PDA

View Full Version : Int chief's bombshell: 'We were overruled on dossier'




diamond geezer
Feb 3, 2004, 11:21 PM
link (http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=487557)

The intelligence official whose revelations stunned the Hutton inquiry has suggested that not a single defence intelligence expert backed Tony Blair's most contentious claims on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.


As Mr Blair set up an inquiry yesterday into intelligence failures before the war, Brian Jones, the former leading expert on WMD in the Ministry of Defence, declared that Downing Street's dossier, a key plank in convincing the public of the case for war, was "misleading" on Saddam Hussein's chemical and biological capability. Writing in today's Independent, Dr Jones, who was head of the nuclear, chemical and biological branch of the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS) until he retired last year, reveals that the experts failed in their efforts to have their views reflected.


Dr Jones, who is expected to be a key witness at the new inquiry, says: "In my view, the expert intelligence analysts of the DIS were overruled in the preparation of the dossier in September 2002, resulting in a presentation that was misleading about Iraq's capabilities."


He calls on the Prime Minister to publish the intelligence behind the Government's claims that Iraq was actively producing chemical weapons and could launch an attack within 45 minutes of an order to do so. He is "extremely doubtful" that anyone with chemical and biological weapons expertise had seen the raw intelligence reports and that they would prove just how right he and his colleagues were to be concerned about the claims.

If Truth was hard currency, the "Coalition of the Willing" would be bankrupt.

As it is though, they are all filthy rich.



Sayhey
Feb 5, 2004, 12:16 AM
If this revelation is true I don't know how the Hutton inquiry makes any sense at all. Also did you see this piece of nonsense from Blair?

Tony Blair has said he was unaware the 45 minute claim over Iraq's WMD meant only battlefield weapons when he urged MPs to vote for war in March last year.

His comments came during a Commons debate on the Hutton report as a former intelligence official said information may have been "misinterpreted".

The September 2002 dossier said Iraq could deploy chemical and biological weapons within 45 minutes.

BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3460517.stm)

Is he now trying to hide behind a claim of his own incompetence?

toontra
Feb 5, 2004, 03:59 AM
Originally posted by Sayhey
If this revelation is true I don't know how the Hutton inquiry makes any sense at all.

I thinks that's what a lot of people are saying! Having read the evidence, especially that of Jones, they simply can't understand Hutton's conclusions - it's like 2 + 2 making 5.

On the 45 minute claim, Hoon was interviewed on BBC Radio 4 this morning saying that, at the time of the September dossier, this wasn't a matter of "public controversy". Er, I think that if the public had known (or even suspected) at the time they had been misled about this threat then there would have been massive public controversy, but even the most cynical person would have doubted that "intelligence" could have been intentionally manipulated to mislead in this way!

kettle
Feb 5, 2004, 04:39 AM
just let him define his position a little more clearly and then the "others" will have the chance to make good use of what they also know.

As an opposition, those being of other camps than "New Labour", these groups of people have been quietly collecting enough sticks and stones to chase out the most hardened of rats.

New Labour came in on a raft of two parties thunder. Quietly those parties will return for their own.:)

The bonus is now the MOD has an IOU with Tony's name on plus the media have been burnt by the ones they love most.