PDA

View Full Version : White House Website hopelessly outdated.




diamond geezer
Feb 19, 2004, 03:02 PM
http://www.whitehouse.gov/response/disarm.html

You would think they would update their website.

Maybe the web designers aren't campaign donors and so don't get any Government money.

The gravest danger we face in the war on terror is outlaw regimes that seek and possess nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.

Twelve years ago, Saddam Hussein agreed to disarm all weapons of mass destruction. For 12 years, he systematically violated that agreement.
Three months ago, the United Nations Security Council gave Saddam his final chance to disarm. He has shown his utter contempt for the U.N.
The U.N. and U.S. intelligence sources have known for some time that Saddam Hussein has materials to produce chemical and biological weapons, but he has not accounted for them:

26,000 liters of anthraxÑenough to kill several million people
38,000 liters of botulinum toxin
500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agents

Almost 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents
From three Iraqi defectors, we know that Iraq in the late 1990s had several mobile biological weapons labs. But he has not disclosed them.
The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, a design for a nuclear weapon, and was working on methods of enriching uranium for a nuclear bomb. He recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa, according to the British Government. He has attempted to purchase high strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons, according to our intelligence sources. Yet he has not credibly explained these activities.
Thousands of Iraqi security personnel are at work hiding documents and materials from the UN inspectors.
Iraqi officials accompany all inspectors in order to intimidate witnesses.
Iraq is blocking U-2 surveillance flights requested by the U.N.
Saddam Hussein has ordered that scientists who cooperate with the UN be killed, along with their families.
Saddam Hussein aids and protects terrorists, including al-Qaida members. He could provide hidden weapons to terrorists, or help them develop their own. It would take just one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known.


The United States will ask the UN Security Council to convene next week to consider the facts of IraqÕs ongoing defiance of the world. We will consult. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm, we will act for the safety of our people, and for the peace of the world.



AMDMACMAN
Feb 21, 2004, 01:58 AM
I know that you are speaking of a valid working link, but where did you actually find that. You make fun of them for not having an up to date site, but I went to their home page and could not find a link to the page you speak of. I also tried to back track through the logical navigation of topics given on your linked page.

either you dug real deap on the site for this or i am completely missing the navigation from the home web page. www.whitehouse.gov

Sparky's
Feb 21, 2004, 06:49 PM
AMDMACMAN, I went to the Whitehouse.gov and within 30 secs found the letter posted. Do a search (in the space provided) for "disarm" in the returning page look at the second item down,....

No Matter Where you go, There you are...

Sparky's
Feb 21, 2004, 06:54 PM
Geezer, I know there are probably several hundred pages on that site and at some time they will get around to updating them all, and then by that time have to start all over again with the 2004 election results.
Do you write HTML? how long does it take to re-write a page?
I ask that not sarcastically, because I really don't know, though I am trying to learn Apple Scripting and I know that is a tedious effort at best.
And did you know that even though the posts may be out of date I find it interesting to see a historical recounting of events, and being able to access older letters and reflect on what effects if any they have had on history. I find older information an emense and valuable sorce of information

Sparky

Krizoitz
Feb 21, 2004, 08:19 PM
it was probably an archive or a press release, so why update it? It was what they said at the time, and its stored so people can go back to it, thats not an uncommon policy. Changing it now would be revisionist history.