http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5gtt0M9L2Muz6WPdEHNhKahaYbSyw
Seems pretty ridiculous to me. You have to be 20 to drive more than one teenager? I can understand the alcohol limits and everything, but ONE teenager?
It'll increase emissions -- more cars will have to go to the same place, thus reducing car pooling and increasing pollution
It'll use more gas, be more expensive
What about designated drivers? It could increase drunk driving!
What about people living in rural Ontario? How would they manage?
... Just simply ridiculous in my opinion. Sure, more safety precautions can be taken but this is a step in the wrong direction in terms of driving passengers....
Anyone have thoughts? (Regardless of where you're from! )
TORONTO — Proposed Ontario legislation to limit the driving privileges of people under age 22 is experiencing backlash from young drivers before the bill is even tabled.
Premier Dalton McGuinty said Tuesday the "modest restrictions" will include a zero blood-alcohol limit for all Ontario drivers aged 21 and under and escalating sanctions for young drivers who speed, starting with a 30-day licence suspension.
Drivers between 16 and 19 will also be limited to having only one teenage passenger in the vehicle, which McGuinty conceded will mean three 19-year-old adults could not go to a movie - or church - in the same car.
Seems pretty ridiculous to me. You have to be 20 to drive more than one teenager? I can understand the alcohol limits and everything, but ONE teenager?
It'll increase emissions -- more cars will have to go to the same place, thus reducing car pooling and increasing pollution
It'll use more gas, be more expensive
What about designated drivers? It could increase drunk driving!
What about people living in rural Ontario? How would they manage?
... Just simply ridiculous in my opinion. Sure, more safety precautions can be taken but this is a step in the wrong direction in terms of driving passengers....
Anyone have thoughts? (Regardless of where you're from! )