pseudobrit
Jan 26, 2004, 01:03 PM
link (http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1106&ncid=1106&e=9&u=/ft/20040126/bs_ft/1073281288764)
Mr Cheney remained implacably opposed to the strategy even after George W. Bush, US president, addressed the UN on the importance of a multilateralist approach, according to a new biography of Mr Blair.
The US vice-president, along with the neo-conservatives in the Bush administration, has consistently argued that the US could be constrained by the UN's inability to reach agreement over the need to invade Iraq.
This makes me sick, especially in light of the recent tone of "if you wanted to share in the spoils, you should have joined us."
This was a sham all along. Many of us had the feeling. Now we're finding how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Mr Cheney remained implacably opposed to the strategy even after George W. Bush, US president, addressed the UN on the importance of a multilateralist approach, according to a new biography of Mr Blair.
The US vice-president, along with the neo-conservatives in the Bush administration, has consistently argued that the US could be constrained by the UN's inability to reach agreement over the need to invade Iraq.
This makes me sick, especially in light of the recent tone of "if you wanted to share in the spoils, you should have joined us."
This was a sham all along. Many of us had the feeling. Now we're finding how deep the rabbit hole goes.
