Apple Seeds OS X 10.5.7 Build 9J39 to Developers

[MacRumors]

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/03/29/apple-seeds-os-x-10-5-7-build-9j39-to-developers/)

Apple's pattern of seeding new builds of Mac OS X 10.5.7 to developers each weekend continues, with Build 9J39 making its way out this weekend. World of Apple publishes (http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2009/03/29/new-seed-of-mac-os-x-1057-surfaces/) the seed notes, which reveal only five documented changes since the previous seed (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/03/23/os-x-10-5-7-build-9j34-seeded-to-developers/).This build in partcular fixes issues Mail signatures, System Profiler having problems with DisplayPort adapters and several other issues.

As with previous builds the inability to install Safari 4 Beta is the only remaining issue.Apple has also added Safari to the list of "general focus areas" upon which developers are asked to concentrate their testing.

Article Link: Apple Seeds OS X 10.5.7 Build 9J39 to Developers (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/03/29/apple-seeds-os-x-10-5-7-build-9j39-to-developers/)

[Tallest Skil]

Only five changes?

I smell Tuesday, but if Safari still doesn't work, it might be the Tuesday after next.:p

[Cubert]

Not being able to install the Safari 4 beta seems to be a big show stopper to me.

[Eidorian]

Not being able to install the Safari 4 beta seems to be a big show stopper to me.I think that was a major one for many people.

The Mini-DisplayPort hasn't been a fun trip either.

[-Ryan-]

I'm quite sure Safari 4 compatibility has been tested internally for months now. I doubt that we'll see it released before developers get a build with compatibility though, so I reckon at least another few weeks before general release. :(

[Lordedmond]

I would hazard a guess regarding the non install of Safari 4 is that its a version checker in Safari looking for 10.5.6 and the security update, because it will not install without the later ( in 10.5.6 )

so maybe its not 10.5.7 thats the problem but the version of safari 4 beta that we have

[D A]

I would hazard a guess regarding the non install of Safari 4 is that its a version checker in Safari looking for 10.5.6 and the security update, because it will not install without the later ( in 10.5.6 )

so maybe its not 10.5.7 thats the problem but the version of safari 4 beta that we have

That would be my guess as well. The problem is almost certainly in Safari, not OS X.

[Rocketman]

10.4.11 still works just fine. :)

Looking forward to 10.6.3.

Rocketman

[wizard]

The title says it all, I'm getting more that a bit frustrated with the networking issues on my early 2008 MBP. Sad but I'm begining to think it is time for a class action suit, as my machine has actually gotten worst with each update. I now have the Mac scanning on what where previously reliable hot spots.

I'm not one to normally get wound up over minor defects in a product as nothing is perfect. This has really degenerated into something that doesn't even work properly Since reports are still wide spread on Apples forms I don't think it is a hardware issue.


Dave

[bedifferent]

Finally, a topic besides the Windows ad campaign. ;)

So the only known issue is Safari 4.0 Beta not playing well with 10.5.7. I'm surprised this is still an issue given Apple's recent promotion of Safari 4.0. It would be nice to see this update on or around Tuesday.

[pmb333]

Only five changes?

I smell Tuesday, but if Safari still doesn't work, it might be the Tuesday after next.:p

Hopefully, it is Tuesday. Then even more hopefully, my new iMac ships on Wednesday. ;)

[Saladinos]

Safari 4 compat can be fixed with an update to that program.

[lazyrighteye]

Simultaneously release both 10.5.7 & Safari 4.1.
Issue over.

[theBigD23]

I was excited to see the fix with Mail Signatures, until I read the details. The signatures still appearing below the replied text, even though we have checked the box to put the signature above the quoted text is really frustrating. I spend hours moving over my mail from Entourage to Mail and then have to revert since I use signatures on most of my emails.:eek:

[Bye Bye Baby]

Gimme gimme

[mikeinternet]

Simultaneously release both 10.5.7 & Safari 4.1.
Issue over.

Took the words right out of my mouth.

[wrldwzrd89]

The question is, does this fix the Spaces bug I found? Or have Apple not been able to reproduce it?

[Peace]

The question is, does this fix the Spaces bug I found? Or have Apple not been able to reproduce it?


The real question is. Have you been able to reproduce it ?. If so file a bug report.

[kabunaru]

The real question is. Have you been able to reproduce it ?. If so file a bug report.

Do you have any idea when Mac OS 10.5.7 might be released?
Monday?

[Peace]

Do you have any idea when Mac OS 10.5.7 might be released?
Monday?

I have no idea. And if I did know I couldn't say.

I can guess though.. Next week sometime ?

[ChaseManhattan]

I know this is not a bug; Well at least part is..

I'm sure I am one of many people who have a gmail address and a mac. And while both companies are on the cutting edge in their respective fields I have this reoccurring problem; Where, when I send an email in any fashion from my gmail account i get a exact copy in my inbox in mail.app. While i had this problem on my Blackberry, It was a simple fix. Similar to rules built into mail.

The problem with mail is that the rules simply dont work for me; Not only do they not work they do really screwy things, Like moving mail that had nothing to do with the rules the the absolute wrong folders. This should be a really simple fix or preferably it should just be built into the next build of mail, where mail.app just knows how to handle gmail accounts... Please apple make it play nice!

P.s. I've used the corrected "rules" as well as different configurations; I'm not stupid and did the research to no avail.

[Eric S.]

Do you have any idea when Mac OS 10.5.7 might be released?
Monday?

Same prediction as last weekend.
Soon.
;)

[kabunaru]

Same prediction as last weekend.
Soon.
;)

Does Apple even read these forums and postpone the release date just to annoy Mac users?

[plinden]

... when I send an email in any fashion from my gmail account i get a exact copy in my inbox in mail.app. While i had this problem on my Blackberry, It was a simple fix. Similar to rules built into mail. ... preferably it should just be built into the next build of mail, where mail.app just knows how to handle gmail accounts... Please apple make it play nice!


Well, I've been accessing my GMail account in Mail ever since Google enabled IMAP support, and like what seems to be the vast majority of people out there (otherwise this wouldn't be the first time I've heard of this happening), I'm not seeing this.

Are you sure you don't have Mail set up to copy you on outgoing messages (Mail Preferences -> Composing)?

[kabunaru]

Looking forward to 10.6.3.

See you next year. Have fun waiting. :)

[aimbdd]

The title says it all, I'm getting more that a bit frustrated with the networking issues on my early 2008 MBP. Sad but I'm begining to think it is time for a class action suit, as my machine has actually gotten worst with each update. I now have the Mac scanning on what where previously reliable hot spots.

I'm not one to normally get wound up over minor defects in a product as nothing is perfect. This has really degenerated into something that doesn't even work properly Since reports are still wide spread on Apples forms I don't think it is a hardware issue.


Dave
umm well have you tried getting it exchanged? they have been glad to help me out in the past.

[minik]

10.4.11 still works just fine. :)

Looking forward to 10.6.3.

Rocketman

huh? You meant 10.5.3?

[voyagerd]

huh? You meant 10.5.3?

Pretty sure he meant what he said. 10.6.0 preview is pretty much stable though, just no FSAA in WoW :(

[boer]

Not being able to install the Safari 4 beta seems to be a big show stopper to me.

I find it likely (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=7331499&postcount=20) Safari 4 will ship with 10.5.7.

[DavidFulero]

I'm going to wait for snow leopard. It's probably too good to be true, but it sounds great.

[synner]

The title says it all, I'm getting more that a bit frustrated with the networking issues on my early 2008 MBP. Sad but I'm begining to think it is time for a class action suit, as my machine has actually gotten worst with each update. I now have the Mac scanning on what where previously reliable hot spots.

I'm not one to normally get wound up over minor defects in a product as nothing is perfect. This has really degenerated into something that doesn't even work properly Since reports are still wide spread on Apples forms I don't think it is a hardware issue.


Dave

Hi,

I have an early 2008 MBP (15") and have not had any problems with networking at all. It successfully connects to any available network I have tried.

Maybe they used different airport cards in some models ?

Bri

[iBug2]

Pretty sure he meant what he said. 10.6.0 preview is pretty much stable though, just no FSAA in WoW :(

I noticed that too. Must be about the new 64 bit graphics drivers not being totally complete yet.

[AdeFowler]

Finally, a topic besides the Windows ad campaign. ;)
+1. I can't believe the attention it's getting.

10.5.7 on Thursday I predict.

[acidfast7]

why does the version code have a J in the middle? do the dev releases usually run a little ahead of the final release:

Version history
Version Build Release date Note
10.5.0 9A581 26 October 2007 Available on first-released retail DVD
10.5.1 9B18 15 November 2007 Apple download page; also available on second-released retail DVD
10.5.2 9C31 11 February 2008 Apple download page
10.5.3 9D34 28 May 2008 Apple download page
10.5.4 9E17 30 June 2008 Apple download page; also available on third-released retail DVD
10.5.5 9F33 15 September 2008 Apple download page
10.5.6 9G55 15 December 2008 Apple download page

[wrldwzrd89]

why does the version code have a J in the middle? do the dev releases usually run a little ahead of the final release:

Version history
Version Build Release date Note
10.5.0 9A581 26 October 2007 Available on first-released retail DVD
10.5.1 9B18 15 November 2007 Apple download page; also available on second-released retail DVD
10.5.2 9C31 11 February 2008 Apple download page
10.5.3 9D34 28 May 2008 Apple download page
10.5.4 9E17 30 June 2008 Apple download page; also available on third-released retail DVD
10.5.5 9F33 15 September 2008 Apple download page
10.5.6 9G55 15 December 2008 Apple download page
That is odd - should be 9HXX shouldn't it? I have not seen this before... but if you think about it, there is an explanation. Remember the new hardware Apple released recently? These shipped with custom builds of 10.5.6, using the 9HXX and 9IXX schemes - one for the iMac/Mac mini, and one for the Mac Pro. 10.5.7 will unify these, if my theory is correct.

[acidfast7]

That is odd - should be 9HXX shouldn't it? I have not seen this before... but if you think about it, there is an explanation. Remember the new hardware Apple released recently? These shipped with custom builds of 10.5.6, using the 9HXX and 9IXX schemes - one for the iMac/Mac mini, and one for the Mac Pro. 10.5.7 will unify these, if my theory is correct.

thanks for the info. so a different branch from the tree? what are the main differences between the 9GXX, 9HXX and 9IXX branches?

also, why 9XXX anyway if it's OSX?

i'm new to apple products.

[wrldwzrd89]

thanks for the info. so a different branch from the tree? what are the main differences between the 9GXX, 9HXX and 9IXX branches?

also, why 9XXX anyway if it's OSX?

i'm new to apple products.
Mac OS X is based on Darwin. Darwin version numbers started at 1 and are incremented every major version. Leopard is the 9th major Darwin revision. The first X is the minor revision number, incremented when Apple releases a new build of Mac OS X or a custom build to support new hardware (as was done for the iMac, Mac Mini, and Mac Pro). The other Xs are for build numbers.

[acidfast7]

Mac OS X is based on Darwin. Darwin version numbers started at 1 and are incremented every major version. Leopard is the 9th major Darwin revision. The first X is the minor revision number, incremented when Apple releases a new build of Mac OS X or a custom build to support new hardware (as was done for the iMac, Mac Mini, and Mac Pro). The other Xs are for build numbers.

Thanks for the insightful reply!

[Lordedmond]

why does the version code have a J in the middle? do the dev releases usually run a little ahead of the final release:

Version history
Version Build Release date Note
10.5.0 9A581 26 October 2007 Available on first-released retail DVD
10.5.1 9B18 15 November 2007 Apple download page; also available on second-released retail DVD
10.5.2 9C31 11 February 2008 Apple download page
10.5.3 9D34 28 May 2008 Apple download page
10.5.4 9E17 30 June 2008 Apple download page; also available on third-released retail DVD
10.5.5 9F33 15 September 2008 Apple download page
10.5.6 9G55 15 December 2008 Apple download page


Then why is the build of 10.5.6 9G2030 in my new 2009 IMac

[The ArchAngel]

Then why is the build of 10.5.6 9G2030 in my new 2009 IMac

Same thing on my new iMac.

[ChaseManhattan]

Well, I've been accessing my GMail account in Mail ever since Google enabled IMAP support, and like what seems to be the vast majority of people out there (otherwise this wouldn't be the first time I've heard of this happening), I'm not seeing this.

Are you sure you don't have Mail set up to copy you on outgoing messages (Mail Preferences -> Composing)?

AH I think that could be the solution to the problem.. I have been using Pop(configured via mail since like 10.5.1. I had no idea they came out with Imap support.. lets see if this works!

[ChaseManhattan]

AH I think that could be the solution to the problem.. I have been using Pop(configured via mail since like 10.5.1. I had no idea they came out with Imap support.. lets see if this works!

Apple needs to update the "Configure Automatically" when using gmail to IMAP not POP. Im not sure if this hase been changed since I set it up builds ago though.

[Povilas]

Same thing on my new iMac.

Strange, on my iMac it's 9G66

[acidfast7]

Same thing on my new iMac.

Cool, you may want to edit the wikipedia entry for OSX 10.5.6 ... mine's a "Build 9G55." :(

I guess that I should add the caveat that I had to update the machine once I received it from 10.5.4, so that's why I am probably at 9G55. It's not even that old either :( and I wish that I had the 8GB RAM.

[wrldwzrd89]

Then why is the build of 10.5.6 9G2030 in my new 2009 IMac

Same thing on my new iMac.

Strange, on my iMac it's 9G66

Cool, you may want to edit the wikipedia entry for OSX 10.5.6 ... mine's a "Build 9G55." :(
The reason for this is that Apple doesn't follow its own rules sometimes, I suppose. That's the only explanation I can think of. Anyone with a 2009 Mac Pro report on their Mac OS X build number?

[bedifferent]

+1. I can't believe the attention it's getting.


Although I admit it's fun to log on that thread every so often and leave a comment to stir the cauldron. It's like poking the wild animals in their cage :p.

[Peace]

The reason for this is that Apple doesn't follow its own rules sometimes, I suppose. That's the only explanation I can think of. Anyone with a 2009 Mac Pro report on their Mac OS X build number?

I've updated to a dev build since then but I think it was 9G3033.

[bedifferent]

Strange, on my iMac it's 9G66

Ooooo, I like that dialog box. You must have themed your OS? What did you use?

[Povilas]

Ooooo, I like that dialog box. You must have themed your OS? What did you use?

Interface Builder from Xcode.

[bedifferent]

Interface Builder from Xcode.

That's way above my head lol. Not quite a programmer. Shoot.

[Povilas]

That's way above my head lol. Not quite a programmer. Shoot.

I disagree :) It's very easy. Just google it if you like.

[bedifferent]

I disagree :) It's very easy. Just google it if you like.

Ah, thanks, I'll google "Interface Builder". I haven't programmed since my college days (almost a decade ago :( ). I've been learning Flash on my free time for web design, but nothing since my Javascript and C++ years.

[Povilas]

Ah, thanks, I'll google "Interface Builder". I haven't programmed since my college days (almost a decade ago :( ). I've been learning Flash on my free time for web design, but nothing since my Javascript and C++ years.

If you don't mind :): http://macthemes2.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=16783903

[Eric S.]

Then why is the build of 10.5.6 9G2030 in my new 2009 IMac

The "2" usually means it's an Intel-specific build (although I've noticed that Mac Pros use "3" - maybe they increment the number for each architecture-specific build). When you update, for example to 10.5.7, they will have integrated that architecture-specific code into the generic codebase, so you'll be able to run the same build as everyone else.

The reason for this is that Apple doesn't follow its own rules sometimes, I suppose. That's the only explanation I can think of. Anyone with a 2009 Mac Pro report on their Mac OS X build number?

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1159

[Eric S.]

. (please remove)

[mc.stever]

why does the version code have a J in the middle? do the dev releases usually run a little ahead of the final release:

Version history
Version Build Release date Note
10.5.0 9A581 26 October 2007 Available on first-released retail DVD
10.5.1 9B18 15 November 2007 Apple download page; also available on second-released retail DVD
10.5.2 9C31 11 February 2008 Apple download page
10.5.3 9D34 28 May 2008 Apple download page
10.5.4 9E17 30 June 2008 Apple download page; also available on third-released retail DVD
10.5.5 9F33 15 September 2008 Apple download page
10.5.6 9G55 15 December 2008 Apple download page

All of the 10.5.7 builds that I've seen have been 9Jxx. No clue what happened to H & I.

Heres a list of the various released builds. Not sure I can see a pattern.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1633

[Eric S.]

All of the 10.5.7 builds that I've seen have been 9Jxx. No clue what happened to H & I.

Heres a list of the various released builds. Not sure I can see a pattern.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1633

Here's a more complete list, at least through 10.5.3. In the past, missing letter builds in the generic stream were used for machine-specific builds:

http://www.theapplemuseum.com/index.php?id=33

[Peace]

Here's a more complete list, at least through 10.5.3. In the past, missing letter builds in the generic stream were used for machine-specific builds:

http://www.theapplemuseum.com/index.php?id=33

I believe "H" and "I" are being reserved for the iPhone"s"

[vvebsta]

How many numbers has Apple gone up to in the past before releasing the next version of OSX? Have they ever gotten to a .9 (like 10.5.9)?

[Eidorian]

How many numbers has Apple gone up to in the past before releasing the next version of OSX? Have they ever gotten to a .9 (like 10.5.9)?10.4.11

It isn't that hard to find. :confused:

[bedifferent]

Cool, you may want to edit the wikipedia entry for OSX 10.5.6 ... mine's a "Build 9G55." :(

I guess that I should add the caveat that I had to update the machine once I received it from 10.5.4, so that's why I am probably at 9G55. It's not even that old either :( and I wish that I had the 8GB RAM.

My Octo Mac Pro has 9G55 as well. I suppose that must be the update version for Intel systems?

[Cboss]

My Octo Mac Pro has 9G55 as well. I suppose that must be the update version for Intel systems?

Seems like that's the case as my '07 Macbook has 9G55.

[goinskiing]

The title says it all, I'm getting more that a bit frustrated with the networking issues on my early 2008 MBP. Sad but I'm begining to think it is time for a class action suit, as my machine has actually gotten worst with each update. I now have the Mac scanning on what where previously reliable hot spots.

I'm not one to normally get wound up over minor defects in a product as nothing is perfect. This has really degenerated into something that doesn't even work properly Since reports are still wide spread on Apples forms I don't think it is a hardware issue.


Dave

Mine has gotten worse too, just a little frustrating. Each update I've been like"Yes! Finally a fix." only to find out that it was worse than before. :mad:

[Eric S.]

My Octo Mac Pro has 9G55 as well. I suppose that must be the update version for Intel systems?

Seems like that's the case as my '07 Macbook has 9G55.

9G55 is just the 10.5.6 released build. My Power Mac G4 is running 9G55 too.

[bedifferent]

If you were to install the pre-release beta, would you be able to install the final release of 10.5.7 over that beta version?

[JavierP]

If you were to install the pre-release beta, would you be able to install the final release of 10.5.7 over that beta version?

Yes, but you will have to install the 10.5.7 final combo update

[Cboss]

9G55 is just the 10.5.6 released build. My Power Mac G4 is running 9G55 too.

Ahh... Ok, gotcha.

[The Flashing Fi]

The title says it all, I'm getting more that a bit frustrated with the networking issues on my early 2008 MBP. Sad but I'm begining to think it is time for a class action suit, as my machine has actually gotten worst with each update. I now have the Mac scanning on what where previously reliable hot spots.

I'm not one to normally get wound up over minor defects in a product as nothing is perfect. This has really degenerated into something that doesn't even work properly Since reports are still wide spread on Apples forms I don't think it is a hardware issue.


Dave

I agree.

Since Leopard's release, the wallpaper switcher on my MBP hardly works properly. It lags everything, unless I disable the 3D dock and the translucent menubar.

And when I installed 10.5.6, it seemed worse. It seemed like everything loaded slower. Overall, it just seemed crappy. 10.5.5 was MUCH better IMO.

It seems like the only way we'll get better drivers is to get Snow Leopard when it comes out, since they will be using a 64-bit kernel, which will require the drivers to be 64-bit, which will mean that will need to rewrite the drivers.

Tiger seemed so much better, but unfortunately, everything has shifted to Leopard, which pretty much forces me to use it.

[ThomasJL]

Any idea if 10.5.7 might be released before this coming Saturday?

[Eric S.]

Any idea if 10.5.7 might be released before this coming Saturday?

Anything is possible. I thought we would have seen the release before now, so who knows? Blog sites like Ars Technica (http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/04/snow-leopard-juno-and-pro-app-updates-oh-my.ars), Softpedia (http://news.softpedia.com/news/Mac-OS-X-10-5-7-Juno-on-Track-for-April-Release-108416.shtml), as well as AppleInsider (http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/03/31/more_proof_of_nehalem_xserves_may_ship_with_os_x_10_5_7.html) are only saying that it will be sometime in April.

[JFreak]

AppleInsider are only saying that it will be sometime in April.

Which means they have no clue. Anybody could have said that, it's no rocket science. If there will not be a 10.5.7 in April, it means Apple's in deep trouble with something.

[Concorde Rules]

My 2009 Mac Pro build is 9G3553

[ThomasJL]

Bump.

Any new news about a release date for 10.5.7?

[Tallest Skil]

Bump.

Any new news about a release date for 10.5.7?

It is against the rules to bump threads. Please go read the rules.

We know nothing about 10.5.7.

[Eric S.]

Any new news about a release date for 10.5.7?

I haven't seen any news stories more recent than the ones I mentioned above in post #70.

[Kilamite]

I'm hoping OS X 10.5.7 fixes unreliable issues with WiFi on 802.1X networks.

It is against the rules to bump threads. Please go read the rules.

We know nothing about 10.5.7.

I think the bump is for your on posts? Not sure... I think bump is just a forbidden word :D

[bedifferent]

It is against the rules to bump threads. Please go read the rules.

We know nothing about 10.5.7.

Bumping doesn't effect threads that are posted by MacRumors', bumping only effects posts written in the forum by other members in order to put their buried post on top. Posting doesn't effect the stance of these particular threads.

[Tallest Skil]

Bumping doesn't effect threads that are posted by MacRumors', bumping only effects posts written in the forum by other members in order to put their buried post on top. Posting doesn't effect the stance of these particular threads.

You mean that threads in the news forum remain in chronological order regardless of the time of the last post?

Then what the heck is the purpose of the bump?

[bedifferent]

You mean that threads in the news forum remain in chronological order regardless of the time of the last post?

Then what the heck is the purpose of the bump?

No threads that MacRumors post on front page and page 2. The threads that are posted by you or I are bumped up depending on the most recent posting, hence why it is against the rules for people to "bump" their own threads to get them back on top again. Posting on these threads doesn't move the actual thread, and bumping comments serves you no good.

[idreaminbeige]

Sooo no new build was released over the weekend. Surely Tuesday is a good prospect for release?

The biggest issue for me is that 10.5.7 seems the likelyist issue holding up the shipping of my imac with an ATI 4850 card. 4 weeks and counting since i ordered...

[iBug2]

Sooo no new build was released over the weekend. Surely Tuesday is a good prospect for release?

The biggest issue for me is that 10.5.7 seems the likelyist issue holding up the shipping of my imac with an ATI 4850 card. 4 weeks and counting since i ordered...

A new build arrived on Monday night. So probably next week is release at the earliest.

[ThomasJL]

A new build arrived on Monday night. So probably next week is release at the earliest.

What is the build number of this new build? Also, on what Web page did you read about this new build?

Thanks! :)

[wrldwzrd89]

World of Apple is reporting Apple has released yet another seed of Mac OS X 10.5.7 to developers. This build (9J39), like the last few, has few know issues and the only know problem is the Safari 4 beta won’t install.

Apple has released several updates at almost a weekly biases. Increased seed speeds and few know issues indicates an imminent release.

If I keep saying it I’ll be right sooner or later.
This is old news. In fact, it's reported at the start of this very thread.

[iBug2]

What is the build number of this new build? Also, on what Web page did you read about this new build?

Thanks! :)

It's 9J44. Couple more changes, same incompatibility with Safari 4.0.

[RichardI]

•Fixed issue with Bluetooth mouse and button settings after disconnect/reconnect
I wonder what that means? I have a Bluetooth mouse that works fine to click and scroll, but it will not track. I have my fingers crossed.:rolleyes:

Rich :cool:

[IT-Pro]

I wonder why World of Apple hasn't reported on the new build yet. Usally they're the first.

[bedifferent]

I wonder what that means? I have a Bluetooth mouse that works fine to click and scroll, but it will not track. I have my fingers crossed.:rolleyes:

Rich :cool:

The Bluetooth can be buggy at times. I stopped using my bluetooth might mouse as at times the tracking stammers. I noticed this happens a lot when Time Machine is backing up. The only way I found to fix it is to turn off the mouse and turn it back on, but the reconnect sometimes doesn't kick in unless you click the mouse a few times while it's getting a handshake. The scroll ball was becoming more and more touchy, and the last time I tried to clean it with alcohol and a Q-Tip it just stopped working all together. I love the look of the mighty mouse, but I have to admit Apple needs to develop a better scroll ball.

[wrldwzrd89]

I wonder why World of Apple hasn't reported on the new build yet. Usally they're the first.
They have now. Linky (http://news.worldofapple.com/archives/2009/04/07/developers-greeted-with-build-9j44-of-mac-os-x-1057/)

[Eric S.]

See you next year. Have fun waiting. :)

Wow! Spot on!

[Kilamite]

Wow! Spot on!

Blimey.. isn't that something!

[Jacquesass]

Wow! Spot on!

That is very cool.