View Full Version : Looking at Blu-Ray Drives/Media -- Mainstream Enough and Cost-Effective?
astrostu
Aug 4, 2009, 04:53 AM
Hi folks, I've been out of the loop for awhile on media these days and what's actually being used. Yes, I know the obvious that Blu-Ray won the format war, that Apple doesn't officially support it (yet), but that Toast 10 and now Final Cut Studio 2 can burn to it.
My situation is that I take A LOT of photographs and do heavy processing, leading to many large files. A recent trip I went on had 1331 photos that, after processing, including all the RAW files, final JPGs, and then intermediate 16-bit PSD files totaled about 58 GB. That's a lot of DVDs. But it's 2 BD-R disks.
I just did a cost analysis tonight and with Amazon selling 15-packs of Memorex BD-R disks for $43, it's about 13¢ per GB. Versus 10¢ for a DVD-R or 15¢ for a DVD-R DL. Factor in the 5.32x formatted space on a BD-R, and I'm seriously considering investing in an internal drive for the second bay of my 2008 MacPro. 2-3 of those 15-pack spindles could dramatically shrink the several dozen DVDs that my photos and various other archived files take up.
I have two basic questions, though. First, I remember reading several months ago (as in, could've been last year) a Wired article that was saying that while Blu-Ray won the format war, the public isn't likely to really adopt it, which seems to be somewhat evidenced by the huge number of DVDs still being sold. I'm not sure I want to invest in a system that'll never have wide-spread support.
Second, if I do end up doing this, can I just shove an LG drive into my second optical bay and have the OS automatically recognize it? I'm looking at the LG GGW-H20L (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136155), just based on reviews on NewEgg and some sort of brand loyalty. But I'm really not sure what to be looking for here.
Oh, and I guess a third question -- is there any software at the moment on the Mac that'll recognize a Blu-Ray disk and play a movie from it? Or do we have to wait for official :apple: support in their DVD player program?
Thanks for help!
gugucom
Aug 4, 2009, 06:51 AM
1. It is entirely normal that life cycles of OD media heavily overlap. There is no alternative to economic distribution of 1080p content. The use of full HDTV will rapidly increase and people will demand more Blu-Ray disks than DVD. The parity may be 3-5 years away but it will happen. Online distribution will not be suitable due to bandwidth restrictions for mass distribution.
2. Yes, no problem with the LG BD ROMs and Burners. OS X recognises them as DL DVD burners only.
3. BD playback on the Mac Pro requires Windows with AHCI drivers. The drives usually come with suitable software for BD playback.
mooblie
Aug 4, 2009, 07:09 AM
astrostu: That LG drive is fine, but it's SATA (not IDE) so you'll need to find a spare internal SATA cable (or use an external FW case, as I do.)
gugucom: OSX recognises that drive as a BD-writer: see attachment: "BD-Write: -R, -RE"
Whilst you can't do BD-Video playback on OSX (Windows required), with Toast 10 + its BD Plugin you can read/write BD data or video -R or -RE discs (and, of course, encode and burn BD-Video discs onto -R or -RE.)
gugucom
Aug 4, 2009, 07:23 AM
astrostu: That LG drive is fine, but it's SATA (not IDE) so you'll need to find a spare internal SATA cable (or use an external FW case, as I do.)
There is no problem with the SATA connection on a 2008 Mac Pro. You have 2 ODD-SATA ports just for that purpose. All you have to do is fitting a SATA power adapter to your 2nd Molex power cable. Then you need a SATA cable with a 90° head to go under the front fan unit. This cable then needs to be routed through the cutout under HDD bay1 into the 2nd ODD bay. The rest is software. Biggest PITA is fitting the AHCI drivers in Windows.
UltraNEO*
Aug 4, 2009, 07:30 AM
OP, I use an BD-R/RE for the exact smae reason.. It makes logical sense.
However if you can find archival grade BluRays, you can store your data permanently securing them for about 50years, though not all BluRay discs are the same. Just though you'd like to know.
1. It is entirely normal that life cycles of OD media heavily overlap. There is no alternative to economic distribution of 1080p content. The use of full HDTV will rapidly increase and people will demand more Blu-Ray disks than DVD. The parity may be 3-5 years away but it will happen. Online distribution will not be suitable due to bandwidth restrictions for mass distribution.
Yeah... But only for those countries who make 'bandwidth' a huge deal. Such as the UK. But TBH I doubt the medium will make it to the Mac, because it'll dent Apple's online media streaming business.
2. Yes, no problem with the LG BD ROMs and Burners. OS X recognises them as DL DVD burners only.
Hmm.. That's not entirely true. The hardware shows up as being a BR burner with or without an extension. If the OP wants to burn BD-R/BD-RE, then he/she will need to purchase and install the BlueRay burning extension, which is a additional plug-in for toast 10.
3. BD playback on the Mac Pro requires Windows with AHCI drivers. The drives usually come with suitable software for BD playback.
Not if it's on OEM device.
gugucom
Aug 4, 2009, 07:36 AM
Yeah... But only for those countries who make 'bandwidth' a huge deal. Such as the UK. But TBH I doubt the medium will make it to the Mac, because it'll dent Apple's online media streaming business.
We are not so poor in bandwidth here in Germany but I doubt that we will see such capacities in the next 3 years. Enthusiasts may have them but not the general public.
:apple: 's streaming business is the more important factor I think. They will naturally look at BD as competitive. Unfortunately they screw their customers over by such policies. In the end it is a sales argument for Windows.
UltraNEO*
Aug 4, 2009, 08:00 AM
We are not so poor in bandwidth here in Germany but I doubt that we will see such capacities in the next 3 years. Enthusiasts may have them but not the general public.
:apple: 's streaming business is the more important factor I think. They will naturally look at BD as competitive. Unfortunately they screw their customers over by such policies. In the end it is a sales argument for Windows.
Well... Seems like we're both happy huh?
I'm in Nippon (uncapped fibre, typically 100~120 Mbit/s)
and you're in Deutschland :D:D Cool...
gugucom
Aug 4, 2009, 08:06 AM
I'm on alone on a cable modem which currently gives 32 Mbit/s download. It is likely to go up in the next years to 100 but I don't see the servers which would keep up with such bandwidth.
UltraNEO*
Aug 4, 2009, 08:42 AM
I'm on alone on a cable modem which currently gives 32 Mbit/s download. It is likely to go up in the next years to 100 but I don't see the servers which would keep up with such bandwidth.
I have the same issues. I can find domestic servers offering high speeds but can't seem to send file overseas at high speeds however locally shared torrent streams fly!!!!!! :)
astrostu
Aug 4, 2009, 12:45 PM
Okay, so it sounds like this is a perfectly valid thing to do at this time. And all I would need to get, in addition to the drive, is a SATA cable with a 90° head? The power hookups should already be in my Mac?
Also, is that (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136155) the drive of choice these days? Or are pretty much most drives created equally, here?
Edit: I also just noticed on Logitech's website that the GGW-H20L burner is discontinued ...
CaptainChunk
Aug 4, 2009, 01:01 PM
I just did a cost analysis tonight and with Amazon selling 15-packs of Memorex BD-R disks for $43, it's about 13¢ per GB. Versus 10¢ for a DVD-R or 15¢ for a DVD-R DL.
Where are you finding DVD-R DLs for $0.15 each?
astrostu
Aug 4, 2009, 01:10 PM
Where are you finding DVD-R DLs for $0.15 each?
That's not per disk. Per disk, I'm still finding it at around $1-$1.20. It's per GB, which is what I realized in a "duh!" moment is what I should be looking at.
Cave Man
Aug 4, 2009, 01:21 PM
Also, is that (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136155) the drive of choice these days? Or are pretty much most drives created equally, here?
I have this drive in a USB2 enclosure and it works fine with Toast 10 for burning 25 gb Blu-ray disks.
geoffreak
Aug 4, 2009, 01:25 PM
Cheaper to use HDDs...:rolleyes:
Cave Man
Aug 4, 2009, 01:27 PM
Cheaper to use HDDs...:rolleyes:
But not as reliable for long-term storage.
CaptainChunk
Aug 4, 2009, 01:53 PM
That's not per disk. Per disk, I'm still finding it at around $1-$1.20. It's per GB, which is what I realized in a "duh!" moment is what I should be looking at.
Yeah, a big DUH to me as well. ;)
gugucom
Aug 4, 2009, 02:07 PM
Cheaper to use HDDs...:rolleyes:
HDDs are a bit chunky for distribution some folks may find. ;)
TheStrudel
Aug 4, 2009, 02:22 PM
Okay, so it sounds like this is a perfectly valid thing to do at this time. And all I would need to get, in addition to the drive, is a SATA cable with a 90° head? The power hookups should already be in my Mac?
Also, is that (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16827136155) the drive of choice these days? Or are pretty much most drives created equally, here?
That is the drive of choice, as it provides an excellent price/performance ratio. It may have been discontinued, but its replacement burns BDs 2x faster and costs more than it's worth, so feel free to buy the one you linked. All you'll have to do is route the SATA cable with 90° head from the logic board as described. The power hook-up, you'll convert from Molex to SATA power, but it's already in the optical drive bay so you just need to buy a converter (they cost like $1 USD).
I find BD back-ups to be very convenient myself, as 25 GB/disc is a nice capacity. Check Meritline.com for cheaper discs in a bulk package - if you're willing to go off brand, they'll be even better deals. Not one of my Optical Quantum discs has coastered yet, though admittedly my burns are complicated archivings of video editing projects that I test with a BD-RE first.
mooblie
Aug 4, 2009, 02:36 PM
...I also just noticed on Logitech's website that the GGW-H20L burner is discontinued ...
Just a point of info, astrostu: LG is not Logitech. (That might slow down your research if you assume that!)
It's well...LG ("Lucky Goldstar" once upon a time, but they dropped that cr*ppy name).
Their range is here (http://sg.lge.com/proddivergent.do?actType=search&categoryId=050401&modelCategoryId=&parentId=05). Looks like the BH08LS20 is slightly cheaper (!) with 8x BD-R write speed, but it's dropped the HD-DVD features, compared to the GGW-H20L (6x).
yoak
Aug 4, 2009, 02:54 PM
mooblie & Cave Man, can you please link to the enclosures you are using?
I´m looking into getting the LG as well, but the job of putting it in my MP is putting me off.
mooblie
Aug 4, 2009, 03:58 PM
mooblie & Cave Man, can you please link to the enclosures you are using?
I´m looking into getting the LG as well, but the job of putting it in my MP is putting me off.
Sure: see here (http://www.span.com/product_info.php?products_id=21472). It has 2xFW400 and USB2.0 external connections, metal case, with fan and internal PSU.
http://www.macpower.com.tw/img/products/snowline/slsata_angledvd_600.jpghttp://www.macpower.com.tw/img/products/snowline/slsata400plus_rearangle_large.jpg
I sourced in UK, but I'm sure Span will ship to Norway, or you can find it locally.
Cave Man
Aug 4, 2009, 04:02 PM
Here's (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817145064) mine.
mooblie
Aug 4, 2009, 04:27 PM
Well done Caveman, yours trumps mine, with its eSATA! :)
Cave Man
Aug 4, 2009, 04:31 PM
I haven't tried the eSATA yet. I was just looking for something cheap that was reliable. I don't use the drive all that often. Archival backup of files and to rip Blu-ray discs when I buy them (which isn't all that often). It's stored in its box 99% of the time.
yoak
Aug 4, 2009, 04:40 PM
Thanks guys. I´ll see if I can find them over here somewhere first.
Cave Man, was it difficult to put together?
Cave Man
Aug 4, 2009, 04:41 PM
Two connections and six screws. Pretty easy.
astrostu
Aug 4, 2009, 07:18 PM
Just a point of info, astrostu: LG is not Logitech. (That might slow down your research if you assume that!)
D'oh! It was a brain fart - I know they're not the same. ;) I was searching on the LG site, not Logitech.
TheStrudel
Aug 4, 2009, 08:08 PM
I would caution against using eSATA, were I you - it's a bit unreliable, for whatever reason. Firewire should be more than fast enough if you want it.
mooblie
Aug 5, 2009, 05:43 AM
I would caution against using eSATA, were I you - it's a bit unreliable, for whatever reason. Firewire should be more than fast enough if you want it.
I've found eSATA to be fine - using Sonnet cards and enclosures. I suppose it may vary for different manufacturers. eSATA gives me about twice the measured R/W speed to drives compared to FW400.
Depends on your application whether you need that speed - video finds it useful!
GeoffP
Sep 19, 2009, 07:16 PM
Hi all,
Has anyone used the LG BE06LU10 external drive on Leopard and/or Snow Leopard?
Web site (http://www.lge.com/ae/it-products/optical-storage/LG-blu-ray-hd-dvd-rom-drives-BE06LU10.jsp) says it is Mac compatible.
Thanks,
GeoffP.
alphaod
Sep 19, 2009, 09:35 PM
I really fine these disks a bit pricier than I'd like; the single layer disks are fine, but they need to significantly cheaper per GB for them to gain track. I mean if I have can spend $1 on a BD-R disk, I would start buying and burning them more readily. DL BD-R disks aren't cost effective.
Now I also have brand preferences. Of all the brands I've bought, I've found that Verbatim is most reliable having never burned a coaster with their media. I guess that's why they cost more. Memorex, I find is just terrible.
However if you can find archival grade BluRays, you can store your data permanently securing them for about 50years, though not all BluRay discs are the same. Just though you'd like to know.
Just buy the Delkin Archival Gold disks; they work very well, but of course are pricey @ $27 each.
alphaod
Sep 19, 2009, 09:41 PM
Hi all,
Has anyone used the LG BE06LU10 external drive on Leopard and/or Snow Leopard?
Web site (http://www.lge.com/ae/it-products/optical-storage/LG-blu-ray-hd-dvd-rom-drives-BE06LU10.jsp) says it is Mac compatible.
Thanks,
GeoffP.
They're all Mac compatible if you have Tigger, Leotard, or Snow Kitteh.
GeoffP
Sep 21, 2009, 01:14 AM
Thanks,
Just bought the LG BE06LU10 external drive today.
Currently have it running on Snow Leopard with no problems.
MakeMKV currently ripping a movie for me.
Will test on Plex shortly......
alphaod
Sep 21, 2009, 01:37 AM
Thanks,
Just bought the LG BE06LU10 external drive today.
Currently have it running on Snow Leopard with no problems.
MakeMKV currently ripping a movie for me.
Will test on Plex shortly......
MakeMKV… didn't know about this. Does it do Bluray decryption as well?
Please provide some feedback :)
GeoffP
Sep 21, 2009, 01:43 AM
MakeMKV… didn't know about this. Does it do Bluray decryption as well?
Please provide some feedback :)
No problem,
Here is the thread (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=748615&highlight=blu+ray) on MacRumors.
I read the whole thread on the weekend to get my head around the topic.
I have ripped my WALL-E Blu-Ray DVD (just the movie which came in at ~18GB) - currently copying the resulting .mkv to my 2009 Mac Mini (running Leopard) to test with Plex.
Will post how it goes.
GeoffP
Sep 21, 2009, 02:08 AM
Well, I ran the .mkv in Plex.
Audio was synced perfectly with the video, the picture quality was absolutely fantastic.
Off to rip the rest of my Blu-Ray DVD collection.
One question if anyone can help, is it better to rip the Dolby Digitial (DD) or Linear PCM (LPCM) audio track - which one is better.
Audio is only going via optical audio output to my Amplifier.
Currently trying LPCM from The Fifth Element.
Thanks,
GeoffP.
alphaod
Sep 21, 2009, 09:43 AM
I'm not tempted to buy Bluray disks. I hate downloading the encoded ones online that are like 6Mbps for 1080p.
lannister80
Sep 21, 2009, 11:27 AM
One question if anyone can help, is it better to rip the Dolby Digital (DD) or Linear PCM (LPCM) audio track - which one is better.
Generally, Dolby Digital if possible. That way if your receiver can't handle DD sound, your Mac/other player will convert it to normal PCM for playing. But with the reverse, you'll always have PCM sound, even if your received could handle DD.
Now, several PCM files can be played simultaneously to create discrete digital sound (player would handle this), but that's not always the case. With DD, you know you're getting the correct number of channels (2.1, 5.1, 7.1, etc) all in the same "file".
Someone correct me if I'm wrong. :)
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.