PDA

View Full Version : For those who believe Clinton was such hot stuff.




Voltron
May 22, 2004, 10:23 AM
The presidency of William Jefferson Clinton will be remembered for many things, not the least of which is a string of White House firsts unequaled by any of his predecessors.

With the lawsuit filed by the Arkansas' lawyer-discipline committee on Friday, Clinton could be on the fast track to make history as the first U.S. president to be disbarred while in office. The committee has a near 100 percent record of winning its disbarment cases.

But disbarment would merely be the latest in a long list of White House precedents. Clinton's remarkable record will also show that he is:

The first elected president in U.S. history to be impeached-Dec. 19, 1998.

The first president to found guilty of a crime while still in office. (Leaking the private correspondence of Kathleen Willey in violation of the Privacy Act).

The first U.S. president to be publicly accused of forcible rape-by Juanita Broaddrick. Feb. 24, 1999.

The first U.S. president to approve the sale of sophisticated weapons technology to a hostile power while its emissaries contributed to his campaign.

The first president to be accused by multiple witnesses, including one under oath before a federal grand jury, of using cocaine while he was the chief law enforcement officer of his state.

The first U.S. president to be accused of sexual assault on White House property-by Kathleen Willey, March 15, 1998.

The first U.S. president to order a paramilitary operation where a network television camera crew was punched, kicked, and forced to the ground at gunpoint to prevent them from broadcasting live video coverage. (Elian Gonzalez's abduction-April 22, 2000.

The first sitting president to be the subject of a sexual harassment suit-filed by Paula Jones. May 8, 1994.

The first U.S. president to order an armored assault on a church, resulting in the deaths of 55 members of the congregation along with 25 of their children. (Waco-April 19, 1993)

The first U.S. presidential candidate to accept financial support from a KGB spy. (Aldrich Ames-$7,000, 1991, 92)

The first sitting U.S. president to be named in a federal criminal referral as a possible witness to and beneficiary of fraudulent financial activity. (Whitewater)

The first president to consult with Congress about combat troop deployment while simultaneously receiving oral sex-according to Monica Lewinsky and Rep. Sonny Callahan. (Starr Report-Sept. 1998)

The first U.S. president to have two senior administration officials die violently under mysterious circumstances while they were being pressed for testimony on assorted White House scandals. (Vince Foster, Ron Brown)

The first U.S. president to have a major cooperating federal witness against him die in prison while waiting to give prosecutors the testimony they later admitted would have led to first family indictments. (James McDougal)

The first U.S. president to launch unprovoked missile attacks on two sovereign nations. (Sudan, Afghanistan-Aug. 20, 1998)

With more than six months of the Clinton administration left, other equally impressive presidential firsts cannot be far off.

This article was published on NewsMax.com Saturday July 1, 2000 at 4:15 PM EDT. It was written by Carl Limbacher and the NewsMax.com Staff and is © copyrighted by NewsMax.com.


http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/firstsby.htm



skunk
May 22, 2004, 10:33 AM
Old news

Clinton is not the President, or the Contender. Anyway, he sounds like an all-American Boy.

pooky
May 22, 2004, 10:40 AM
This is so moronic it's almost not worth responding to. Sly, if you're going to quote this drivel, at least find a source that doesn't lie. I'm not going to waste time shooting holes in all of this idiot's arguments, I'll just point out the following:

First, almost all of the points in the article are based on accusations. Not crimes. Anyone can be accused of a crime, it doesn't mean he/she has done anything.

Second, the fact that the first criticism on the list is an outright lie torpedoes the credibility of the rest. Repeat after me: Clinton was not the first president to be impeached.

Andrew Johnson was impeached on Feb 24 1868. The trial ended on May 26, 1868, with Johnson's acquittal by a single vote. Nixon (a republican) would also have been impeached, and likely convicted, had he not resigned in disgrace. Also remember that nixon was being impeached for actual crimes. Clinton was, in the end, guilty only of being a horny bugger. And don't start with the lying crap, if we impeached every politician who ever lied, there would be none left.

See, these are what facts look like. You get them by doing research. Try using them before you post this crap here.

Voltron
May 22, 2004, 11:07 AM
This is so moronic it's almost not worth responding to. Sly, if you're going to quote this drivel, at least find a source that doesn't lie. I'm not going to waste time shooting holes in all of this idiot's arguments, I'll just point out the following:

First, almost all of the points in the article are based on accusations. Not crimes. Anyone can be accused of a crime, it doesn't mean he/she has done anything.

Second, the fact that the first criticism on the list is an outright lie torpedoes the credibility of the rest. Repeat after me: Clinton was not the first president to be impeached.

Andrew Johnson was impeached on Feb 24 1868. The trial ended on May 26, 1868, with Johnson's acquittal by a single vote. Nixon (a republican) would also have been impeached, and likely convicted, had he not resigned
in disgrace. Also remember that nixon was being impeached for actual crimes. Clinton was, in the end, guilty only of being a horny bugger. And don't start with the lying crap, if we impeached every politician who ever lied, there would be none left.

See, these are what facts look like. You get them by doing research. Try using them before you post this crap here.
Can I quote you in similar arguments about Bush in other threads?

skunk
May 22, 2004, 11:24 AM
Can I quote you in similar arguments about Bush in other threads?
It would make a nice change from the endless drivel from boortz.

pooky
May 22, 2004, 10:35 PM
Can I quote you in similar arguments about Bush in other threads?

Go right ahead. I don't believe I've made any comments about Bush, and if I have, they're well researched or they're my own opinion, not misleading statements, lies, or long quotes from questionable sources.

pivo6
May 22, 2004, 10:50 PM
http://www.papillonsartpalace.com/firstsby.htm which contains some guy's opinions

Let's see here. You post a link to some guy who runs a website for his wife's artwork, has some spare MB's, and posts his opinions. We're happy for him. :rolleyes:

Unfortunately, it just troll bait.

professor
May 23, 2004, 10:45 AM
It will be quite boring to read the much longer list dedicated to the great accomplishment of your current president.
What are you trying to accomplish, macfan, sorry, voltron?

pooky
May 23, 2004, 12:32 PM
You post a link to some guy who runs a website for his wife's artwork, has some spare MB's, and posts his opinions...

And the art's not even that good. And talk about a fugly web page. Black text on a salmon background? Dear lord, what were you thinking?!

IJ Reilly
May 23, 2004, 01:10 PM
Bud Uglly! (http://budugllydesign.com/archivebud/bud9806/bud.html)

zimv20
May 23, 2004, 03:48 PM
edit: never mind

pseudobrit
May 23, 2004, 03:57 PM
edit: never mind

Me too.