PDA

View Full Version : Yet more evidence Bush disregarded terror.




diamond geezer
Apr 4, 2004, 10:10 PM
link (http://dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/12/bush/index.html)

September 12, 2001 | WASHINGTON -- They went to great pains not to sound as though they were telling the president "We told you so."

But on Wednesday, two former senators, the bipartisan co-chairs of a Defense Department-chartered commission on national security, spoke with something between frustration and regret about how White House officials failed to embrace any of the recommendations to prevent acts of domestic terrorism delivered earlier this year.

Bush administration officials told former Sens. Gary Hart, D-Colo., and Warren Rudman, R-N.H., that they preferred instead to put aside the recommendations issued in the January report by the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. Instead, the White House announced in May that it would have Vice President Dick Cheney study the potential problem of domestic terrorism -- which the bipartisan group had already spent two and a half years studying -- while assigning responsibility for dealing with the issue to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, headed by former Bush campaign manager Joe Allbaugh.

The Hart-Rudman Commission had specifically recommended that the issue of terrorism was such a threat it needed far more than FEMA's attention.

Before the White House decided to go in its own direction, Congress seemed to be taking the commission's suggestions seriously, according to Hart and Rudman. "Frankly, the White House shut it down," Hart says. "The president said 'Please wait, we're going to turn this over to the vice president. We believe FEMA is competent to coordinate this effort.' And so Congress moved on to other things, like tax cuts and the issue of the day."

"We predicted it," Hart says of Tuesday's horrific events. "We said Americans will likely die on American soil, possibly in large numbers -- that's a quote (from the commission's Phase One Report) from the fall of 1999."

On Tuesday, Hart says, as he sat watching TV coverage of the attacks, he experienced not just feelings of shock and horror, but also frustration. "I sat tearing my hair out," says the former two-term senator. "And still am."

Rudman generally agrees with Hart's assessment, but adds: "That's not to say that the administration was obstructing."

"They wanted to try something else, they wanted to put more responsibility with FEMA," Rudman says. "But they didn't get a chance to do very much" before terrorists struck on Tuesday.

The White House referred an inquiry to the National Security Council, which did not return a call for comment.



zimv20
Apr 4, 2004, 10:33 PM
reinforced cockpit doors was one of the many recommendations of the hart/rudman report. too bad none of it was implemented until after 9/11.

IJ Reilly
Apr 4, 2004, 11:04 PM
The creation of the Department of Homeland Security was also a Hart-Rudman recommendation opposed by Bush until after 9-11, and it wasn't until after he was able insert an anti-labor poison pill into the bill that he finally supported it. Then he accused Democrats of opposing homeland security because they didn't like the anti-labor provisions. I'd say it doesn't get more devious and cynical then that, but of course it does.

diamond geezer
Apr 4, 2004, 11:25 PM
One insertion in the bill was that companies who used off-shore tax-dodges couldn't be given Government contracts. The Republicans removed that pretty damn quick.