Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

FullBodyFilms Protection Pack for iPhone 3G

G

GeneticFreak84

macrumors regular
Jul 13, 2008
171
0
jshelf23 said:
any body have these or tried them?
Click to expand...

Assuming it's the same/similar to the anti-glare Power Support film and the anti-fingerprint SGP film, then yes it does a PHENOMENAL job at preventing fingerprints (I have the SGP Anti-Fingerprint film on my iPhone).

However, there is a tradeoff. The film reduces the clarity of the screen, users often complain of a "frosted" look. I personally think it's worth it. Others do not.
 
THE JUICEMAN

THE JUICEMAN

macrumors 68020
Original poster
Oct 3, 2007
2,371
1,122
GeneticFreak84 said:
Assuming it's the same/similar to the anti-glare Power Support film and the anti-fingerprint SGP film, then yes it does a PHENOMENAL job at preventing fingerprints (I have the SGP Anti-Fingerprint film on my iPhone).

However, there is a tradeoff. The film reduces the clarity of the screen, users often complain of a "frosted" look. I personally think it's worth it. Others do not.
Click to expand...

yea i figured it was similar. i wanted someone to compare it to the PS. but actually is there any difference between the PS and the SGP?
 
B

badgerman

macrumors 6502a
Jun 9, 2008
546
1
I can confirm the FBF protection pack screen is the same as the PS antiglare and crystal films. Read the review on ilounge.

The antiglare is excellent at repelling finger prints and smudges.

The main body is v good also. I have used both on my 2G and 3G and would highly recommend both packs, it suprises me that they are not more popular as was $20.50 to UK.
 
L

larapumkin

macrumors regular
Sep 25, 2008
162
0
jshelf23 said:
yea i figured it was similar. i wanted someone to compare it to the PS. but actually is there any difference between the PS and the SGP?
Click to expand...

i saw a thread comparing those two saying SGP is more clear and sensitive.
But imo, that does not seems to be a huge difference.
Well SGP is a bit cheaper though.
 
M

m98evolution

macrumors newbie
Sep 23, 2008
20
0
larapumkin said:
i saw a thread comparing those two saying SGP is more clear and sensitive.
But imo, that does not seems to be a huge difference.
Well SGP is a bit cheaper though.
Click to expand...

I currently have the FBF on my phone and its great. I haven't had the chance to try the SGP yet, is the cut the same as the FBF and are there any out there with pics of it being clearer? If it is better, I'd love to try it out.
 
L

larapumkin

macrumors regular
Sep 25, 2008
162
0
m98evolution said:
I currently have the FBF on my phone and its great. I haven't had the chance to try the SGP yet, is the cut the same as the FBF and are there any out there with pics of it being clearer? If it is better, I'd love to try it out.
Click to expand...

the thread i saw had picture of comparing those two in white screen and sgp seems a bit clear than ps, the thread does not seem to be exsisting anymore though. but does it make that big difference? heard that it only makes different on white background.
i don go for antiglare ones..i like to keep my screen crystal clear.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom