Best movie trilogy

[edesignuk]

Following on from this (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=9750) thread, what do you think is the best film trilogy, for me it has to be the Die Hard Trilogy.

[billiam0878]

I'm going to go with The Godfather, though I really enjoyed Star Wars (episodes IV-VI).

Bill

[topicolo]

I'm guessing that the Matrix and the Lord of the Rings trilogies will be up there in a couple of years.

Star Wars has just sunk down a few spots due to the recent crap they've put out (tarnishes the originals)

[stoid]

Originally posted by topicolo
Star Wars has just sunk down a few spots due to the recent crap they've put out (tarnishes the originals)

Not to start a flame war, but I love the prequels!! I think that as standalone movie they do suck, but when viewed in light of the originals, they are very good. Also, Empire Strikes Back is the greatest movie ever, and by far the best of the Trilogy.

[Ifeelbloated]

Leprechaun 1-3
I want me gold.

[ShaolinMiddleFinger]

Back To The Future

Indiana Jones

*quick note-Back To The Future Trilogy comes out on DVD Dec. 17

[alex_ant]

Originally posted by ShaolinMiddleFinger
Back To The Future

Indiana Jones
Definitely! Back to the Future needs to be on the list just for its sheer number of great quotes...

"Now make like a tree, and get outta here"

"Elaine, you're my density..."

"I am Darth Vader... from the planet... Vulcan!"

[macsurfer]

INDIANA JONES!!!

INDIANA JONES!!!

INDIANA JONES!!!

[peterjhill]

I would have to say that it will be The Lord of the Rings for me. I know it is not complete yet, but based on the first one, it is the top of my list.

Otherwise:
Resevoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown

[Paladin]

Best Trilogy - From Dusk 'Til Dawn 1-3...or have they sent already sent a number 4 straight to video? What was Tarantino thinking?

[edesignuk]

Originally posted by peterjhill
Otherwise:
Resevoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown
Erm....hello...trilogy meaning 3 :rolleyes:
I don't remember there being Pulp Fiction 1, 2 and 3.

[peterjhill]

Originally posted by verbose101

Erm....hello...trilogy meaning 3 :rolleyes:
I don't remember there being Pulp Fiction 1, 2 and 3.

Err hello, the three movies were related to one another. Some movies that are part of a trilogy don't follow one story thread.

Look at the "New Jersey Trilogy" as it is called by it's writer/director Kevin Smith. Not only are Clerks, MallRats, and Jay and Silent Bob Strike back part of different stories, with different names that don't end in 1 2 or three, but some of the characters are played by the same actor, yet are playing different characters. You must have woken up on the wrong side of the bed this morning, judging by your posts today.

I would say that the movies that I mentioned all took place in the same "world" and are related to one another, and thus fulfil the definition of trilogy.

As yet another example, look at La Femme Nikita and The Professional. Luc Besson calls The Professional a sequal to La Femme Nikita, even though Jean Reno's character dies in both movies!

Maybe you can start a thread and ask people what their favorite three movies whose titles differ only in the numbers at the end of them, and that the number of movies is not greater than three. Would that make you feel better?

[edesignuk]

Ok mate, chill, I don't want to start any arguments, whatever is cool :D

[Geert]

Originally posted by macsurfer
INDIANA JONES!!!

INDIANA JONES!!!

INDIANA JONES!!!

Same Here, Indiana Jones.

(though, LOTR when fininshed, will be the next number one I guess, shared first place I'dd say)

[Durandal7]

The original Star Wars trilogy.

The Indiana Jones and Austin Powers trilogies come in second.

[job]

Indiana Jones...

Although they are apparently planning on making a 4th one with Harrison Ford....

[GeeYouEye]

Star Wars, followed closely by Star Trek II, III, and IV.

[macsurfer]

Originally posted by peterjhill
I would have to say that it will be The Lord of the Rings for me. I know it is not complete yet, but based on the first one, it is the top of my list.

Otherwise:
Resevoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown

Ummm, that's not a trilogy, dude. That's just three movies by the same director. Don't argue with me, I earned my degree in Film History, Theory, and Criticism.

[Royal Pineapple]

STAR WARS IV, V, VI

LOTR, when its all relesed

Manhunter, Sclience of the Lambs, Hannabal
actually manhunter sucked but the other two were great.

and many more.

[scem0]

Well this is an ez question even though the 2nd 2 movies are yet 2 be released:

The Matrix trilogy

The Matrix - The Matrix Reloaded - The Matrix Revolutions

They are going to be tight - go to The Matrix Online (www.thematrixonline.com) to learn more about the sequels.

[Mr. Anderson]

I don't think you can actually say the best trilogy is something you haven't even seen. LOTR- Fellowship was good, but it really wasn't what you would call riveting. And the Matrix was great as well, but its all potential, and speculation - like a rumor that the new G5 is going to blow the doors off of every PC out there and say the *G5* is the best computer, even though no one's got one. Come on!

For me, I'd go with Indiana Jones or Austin Powers, Goldmember was fantastic.

And, the worst trilogy in my book has to be Highlander - the first one was great, but wow, did they really screw up the other two.

D

[scem0]

Originally posted by dukestreet
I don't think you can actually say the best trilogy is something you haven't even seen. LOTR- Fellowship was good, but it really wasn't what you would call riveting. And the Matrix was great as well, but its all potential, and speculation - like a rumor that the new G5 is going to blow the doors off of every PC out there and say the *G5* is the best computer, even though no one's got one. Come on!
D

That is true on some things. Like I couldnt say that if they made the tomb raider movie into a trilogy (angelina jolie) that it would be good. But LOTR and the Matrix were 'riveting' - and with the amount of time & money being spent on them - there is a good chance they will be awesome. And even if the second ones suck it will still be a good trilogy because of the 1st one.

[Mr. Anderson]

Originally posted by scem0
- and with the amount of time & money being spent on them - there is a good chance they will be awesome.

When has throwing time and money at a movie guarrenteed success and a good movie? Don't even get me started there.

And *a good chance* doesn't mean it will. You missed my point, anything not a trilogy thats been released shouldn't be considered - sure they all have potential - but its silly to say they are the best.

Thats all I'm saying, deal with it.

[Durandal7]

Originally posted by dukestreet

And, the worst trilogy in my book has to be Highlander - the first one was great, but wow, did they really screw up the other two.

D

You got that right. I loved the first one but the second one sucked. I mean, a hole in the ozone layer was the best plot they could get together. I haven't even bothered renting the third one yet.

[scem0]

I cant really say that LOTR will be good but I think it will, but as for the matrix I am sure it will. I have spent a lot of time researching it, and I have been dissapointed by absolutely none of what I have learned about it. The special effects in the first one were revolutionary, but the inside people on the matrix trilogy are saying that the special effects in this one can't be coppied. Just by looking at the trailer (available at thematrix.com) you can tell that the movie is gunna be awesome.

[brogers]

The first three Alien movies are the best ever....for me that is. The fourth one was garbage. Aliens is about the best movie I have ever seen!!!!

[edesignuk]

Originally posted by macsurfer


Ummm, that's not a trilogy, dude. That's just three movies by the same director. Don't argue with me, I earned my degree in Film History, Theory, and Criticism.
Thanku! That's what I said earlier on in the thread, but he wouldn't listen. :rolleyes:

[irmongoose]

Austin Powers. (And, as a million other people have said, The Matrix Trilogy, when it comes out, will PROBABLY be #1)




irmongoose

[MidnightRambler]

The Godfather - hands down (despite the piss-poor Godfather III).




You know, I could argue that several sets of Kubrick films qualify as trilogies (eg. Paths of Glory / Dr. Strangelove / Full Metal Jacket), but I would waste my breath.

[MidnightRambler]

I'm shocked that nobody's mentioned Mad Max / The Road Warrior / Beyond Thunderdome. ;)

[MidnightRambler]

Originally posted by macsurfer


Ummm, that's not a trilogy, dude. That's just three movies by the same director. Don't argue with me, I earned my degree in Film History, Theory, and Criticism.







Oh yeah?

tril·o·gy Pronunciation Key (trl-j)
n. pl. tril·o·gies
A group of three dramatic or literary works related in subject or theme.



Sort of a director-centric viewpoint you have there, 'eh? And don't argue with me, I make my living as a director.

[sturm375]

The Evil Dead Trilogy
-Evil Dead
-Evil Dead2
-Army of Darkness

Bruce Campell & Sam Rami Rock!!!!

[topicolo]

Originally posted by sturm375
The Evil Dead Trilogy
-Evil Dead
-Evil Dead2
-Army of Darkness

Bruce Campell & Sam Rami Rock!!!!
Hell yeah! (although I also liked the Ninja Turtles trilogy when I was 12 so that's not saying much):)

[P-Worm]

People, you are missing only the greatest trilogy of all time...Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles! I mean, come on, this is a given. This thread should be who is the coolest ninja turtle. My vote goes for Donatello.

[topicolo]

Donatello was a nerd! I would be Leonardo since he was a good leader. What was up with April? Did she ever shower? It's insane that a reporter would wear a yellow jumpsuit, not to mention the fact that she almost never changed her clothes.

[dnte42]

Groovy. Funny, the Evil Dead Trilogy should really only be two movies since 2 is just a PG-13 rated version of 1 (or is it the other way around? They are basically just the same movie :p ). Wonderfully crappy movies. I love all of the strange, low-budget camera effects. While not the best, I'd say the Lethal Weapon movies (well, 3 of the 4, I suppose) deserve and honorable mention.

[topicolo]

I think one of the worst would be the batman series. After 2, it just tanked and got all acid-laced and psychodelic.

[jefhatfield]

for foreign movies: red, white, blue

for domestic movies: rocky and pearl harbor;)

[kiwi_the_iwik]

Originally posted by dukestreet
And, the worst trilogy in my book has to be Highlander - the first one was great, but wow, did they really screw up the other two. D

You're not wrong there - goddammit. What were they thinking? Couldn't they leave it just with the first one? I mean - come on - the Planet ZEISST?!?!?

I saw that they made a fourth in the series - AVOID IT, at all costs...

It has to rank right down there with "Darkman".

In fact - perhaps we should change this thread to the WORST trilogies ever created. It seems as if everyone has an opinion on that.

For me, anyway, my "best" list (not in any particular order) is:

•The Godfather (Yes - 3 WAS crap, though)
•Die Hard (as above)
•Beverly Hills Cop (Shows it's age - and also, as above)
•Alien (They got progressively worse, but better than most)
•Lethal Weapon (funny moments, nice mullets...)
•Star Wars (Lousy dialogue, though - i.e. "Search your feelings..." aargh!)
•Indiana Jones (Just can't fault perfection...)
•Back To The Future (great for an adolescent, or kid at heart...)
•James Bond (Yes - I KNOW there's more than 3...)
•Rambo (Pure slapstick...)

And as for the "worst" list:

•Batman (Interesting - just didn't work. Nice platform for ailing stars)
•Darkman (What?!?!? WHY was it ever MADE?)
•Highlander (First is one of my fave's of ALL TIME - Kiss the others goodbye)
•Three Colours Red/White/Blue (If I WANTED a good read, I'd buy a book. I hate subtitles...)

[macsurfer]

Originally posted by MidnightRambler








Oh yeah?

tril·o·gy Pronunciation Key (trl-j)
n. pl. tril·o·gies
A group of three dramatic or literary works related in subject or theme.



Sort of a director-centric viewpoint you have there, 'eh? And don't argue with me, I make my living as a director.

Big Deal buddy, what do you direct? Cable Access commercials? They are not a trilogy. You remind me of the people in the production department who would cut their REQUIRED history, theory and criticism classes becasue "oh man they are such a waste of time, I want to make movies"....F*ckin idiots.

[peterjhill]

Originally posted by macsurfer


Big Deal buddy, what do you direct? Cable Access commercials? They are not a trilogy. You remind me of the people in the production department who would cut their REQUIRED history, theory and criticism classes becasue "oh man they are such a waste of time, I want to make movies"....F*ckin idiots.
webster.com:

Main Entry: tril·o·gy
Pronunciation: 'tri-l&-jE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -gies
Etymology: Greek trilogia, from tri- + -logia -logy
Date: circa 1661
: a series of three dramas or literary works or sometimes three musical compositions that are closely related and develop a single theme

Hurm, could the stories of LA lowlifes be part of a Theme? Compare it to Kieslowski's "Red" "White" and "Blue" to use the English titles. As many people in this thread have mentioned, it is also considered a trilogy. The second movie what not named Red II or Red Strikes Back. I don't understand why you feel the need to be such an ass. You are making all these judgements about other macrumors members, if you need to do it to feel better about yourself, then I feel bad for you. I think that just as Kevin Smith has his "New Jersey Trilogy" and Kieslowski has his "Colors Trilogy" that Quentin Tarantino has his "L.A. Trilogy"

Maybe it is not as obvious to some that it might fall into the trilogy category. I think that anyone who has seen Resivoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown would say that they are three dramas that are closely related, and develop a single theme. The theme being the semi-organized crime of L.A.

Open your mind to new ideas.

[Gus]

Sturm, you beat men to the Evil Dead movies! I love them (check my sig) and those are great flicks, and Sam is great too. Loved the new Spiderman flick.

They are cheesy, yes, but the techniques Sam used were fantastic, especially with the budget (or lack thereof) that he had.

Gus

[macsurfer]

Originally posted by peterjhill

webster.com:


Hurm, could the stories of LA lowlifes be part of a Theme? Compare it to Kieslowski's "Red" "White" and "Blue" to use the English titles. As many people in this thread have mentioned, it is also considered a trilogy. The second movie what not named Red II or Red Strikes Back. I don't understand why you feel the need to be such an ass. You are making all these judgements about other macrumors members, if you need to do it to feel better about yourself, then I feel bad for you. I think that just as Kevin Smith has his "New Jersey Trilogy" and Kieslowski has his "Colors Trilogy" that Quentin Tarantino has his "L.A. Trilogy"

Maybe it is not as obvious to some that it might fall into the trilogy category. I think that anyone who has seen Resivoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and Jackie Brown would say that they are three dramas that are closely related, and develop a single theme. The theme being the semi-organized crime of L.A.

Open your mind to new ideas.

I don't need you telling me to open my mind to new ideas, Chewbacca. Those three movies are no more a trilogy than Merchant-Ivory's "A Room With a View", "Maurice" and "Howards End". As much as I love those movies, they are not a trilogy either. By the way, it was called "Blue", "White" and "Red" becuase they are the colors of the French flag. The actual official titles were "Three Colors: Blue" "Three Colors: White" and "Three Colors: Red", in THAT order.

[rice_web]

Groundhog Day

Okay, so it isn't a trilogy, but it still rocks.

Besides, it might technically be a trilogy because of all the times he repeats the same day....

eh, nevermind.

[jefhatfield]

Originally posted by rice_web
Groundhog Day

Okay, so it isn't a trilogy, but it still rocks.

Besides, it might technically be a trilogy because of all the times he repeats the same day....

eh, nevermind.

rocky had more than three but you could fit all of them into three movies...the first one was good, though

and pearl harbor seemed so long is was like a trilogy with three distinct stories...two love stories and the actual battle...it kind of dragged but it's nice when seen as a miniseries

[JG of Borg]

Star Trek 2,3,4 - I liked 2 and 4 better than 3 though.

[Durandal7]

Originally posted by topicolo
Donatello was a nerd! I would be Leonardo since he was a good leader.

Erm, some people would call you a nerd for debating who the coolest Teenage Mutant Turtle is on an online forum :rolleyes:

[diorio]

The teenage mutant ninja turtles? They hang out with a rat and live in the sewers. You are a nerd who needs to watch some real movies. ;)

[ShaolinMiddleFinger]

Originally posted by rice_web
Groundhog Day

Okay, so it isn't a trilogy, but it still rocks.

Besides, it might technically be a trilogy because of all the times he repeats the same day....

eh, nevermind.

That movie was just an total waste of time. It just kept on going and going and going and going. I can't believe I watched it to the very end. The story should have gotten Bill Murray shot in the ass at the end. It would have ended in a happier note.

[hesdeadjim]

As far as trilogies go, this is the only one where all three are enjoyable. (I've never seen evil dead, so I don't know about it). Look at the ones that are always on this list Godfather 3 sucked, Return of the Jedi sucked, Back To The Future Sucked (it just didn't seem to fit IMO), Star Trek 3 sucked, and the list goes on. Also, Jackie Brown sucked. Now, I would probably say that Jackie Brown is a sequel to Pulp Fiction (more like a remake at some points), but Reservoir Dogs really is quite different from the other ones so it is hard to constitue as a Trilogy. At least that's my two cents.

[hesdeadjim]

I meant BTTF 3 was bad. Also, I shouldn't have used sucked so much but oh well. That's why I'm engineer, I no need to be good at English.