virividox macrumors 601 Original poster Feb 8, 2004 #1 http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/st...ff/story/0001/20040208/0449133941.htm&sc=1110 a little funny news.
http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/st...ff/story/0001/20040208/0449133941.htm&sc=1110 a little funny news.
gwuMACaddict macrumors 68040 Feb 8, 2004 #2 yeah... i saw that earlier today too... i wore a kilt once, a little too drafty for my taste, but whatever floats your boat i guess... 🙁
yeah... i saw that earlier today too... i wore a kilt once, a little too drafty for my taste, but whatever floats your boat i guess... 🙁
teabgs macrumors 68030 Feb 8, 2004 #3 I only wear my kilt when it's warm out....cause in the winter it's too "drafty". 😀 but it's GREAT in the summer time...
I only wear my kilt when it's warm out....cause in the winter it's too "drafty". 😀 but it's GREAT in the summer time...
wdlove macrumors P6 Feb 8, 2004 #4 It is always good to have a little happy news for a change. They should be able to dress as they choose, it will be a centuries old Scottish tradition in America.
It is always good to have a little happy news for a change. They should be able to dress as they choose, it will be a centuries old Scottish tradition in America.
Counterfit macrumors G3 Feb 8, 2004 #5 And to think women fought for the exact opposite thing in the late 19th/early 20th centuries 🙄 I don't have a problem with it, as long as they have something underneath.
And to think women fought for the exact opposite thing in the late 19th/early 20th centuries 🙄 I don't have a problem with it, as long as they have something underneath.
teabgs macrumors 68030 Feb 8, 2004 #6 Originally posted by Counterfit And to think women fought for the exact opposite thing in the late 19th/early 20th centuries 🙄 I don't have a problem with it, as long as they have something underneath. Click to expand... with a kilt you dont. otherwise you're not wearing it correctly. it's just like freeballin' it, but without pant legs...
Originally posted by Counterfit And to think women fought for the exact opposite thing in the late 19th/early 20th centuries 🙄 I don't have a problem with it, as long as they have something underneath. Click to expand... with a kilt you dont. otherwise you're not wearing it correctly. it's just like freeballin' it, but without pant legs...
wdlove macrumors P6 Feb 8, 2004 #7 Originally posted by teabgs with a kilt you dont. otherwise you're not wearing it correctly. it's just like freeballin' it, but without pant legs... Click to expand... I guess that is the reason that teabgs said it is drafty. 😛 At the right occasion, I'd be interested in wearing a Kilt, but with under wear.
Originally posted by teabgs with a kilt you dont. otherwise you're not wearing it correctly. it's just like freeballin' it, but without pant legs... Click to expand... I guess that is the reason that teabgs said it is drafty. 😛 At the right occasion, I'd be interested in wearing a Kilt, but with under wear.
Counterfit macrumors G3 Feb 8, 2004 #8 Originally posted by teabgs with a kilt you dont. otherwise you're not wearing it correctly. it's just like freeballin' it, but without pant legs... Click to expand... Except I have no interest in seeing your... equipment. Other members might (😉) but not me 😛 edit: I need to work on my spelling...
Originally posted by teabgs with a kilt you dont. otherwise you're not wearing it correctly. it's just like freeballin' it, but without pant legs... Click to expand... Except I have no interest in seeing your... equipment. Other members might (😉) but not me 😛 edit: I need to work on my spelling...