PDA

View Full Version : PS3 gets GPU downgrade




GFLPraxis
Aug 29, 2006, 05:08 PM
Please don't kill the messenger :(
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33995
PS3 downgraded again

RSX woes this time

By Charlie Demerjian: Monday 28 August 2006, 16:43
IT LOOKS LIKE the PS3 is way too powerful for us mere humans, and because the value is so overwhelming, Sony is going to make it a little more palatable. The RSX, previously scheduled to run at 550/700 core/memory has been realigned with expectations and the value chain at 500/650.

We can't tell you why the GPU lost nearly 10% of it's clock, it could be an NVidia screwup, or it could be Sony/Cell. Either way, it just became much less of an overwhelming value, but you get a DRM infected drive for 'free' either way.

As a help to the fanbois who inevitably write in somewhat curious broken englishish every time their precious console gets re-specced in a downward manner, please cut and paste the following. It will save you at least an hour trying to figure out the parts of the keyboard that are not WASD:

You teh sux0r 2 sae teh PS3 is not going to teh r0x0r! Yew lie, yew 360 luvr. U teh sux! U maek thing up, go die!!!1111one!1!!!1 heheheheh

As for Sony, I know your reaction, you are going to start a whispering campaign on the forums like last time. Please give the PR genius who thought that one up a promotion and a raise. It worked so well to cower me that I got more inside sources disgusted with you third rate backstabbing attempts than I got in a year. Please do it again, I didn't take offense last time, and I promise not to this time. µ



zap2
Aug 29, 2006, 05:15 PM
well it still has like games with 22GB!!!111!!1!!!, with ONE WHOLE GB of AUDIO ONLY..if thats not next gen i don't know is!

PWNNNED

Dagless
Aug 29, 2006, 05:23 PM
and it turns out Sony are pulling all blue lasers for PS3 too. Good for PS3 stock, bad for other next gen video players.

http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/08/29/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-on-hold-for-blue-laser-shortage/

ReanimationLP
Aug 29, 2006, 05:27 PM
Its probably due to heat. Those 7800 chips are VERY hot runners. The RSX is based off of the GeForce 7800 GPU.

I dont exactly trust the Inquirer though. >.>

Dagless
Aug 29, 2006, 05:33 PM
Are those really the PS3's GPU specs? They're not that much faster than my 9600 pro (400mhz core, 450mhz memory). which is a good 3-4 or so years old now! I just thought it would be faster, seeing it's the PLAYSTATION 3 and all.

ReanimationLP
Aug 29, 2006, 05:49 PM
Are those really the PS3's GPU specs? They're not that much faster than my 9600 pro (400mhz core, 450mhz memory). which is a good 3-4 or so years old now! I just thought it would be faster, seeing it's the PLAYSTATION 3 and all.

The actual speeds of the chip dont matter. The 7800 which is what the RSX is based off of is up to 9x faster than a 9800XT. A 9800XT is almost 3x as fast as a 9600.

GFLPraxis
Aug 29, 2006, 05:52 PM
Are those really the PS3's GPU specs? They're not that much faster than my 9600 pro (400mhz core, 450mhz memory). which is a good 3-4 or so years old now! I just thought it would be faster, seeing it's the PLAYSTATION 3 and all.

Clock speed is almost useless for comparing GPU's of different architecture.

I've seen graphics cards of one brand outperform graphics cards of another brand with three times the clock speed.

It's primary use is for measuring how much you overclock the card by ;)

Dagless
Aug 29, 2006, 06:34 PM
yea sorry, I dropped out of the graphics card game way before I got my last video card.
"will it run Doom 3?"
"should do!"
*buys*
all I know now is DX9, 10 etc. and that 10 will be beautiful.

MacRumorUser
Aug 29, 2006, 06:40 PM
What it does mean is the GPU on it's own - which was less powerful than the 360's - is now even more so.

sikkinixx
Aug 29, 2006, 06:52 PM
somehow im not surprised... :(

where did this guy get his source from though? seems kinda odd...

GFLPraxis
Aug 29, 2006, 07:18 PM
What it does mean is the GPU on it's own - which was less powerful than the 360's - is now even more so.

I think the PS3's GPU actually had more polygon-pushing power than the XBox 360's, though I might be wrong.

The XBox 360's is very well designed though, with the free antialiasing, so it took less work to do some of the effects (like 4x AA) and the result was that the XBox 360 does better in most real-world situations because while the PS3's actually is faster it has more bottlenecks and thus takes it more work to do some things.

sikkinixx
Aug 29, 2006, 07:30 PM
i would love for all the rumors and secrets to stop and for Sony (and Nintendo for that matter) to just say "OK! here's the deal..." and explain it all. Sony shouldnt' be changing things this close to launch, get those damn things on the production line. IGN keeps saying "Sony has more in store at TGS!" well they said that at E3, then at GC now at TGS, just say what you have to say damn it! :mad:


ok I feel better, I realize its all marketing (and probably some mistakes trying to be covered up) but still! its driving me nuts.

edit: btw
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.09/sony.html
not a bad article, kinda long but makes you wonder about the direction Sony is going

Tommyg117
Aug 29, 2006, 07:42 PM
I'm a little worried, I need some positive sony news. I am a fan, but they gotta get some good press.

Dagless
Aug 29, 2006, 08:11 PM
To PS3 buyers - If it means the system being out sooner is a possibility then isn't that a good thing? Sure Sony have gone back on what they originally said, anyone who didn't think that would happen deserves a Japanese PSX. It's like Sony altering the shift of Blue laser diodes from everywhere to the PS3. They just want the machine out.

2nyRiggz
Aug 29, 2006, 09:28 PM
The actual speeds of the chip dont matter. The 7800 which is what the RSX is based off of is up to 9x faster than a 9800XT. A 9800XT is almost 3x as fast as a 9600.


Indeed....I'm taking all of this crap with a grain of salt.....there just chipping away at the PS3....oh well whatever.

Sony just bring it soon so all of this trash could stop.



Bless

Bobdude161
Aug 29, 2006, 09:33 PM
You teh sux0r 2 sae teh PS3 is not going to teh r0x0r! Yew lie, yew 360 luvr. U teh sux! U maek thing up, go die!!!1111one!1!!!1 heheheheh

Tommyg117
Aug 29, 2006, 10:09 PM
You teh sux0r 2 sae teh PS3 is not going to teh r0x0r! Yew lie, yew 360 luvr. U teh sux! U maek thing up, go die!!!1111one!1!!!1 heheheheh
hahaha, I was waiting for that. Anyone read on joystiq today that they are having trouble with their blu-ray laser production? Does this mean laser problems similar to the early PS2s?

Rocksaurus
Aug 29, 2006, 11:45 PM
I dont exactly trust the Inquirer though. >.>

Exactly. I don't even own any video game systems so don't see this as a PS3 supporting vote, but I think due to the source of this article (The Inquirer) people need to stop treating it like it's a fact...

LethalWolfe
Aug 29, 2006, 11:54 PM
and it turns out Sony are pulling all blue lasers for PS3 too. Good for PS3 stock, bad for other next gen video players.

http://www.hdbeat.com/2006/08/29/blu-ray-vs-hd-dvd-on-hold-for-blue-laser-shortage/

Oh man, that's funny. Not funny "ha, ha" but funny "D'oh!" As if the launch of Blu-ray hasn't been hampered enough. If Sony keeps this up HD-DVD will win by default 'cause Blu-ray can barely get out of the starting gate.


Lethal

Ja Di ksw
Aug 30, 2006, 01:17 AM
You teh sux0r 2 sae teh PS3 is not going to teh r0x0r! Yew lie, yew 360 luvr. U teh sux! U maek thing up, go die!!!1111one!1!!!1 heheheheh

Aaaaaaaa, I just grammar sporked myself!

Pressure
Aug 30, 2006, 03:20 AM
Aaaaaaaa, I just grammar sporked myself!

Let me guess, you didn't go to the supplied link in first post? ;)

BlizzardBomb
Aug 30, 2006, 04:32 AM
I think it's safe to say the 360 and PS3 will now be (pretty much) on par with each other graphically.

greatdevourer
Aug 30, 2006, 05:05 AM
I think it's safe to say the 360 and PS3 will now be (pretty much) on par with each other graphically. From what I remember, they were before, thus meaning that on paper, the PS3 is worse

ReanimationLP
Aug 30, 2006, 09:39 AM
Exactly. I don't even own any video game systems so don't see this as a PS3 supporting vote, but I think due to the source of this article (The Inquirer) people need to stop treating it like it's a fact...

The Inquirer is the National Enquirer of the tech world. :rolleyes:

Tommyg117
Aug 30, 2006, 09:42 AM
From what I remember, they were before, thus meaning that on paper, the PS3 is worse
Uh Oh. I bet they will still market it the same as the most powerful. I am really excited to see what happens with this system.

Ja Di ksw
Aug 30, 2006, 11:14 AM
Let me guess, you didn't go to the supplied link in first post? ;)

I did (or actually, I just read it as it was posted here). I was just making a joke off of a joke.

Abulia
Aug 30, 2006, 11:16 AM
Remember, it's a "supercomputer," not a gaming console! :D

Dagless
Aug 30, 2006, 11:43 AM
And you should be grateful Sony are giving it to you for so cheap!

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 11:56 AM
Sony are making a **** load of mistakes and boobs with the ps3, but it doesnt matter if they covered each one in fecal matter, stuffed the innards with used tampons and called it Sony Gaystation! people will still blindly run in buy the machine and declare it the greatest thing since slice bread.

I'm sure there are many people who blindly believe every bit of Sony pro hype and lovingly dismiss any negative press it recieves.

I'm sorry buth there really are a lot of stupid people out there, who really are like Sheep - following what advertising industry tell them to.

When failed promises, over hyped specs, and a heap of ******** did the playstation 2 no harm, PS3 is only following the exact same game, and I'm sure will be just as successful.



Whilst i'm wise to the bullcrap. I will pick up a ps3, because there are some games that look promising. If the only way I'm going to be able to play them is to buy this over priced, fecal covered, tampon inserted Sony Gaystation... :p then I guess that's what I'll have to do....

At least my 360 & Wii will have company :)

bmb012
Aug 30, 2006, 12:26 PM
Ps3's are going to be made out of cheap parts and explode. I can't wait until the thing comes out and everyone wonders why the graphics aren't better than the 360's. Then again, that didn't stop the ps2 from crushing the Dreamcast...

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 12:40 PM
Then again, that didn't stop the ps2 from crushing the Dreamcast...

Exactly my point. Some people believe whatever they are told.

ReanimationLP
Aug 30, 2006, 12:41 PM
Sony are making a **** load of mistakes and boobs with the ps3, but it doesnt matter if they covered each one in fecal matter, stuffed the innards with used tampons and called it Sony Gaystation! people will still blindly run in buy the machine and declare it the greatest thing since slice bread.

I'm sure there are many people who blindly believe every bit of Sony pro hype and lovingly dismiss any negative press it recieves.

I'm sorry buth there really are a lot of stupid people out there, who really are like Sheep - following what advertising industry tell them to.

When failed promises, over hyped specs, and a heap of ******** did the playstation 2 no harm, PS3 is only following the exact same game, and I'm sure will be just as successful.



Whilst i'm wise to the bullcrap. I will pick up a ps3, because there are some games that look promising. If the only way I'm going to be able to play them is to buy this over priced, fecal covered, tampon inserted Sony Gaystation... :p then I guess that's what I'll have to do....

At least my 360 & Wii will have company :)

Umm... isnt that a little harsh towards gay people? o.o

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 12:49 PM
Umm... isnt that a little harsh towards gay people? o.o

LOL! No.... :p Sony Gaystation, just a play on words... Playstation~Gaystation

I'm refering to gay being used in the same context as 'crap' 'useless' 'sad', rather than gay in the direct context of homosexuality.

Trust me gay people know the difference and are not that easily offended... :D

ChrisK018
Aug 30, 2006, 01:00 PM
Unless I see some news about how EA Sports, Square Enix and Konami are pulling their titles, I don't see a GPU downgrade as a major problem.

Sony is digging itself into a hole with the PS3-- but with some solid, exclusive hit games they can probably live to see another console.

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 01:04 PM
Unless I see some news about how EA Sports, Square Enix and Konami are pulling their titles, I don't see a GPU downgrade as a major problem.

Sony is digging itself into a hole with the PS3-- but with some solid, exclusive hit games they can probably live to see another console.

Yep. Hey it's all about the games. So it wont be able to push a few extra polygons... Most people wouldnt see the difference.

Sony maybe digging itsellf into a hole, but it's also a master at the art of PR 'spin'.

Only a delay (which I predicted for Europe regardless) to the launch date in US & Japan would do them 'real' harm.

Ja Di ksw
Aug 30, 2006, 01:13 PM
I'm refering to gay being used in the same context as 'crap' 'useless' 'sad', rather than gay in the direct context of homosexuality.

Trust me gay people know the difference and are not that easily offended... :D

Yes, what people fail to realize when they get worried after you write that is that you've talked to every gay person and straight person with gay friends / family and found out they're ok with it. And you had them hooked up to a lie detector at the time, so you know they were being honest with you.

That, or you know one or two gay people and somehow mistook them for every gay person on earth.

BoyBach
Aug 30, 2006, 01:14 PM
So, Sony has alleged changed spec's of the PS3 and production hasn't started yet but they are still going to release it worldwide in two months with two million units available at launch, and have four million units 'out in the wild' by the year end?

Yeah, right!

GFLPraxis
Aug 30, 2006, 01:18 PM
You teh sux0r 2 sae teh PS3 is not going to teh r0x0r! Yew lie, yew 360 luvr. U teh sux! U maek thing up, go die!!!1111one!1!!!1 heheheheh


What terrible l33tsp34k! If they truly want to be l33t, they'd write like this.


Y0u t3h sux0r 2 s43 73h PS3 i5 n07 g0i|\|g 70 73h r0x0r! Y3w 1i3, y3w 360 1uvr. U 73h sux! U m43k 7hi|\|g up, g0 di3!!!1111one!1!!!1


I read 13375p34k fluently ;)

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 01:21 PM
Yes, what people fail to realize when they get worried after you write that is that you've talked to every gay person and straight person with gay friends / family and found out they're ok with it. And you had them hooked up to a lie detector at the time, so you know they were being honest with you.

That, or you know one or two gay people and somehow mistook them for every gay person on earth.

:rolleyes: I'm gay - get over it! And yes I've discussed the issue in depth with many gay people. Jesus - it's so funny that as one of the few gay people of the forums, I'm the one accused of being homophobic... :rolleyes:

While i dont speak for every gay person or claim to, I have more of an insight than the straight 'political correctness' police on this forum..... :p

Ja Di ksw
Aug 30, 2006, 01:31 PM
:rolleyes: I'm gay - get over it! And yes I've discussed the issue in depth with many gay people. Jesus - it's so funny that as one of the few gay people of the forums, I'm the one accused of being homophobic... :rolleyes:

I love the straight 'political correctness' police on this forum..... :p

You may be gay, but that doesn't mean you speak for everyone. I know black people that are offended when other black people say the word nig--. No one is accusing you of being homophobic, what people are saying is that others might feel differently about your word use than you do.

BoyBach
Aug 30, 2006, 01:34 PM
What terrible l33tsp34k! If they truly want to be l33t, they'd write like this.


Y0u t3h sux0r 2 s43 73h PS3 i5 n07 g0i|\|g 70 73h r0x0r! Y3w 1i3, y3w 360 1uvr. U 73h sux! U m43k 7hi|\|g up, g0 di3!!!1111one!1!!!1


I read 13375p34k fluently ;)


Eh? :eek:

Can somebody please translate that for me?

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 01:36 PM
You may be gay, but that doesn't mean you speak for everyone. I never said I did !!! :rolleyes:

Eh? :eek:

Can somebody please translate that for me?

You the sucker *** **** PS3 is not going to *** ?????? man I give up!! What does it say??

zap2
Aug 30, 2006, 01:37 PM
You may be gay, but that doesn't mean you speak for everyone. I know black people that are offended when other black people say the word nig--. No one is accusing you of being homophobic, what people are saying is that others might feel differently about your word use than you do.


Then maybe he just doesn't care about what other people think? Perhaps MRU is a jerk and has no friends because he is always mocking gays people.(even thought he is gay) :rolleyes:

But onto the PS3 losing GPU power..its bad, as its the place it was weaker then the 360 from the start..if it had lost a little CPU power, who cares its stronger then the 360, the GPU however needs all the power it can get

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 01:42 PM
Then maybe he just doesn't care about what other people think? Perhaps MRU is a jerk and has no friends because he is always mocking gays people.(even thought he is gay)

:confused: :rolleyes: :confused:

When am I always mocking gay people? When am I making personal attacks on people in the forum?

zap2
Aug 30, 2006, 01:47 PM
:confused: :rolleyes: :confused:

When am I always mocking gay people? When am I making personal attacks on people in the forum?


The "perhaps" met to make it a sarcastic statement, clearly you don't do those things. Few people on this whole forum go for the personal attacks(some spammers do buts thats it)

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 01:50 PM
The "perhaps" met to make it a sarcastic statement, clearly you don't do those things. Few people on this whole forum go for the personal attacks(some spammers do buts thats it)

Well I thought that's what you meant - but you forgot to add the ;)

;) MRU :D

By the way Zap has House season 3 started stateside yet? Is it true it's the final series?

----------

On topic again..

Wont the supposed added benefit and horsepower of the CPU make up for the loss in GPU speed? Also remember there was a similar thread started a while ago that rumored the CPU had been stepped down to 2.8ghz, but that turned out to be a turkey. Maybe this is too?

zap2
Aug 30, 2006, 01:52 PM
Well I thought that's what you meant - but you forgot to add the ;)

;) MRU :D

By the way Zap has House season 3 started stateside yet? Is it true it's the final series?


Fixed. It starts next week, Tuesday for 2hrs..i sure hope its not the last season..i don't really see reason to end it, as it has good ratings

BoyBach
Aug 30, 2006, 01:53 PM
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.09/sony.html
not a bad article, kinda long but makes you wonder about the direction Sony is going


Nice find! :)

The writer and the people quoted back up my own thoughts about the current state of Sony. That is that unless they get a rocket up the arse, they're doomed! :D

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 01:59 PM
Fixed. It starts next week, Tuesday for 2hrs..i sure hope its not the last season..i don't really see reason to end it, as it has good ratings

Yeah I heard that Hugh Laurie wants too much money or some such. It's a great series - i watch it repeatedly most nights on Hallmark..

Nice find! :)

The writer and the people quoted back up my own thoughts about the current state of Sony. That is that unless they get a rocket up the arse, they're doomed! :D

Interesting article, but maybe I'm being thick? how come it's dated 14/09/06 ?

BoyBach
Aug 30, 2006, 02:04 PM
Interesting article, but maybe I'm being thick? how come it's dated 14/09/06 ?


At a guess, either it's from the September issue of the magazine, or Wired have a time machine :eek:

BlizzardBomb
Aug 30, 2006, 02:15 PM
Yeah I heard that Hugh Laurie wants too much money or some such. It's a great series - i watch it repeatedly most nights on Hallmark..



Interesting article, but maybe I'm being thick? how come it's dated 14/09/06 ?

It's the American version so its dated on 09/14/06. Errr... wait that doesn't work either.

zap2
Aug 30, 2006, 02:20 PM
Yeah I heard that Hugh Laurie wants too much money or some such.



That would suck..House is my favorite show...i hope they give it to him, or he lowers what he wants because its a great show

Eraserhead
Aug 30, 2006, 02:32 PM
That would suck..House is my favorite show...i hope they give it to him, or he lowers what he wants because its a great show

Many excellent British shows *cough* the Office *cough* end after a couple of seasons rather than go on and on until they become a joke, maybe Laurie is trying to do the same with House. I do like House though it's a really good show, I got really addicted to it earlier this summer.

zap2
Aug 30, 2006, 02:36 PM
I would hope Fox gives him what he wants..a few more season please! It has won a good amount of awards, and has been nominated for a good amount more. But also i wouldn't want it to be over used, its a great show, and i hope they kill it off before it becomes a joke, but i'm hoping 5 season, if they can keep it up to how great it is today.

MacRumorUser
Aug 30, 2006, 02:44 PM
I would hope Fox gives him what he wants..a few more season please! It has won a good amount of awards, and has been nominated for a good amount more. But also i wouldn't want it to be over used, its a great show, and i hope they kill it off before it becomes a joke, but i'm hoping 5 season, if they can keep it up to how great it is today.

how would they kill it off? Oh I know...

Give House the mystery disease ? With him incapacitated there would be no-one to cure it :)

I assume it will depend on viewing figures. If it continue to recieve awards and attract high viewing figures fox will pay whatever it takes to keep him.

Just read up - His original contract was for 24 months / 2 seasons. After the success they signed him up for a third season - but he has demanded a huge pay increase to reflect the shows popularity - nearly $300,000 per episode. (from 400k per season previously)

So they basically are not commiting to a fourth season and playing it by ear. But he has been signed for a full third series. So should audience figures go belly up they will at least end the show on a full third series rather than pullled halway through....

However with an estimated 17.2 million US viewers - the chances are we will be seeing it for a long time.

zap2
Aug 30, 2006, 03:04 PM
how would they kill it off? Oh I know...

Give House the mystery disease ? With him incapacitated there would be no-one to cure it :)

I assume it will depend on viewing figures. If it continue to recieve awards and attract high viewing figures fox will pay whatever it takes to keep him.

Just read up - His original contract was for 24 months / 2 seasons. After the success they signed him up for a third season - but he has demanded a huge pay increase to reflect the shows popularity - nearly $300,000 per episode. (from 400k per season previously)

So they basically are not commiting to a fourth season and playing it by ear. But he has been signed for a full third series. So should audience figures go belly up they will at least end the show on a full third series rather than pullled halway through....

However with an estimated 17.2 million US viewers - the chances are we will be seeing it for a long time.


Wow 300k per episode..thats a lot.. William Petersen from CSI(Plays Grissom) makes about 100 per episode which i thought was alot(it still is but 300k makes it look smaller) i hope the keep paying him until the end of a season, i don't want it just to end in the middle of one.

Dagless
Aug 30, 2006, 03:10 PM
Many excellent British shows *cough* the Office *cough* end after a couple of seasons rather than go on and on until they become a joke, maybe Laurie is trying to do the same with House. I do like House though it's a really good show, I got really addicted to it earlier this summer.

Exactly my sentiments. If something is great then don't let it dwindle and fade away. The Office, Phoenix Nights, Fawlty Towers. leave a good history.

Mavimao
Aug 30, 2006, 03:10 PM
Y0u t3h sux0r 2 s43 73h PS3 i5 n07 g0i|\|g 70 73h r0x0r! Y3w 1i3, y3w 360 1uvr. U 73h sux! U m43k 7hi|\|g up, g0 di3!!!1111one!1!!!1


You the suxxor, she the PS3 is not going to the rocksor. You lie, you 360 lover, you the sucks. you make things up. Go die!


That's the best I can make of it.

(do I get a cookie?)

AP_piano295
Aug 30, 2006, 03:23 PM
You the suxxor, she the PS3 is not going to the rocksor. You lie, you 360 lover, you the sucks. you make things up. Go die!


That's the best I can make of it.

(do I get a cookie?)

lmao

greatdevourer
Aug 30, 2006, 03:30 PM
Exactly my sentiments. If something is great then don't let it dwindle and fade away. The Office, Phoenix Nights, Fawlty Towers. leave a good history. Hence how Dr Who did/does so well - they can completely change it all every few years

Mackilroy
Aug 30, 2006, 03:46 PM
You the suxxor, she the PS3 is not going to the rocksor. You lie, you 360 lover, you the sucks. you make things up. Go die!


That's the best I can make of it.

(do I get a cookie?)

No, you quoted it wrong. ;)

The correct translation is this:

You the suck to say the PS3 is not going to the rocks! You lie, you 360 lover. You the sucks! You make things up, go die!!!!!!!!

BoyBach
Aug 30, 2006, 04:50 PM
You the suxxor, she the PS3 is not going to the rocksor. You lie, you 360 lover, you the sucks. you make things up. Go die!


That's the best I can make of it.

(do I get a cookie?)


Yes! :)

Mavimao
Aug 30, 2006, 05:00 PM
Mackilroy's the winner! He gets the cookie!

XNine
Aug 30, 2006, 05:13 PM
Until the actual specs of the machine are posted on Sony's website, I won't believe it, which goes to say I won't believe anything from anyone until it's posted there.

paddy
Aug 30, 2006, 05:13 PM
You know all the fanboy talk like this -

"Y0u t3h sux0r 2 s43 73h PS3 i5 n07 g0i|\|g 70 73h r0x0r! Y3w 1i3, y3w 360 1uvr. U 73h sux! U m43k 7hi|\|g up, g0 di3!!!1111one!1!!!1"?

I've never actually seen any of this kind of speak on any forums, links to any forum like this please? I'd love to see this kind of speech being used in a serious manner! (I need a good laugh).

XNine
Aug 30, 2006, 05:16 PM
You know all the fanboy talk like this -

"Y0u t3h sux0r 2 s43 73h PS3 i5 n07 g0i|\|g 70 73h r0x0r! Y3w 1i3, y3w 360 1uvr. U 73h sux! U m43k 7hi|\|g up, g0 di3!!!1111one!1!!!1"?

I've never actually seen any of this kind of speak on any forums, links to any forum like this please? I'd love to see this kind of speech being used in a serious manner! (I need a good laugh).

It's generally used by stupid 12 year olds, stupid 15 year old gamers in mid-game, and people who joke about it.

killr_b
Aug 30, 2006, 06:39 PM
You know all the fanboy talk like this -

"Y0u t3h sux0r 2 s43 73h PS3 i5 n07 g0i|\|g 70 73h r0x0r! Y3w 1i3, y3w 360 1uvr. U 73h sux! U m43k 7hi|\|g up, g0 di3!!!1111one!1!!!1"?

I've never actually seen any of this kind of speak on any forums, links to any forum like this please? I'd love to see this kind of speech being used in a serious manner! (I need a good laugh).


www.Myspace.com (http://www.myspace.com):D

sikkinixx
Aug 30, 2006, 07:39 PM
lol i love when threads get too long and lose track of whatever the original topic was!

Im wondering if House should end, I found towards the tail end of the second season that the 'formula' it follows (ie. think its one thing, its not, almost kill patient, try again, house sees some chance encounter, BAM cure) was starting to get a little predictable, but then again I didnt see the lresult of the ast episode of season 2 coming so maybe im just out of it or something...