PDA

View Full Version : Vanishing Votes




zimv20
May 1, 2004, 03:25 PM
from the Nation (http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20040517&s=palast)


Vanishing Votes

by GREGORY PALAST

[from the May 17, 2004 issue]

On October 29, 2002, George W. Bush signed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). Hidden behind its apple-pie-and-motherhood name lies a nasty civil rights time bomb.

First, the purges. In the months leading up to the November 2000 presidential election, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, in coordination with Governor Jeb Bush, ordered local election supervisors to purge 57,700 voters from the registries, supposedly ex-cons not allowed to vote in Florida. At least 90.2 percent of those on this "scrub" list, targeted to lose their civil rights, are innocent. Notably, more than half--about 54 percent--are black or Hispanic. You can argue all night about the number ultimately purged, but there's no argument that this electoral racial pogrom ordered by Jeb Bush's operatives gave the White House to his older brother. HAVA not only blesses such purges, it requires all fifty states to implement a similar search-and-destroy mission against vulnerable voters. Specifically, every state must, by the 2004 election, imitate Florida's system of computerizing voter files. The law then empowers fifty secretaries of state--fifty Katherine Harrises--to purge these lists of "suspect" voters.

The purge is back, big time. Following the disclosure in December 2000 of the black voter purge in Britain's Observer newspaper, NAACP lawyers sued the state. The civil rights group won a written promise from Governor Jeb and from Harris's successor to return wrongly scrubbed citizens to the voter rolls. According to records given to the courts by ChoicePoint, the company that generated the computerized lists, the number of Floridians who were questionably tagged totals 91,000. Willie Steen is one of them. Recently, I caught up with Steen outside his office at a Tampa hospital. Steen's case was easy. You can't work in a hospital if you have a criminal record. (My copy of Harris's hit list includes an ex-con named O'Steen, close enough to cost Willie Steen his vote.) The NAACP held up Steen's case to the court as a prime example of the voter purge evil.

The state admitted Steen's innocence. But a year after the NAACP won his case, Steen still couldn't register. Why was he still under suspicion? What do we know about this "potential felon," as Jeb called him? Steen, unlike our President, honorably served four years in the US military. There is, admittedly, a suspect mark on his record: Steen remains an African-American.


Take Gadsden County. Of Florida's sixty-seven counties, Gadsden has the highest proportion of black residents: 58 percent. It also has the highest "spoilage" rate, that is, ballots tossed out on technicalities: one in eight votes cast but not counted. Next door to Gadsden is white-majority Leon County, where virtually every vote is counted (a spoilage rate of one in 500).

How do votes spoil? Apparently, any old odd mark on a ballot will do it. In Gadsden, some voters wrote in Al Gore instead of checking his name. Their votes did not count.

Harvard law professor Christopher Edley Jr., a member of the Commission on Civil Rights, didn't like the smell of all those spoiled ballots. He dug into the pile of tossed ballots and, deep in the commission's official findings, reported this: 14.4 percent of black votes--one in seven--were "invalidated," i.e., never counted. By contrast, only 1.6 percent of nonblack voters' ballots were spoiled.


Now let's talk about America. In the 2000 election, 1.9 million votes cast were never counted. Spoiled for technical reasons, like writing in Gore's name, machine malfunctions and so on. The reasons for ballot rejection vary, but there's a suspicious shading to the ballots tossed into the dumpster. Edley's team of Harvard experts discovered that just as in Florida, the number of ballots spoiled was--county by county, precinct by precinct--in direct proportion to the local black voting population.


In the last presidential election, approximately 1 million black and other minorities voted, and their ballots were thrown away. And they will be tossed again in November 2004, efficiently, by computer--because HAVA and other bogus reform measures, stressing reform through complex computerization, do not address, and in fact worsen, the racial bias of the uncounted vote.



Neserk
May 1, 2004, 03:27 PM
Can someone explain to me the logic behind not allowing an ex-con to vote? I understand not allowing someone currently serving time to vote... but an ex-con? That has never made sense to me. The first time someone said (I was in high school) I thought they *must* be mistaken...

zimv20
May 1, 2004, 03:31 PM
Can someone explain to me the logic behind not allowing an ex-con to vote?
yes - a disproportiantely high number of cons are non-white and a disproportionately high number of non-whites vote democrat. such purges help the GOP.

Dont Hurt Me
May 1, 2004, 03:33 PM
Another catchy phrase that does the opposite of how its named, just another title of lies to add to the Patriot act,Clean air initiative,No Child left behind.
Every U.S citizen should be allowed to vote period!!! Politics and games from the white collar crowd.

Neserk
May 1, 2004, 06:15 PM
yes - a disproportiantely high number of cons are non-white and a disproportionately high number of non-whites vote democrat. such purges help the GOP.


When in US history was this decided? Who decided it?

SlyHunter
May 1, 2004, 07:15 PM
Can someone explain to me the logic behind not allowing an ex-con to vote? I understand not allowing someone currently serving time to vote... but an ex-con? That has never made sense to me. The first time someone said (I was in high school) I thought they *must* be mistaken...
When you become a criminal incarcerated you lose most of your citizen rights which includes the right to bear arms and the right to vote. They can regain these rights if they chose thru petitioning a sometimes time consuming process.

numediaman
May 1, 2004, 08:17 PM
Diebold gets their just desserts.

I may be a Diebold stockholder, but I realize this is one vile company.

State Blocks Digital Voting
The elections chief puts touch-screen and other systems on hold and calls for an investigation of a manufacturer. Registrars are surprised.

By Stuart Pfeifer, Times Staff Writer

SACRAMENTO — California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley on Friday withdrew his approval of electronic voting machines throughout the state — a step that could force many voters to return to paper ballots in November.

Shelley's decision — which experts called the most significant setback yet in the nation's shift to computerized voting — allows 10 of 14 California counties that use electronic voting to reapply for certification if they meet 23 new security conditions.

The remaining four counties — San Diego, San Joaquin, Solano and Kern — are banned from using their touch-screen systems in November. Shelley, the state's top elections official, also called on California Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer to investigate the company that made the equipment in those counties, Diebold Election Systems, for allegedly lying to state officials.

zimv20
May 1, 2004, 08:20 PM
State Blocks Digital Voting
[...]
Shelley, the state's top elections official, also called on California Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyer to investigate the company that made the equipment in those counties, Diebold Election Systems, for allegedly lying to state officials.
some good news there. i hope ohio is paying attention. florida's probably a lost cause...

Neserk
May 1, 2004, 08:25 PM
When you become a criminal incarcerated you lose most of your citizen rights which includes the right to bear arms and the right to vote. They can regain these rights if they chose thru petitioning a sometimes time consuming process.


I understanding losing the right to bear arms... but vote? Why???

SlyHunter
May 1, 2004, 08:38 PM
I understanding losing the right to bear arms... but vote? Why???
Part of the punishment.

Neserk
May 1, 2004, 09:22 PM
Part of the punishment.


I guess doing ones time is not sufficient?

skunk
May 1, 2004, 09:26 PM
I guess doing ones time is not sufficient?
It doesn't get rid of the voters.

Desertrat
May 1, 2004, 09:49 PM
Loss of certain civil rights, including the right to vote, has long been part of the punishment for any felony.

I have no objection to the purging, if the one who has been purged is notified. Since one's current address is required by law to be known to the registration office, it should be no problem. It says on my Texas voter registration card that if I move, I am to notify that office immediately. (In Texas, it's the County Clerk's office.)

If you're purged by error as to your felony status, you can go to the registration office and re-register. In Texas, you must be registered no later than 30 days prior to an election. Five months is left for this effort...

'Rat