Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Hls811

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Apr 19, 2004
832
46
New Jersey
I currently have a D60 and my primary lens is a Tamron 28-300mm which I do like. I also have the Nikon kit 18-55mm VR lens which I rarely use. I noticed that the Tamron 18-270 has started to ship and I’ve been tempted by it as a replacement. I thought that I had read somewhere that since the 28-300mm isn’t really designed for the D60 I’m not getting the full 300mm zoom; It had something to do with the smaller sensor size and it being a Di lens, not Di-II – I honestly don’t fully understand all of that so that’s part of the confusion.

With the new 18-270mm being available and more designed for smaller sensor cameras would I be benefiting at all by getting the new lens? To me a big bonus is having one lens that replaces my 2 current ones, and if I’m not sacrificing the zoom its definitely worth it (I’d think)>.

Hopefully I didn’t confuse anyone..
 

bmcgrath

macrumors 65816
Oct 5, 2006
1,077
40
London, United Kingdom
With the range of 18-270 you realize image quality is gonna be quite poor?

With that aside. If I were you I'd go for the 18-270 over something like the 28mm version.
Reason is, on a crop body 18 is gonna give you some what of a wide angle lens. This also depends on what you shoot...?
 

Hls811

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Apr 19, 2004
832
46
New Jersey
With the range of 18-270 you realize image quality is gonna be quite poor?

With that aside. If I were you I'd go for the 18-270 over something like the 28mm version.
Reason is, on a crop body 18 is gonna give you some what of a wide angle lens. This also depends on what you shoot...?

Quite poorer compared to what? I already have the 28-300 and I'm pleased with the image quality that it produces. Would it be noticeably different?
 

bmcgrath

macrumors 65816
Oct 5, 2006
1,077
40
London, United Kingdom
To be honest...

If you already have the 18-55 and 28-300 why are you interested in the 18-270.

If you wanna invest in new lenses perhaps an ultra wide? Or Macro? or get a flash?

What kinda photography are you into? :)
 

Hls811

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Apr 19, 2004
832
46
New Jersey
To be honest...

If you already have the 18-55 and 28-300 why are you interested in the 18-270.

If you wanna invest in new lenses perhaps an ultra wide? Or Macro? or get a flash?

What kinda photography are you into? :)

The main reason is just to consolidate. I barely ever carry the 18-55 with me, so having the 18-270 would allow me to always have a true "all in one" with m and maximize the range I have.

Most of my pictures are at sporting events so its nice to have a wider range.. the wide angle would help with some complete stadium shots and the zoom would help close in on the field. (the 300mm works nicely for that now, I don't think I'd notice much difference between 300mm and 270mm (I believe it translates to something like 450mm vs 418mm)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.