There's this.
And then there is the fact that it's a 5MP superzoom from 2003. A $400 D40 will mop the floor with it, and Sony was never known for it's low ISO noise.
Are you actually asking whether it's worth getting one, or are you considering getting a new camera?
Yeah - a D40 that can be had new for $650 (or used for $400) will kill it in every aspect; even size.Not really looking at selling it just yet, just curious as to how it compares to today's cameras in the price range. It's been good for me so far, it takes good pictures. So you're saying that the current $400 cameras easily beat it?
Yeah - a D40 that can be had new for $650 (or used for $400) will kill it in every aspect; even size.
Your question is pretty vague. What exactly is "that quality/price range" when we're talking about a five year old camera? In any case, the type of answer you're going to get will depend on why you're asking.
If you're asking "should I buy another one of these?", then the answer is clear. NO.
If you're asking "can I make lots o' money by selling this?" then the answer is clear. NO. It's old, out-dated tech.
If you're asking "should I keep it?" then we have to ask, in turn: Are you happy with the output? Do you still enjoy using it? Because you're really the only one qualified to answer that particular question.
Actually, the D40 can be had new with the 18-55mm lens for $450, refurb for $400, used for less than that... you can get the D40 with the 18-55 and 55-200mm lenses for $530 at Sam's Club right now, too.
Just a heads up, more for the OP than anything.
Right now, my current camera is a Sony DSC-F717. How does that rank compared to other cameras in that quality-price range? It cost about $1000 in 2003.
upsguy27: "... Sorry for the bad quality, the only other camera I have is on my BlackBerry. ..."
Say? How did you get your Blackberry picture(s) to load onto your Mac?
I may want a new one once I start taking more serious professional photos again.
Huh. Interesting to know. Right now, I have the Sony Wide Angle Lens, a few 58mm lens, and some telephoto lens.
Youre luck that yours hasnt gotten the dreaded LCD sensor glitch...mine did.
And the "wide angle" attachment is a BULKY, HEAVY, UGLY piece of screw on glass that barely adds anything, but certainly takes away quality.
I couldnt understand Sony's idea with this camera then, and still dont now.
BlackBerry Issue:
" ... Say? How did you get your Blackberry picture(s) to load onto your Mac? "
"... email, sd card, enabling use ad external drive..."
Can't find software to work with regular USB Sync/charge cable?
I used a regular USB cable, with the BlackBerry desktop software and synced the photos. Worked fine for me.
" ... the BlackBerry desktop software and synced the photos. ..."
Which software? My version of "PocketMac for Blackberry (Pearl)" doesn't sync photos or indicate it will do so when configured for iPhoto sync., either ...
I don't mind buying more software, but I expected a camera / cellphone of reasonable expense (costs) not to have any extra requirements like extra downloads and purchases ...?