Skype Frame Rates: Plastic vs. Aluminum MacBook

[ThomasJL]

Will there be any difference, whatsoever, in terms of frames per second when using Skype on a plastic MacBook with the Intel X3100 GMA versus the aluminum MacBook with the Nvidia integrated graphics?

(The reason I ask is this: I am planning on getting two of the exact same computers for myself and my dad so we can video chat with Skype. We'll both be using a top-of-the-line Logitech QuickCam Vision Pro webcam, and we'll both be using a fiber optic Internet connection. My biggest concern in purchasing a computer is running Skype at the highest frames per second rate possible.)

Thanks for any and all feedback. :)

[silverblack]

You may want to first look into the highest resolution and transfer rate that Skype is limited to offer. I have a feeling that would be your limiting factor, or the internet connection (even fiber optics), not the laptop itself.

[bearcatrp]

Why buy a web cam when the macbook has a built in webcam? They work great in skype.

[snaky69]

Will there be any difference, whatsoever, in terms of frames per second when using Skype on a plastic MacBook with the Intel X3100 GMA versus the aluminum MacBook with the Nvidia integrated graphics?

(The reason I ask is this: I am planning on getting two of the exact same computers for myself and my dad so we can video chat with Skype. We'll both be using a top-of-the-line Logitech QuickCam Vision Pro webcam, and we'll both be using a fiber optic Internet connection. My biggest concern in purchasing a computer is running Skype at the highest frames per second rate possible.)

Thanks for any and all feedback. :)

Your limiting factor here is the speed of the internet connection, not the video hardware.

[ThomasJL]

You may want to first look into the highest resolution and transfer rate that Skype is limited to offer. I have a feeling that would be your limiting factor, or the internet connection (even fiber optics), not the laptop itself.

On Skype's download page for OS X, it reads, "Your video conversations are now set at a whopping 640 x 480 pixels by default with up to 25 frames per second."

My #1 concern is having the absolute sharpest video quality with as little pixelation as possible. In regards to this concern, will the new aluminum MacBooks with the Nvidia integrated graphics offer any advantage, whatsoever, to the old plastic MacBooks with the Intel integrated graphics?

[silverblack]

Think about a DVD movie, which has a slightly better resolution, and similar frame rate. I'd say the graphic capability of most recent laptops can handle that without problem.

Of course, it's not just the graphics, because the signal needs to be encoded into or decoded form data, which is a processing task.

I still think your internet connection will be the determining factor, especially if you are chatting with someone oversea, rather than the laptop.

[cellocello]

On Skype's download page for OS X, it reads, "Your video conversations are now set at a whopping 640 x 480 pixels by default with up to 25 frames per second."

My #1 concern is having the absolute sharpest video quality with as little pixelation as possible. In regards to this concern, will the new aluminum MacBooks with the Nvidia integrated graphics offer any advantage, whatsoever, to the old plastic MacBooks with the Intel integrated graphics?

No. What you're seeking ("having the absolute sharpest video quality with as little pixelation as possible") is 100% reliant on the internet connection.

[rd261]

Chatting with skype does not require a high end graphic card. As long as your internet connection is fast, then you should be fine with both computers. I video chat with ichat from time to time in my last gen. black macbook and is sharp and smooth, so I guess the same will apply for skype. By the way, I have internet by cable at 6 mbps.

[heatmiser]

What's the resolution of the camera on pre-aluminum Macbooks? 320x240?

[priller]

What's the resolution of the camera on pre-aluminum Macbooks? 320x240?

640 x 480

[heatmiser]

640 x 480

Ah, thanks.

[ThomasJL]

Thanks for all the replies, guys. I appreciate it. :)

So, if the two chatters had the exact same computers, the exact same broadband Internet connection, and the exact same top-of-the-line Logitech webcams, will a better graphics card even make a tiny difference in picture quality?

[beg_ne]

On Skype's download page for OS X, it reads, "Your video conversations are now set at a whopping 640 x 480 pixels by default with up to 25 frames per second."

My #1 concern is having the absolute sharpest video quality with as little pixelation as possible. In regards to this concern, will the new aluminum MacBooks with the Nvidia integrated graphics offer any advantage, whatsoever, to the old plastic MacBooks with the Intel integrated graphics?

The hardware makes no difference at all. My mom has a new Macbook but the video is pretty crappy because of the less than awesome internet connection in Montana. I have a 1st gen low end Macbook and my video image is much better because I'm on a solid connection.

[beg_ne]

Also I don't know that I would waste any money on the Logitech cam, you're up to the mercy of the crap drivers and software they tend to put out. Plus their site is basically BS regarding the video quality:


HD video: QuickCam Vision Pro is a high-performance webcam capable of delivering 720p high-quality images* up to 1600 X 1200 pixels.


You'll notice their wording of high-quality "images" with the *. Which reads:


* Capture VGA video with Photo Booth and QuickTime PRO, or capture up to 2-megapixel images – including 720p – with UVC based applications like BTV PRO.

So in most apps you won't gain any resolution on the iSight, if there is even any difference. also the "BTV PRO" program they reference is a fricken' pre-OS X app that hasn't been updated in about 7 years.

http://www.bensoftware.com/btv/dlindex.html

"The latest version of BTV Pro is 5.4.1, released 7 May 2002"

Regarding the difference between the Plastic MB and the Unibody MB, as I mentioned in my previous post there was no difference as far as that goes, but I guess in the future perhaps Skype might make use of the video card to improve something, but I really doubt they are doing anything now. Not to mention that Skype hasn't had any updates forever so who knows if they'll ever give Mac users anything new.

[wagonofdoom]

i have 17mb down and 15mb up...my video quality on skype is spot on

[likemyorbs]

im still not getting why the OP isnt using the built in i-sight which is awesome. people used to pay a pretty penny for isights

[ThomasJL]

im still not getting why the OP isnt using the built in i-sight which is awesome. people used to pay a pretty penny for isights

I've done a side-by-side comparison, and Logitech's top-of-the-line QuickCam Vision Pro (which, by the way, is Mac only) has a much better picture than the built in iSight. Higher resolution, much better sharpness, clarity, and color. It has a glass lens made by Carl Zeiss, and it's autofocus. You can view more info about this webcam here:

http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/webcam_communications/webcams/devices/4528&cl=us,en

The aluminum external iSight, on the other hand, has a lower picture quality than the built-in iSight on any MacBook. It shouldn't surprise, as the technology on the external iSight is literally a couple of years older than the built-in iSight on the very first MacBook.