The United States, the world's biggest carbon dioxide emitter, signed the agreement but did not ratify it, and the Bush administration has since withdrawn U.S. support, calling instead for voluntary emission reductions by U.S. industry and more scientific research into climate change.
How dare they use more fuel... what will folks put in their gas guzzling SUVs if the Chinese and Indians are burning all the fuel? Quick, surely we must be able to invade them....Isn't al-queda based in China or something?
The above was hyperbole and sarcasm...in case you thought I meant it.
No one is covered by it right now because there weren't enough signatures to ratify. Ratification was based on emissions. So if like the USA, Germany and Japan signed on it would be in effect but if dozen lesser countries signed it wouldn't be.
Last time I checked Japan hadn't signed on either(rather ironic eh?)
There are issues though with the treaty. The way its phrased is bizarre. A certain percentage decrease from the levels that were in use 5 years before the treaty was written. There are a large number of countries which are exempted as "developing" Including the PRC and India.
Bill Clinton did sign the treaty but the senate never ratified it. Even if Bush hadn't withdrawn the treaty from the senate it never would have been ratified. There are people who said that he signed it because he knew it would never be ratified.