeys and chilling, where music is what you want to listen to, without visual distractions, and where those with large music libraries are catered for.

Around a year ago, Apple sent me a questionnaire re the iPod; most of the questions concerned video capabilities - whether this would this interest me, etc. I got a very strong sense that I was in a minority, in that I stressed my interest in this device was audio, not visual.

Cheers

Scarlet Fever
Sep 10, 2008, 08:44 AM
Am I the only one who prefers actual buttons? The best feature of the non-touchscreen iPods is the ability to perform actions without taking it out of your pocket. With a normal iPod, you can change the volume, skip tracks and fast forward or rewind without looking at it.

I really hope Apple doesn't milk the multitouch too much. It's very nice, but I don't think it's advancing usability at all.

davidjearly
Sep 10, 2008, 08:50 AM
I disagree. I think yesterday's announcements show that Apple is happy with their current line-up of iPods, but felt that there was a few tweaks they could make.

The new iPod nano, is IMO, the best one they have released yet and improves on last year's model that I did not like. They have returned to the favoured portrait design, and still managed to retain the nice display of the 3G model. They have revised the menu again, which improves it even more. The accelerometer is another nice addition. I think it is a great product and definitely the best iPod nano yet.

As for the punched in the face look of the new iMac and iPod nano, I couldn't disagree more. I think the aluminium design is beautiful. When talking about the iMac, it is a massive improvement over the white model. I have both side by side, and can not believe how much better the newer one looks. This is going to be an issue of personal opinion.

The iPod touch update was again, an improvement over its predecessor. The speaker and volume controls were two of the most highly touted features asked for by users and Apple delivered it. The Nike+ is an excellent addition for the many people who were forced to purchase only the iPod nano previously. As for the lack of a hard drive, I can see why Apple has done this. I believe that a hard drive would make the iPod OS less responsive, as the 1.8" drives are very slow compared to flash memory.

The iPod classic got no tweaks because, well, it is the 'classic'. I believe the days of the traditional iPod's are gone and this is why that model has no new features. It remains for the people who want a simple, large capacity player without the bells and whistles of the other models.

lofight
Sep 10, 2008, 09:04 AM
Because they can't really do a massive upgrade to a ipod nano, ipod classic, or ipod shuffle, they just slowly add feautures.. If the the 2g ipod nano had the edges of the 4g, and the 4g ipod nano had the edges (not features) everybody would still be suprised now.. It's just the change that they make.. The same with the back of both the iphone and the ipod touch..

I think Apple already is thinking deep about what new revolution they want to bring to the people.. To find another product o improve is going to be very hard I think.. The next real revolution I'm expecting is a tablet mac.. That could get really exciting!

dan-o-mac
Sep 10, 2008, 09:06 AM
It's hard to believe the nano came out three years ago, and the only major upgrade besides redesign has been the ability to turn it on it's side and play video. What's harder to believe is the fact that people are still gushing over them. Go figure. :D

As long as customers keep going ga-ga over these small incremental updates, Apple is going to provide just that. Once in a while they will knock one out the park with a redesign(FP iMac, iPhone/iPod Touch, Macbook Air). I guess you can't expect them to do it all the time.

lofight
Sep 10, 2008, 09:07 AM
Am I the only one who prefers actual buttons? The best feature of the non-touchscreen iPods is the ability to perform actions without taking it out of your pocket. With a normal iPod, you can change the volume, skip tracks and fast forward or rewind without looking at it.

I really hope Apple doesn't milk the multitouch too much. It's very nice, but I don't think it's advancing usability at all.

I think that's is going to be THE hard decision for apple in the following years.. Make a full multitouch ipod nano, or stay with the buttons..

MowingDevil
Sep 10, 2008, 09:53 AM
I got a very strong sense that I was in a minority, in that I stressed my interest in this device was audio, not visual.

I'm w/ ya man! Try and find a cel phone that is *gasp* just a PHONE! I haven't seen one in years. Not everyone needs a camera, music player, web browser etc in their friggin' phone. I've got a Nano that plays video but I primarily use it for audio not to sit there and look at a tiny screen. I've got a PALM to handle my contacts & calender stuff...when I need it I bring it. When I need music I bring my Nano....thats why I opted for the Nano instead of the Touch. I don't need the browser, video and contact stuff in my freakin' MP3 player.

Maybe someday I'll consolidate everything in an iPhone but for now I don't mind diversifying my gadgets. Look at it this way if one of them goes down I'm not screwed for all the other devices.

synagence
Sep 10, 2008, 11:03 AM
While apple likes it glitzy hyped press conferences its kinda making a rod for its own back .... issuing an invite for a "Let's Rock" conference which ends up being pretty minor rev's of the products means let-down and disappointment.

If they reduced the amount of releases then when they held one people could geniunely get excited and anticipate major annoucements.

Holding quarterly rev annoucements breeds apathy.

Insulin Junkie
Sep 10, 2008, 11:24 AM
Around a year ago, Apple sent me a questionnaire re the iPod; most of the questions concerned video capabilities - whether this would this interest me, etc. I got a very strong sense that I was in a minority, in that I stressed my interest in this device was audio, not visual.

Agreed. The iPod is an extremely commercial music player, I'd think that audiophiles with a true concern for great quality audio playback wouldn't buy an iPod in the first place (at least because of the audio bit, the quality really isn't as good as some other audio players out there - even the new Sony walkman player, for example). I know more than one person who'd never consider the iPod, simply because of its inferior sound quality when compared to lots of other players out there.

The 'serious audiophiles' may look elsewhere, while the 'masses' (with a slightly smaller music collection than 100> GB perhaps) will deem the sound quality good enough, and most of them obviously value video playback capabilities (whether it's just to brag / show off, or whether they truly want to watch the latest episode of some TV show or music video in miniature format on their mp3 player screens).

Then there's the people whom the audio quality does, but don't care much for video / other features, but it's probably a minority by now.

QuarterSwede
Sep 10, 2008, 11:39 AM
I highly doubt Apple's run out of ideas. Multi-touch is brilliant and has endless possibilities. I'm actually shocked at how easy it is to type on and browse the web. I actually find it to be a better surfing experience than with your traditional computer and mouse.

As far as iPod sound quality goes it's very hard for me to tell the difference between a 160-192Kbps AAC and the actual CD on my 7.1 Onkyo system. It's no "audiophile" setup but then again CDs aren't either. I'd personally prefer of everything audio moved to something like DVD-A or SACD with 5.1+, only digitally. CDs sound good but they pail in comparison to those two formats. Overall, I'd rather enjoy listening to music anywhere than enjoy listening to a nice "audiophile" system only in my house.

Also I really love having one device that serves so many wants. I use it for phone, Internet, email, music in my car (via head unit dock connector) and at work (built in speaker), calendar and YouTube (great for researching products wirh real world use reviews before buying).

theknightshift
Sep 10, 2008, 12:02 PM
Re: replaceable batteries
Why on earth would you ever want this?
Thats a terrible idea for the consumer and a total waste. The power system on iPods is fine the way they are. Just think of the environmental toll it would have on the planet to have every iPod w/ disposable batteries. Thats the only way it would be really profitable for Apple. If they made them rechargeable batteries then that wouldn't be such a bad idea. Still I'm fine w/ them the way they are.

Why would I want this? Why would a LOT of people want this?

Have you ever been on a long trip, or out camping in the middle of nowhere, without a convenient place to recharge your iPod or iPhone... and the battery starts running out of juice? Wouldn't it be great to simply whip out a freshly-charged one and slap it in there and keep going?

Apple could sell them for $50 each, and there would be plenty of people who would be very happy to buy one or even a few, for the convenience that it would provide.

And I didn't say anything about them being "disposable". Make them rechargeable like regular iPod or cellphone batteries. And since there's some emphasis on environmental impact, what better way to keep an iPod out of the landfill than to not let it "die" just because the battery has? :)

QuarterSwede
Sep 10, 2008, 12:17 PM
Re: replaceable batteries


Why would I want this? Why would a LOT of people want this?

Have you ever been on a long trip, or out camping in the middle of nowhere, without a convenient place to recharge your iPod or iPhone... and the battery starts running out of juice? Wouldn't it be great to simply whip out a freshly-charged one and slap it in there and keep going?

Apple could sell them for $50 each, and there would be plenty of people who would be very happy to buy one or even a few, for the convenience that it would provide.

And I didn't say anything about them being "disposable". Make them rechargeable like regular iPod or cellphone batteries. And since there's some emphasis on environmental impact, what better way to keep an iPod out of the landfill than to not let it "die" just because the battery has? :)
You do realize that you can buy mobile dockable chargers. Some even let you use AA batteries. Personally, I'd rather them keep the device thin.

MacBass
Sep 10, 2008, 03:29 PM
My favourite MP3 player was the second generation iPod nano. It was just about perfect and when they decided to replace it with the 'fatty'

I believe it is properly referred to as the choad Nano. The new nano doesn't quite appeal to me, and the Touch's refinements hardly merited a keynote. What really irked me was the single configuration of the Classic. Yeah, the 160 was a fatty, but I really would like to carry around my ENTIRE library, podcasts included. With my 80 GB Classic, I'm forced to go through and uncheck certain items - a task I haven't had to do since my 2 GB Nano.

Muncher
Sep 10, 2008, 08:50 PM
I really hope Apple doesn't milk the multitouch too much. It's very nice, but I don't think it's advancing usability at all.

That's a little harsh. At any rate, it does wonders for marketing! :p (Besides, so far, Apple is the only manufacturer that I've seen that can pull off usable multi-touch.

QCassidy352
Sep 10, 2008, 10:05 PM
I want the old 1G shuffle back, it was so much better than the current one.

:eek: First time I've ever heard THAT!

I think the thing is that each of the current ipods was so well designed in its first iteration that all progress has been evolutionary rather than revolutionary. There's a limit to how much smaller any of them can get, mostly because a certain amount of size is desirable so that controls are easy to use and the screen is decently sized.

But on the other hand, the touch is only a year old, so I think it's not really fair to say they're out of ideas.

blashphemy
Sep 11, 2008, 01:59 AM
My main problem with Apple right now is that they've stagnated.

iPods:
1) The new nano takes design cues from the Zune
2) The 160 GB version was too fat? WTF?! The whole point of the 160 GB one was that you could put ALL your music in the car or on a dock and it didn't matter how thin it was because nobody ever saw the side, just the front. We didn't CARE if it was slightly thicker.
3) So.... what did they do to the iPod touch? Exactly. It's still the same product - adding front USB ports to my computer is not revolutionary and neither was adding volume controls. And other than that, it's a little bit thinner (when it was thin enough), got a Nike + iPod thingie (who uses that anyways, when I run I do it on a treadmill) built-in (and I seriously doubt that the people who had been using it really cared that there was a dongle), and then we got integrated speakers. Big whoop.

Recent macs:
1) The MacBook Air... how do I describe this. It's like buying a nice pizza and right when it's out of the oven, you press paper towels onto the surface of the pizza to get all the fatty oils off of it. Yeah it makes the pizza a little healthier but then it tastes like CRAP. Look at the Lenovo X300 - just barely thicker and heavier but WORLDS apart in terms of the keyboard, ruggedness, an optical drive (although I actually agree with Steve on this, optical drives are becoming increasingly unnecessary), more USB ports... it's just a better computer from a hardware standpoint.
2) iMac Aluminum - WHAT were they thinking?! Ugly as hell and the remote doesn't attach to the side anymore. Dear god.

What happened to the Apple that brought us the Titanium Powerbook - Not just the first 17" laptop to the market but the lightest too (I have a Dell laptop from the same time period, twice as thick and the same weight but 15.4")? What happened to the Apple that forever made the CD player obsolete? What happened to the innovation at Apple? What happened to "Think Different" - the Apple that wouldn't settle for tiered pricing on iTunes? What happened to the Apple that decided that public image was more important that big sales?

I know a few users that used to be part of Apple's core audience - they still hold onto their Powermac G5's and eMacs. That was back when owning a Mac had a statement. Now that I can go to a completely random person on my dorm floor to borrow a USB cable for my iPod, Apple is no longer the status symbol nor the image it used to be.

Want to be innovative Apple? Simple - go pick off the remains of Microsoft's failed efforts. Microsoft has the brain talent but not the means to market it properly. Proper example - Tablet PCs and education. Simply make a Macbook that has a reversible screen, a pen silo, put proper handwriting recognition in OS X, and jack the price up $500. I see enough MacBook Pros to know that student's parents will be able to afford it. Sponsor initiatives to get paper textbooks onto these Tablets and you're basically marketing the Jesus laptop for a student. And then, be innovative while you're at it - put in a nice high pixel-density display, make it light like the MacBook Air... you could go places with this.

I think Apple can find ideas, I just don't think that Apple has the balls anymore to sell it.

MowingDevil
Sep 11, 2008, 02:57 AM
Interesting.
I too have felt that way. I used to be the oddball w/ the Mac....now they're at coffee shops everywhere. The thing is, back when they were all beige...they were built very well...they were built to last. I have never had a problem w/ a Mac ever. Never had to return one or take it in for a fix. I looked after it and it didn't break. Now all I hear about is flaws, returns and major screw-ups. I go into the Apple store and it looks like an electronics Toys-r-us. Seriously, I sat down w/ the Air for a few minutes and couldn't stand it. That screen is terrible imo. I'm glad I got the white iMac (last of the matte and yes the remote attaches to the side)...at first I was disappointed because they revamped the line but I really like that white version, its awesome! I don't know whats scarier, the nVidia chip or what they're going to do with a MBP redesign.

Insulin Junkie
Sep 11, 2008, 05:23 AM
What happened to the Apple that decided that public image was more important that big sales?

I know a few users that used to be part of Apple's core audience - they still hold onto their Powermac G5's and eMacs. That was back when owning a Mac had a statement. Now that I can go to a completely random person on my dorm floor to borrow a USB cable for my iPod, Apple is no longer the status symbol nor the image it used to be.


I'm curious...do you think there was ever a time in which Apple wouldn't have preferred to be where they are now? Because I think their niche-dwelling for so long wasn't happening because they didn't choose to be mainstream, merely because that they couldn't manage to reach a larger audience before they introduced the iPod.
And any change that's happening now happened as a result of being more commercial. I think one thing just led to another here.

As for me, I'm happy that Apple's becoming more popular. For one, it shaves a bit off Microsoft's monopoly and makes them sweat a little, and secondly, more and more people are using an OS that deserves that amount of users, and a whole lot more.

This complaining about how everyone has it... is nothing but being angry at a perceived loss of distinction.

I think a person's character and meaningful deeds define him as an individual, not the consumer products he buys.