PDA

View Full Version : More corruption amongst House Dems




Wotan31
Jul 17, 2009, 02:40 PM
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0709/Big_Dem_cash_dump_on_eve_of_climate_vote.html?showall

Big Dem cash dump on eve of climate vote

Three House Democratic leaders who were whipping members on the climate change bill gave tens of thousands in campaign cash to party moderates around the time of the 219-212 vote on June 26, according to Federal Election Commission records.

It's impossible to tell if that torrent of cash was an attempt to schmear wavering Democrats -- or just part of the usual cash dump made by leaders on the eve of the June 30 quarterly fundraising deadline.

Majority Whip Jim Clyburn (D-SC) doled out $28,000 to reps who eventually voted yes on June 24, two days before the big vote -- on a day when House leaders were doing some heavy-duty arm-twisting.

Clyburn recipients who voted for the bill included a who's-who of battleground district Dems: Steve Driehaus, D-OH ($2,000); Martin Heinrich, D-NM ($2,000); Suzanne Kosmas, D-Fla. ($4,000); Betsy Markey, D-Colo. ($2,000); Carol Shea-Porter, D-NH ($2,000), Baron Hill, D-Ind. ($2,000); Alan Grayson, D-Fla. ($2,000); Leonard Boswell, D-Iowa ($2,000); Jim Himes, D-Conn. ($2,000); Mary Jo Kilroy, D-OH ($2,000); Kurt Schrader, D-Ore. ($2,000); Jerry McNerney, D-Calif. ($2,000) and Tom Perriello, D-Va. ($2,000).

On the other hand, Clyburn also gave at least $14,000 to Democrats who voted no despite his pressure: Mike Arcuri, D-NY ($2,000); Marion Berry, D-Ark. ($2,000); Bobby Bright, D-Ala. ($2,000); Chris Carney, D-Penn. ($2,000); Chet Edwards (D-Tx.), Travis Childers , D-Miss. ($2,000); Parker Griffith, D-Ala. ($2,000) and Harry Mitchell, D-NM ($2,000).

The same pattern held true for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who gave $4,000 to yes-voting Ohio Democrat Zack Space and the same amount to no-voting Chris Carney.

House Energy and Commerce Henry Waxman gave at least $16,000 to yes-voters on June, 25, FEC records show.

A Waxman campaign spokesman said the payouts were part of the usual "end-of-quarter activity."

Ken Spain, communications director of the National Republican Congressional Committee emails this response:

“If this was a concerted effort by the Democratic leadership to purchase votes for Nancy Pelosi’s national energy tax at the eleventh hour, then it is unconscionable at best and corrupt at worst. The sad fact for those Democrats who were seemingly bought and paid for, is that it will take a lot more money than they received to defend such an atrocious vote.”



NT1440
Jul 17, 2009, 02:42 PM
So should we go into detail about the corruption of Republicans too?:rolleyes:

The system is corrupt on all sides, thats a fact.

Edit: ah another typical GOP move, take something that is uncertain, and suggest as often and hard as possible that it was not right.

"It's impossible to tell if that torrent of cash was an attempt to schmear wavering Democrats -- or just part of the usual cash dump made by leaders on the eve of the June 30 quarterly fundraising deadline"

Sky Blue
Jul 17, 2009, 02:43 PM
Ain't no party like a bipartisan party!

Conservative group offers support for $2M

The American Conservative Union asked FedEx for a check for $2 million to $3 million in return for the group’s support in a bitter legislative dispute, then the group’s chairman flipped and sided with UPS after FedEx refused to pay.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25072.html#ixzz0LXlimUME

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25072.html

skunk
Jul 17, 2009, 02:45 PM
On the other hand, Clyburn also gave at least $14,000 to Democrats who voted no despite his pressure ... The same pattern held true for House Speaker Nancy PelosiAm I missing something, or is this as it seems just a ludicrous and desperate partisan smear? :confused:

NT1440
Jul 17, 2009, 02:46 PM
Am I missing something, or is this as it seems just a ludicrous and desperate partisan smear? :confused:

Just more of the same it seems.

Ugg
Jul 17, 2009, 04:05 PM
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0709/Big_Dem_cash_dump_on_eve_of_climate_vote.html?showall

politico must be desperate for news. This is a total non-starter.

freeny
Jul 17, 2009, 04:24 PM
Its as if the OP only read the headline...

LizKat
Jul 17, 2009, 04:29 PM
They all stand down there at quarter end and dish it out, it's not like it's one party or the other. Job one is getting re-elected, job two is fund-raising for one's own re-election, job three raising funds for the PAC, job four handing out the PAC money, did I leave anything out?

Oh, and as time permits, voting on legislation prepared in large part by the lobbyists who help fund one's coffers.

Ugg got it right. Slow news day at Politico.

Zombie Acorn
Jul 17, 2009, 06:37 PM
Politicians make me sick. Its almost like they breed these people somewhere closed off from the rest of America.

Gelfin
Jul 17, 2009, 06:44 PM
Its almost like they breed these people somewhere closed off from the rest of America.

I'm fairly sure it'd still be illegal for them to breed right out in front of the rest of America.

But if they really wanted to, I suppose they do make the laws.

Mr. Giver '94
Jul 17, 2009, 06:45 PM
The Legislative Branch is what is wrong with the American Government.

It's a huge waste of time and money.

Capt Crunch
Jul 17, 2009, 08:34 PM
The Legislative Branch is what is wrong with the American Government.

It's a huge waste of time and money.

What would you suggest?

solvs
Jul 20, 2009, 02:22 PM
Am I missing something, or is this as it seems just a ludicrous and desperate partisan smear? :confused:

And yet no response from the OP?

thegoldenmackid
Jul 20, 2009, 02:27 PM
This would be news, except this is isn't anything new?