Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I wasn't very happy with the article. I didn't really examine it, but here's a few problems.

1. The author referred to him(her)self a few times. Not good practice to do.

2. There were quite a few things referred to as fact when it's highly debatable still, such as the existence of a tablet that will be based on the iPhone OS. According to the article, it's a given that just such a tablet is coming out, which may or may not be true.

3. It didn't say anything new. Why write something that only repeats what's already been said?

So.... yeah. Read it if you want, I didn't really enjoy it though.
Nate
 
I wasn't very happy with the article. I didn't really examine it, but here's a few problems.

1. The author referred to him(her)self a few times. Not good practice to do.

2. There were quite a few things referred to as fact when it's highly debatable still, such as the existence of a tablet that will be based on the iPhone OS. According to the article, it's a given that just such a tablet is coming out, which may or may not be true.

3. It didn't say anything new. Why write something that only repeats what's already been said?

So.... yeah. Read it if you want, I didn't really enjoy it though.
Nate


It's just another article..
There are millions out there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.