PDA

View Full Version : Iraq: The Biggest Fraud of All Time?




skunk
Feb 15, 2009, 07:28 PM
A 'fraud' bigger than Madoff
Senior US soldiers investigated over missing Iraq reconstruction billions

By Patrick Cockburn in Sulaimaniyah, Northern Iraq
Monday, 16 February 2009

In what could turn out to be the greatest fraud in US history, American authorities have started to investigate the alleged role of senior military officers in the misuse of $125bn (£88bn) in a US -directed effort to reconstruct Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein. The exact sum missing may never be clear, but a report by the US Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) suggests it may exceed $50bn, making it an even bigger theft than Bernard Madoff's notorious Ponzi scheme.

"I believe the real looting of Iraq after the invasion was by US officials and contractors, and not by people from the slums of Baghdad," said one US businessman active in Iraq since 2003.

In one case, auditors working for SIGIR discovered that $57.8m was sent in "pallet upon pallet of hundred-dollar bills" to the US comptroller for south-central Iraq, Robert J Stein Jr, who had himself photographed standing with the mound of money. He is among the few US officials who were in Iraq to be convicted of fraud and money-laundering.

Despite the vast sums expended on rebuilding by the US since 2003, there have been no cranes visible on the Baghdad skyline except those at work building a new US embassy and others rusting beside a half-built giant mosque that Saddam was constructing when he was overthrown. One of the few visible signs of government work on Baghdad's infrastructure is a tireless attention to planting palm trees and flowers in the centre strip between main roads. Those are then dug up and replanted a few months later.

Iraqi leaders are convinced that the theft or waste of huge sums of US and Iraqi government money could have happened only if senior US officials were themselves involved in the corruption. In 2004-05, the entire Iraq military procurement budget of $1.3bn was siphoned off from the Iraqi Defence Ministry in return for 28-year-old Soviet helicopters too obsolete to fly and armoured cars easily penetrated by rifle bullets. Iraqi officials were blamed for the theft, but US military officials were largely in control of the Defence Ministry at the time and must have been either highly negligent or participants in the fraud.

American federal investigators are now starting an inquiry into the actions of senior US officers involved in the programme to rebuild Iraq, according to The New York Times, which cites interviews with senior government officials and court documents. Court records reveal that, in January, investigators subpoenaed the bank records of Colonel Anthony B Bell, now retired from the US Army, but who was previously responsible for contracting for the reconstruction effort in 2003 and 2004. Two federal officials are cited by the paper as saying that investigators are also looking at the activities of Lieutenant-Colonel Ronald W Hirtle of the US Air Force, who was senior contracting officer in Baghdad in 2004. It is not clear what specific evidence exists against the two men, who have both said they have nothing to hide.

The end of the Bush administration which launched the war may give fresh impetus to investigations into frauds in which tens of billions of dollars were spent on reconstruction with little being built that could be used. In the early days of the occupation, well-connected Republicans were awarded jobs in Iraq, regardless of experience. A 24-year-old from a Republican family was put in charge of the Baghdad stock exchange which had to close down because he allegedly forgot to renew the lease on its building.

In the expanded inquiry by federal agencies, the evidence of a small-time US businessman called Dale C Stoffel who was murdered after leaving the US base at Taiji north of Baghdad in 2004 is being re-examined. Before he was killed, Mr Stoffel, an arms dealer and contractor, was granted limited immunity from prosecution after he had provided information that a network of bribery – linking companies and US officials awarding contracts – existed within the US-run Green Zone in Baghdad. He said bribes of tens of thousands of dollars were regularly delivered in pizza boxes sent to US contracting officers.

So far, US officers who have been successfully prosecuted or unmasked have mostly been involved in small-scale corruption. Often sums paid out in cash were never recorded. In one case, an American soldier put in charge of reviving Iraqi boxing gambled away all the money but he could not be prosecuted because, although the money was certainly gone, nobody had recorded if it was $20,000 or $60,000.

Iraqi ministers admit the wholesale corruption of their government. Ali Allawi, the former finance minister, said Iraq was "becoming like Nigeria in the past when all the oil revenues were stolen". But there has also been a strong suspicion among senior Iraqis that US officials must have been complicit or using Iraqi appointees as front-men in corrupt deals. Several Iraqi officials given important jobs at the urging of the US administration in Baghdad were inexperienced. For instance, the arms procurement chief at the centre of the Defence Ministry scandal, was a Polish-Iraqi, 27 years out of Iraq, who had run a pizza restaurant on the outskirts of Bonn in the 1990s.

In many cases, contractors never started or finished facilities they were supposedly building. As security deteriorated in Iraq from the summer of 2003 it was difficult to check if a contract had been completed. But the failure to provide electricity, water and sewage disposal during the US occupation was crucial in alienating Iraqis from the post-Saddam regime.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/a-fraud-bigger-than-madoff-1622987.html

Where does the buck stop for this one, George?



iJohnHenry
Feb 15, 2009, 07:45 PM
Unless their accounts are in some God-forsaken Hell-hole of a country, can we not inquire of their financial health??

skunk
Feb 15, 2009, 07:47 PM
Neither you nor I can do anything at all.

Dont Hurt Me
Feb 15, 2009, 07:51 PM
A trillion dollars down the drain and what do we have to show for it? anything? Bush & his republicans given away our tax dollars with no accountability what so ever in Iraq. They just did the same thing with banks and wall street. Then they have the gull to bitch about the democrats.:rolleyes:

iJohnHenry
Feb 15, 2009, 07:54 PM
Neither you nor I can do anything at all.

That was never in doubt.

Why do I even try???

Lord Blackadder
Feb 15, 2009, 07:56 PM
Right now the GOP whines about "wasteful spending" in the bailout bill and won't vote for it. Well, what the **** about this then? :mad:

I think we all know that corruption has taken place in the Iraq reconstruction programs, but I had hoped it wasn't this bad.

Gelfin
Feb 15, 2009, 07:57 PM
Unless their accounts are in some God-forsaken Hell-hole of a country, can we not inquire of their financial health??

"Accounts?"

That's sort of the great thing about a mountain of hundred dollar bills.

iJohnHenry
Feb 15, 2009, 07:58 PM
As I have said before, wack all lobbyists.

That's sort of the great thing about a mountain of hundred dollar bills.

That's why they killed the $1,000 bill. Easier to follow electronic transfers of funds.

Rt&Dzine
Feb 15, 2009, 10:00 PM
It's been a fraud starting with the false premise for the invasion. Halliburton et. al. are the big winners and everyone else are losers.

http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/

blackfox
Feb 16, 2009, 04:19 AM
I would be curious whether this fraud is the result of deliberate planning on some level, or of individuals taking advantage of a chaotic situation.

IOW, was post-invasion (or even invasion) planning made with the intention for embezzlement, or was it so poorly done as to make opportunists out of some folk?

I would hope some more investigation goes into this...

hulugu
Feb 16, 2009, 12:09 PM
I would be curious whether this fraud is the result of deliberate planning on some level, or of individuals taking advantage of a chaotic situation.

IOW, was post-invasion (or even invasion) planning made with the intention for embezzlement, or was it so poorly done as to make opportunists out of some folk?

I would hope some more investigation goes into this...

I'd guess most of it was from the lack of oversight on contractors: shoddy building and design, outright fraud, overcharges, and 'accounting errors.' And, some was surely stolen by hand.

Aea
Feb 16, 2009, 05:40 PM
I'd guess most of it was from the lack of oversight on contractors: shoddy building and design, outright fraud, overcharges, and 'accounting errors.' And, some was surely stolen by hand.

Say that this was some sort of grand conspiracy is absolutely absurd. However, contractor favoritism and the general chaos of a war pretty much guaranteed that specific companies would be making quite a bit of money, but that's just a matter of circumstance.

chrmjenkins
Feb 16, 2009, 05:59 PM
Hey man, pizza is here!
...

What the heck is this?

mactastic
Feb 21, 2009, 06:25 PM
Where does the buck stop for this one, George?
Over there. At the new guy's desk. Heh. Heh.

The sad thing is that conservatives get their panties in a twist over a welfare queen who gets an undeserved couple hundred thousand or so over a lifetime; yet can't seem to muster much outrage over these kinds of massive frauds.

Mistaken priorities...