PDA

View Full Version : "The 5 Sisters" - Media Gigantism




Rower_CPU
Feb 16, 2004, 11:41 PM
Someone passed along this NYTimes article (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/16/opinion/16SAFI.html?ex=1077971562&ei=1&en=f177c2d67443efa7) about media corporations mergers that I thought I'd share with folks and see what they thought.

If one huge corporation controlled both the production and the dissemination of most of our news and entertainment, couldn't it rule the world?

Can't happen here, you say; America is the land of competition that generates new technology to ensure a diversity of voices. But consider how a supine Congress and a feckless majority of the Federal Communications Commission have been failing to protect our access to a variety of news, views and entertainment.

The media giant known as Viacom-CBS-MTV just showed us how it controls both content and communication of the sexiest Super Bowl. The five other big sisters that now bestride the world are (1) Murdoch-FoxTV-HarperCollins-WeeklyStandard-NewYorkPost-LondonTimes-DirecTV; (2) G.E.-NBC-Universal-Vivendi; (3) Time-Warner-CNN-AOL; (4) Disney-ABC-ESPN; and (5) the biggest cable company, Comcast.



IJ Reilly
Feb 17, 2004, 01:50 AM
Originally posted by Rower_CPU
Someone passed along this NYTimes article (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/16/opinion/16SAFI.html?ex=1077971562&ei=1&en=f177c2d67443efa7) about media corporations mergers that I thought I'd share with folks and see what they thought.

I think the federal government operates for the benefit of corporations, not people.

amnesiac1984
Feb 17, 2004, 11:42 AM
Yeah, but isn't it 6 sisters? I mean the article mentions 6 major media conglomerates but only 5 of them are sisters?

Anyway, I'll stop being pedantic and say that this this sucks and it shouldn't be allowed to happen. That's part of the problem with capitalism, it's not regulated nearly enough and morals and ethics in the business world are not nearly strong enough.