PDA

View Full Version : Bush Rouses the Sleeping Dogs of the Culture War




IJ Reilly
Feb 18, 2004, 05:27 PM
I've been getting this these editorials by e-mail ever since I signed up to follow Huffington's gubernatorial campaign last year. I haven't passed any along before, but this one is such a tub-thumper, I can't resist.

By Arianna Huffington

“I’m a war president,” George Bush told us.

But as the body count in Iraq continues to rise, the president’s approval rating plummets, and the furor over phantom WMD, sexed-up intel, and Bush’s spotty Air National Guard service refuses to go away, it appears Karl Rove is planning a small rewrite for his candidate: “I’m a culture war president.”

Remember that divisive pre-9/11 campaign staple? Well, it’s flared up again — with a vengeance and a rash of new administration actions clearly aimed at shoring up the president’s Christian conservative base.

In the last month, the president has traded in his too-tight flight suit for a revival tent, backing a new anti-obscenity crusade, anti-condom sex-ed programs, a renewed commitment to fighting the drug war, and his attorney general’s efforts to poke around the private medical records of women who’ve had abortions. He even hinted in his State of the Union that he’d be willing to endorse a constitutional ban on gay marriage.

With Silver Starred John Kerry threatening the president’s hold on the high ground of national defense, Team Bush has decided it’s time to switch battlefields and start screaming about Sodom and Gomorrah.

And who has time to talk about the 3 million jobs lost on Bush’s watch when gay couples are trying to make their lifetime commitment legal? Heaven forbid.

You would think the Christian right has more pressing matters to worry about. America now has 35 million people living in poverty, many of them working poor. And Christian conservatives are up in arms about gay marriage?

Maybe they should take another look at the Bible and its admonition that we shall be judged by what we do for the least among us. Indeed, if you removed every reference to poverty in the New Testament, the Good Book would be reduced to little more than a Not Bad Pamphlet. In the words of Rev. Jim Wallis, “The Prophets would be decimated, the Psalms destroyed, and the Gospels ripped to shreds.” On the other hand, there is not a single mention of gay marriage or the need to ban it.

Regrettably, this perversion of presidential priorities is not limited to campaign rhetoric — it extends to how our increasingly limited tax dollars are being spent. Take the administration’s new anti-obscenity push — a blast from our blue-nosed past. Bush’s 2005 budget calls for a boost in funding for government efforts to crack down on the adult entertainment industry — one of the precious few non-terror-related programs to garner a spending increase.

I kid you not: While the White House is cutting back on its housing budget, veterans’ benefits, and the National Institutes of Health, it’s opening up the coffers to make sure you have a harder time downloading the Paris Hilton sexcapade on the Net.

But that’s not even the worst of it. The Justice Department has recently assigned a team of FBI agents to focus exclusively on adult obscenity cases. That’s right, with the war on terror in full swing, our war president is going to have a group of G-men doing nothing but working the porn beat when they could be tracking down — oh, I don’t know — terrorist sleeper cells. Talk about your misguided allocation of manpower. I don’t know about you, but I certainly feel safer knowing the feds are going to be keeping close tabs on Jenna Jameson.

We see the same loopy sense of right and wrong being played out in the Janet Jackson firestorm. Less than two weeks after the shock and bra of the Super Bowl, Bush’s congressional cronies were already holding hearings on the matter. Compare that to the foot-dragging that followed 9/11. It took 14 months — and a candlelight vigil outside the White House by the victims’ family members — before the president finally relented and the 9/11 Commission was created. Now that’s indecent.

For the moral relativists in the Bush administration, the definition of sin seems to depend on whether the sinner can further their political purposes.

So Justin exposing Janet’s boob is a sin, but White House staffers exposing Victoria Plame is a win. Profiting from porno is a sin, but Halliburton’s wartime profiteering is a win. Two men getting hitched is a sin, but Cheney and Scalia shacking up in a duck blind is a win. Telling students condoms can prevent STDs is a sin, but lying about WMD is a win. And so, apparently, is GOP staffers hacking into Senate computers and Tom DeLay illegally funneling corporate money to Texas politicians.

The president’s culture war is little more than breasts and circuses. Election-year weapons of mass distraction. Hail to the Panderer-in-Chief.



wwworry
Feb 18, 2004, 05:39 PM
I agree. Bush is a plight on this country and should be removed.

You know, I was actually a bit nervous writing the above so let me clarifiy: I hope he loses the election.

Dale Sorel
Feb 18, 2004, 05:42 PM
Originally posted by wwworry
I agree. Bush is a plight on this country and should be removed.

That's the CIA knocking on your door ;)

wwworry
Feb 19, 2004, 07:32 AM
I was kind of expecting the FBI. ;)

mactastic
Feb 19, 2004, 09:42 AM
Shouldn't that be blight on our country?

IJ Reilly
Feb 19, 2004, 10:49 AM
Originally posted by mactastic
Shouldn't that be blight on our country?

plight

n 1: a situation from which extrication is difficult especially an unpleasant or trying one.

Works for me.

mactastic
Feb 19, 2004, 10:57 AM
Originally posted by IJ Reilly
plight

n 1: a situation from which extrication is difficult especially an unpleasant or trying one.

Works for me.

Lol, fine. I'd never heard that expression use plight before though.

On topic however, I think this election will be even more divisive and cause more enmity between the two parties than even the election of 2000 did. Sadly, the tone in Washington is not likely to change no matter who wins.

wwworry
Feb 19, 2004, 12:46 PM
when I read it back to myself it kept saying blight. Oops!

Sparky's
Feb 21, 2004, 09:52 PM
OK lets consider the source:
Arianna Huffington is a nationally syndicated columnist and author of ten books. Originally from Greece, she moved to England when she was sixteen and graduated from Cambridge University with an M.A. in Economics. At twenty-one she became President of the famed debating society, the Cambridge Union.

In 2003, she ran for governor as an Independent in California's recall election. Her populist grassroots campaign was widely praised for putting the media spotlight on the corrupting influence of special interest money on American politics.

If you really want to know more go here:
http://www.ariannaonline.com/biography.html

So tell me the Dems aren't already posting scathing articles to "bring down the GOP.." Lets all just take a step back and remember this is an election year!

IJ Reilly
Feb 22, 2004, 12:26 PM
Huffington isn't a Democrat, she's an independent. In fact, for years before becoming an independent, she was a Gingrich Republican and ran her conservative Republican ex-husband's successful campaign for the House of Representatives and his unsuccessful campaign for the Senate. What's more, she's been sharply critical of Bush from the very start, so Huffington's columns aren't election year maneuvering from Democrats, but the consistent opposition to the Bush regime from a vocal political independent.