jefhatfield
Oct 20, 2003, 08:08 AM
...same thing anyway and dot.com showed the world that
in northern california, i know of only one person personally that made any money in dot.com but he was a VC and he was involved in insider stuff like they usually are...and made millions taking over companies and selling it for its parts like danny devito's character in "other people's money"
i personally don't like to gamble but the time i went to las vegas, i played the slots and nothing happened...then at the airport on the way back to california, i hit three jackpots...but they were nickels so it wasn't a big deal but it was a major rush anyway
i know of two people who gave up coffee in the morning and spend two of three dollars on lottery tickets and even though they spent over ten grand over the years each, sometimes they would win 3 grand or a thousand or five hundred a few times...but overall they lost more than they won by at least 30 percent
but it's still more lucrative to win seven grand back out of ten grand spent (two or three dollars at a time) instead of spending ten grand on coffee and cigatettes over a ten year time period and having weakened health as a result and getting no money back in return...when my friends would win five hundred to several thousand on a ticket, they would go on vacation or buy a new tv or something...again contrast that against the equally expensive cigarette or coffee habit they gave up in exchange for lotto or scratchers
so you say that a 70 cent return on a dollar is a waste? maybe so, but better than dot.coms and stocks have given back in general over the past few years...my friend put tons of money into all kinds of stocks a few years ago going for medium to aggressive investment approaches...and for the the late 90s into 2000, he did well...then the sh## hit the fan and he, along with millions of other americans, have not recovered yet
a few months ago, one of wall street's top investors was a guest on abcnews radio and he pulled out of the market before the fall and has not put a dime back into stocks, bonds, or anything in the investment field in three years...he retained his earnings but has not made a dime since then but he did mention that, even so, he did better than any investor in america...he was the only major investor/commentator/writer in financial circles who completely avoided dot.com and tech stocks and even though there were other big time investment gurus who warned others to stay clear of high tech, he was the only one who actually steered clear of it:p
ps... a relative i know made a good deal of money in real estate in the 70s only to lose it all and rack up mind boggling debt...after paying off debts and breaking even...he supposedly learned his lesson and remained rather happy and stable living paycheck to paycheck
then dot.com arrived and he made even a larger fortune and lost it in a few days when the bubble of dot.com and high tech burst but at least this time, he ended up at zero and not hundreds of thousands in debt...again, he is happy living paycheck to paycheck and having amassed two short lived fortunes quickly, only to see it evaporate twice even more quickly, i hope he has learned his lesson:p
in northern california, i know of only one person personally that made any money in dot.com but he was a VC and he was involved in insider stuff like they usually are...and made millions taking over companies and selling it for its parts like danny devito's character in "other people's money"
i personally don't like to gamble but the time i went to las vegas, i played the slots and nothing happened...then at the airport on the way back to california, i hit three jackpots...but they were nickels so it wasn't a big deal but it was a major rush anyway
i know of two people who gave up coffee in the morning and spend two of three dollars on lottery tickets and even though they spent over ten grand over the years each, sometimes they would win 3 grand or a thousand or five hundred a few times...but overall they lost more than they won by at least 30 percent
but it's still more lucrative to win seven grand back out of ten grand spent (two or three dollars at a time) instead of spending ten grand on coffee and cigatettes over a ten year time period and having weakened health as a result and getting no money back in return...when my friends would win five hundred to several thousand on a ticket, they would go on vacation or buy a new tv or something...again contrast that against the equally expensive cigarette or coffee habit they gave up in exchange for lotto or scratchers
so you say that a 70 cent return on a dollar is a waste? maybe so, but better than dot.coms and stocks have given back in general over the past few years...my friend put tons of money into all kinds of stocks a few years ago going for medium to aggressive investment approaches...and for the the late 90s into 2000, he did well...then the sh## hit the fan and he, along with millions of other americans, have not recovered yet
a few months ago, one of wall street's top investors was a guest on abcnews radio and he pulled out of the market before the fall and has not put a dime back into stocks, bonds, or anything in the investment field in three years...he retained his earnings but has not made a dime since then but he did mention that, even so, he did better than any investor in america...he was the only major investor/commentator/writer in financial circles who completely avoided dot.com and tech stocks and even though there were other big time investment gurus who warned others to stay clear of high tech, he was the only one who actually steered clear of it:p
ps... a relative i know made a good deal of money in real estate in the 70s only to lose it all and rack up mind boggling debt...after paying off debts and breaking even...he supposedly learned his lesson and remained rather happy and stable living paycheck to paycheck
then dot.com arrived and he made even a larger fortune and lost it in a few days when the bubble of dot.com and high tech burst but at least this time, he ended up at zero and not hundreds of thousands in debt...again, he is happy living paycheck to paycheck and having amassed two short lived fortunes quickly, only to see it evaporate twice even more quickly, i hope he has learned his lesson:p
