(Safari (3.0) Won't Be Included With The Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update)

[STEPHEN SNELL]

Since when that You've heard that Safari (3.0) is going to be included in the Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update? It would be nice because I'm having Problems with Safari (2.0.4) (419.3), but I highly doubt that they're going To-Do A that big of jump in "Tiger" since Safari (3.0) is Reserved for Mac OS X (10.5) "Leopard". It's like saying that Mail (3.0) is Coming-Out in the Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update too. NOTE: the only reason why Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update is so very huge is because they've been Working on it for almost (6 Months) now.

[epochblue]

Since when that You've heard that Safari (3.0) is going to be included in the Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update? It would be nice because I'm having Problems with Safari (2.0.4) (419.3), but I highly doubt that they're going To-Do A that big of jump in "Tiger" since Safari (3.0) is Reserved for Mac OS X (10.5) "Leopard". It's like saying that Mail (3.0) is Coming-Out in the Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update too. NOTE: the only reason why Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update is so very huge is because they've been Working on it for almost (6 Months) now.

If you're having trouble with the current default Safari version, you could try to use the WebKit nightlies at http://webkit.org/.

[Thinine]

And what's with the randomly capitalized letters?

And who ever said that 10.4.9 would include a new Safari?

[nickster9224]

anyone know when 10.4.9 is comin out

[gavd]

anyone know when 10.4.9 is comin out

No-one will know for definite until they release it.

[mduser63]

anyone know when 10.4.9 is comin out

Of course not.

As for the question about 10.4.9 including Safari 3.0, I'm sure it won't as that's a Leopard only feature. However, 10.3.9 did include an update to Safari so that it used the same rendering engine as the Tiger version of Safari (Safari 2.0) which meant better rendering compliance. The same kind of thing could very well happen with 10.4.9 (or whatever the last Tiger update is).

[Le Big Mac]

Of course not.

As for the question about 10.4.9 including Safari 3.0, I'm sure it won't as that's a Leopard only feature. However, 10.3.9 did include an update to Safari so that it used the same rendering engine as the Tiger version of Safari (Safari 2.0) which meant better rendering compliance. The same kind of thing could very well happen with 10.4.9 (or whatever the last Tiger update is).


that seems like the most likely and sensible course.

[fowler.]

does anyone have experience with Safari 3.0 or the latest builds of WebKit?

they don't seem to render as well as the standard version.

for example, Google Reader is totally wonky. I guess that's all I can think of at the moment :p, but still. kind of annoying.

[nazmac21]

anyone know when 10.4.9 is comin out

Could be this Friday as the last Mac OS X Update (10.4.8) was released on a Friday.

[epochblue]

does anyone have experience with Safari 3.0 or the latest builds of WebKit?

they don't seem to render as well as the standard version.

for example, Google Reader is totally wonky. I guess that's all I can think of at the moment :p, but still. kind of annoying.

I'd submit this to the WebKit team, if it hasn't been already. No sense in backtracking with the rendering engine :)

[mdriftmeyer]

Unless you're using Google's nightly builds of it's Toolbar you better expect it to flake out. They most certainly inherit in their ObjC++ classes from Apple's classes. Apple's API is in-flux and is merging in with KHTML/KJS so that they both work much more cohesively.

I can tell you that the WebKit SVN definitely is more CSS2.1/Javascript1.6/CSS3 compliant than the latest release of Safari.

I could careless whether 10.4.9 includes Leopard's Safari 3.0 UI. I want the compliancy fixes first and foremost.

[STEPHEN SNELL]

Don't look @ Me because someone else said that. You should learn to Read more better.

[mdhankins]

Don't look @ Me because someone else said that. You should learn to Read more better.

I believe that we're looking @ you because you started this thread

I hate to break it to you, but you should learn to Write more better... :p

[STEPHEN SNELL]

Originally Posted by mduser63
Of course not.

As for the question about 10.4.9 including Safari 3.0, I'm sure it won't as that's a Leopard only feature. However, 10.3.9 did include an update to Safari so that it used the same rendering engine as the Tiger version of Safari (Safari 2.0) which meant better rendering compliance. The same kind of thing could very well happen with 10.4.9 (or whatever the last Tiger update is).


He did duh. Read!!!

[mduser63]

Originally Posted by mduser63
Of course not.

As for the question about 10.4.9 including Safari 3.0, I'm sure it won't as that's a Leopard only feature. However, 10.3.9 did include an update to Safari so that it used the same rendering engine as the Tiger version of Safari (Safari 2.0) which meant better rendering compliance. The same kind of thing could very well happen with 10.4.9 (or whatever the last Tiger update is).


He did duh. Read!!!

How old are you? Your posts don't make any sense to me.

[rogersmj]

Yeah I'm having a hell of a time making any sense of this thread myself. A few tips: write in complete sentences, at least try to spell everything correctly, lay off the Random caps, and (what's with) all the (parentheses)?

[Wild-Bill]

Don't look @ Me because someone else said that. You should learn to Read more better.

Dude,

The last time you posted in here was June 8th 2006. And the post back then had some incoherent rambling about the update to 10.47.

What's your deal? And Why (the) Random capitalization weirdNess ?

[Scarlet Fever]

were we even expecting Safari 3 with 10.4.9, or have i missed something?

[epochblue]

were we even expecting Safari 3 with 10.4.9, or have i missed something?

It's not a rumor I'd ever heard, nor do they typically ship the next version of a program with an OS update (at least not that I'm aware).

[Father Jack]

Don't look @ Me because someone else said that. You should learn to Read more better.
Your English are good. :(

FJ

[clevin]

were we even expecting Safari 3 with 10.4.9, or have i missed something?

well, normally ppl only expecting 2.x for Tiger. or they can switch to gecko/opera if they don't want to buy new OS.

[Markleshark]

Too many brackets in the OP for me... Whats the point of this thread?

Oh, well I wasnt expecting any Safari updates anyway.

Don't look @ Me because someone else said that. You should learn to Read more better.

lmco, you should also maybe learn to Write more better...

[kwood]

It's not a rumor I'd ever heard, nor do they typically ship the next version of a program with an OS update (at least not that I'm aware).

This is the first time I have ever heard of this rumor. Not that it particularly matters. Is Safari 2 available for Panther? My understanding of the versions are as follows:

Mac OS X 10.2.8 and Safari 1.X
Mac OS X 10.3.X and Safari 1.X
Mac OS X 10.4.X and Safari 2.X

That being Said I know Safari didn't come with 10.2 but was downloadable (either in the 10.2.8 update or separately). I am not completely sure about this, but if someone knows the answer to this then it may provide a hint to the inclusiveness of Safari 3.X in 10.4.9.

My guess is that Safari 3.0 will be for 10.5, but we could always ask a developer who has 10.4.9 seeded to them.

[tombarnes]

This is such a bizarre thread. Is a massive assumption being made here? It's just i have never heard anyone mention safari 3.0 coming with 10.4.9. Its all a bit weird.

Also stop using (brackets) so much!

[STEPHEN SNELL]

This is such a bizarre thread. Is a massive assumption being made here? It's just i have never heard anyone mention safari 3.0 coming with 10.4.9. Its all a bit weird.

Also stop using (brackets) so much!

No, someone else mentioned it, not Me, but however, I'd like to see "Apple" to Update to Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update because Safari (2.0.4) really sucks. If "Apple" doesn't do A Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update, then I'm really hoping that I can get my Hands on "Leopard" pretty quick here.

[epochblue]

I'd like to see "Apple" to Update to Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update because Safari (2.0.4) really sucks.

This confuses me. What about Safari 2.0.4 "really sucks?" I use it on a daily basis and find the experience to be an absolute delight. Are there specific websites that don't work for you? Does it crash? You're being vague about what exactly the problem is...

[Superdrive]

I'm waiting for 10.4.10.

[STEPHEN SNELL]

Ever since I'ved Upgraded to "Tiger" Safari has been A (JOKE) because when I've got A Open Window on top of the other and when I close it, then the whole entire Program will Crash on Me. Plus, the stupid Downloads won't Work and so I use Opera instead.

[crees!]

And what's with the randomly capitalized letters?

And who ever said that 10.4.9 would include a new Safari?

And why does the post start off like we're already in the middle of a discussion?

[wordmunger]

I agree. Safari sucks. Every time I use it I head right back to firefox, instead of speculating about when the next version might appear, and whether it might suck less.

[mduser63]

Ever since I'ved Upgraded to "Tiger" Safari has been A (JOKE) because when I've got A Open Window on top of the other and when I close it, then the whole entire Program will Crash on Me. Plus, the stupid Downloads won't Work and so I use Opera instead.

I'd just like this opportunity to tell you that it's not generally considered to be acceptable to invent your own new rules of grammar and syntax. Capital letters are essentially for proper nouns and the word 'I'. Parentheses are not meant to be used for emphasis, rather they are used to insert a non-essential but interesting or clarifying phrase into a sentence. If a sentence doesn't read right with the parenthetical clauses removed, then parentheses are not appropriate in that case. Does that make sense?

I still think this thread is downright bizarre. My advice would be to switch to another browser like Camino or Firefox if you don't like Safari. Apple isn't going to release Safari 3.0 for Tiger. Sorry.

[IJ Reilly]

No, someone else mentioned it, not Me, but however, I'd like to see "Apple" to Update to Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update because Safari (2.0.4) really sucks. If "Apple" doesn't do A Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update, then I'm really hoping that I can get my Hands on "Leopard" pretty quick here.

I'd like to help you but my brain just exploded.

[mad jew]

Most of the capital letters are in reference to the original poster. Maybe STEPHEN SNELL is the Lord.

[quangdiggity]

Is this "MacRumors" thread A (JOKE)?

[bearbo]

Ever since I'ved Upgraded to "Tiger" Safari has been A (JOKE) because when I've got A Open Window on top of the other and when I close it, then the whole entire Program will Crash on Me. Plus, the stupid Downloads won't Work and so I use Opera instead.

are you even using mac? or just on a dell?

[ppnkg]

I'd just like this opportunity to tell you that it's not generally considered to be acceptable to invent your own new rules of grammar and syntax. Capital letters are essentially for proper nouns and the word 'I'. Parentheses are not meant to be used for emphasis, rather they are used to insert a non-essential but interesting or clarifying phrase into a sentence. If a sentence doesn't read right with the parenthetical clauses removed, then parentheses are not appropriate in that case. Does that make sense?


No no wait! Give the guy a chance to explain his grammar rules! This could make the thread interesting after all!

StePheN will (YOU) ExpLaiN(?):confused:

[rogersmj]

This thread was making my head hurt, but you guys just made me LOL :)

I'd like to help you but my brain just exploded.

That's the feeling I had. I don't know about the rest of you, but whenever I read something the punctuation creates different "tones" in my head. So when I'm reading this guy's posts, where every sentence has a half dozen randomly capitalized words, nested parentheses, and quotes everywhere, by the time I get to the end of the post by brain has, like IJ Reilly's, exploded.

[sorryiwasdreami]

No, someone else mentioned it, not Me, but however, I'd like to see "Apple" to Update to Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update because Safari (2.0.4) really sucks. If "Apple" doesn't do A Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update, then I'm really hoping that I can get my Hands on "Leopard" pretty quick here.

Maybe some form of code lies in his posts, an anagram if you will.

[MonkeyClaw]

((MayBe iTs "A" neW)((lAnguaGe or sOmethin(g)...")

[fklehman]

lawl

[solvs]

I can only assume the original poster was trying to reply to a comment in another thread and accidentally started a new thread. As for the "red more better" part, it pretty much speaks for itself. No, Safari 3 isn't in 10.4.9. Keep using Opera or FF or whatever.

Had you approached this better and maybe asked for help with Safari instead of, whatever it is you're doing, maybe we could have helped you, but even if we knew what you were talking about, now we probably wouldn't want to.

[dpaanlka]

No, someone else mentioned it, not Me, but however, I'd like to see "Apple" to Update to Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update because Safari (2.0.4) really sucks. If "Apple" doesn't do A Safari (3.0) in Mac OS X (10.4.9) Update, then I'm really hoping that I can get my Hands on "Leopard" pretty quick here.

What the... where did you get the idea that Safari 3 was supposed to come out with 10.4.9? Can you show us or something? Are we understanding you right? And why are you quoting "Apple" - do you not believe the company is really called Apple?

[Daiden]

Most likely Safari will use Leopard exclusive features, so I doubt we'll see it in a Tiger release.

[STEPHEN SNELL]

I'm using A PowerPC G4 Mac and no I'm not the Lord.:eek: :eek: :eek:

[psychofreak]

I'm using A PowerPC G4 Mac and no I'm not the Lord.:eek: :eek: :eek:

Here's a quickie: Why do you Say tiger User in (YOUR) signature, as well as 10.4.8?

[Nutter]

But the real question, Why is Apple won't be including Calculater Widget 2.0 with The Mac OS X (10.4.9) update? I was been using Calculater Widget 1 but it really sucks because (it) crashes when I divide.

[dpaanlka]

I just wanted to let every one know that I really enjoy this thread and I hope it does not get wastelanded very very soon because that would be a horrible thing and A true loss for The "MacRumors" (community).

[STEPHEN SNELL]

Because I like it. And what does the Widget Calculater has to do with on what We're talking about???

[IJ Reilly]

I just wanted to let every one know that I really enjoy this thread and I hope it does not get wastelanded very very soon because that would be a horrible thing and A true loss for The "MacRumors" (community).

Well that's just Your (opinion).

[Stridder44]

Don't look @ Me because someone else said that. You should learn to Read more better.


lol I hope this is a joke.

Now why the hell is this news? I swear guys you really amaze me with some of your speculation sometimes. Safari 3.0 won't be in 10.4.9 you say!? Gasp! Surly this couldn't be because Safari 3.0 is a part/feature of Leopard.

You know I also hear that Time Machine won't even be in the 10.4.9 update. The nerve... :rolleyes:

[STEPHEN SNELL]

Boy, You Guys are way off track here. I'm talking about Safari and You're off in A totally different subject than I am.

[Shadow]

Boy, You Guys are way off track here. I'm talking about Safari and You're off in A totally different subject than I am.

That's because No-One can (UNDERSTAND) Your posts.

[QCassidy352]

You know I also hear that Time Machine won't even be in the 10.4.9 update. The nerve... :rolleyes:

Well That's the lAst straW ThEn, I'm definitely NoT (BUying) 10.4.9!

[Tymmz]

This is a wired thread! May I ask where the OP (original poster) is from?

Seriously!

(TyMmZ)™

[kwood]

Boy, You Guys are way off track here. I'm talking about Safari and You're off in A totally different subject than I am.

Oh dear......I can't take it anymore...... No one understands what you are talking about. No one knows where you got your information from or even what rumor you are referencing.

That and the grammar is bad. The Random Capitols and the use homonyms in your post also makes it difficult to reed and get the General Heir of what you are trying say. I will have tiers of Joy like reign when eye understand what you mean.