PDA

View Full Version : Rumsfeld fears U.S. losing long-term fight against terror




zimv20
Jun 6, 2004, 09:15 PM
link (http://www.suntimes.com/output/terror/cst-nws-rums06.html)


SINGAPORE -- The United States and its allies are winning some battles in the terrorism war but may be losing the broader struggle against Islamic extremism that is terrorism's source, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Saturday.

The troubling unknown, he said, is whether the extremists -- whom he termed ''zealots and despots'' bent on destroying the global system of nation-states -- are turning out newly trained terrorists faster than the United States can capture or kill them.

''It's quite clear to me that we do not have a coherent approach to this,'' Rumsfeld said at an international security conference.

His remarks showed a level of concern about the long-term direction of the U.S.-led global fight against terrorism that Rumsfeld rarely addresses in public.

The Pentagon chief usually lauds the efforts of U.S. troops, denounces terrorist networks and urges other countries to join the effort to stop terrorist acts.

Saturday, he went further, saying that while terrorists must be confronted, the bigger problem is the extremist Islamic ideology that produces them.

''What you have is a civil war in that religion where a small minority are trying to hijack it,'' he said.

(more)



Sayhey
Jun 6, 2004, 09:42 PM
Saturday, he went further, saying that while terrorists must be confronted, the bigger problem is the extremist Islamic ideology that produces them.

''What you have is a civil war in that religion where a small minority are trying to hijack it,'' he said.


Now, how does a foreign policy, that turns almost every Islamic nation in the world hostile to the US, helping combat this problem? Let's see we could occupy the capital of Islamic nations, shoot up Muslim holy sites, and capture and hold the citizens of such nations without regard to the Geneva Convention, including torture and humiliation - that's the ticket! Where was this concern when he dismissed all the pre-war planning that told him that his disregard for the "post-war" Iraq was going to lead to the alienation, hatred, and polarization that he is lamenting now? If Rummy is serious about any of this he would start by resigning effective immediately.

zimv20
Jun 6, 2004, 10:38 PM
If Rummy is serious about any of this he would start by resigning effective immediately.
don't worry, i'm sure he'll take "full responsibility"

blackfox
Jun 7, 2004, 04:05 AM
I believe a more appropriate title to this thread would be:

"Rumsfeld fears US losing long-term fight against reality"
or
"Rumsfeld fears losing long-term fight against competence"

This is kinda fun...
On a serious note, I seem to remember something about hindsight and 20/20...good for him...it shows we could all be Secretary of Defense, if all we need is belated common-sense brought on by overwhelming evidence...Yay USA.

mactastic
Jun 7, 2004, 09:16 AM
You mean it's possible to win every major battle and still lose the war? And Rummy's just realizing this? I thought everyone learned that lesson 30 years ago. Except for the neocons I guess...

Neserk
Jun 7, 2004, 05:14 PM
I think he just wants to convert all Muslims. Seriously, that is his underlying message: if we don't convert them we'll never win the war on terror.