PDA

View Full Version : cheney caught in a lie?




zimv20
May 30, 2004, 02:08 PM
Time magazine link (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040607-644111,00.html)

from the administration that promised to restore honor to the WH and avoid even the appearance of impropriety:

The Paper Trail
Did Cheney Okay a Deal?
By TIMOTHY J. BURGER AND ADAM ZAGORIN

Vice President Dick Cheney was a guest on NBC's Meet the Press last September when host Tim Russert brought up Halliburton. Citing the company's role in rebuilding Iraq as well as Cheney's prior service as Halliburton's CEO, Russert asked, "Were you involved in any way in the awarding of those contracts?" Cheney's reply: "Of course not, Tim ... And as Vice President, I have absolutely no influence of, involvement of, knowledge of in any way, shape or form of contracts led by the [Army] Corps of Engineers or anybody else in the Federal Government."

Cheney's relationship with Halliburton has been nothing but trouble since he left the company in 2000. Both he and the company say they have no ongoing connections. But TIME has obtained an internal Pentagon e-mail sent by an Army Corps of Engineers official—whose name was blacked out by the Pentagon—that raises questions about Cheney's arm's-length policy toward his old employer. Dated March 5, 2003, the e-mail says "action" on a multibillion-dollar Halliburton contract was "coordinated" with Cheney's office. The e-mail says Douglas Feith, a high-ranking Pentagon hawk, got the "authority to execute RIO," or Restore Iraqi Oil, from his boss, who is Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. RIO is one of several large contracts the U.S. awarded to Halliburton last year.

The e-mail says Feith approved arrangements for the contract "contingent on informing WH [White House] tomorrow. We anticipate no issues since action has been coordinated w VP's [Vice President's] office." Three days later, the Army Corps of Engineers gave Halliburton the contract, without seeking other bids. TIME located the e-mail among documents provided by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group.

Cheney spokesman Kevin Kellems says the Vice President "has played no role whatsoever in government-contract decisions involving Halliburton" since 2000. A Pentagon spokesman says the e-mail means merely that "in anticipation of controversy over the award of a sole-source contract to Halliburton, we wanted to give the Vice President's staff a heads-up."

Cheney is linked to his old firm in at least one other way. His recently filed 2003 financial-disclosure form reveals that Halliburton last year invoked an insurance policy to indemnify Cheney for what could be steep legal bills "arising from his service" at the company. Past and present Halliburton execs face an array of potentially costly litigation, including multibillion-dollar asbestos claims.



skunk
May 30, 2004, 03:02 PM
Time magazine link (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040607-644111,00.html)

from the administration that promised to restore honor to the WH and avoid even the appearance of impropriety:
It's a bit of a habit with Cheney, isn't it? Those Iraq nucular weapons claims?

mcfudd
May 30, 2004, 03:11 PM
Cheney and Bush are part of the military-industrial complex on the scale of LBJ and Nixon.

A vote for Bush/Cheney is a vote for giving the majority of tax revenues to defense contractors, oil companies, and any other large republican campaign donors that happen to have the number "322" stamped on their forehead.

Now all they need to do is ram through Patriot Act 2 and these posts will be declared illegal because the first amendment of the constitution will no longer exist.

Neserk
May 30, 2004, 03:16 PM
When you consider how bad Bush has been when he had the possibility of being elected to a second term it is scary to think of what he would do when there was no possibility of another term. :eek: Truly scary.

skunk
May 30, 2004, 03:19 PM
When you consider how bad Bush has been when he had the possibility of being elected to a second term it is scary to think of what he would do when there was no possibility of another term. :eek: Truly scary.
It's the rampant cynicism that gets me.

Neserk
May 30, 2004, 04:59 PM
It's the rampant cynicism that gets me.


Who me? I was born a cynic. My first word wasn't the standard: mama, dada, baba, or ball. It was Icky! Seriously. It's in my baby book!

skunk
May 30, 2004, 05:38 PM
Who me? I was born a cynic. My first word wasn't the standard: mama, dada, baba, or ball. It was Icky! Seriously. It's in my baby book!
I didn't actually mean you! I meant the politicians! :rolleyes:

wwworry
May 30, 2004, 07:13 PM
Why shouldn't he coordinate the contract? He was the Halliburton CEO. If anyone can set it up he can. :rolleyes:

What sort of new revisionist reasoning can we expect now. Those crooks are pretty good at that now.

Neserk
May 30, 2004, 07:56 PM
I didn't actually mean you! I meant the politicians! :rolleyes:


ohhh... please explain. About their cynacism. (I guess my internal spell checker is down).