PDA

View Full Version : Start Paying for iTools...




MareksMacServer
Jul 16, 2002, 11:04 PM
Just got word that everyone that is a registered iTools member might end up paying up to $ 100.00 per year for the service. Composed of the @mac.com, iCards, Homepage, and the Parental Controll it looks like the free times are over.

Attached is a picture of the apple site at 9:10 PM on July 17, 2002.

Let me know what you think.



King Cobra
Jul 16, 2002, 11:14 PM
Hasn't this been brought up before?

>...at 9:10 PM on July 17, 2002.
I think your time is a little off if you are living in the Rapid City area of South Dakota, Bubba!

menoinjun
Jul 16, 2002, 11:18 PM
I'm sorry... but does no one else realize that Apple would be insane to take away itools??? Maybe add a pay section larger than they have now...but there is a snowballs chance in hell of apple taking away itools completely if you pay.

Give it up.

-Pete

MareksMacServer
Jul 16, 2002, 11:30 PM
Hey fear the king...... ( and everyone )

Sorry with the late catch on the news. When i heard the news i was just so shocked i had to tell someone, i registed here and posted my news without reading the previous one's. Once again sorry.

--------------

Other Mac OS Rumors that might become true at the Macworld Expo...


G4 iBook
Final Release of Mac Os X 10.2
Faster iMac's
17 inch Flat Pannel iMac
.......and a few more

Durandal7
Jul 16, 2002, 11:56 PM
Not gonna happen. iTools has always been pushed as a feature of MacOS 9 and now MacOS X. There isn't any way they will abolish iDisk and mac.com simply because it has been advertised so much as a free service.

Mr. Anderson
Jul 16, 2002, 11:59 PM
$100.00 a year! No way would I pay that, and I'm sure that would go for just about everyone else. I certainly hope it doesn't happen. Hey, I've got about 8 accounts.....that would be silly. Can't imagine they ask for payment, just doesn't seem right.

D

Rower_CPU
Jul 17, 2002, 12:13 AM
No way they're gonna charge...

Have you learned nothing from the whole QT6 debacle? They held onto it for 5 months before releasing it, because of the fees associated with the MPEG4 licensing.


Although the unavailability of iTools tonight brings up some interesting thoughts for the keynote...hmmmm?

Archer
Jul 17, 2002, 01:45 AM
QT6 debacle? Do you know what you're talking about? Apple placed pressure on MPEG-LA (not my hometown, but "Licensing Agreement") to get its collective arse together so the licensing fee wouldn't be stuck on you the user or the small time webmaster. It took so long, 5 months, try a few years becuase MPEG-LA tried to use MPEG2 fees/laws to MPEG4. Eh, to cut the story short, Apple was trying to do good by the end user, creatives, and webmasters who would not be able to afford the high MPEG-4 fees.

Before getting off on Apple about the QT6 debacle you may want to Google yourself for an education about new media formats of the 21st century.

On a sidenote, $100 divided by 12 months is $8.50 a month. If Apple added a few more email's to each account, good bandwidth, good storage, hold my hand to create a really kick arse website, and added some only with Apple features I would pay for it. What are other ISP's charging, 10.95 - 19.95? Eh, I'm sure the free iTools, free .Mac will still be there.

madamimadam
Jul 17, 2002, 02:23 AM
Originally posted by Archer
QT6 debacle? Do you know what you're talking about? Apple placed pressure on MPEG-LA (not my hometown, but "Licensing Agreement") to get its collective arse together so the licensing fee wouldn't be stuck on you the user or the small time webmaster. It took so long, 5 months, try a few years becuase MPEG-LA tried to use MPEG2 fees/laws to MPEG4. Eh, to cut the story short, Apple was trying to do good by the end user, creatives, and webmasters who would not be able to afford the high MPEG-4 fees.

Before getting off on Apple about the QT6 debacle you may want to Google yourself for an education about new media formats of the 21st century.

On a sidenote, $100 divided by 12 months is $8.50 a month. If Apple added a few more email's to each account, good bandwidth, good storage, hold my hand to create a really kick arse website, and added some only with Apple features I would pay for it. What are other ISP's charging, 10.95 - 19.95? Eh, I'm sure the free iTools, free .Mac will still be there.


?????????

Maybe I read Rower's post incorrectly but I thought he was saying what you said expect in MANY less words.


Update: Check Out This Link (http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm)

Choppaface
Jul 17, 2002, 02:37 AM
well, they can't give free bandwidth forever. but $100 does seem a bit much...

Geert
Jul 17, 2002, 03:04 AM
No way I'm paying for that.
Adding some great feature to iTools euh sorry .mac, that you got to pay for, okay.
But not the features we're using right now.
I they charge me, I'm closing my account.

iwantanewmac
Jul 17, 2002, 05:29 AM
I'm NEVER going to pay for that.
And that's final.
They shouldn't have made it for free in the first place then.

groovebuster
Jul 17, 2002, 07:21 AM
So here we are!!! 99.95$ per year for the iDisk and an E-Mail account? (I never used the HP-feature) Yeah! Right!!!

I guess I won't use the iTools anymore when the "grace period" is over. I knew that it wouldn't be forever for free, but that expensive???

Steve... that was stupid move! :(

groovebuster

heinzruediger
Jul 17, 2002, 08:08 AM
I hate to say it, but Apple is talking about switch, and pi++es off all the loyal mac users!

Shane
Jul 17, 2002, 08:13 AM
No way am I paying for this "feature". It was marketed as a FREE service in the begining. Apple has pissed me off on this one. F them.
Shane

Rower_CPU
Jul 17, 2002, 08:32 AM
Originally posted by Archer
QT6 debacle? Do you know what you're talking about? Apple placed pressure on MPEG-LA (not my hometown, but "Licensing Agreement") to get its collective arse together so the licensing fee wouldn't be stuck on you the user or the small time webmaster. It took so long, 5 months, try a few years becuase MPEG-LA tried to use MPEG2 fees/laws to MPEG4. Eh, to cut the story short, Apple was trying to do good by the end user, creatives, and webmasters who would not be able to afford the high MPEG-4 fees.

Before getting off on Apple about the QT6 debacle you may want to Google yourself for an education about new media formats of the 21st century.

On a sidenote, $100 divided by 12 months is $8.50 a month. If Apple added a few more email's to each account, good bandwidth, good storage, hold my hand to create a really kick arse website, and added some only with Apple features I would pay for it. What are other ISP's charging, 10.95 - 19.95? Eh, I'm sure the free iTools, free .Mac will still be there.

Reread my post.

madam'-
Thanks for trying to clarify.:)

madamimadam
Jul 17, 2002, 11:13 AM
Originally posted by Shane
No way am I paying for this "feature". It was marketed as a FREE service in the begining. Apple has pissed me off on this one. F them.
Shane

And where you gonna go... Hotmail???? It is good value for money.... don't like it, don't use it... no need to be a d1ckhead about the matter.

Like I said, though, where you gonna go???


Update: Check Out This Link (http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm)

MareksMacServer
Jul 17, 2002, 11:20 AM
Apple said that they would charge $ 100.00 per year for the .mac services. There are a few new features but the price is way too high. If you were a member of the iTools service you get $ 50 off your first year.


This was announced at the Macworld Expo in NY July 17 and came with some other interesting new things like iCal, the 20GIG iPod, a 17 inch flat pannel iMac and a few more things...

DarkNovaMatter
Jul 17, 2002, 12:58 PM
Well Apple has done a good job of killing people. I had just switched to iTools because of hotmail (they reset all user prefs, and made my one account non-accesable unless someone would verrify they were an adult by using their credit card #). Anyone know of a good free e-mail that isn't a hassle like hotmail/apple. I don't expect them to give free bandwidth but $100 a year? thats a little too much.

sjs
Jul 17, 2002, 01:10 PM
All of you who say they will "never..." are one day soon going to have to pony up the cash.

First - do you have anti-virus software? You're paying about $49 per year already.

Second - email accounts at places like Yahoo...$30 per year.

The value of having a Homepage and having 100 mb of storage? It's worth SOMETHING, RIGHT?

Get a grip, you'll pay and you'll be getting a pretty decent deal.

halli
Jul 17, 2002, 01:56 PM
I think this great service is worth at least $100, at least I gladly paid ($50 with rebate). We are getting so much free stuff from apple (itunes, iphoto, imovie...) that I think they can charge us for the .mac service. :)

cleo
Jul 17, 2002, 02:02 PM
What I'd like to see (pipe dream, I know, but still) is the Homepage hosting offering PHP and MySQL. That, in my mind, would DEFINITELY be worth the money, and I'd have no qualms whatsoever paying up. As it is, I already have my own domain and hosting, and as cool as the synching and iCal bit is, I don't know that it's totally worth it.

strider42
Jul 17, 2002, 02:10 PM
Originally posted by halli
I think this great service is worth at least $100, at least I gladly paid ($50 with rebate). We are getting so much free stuff from apple (itunes, iphoto, imovie...) that I think they can charge us for the .mac service. :)

I think all this stuf is worth the price, but the problem is all I want is the email. I could care less about the rest of it. I'd love to see a free or lower cost email option (hotmail expanded email is only 20 bucks a year, I don't like hotmail, but thats the kind of program I want/need)

20 bcuks I'll pay, 100 bucks I won't/ not for email, whcih si the only thing I'll be using.

twistedsun
Jul 17, 2002, 02:27 PM
hey anyone complaining about the mac.com mail charge please go to the.mac section of there site and send some feedback to them, thell them how dumb it is and how mad you are, tell everyone you know to. its absolutly rediculous to have to pay for an email name all of a sudden. keep mail free atleast.

mail apple and complain, let them know they f'kt up

-john

Wash!!
Jul 17, 2002, 02:51 PM
I'm a very mac loyal, but today my use of itool and the .mac email will die when the grace period is over. sorry apple.
:(
I know they can given away stuuf for free for ever. but a least give us new G4's or G5 to justifiy this charges.

gopher
Jul 17, 2002, 03:25 PM
http://www.petitiononline.com/iTol/petition.html

Sign it...you'll be glad you did.

aggemam
Jul 17, 2002, 07:40 PM
Hi

I just sent this to Apple. I encourage anyone to write to them aswell. And sorry if my English is quirky - it's not my primary language.

---

Hi.

This e-mail is somewhat long, but please read it all, as it contains questions that I would like to have answered.

I see no reason that one has to pay for the original iTools serivces that were free, such as mac.com e-mail. Eg. the "free" e-mail address that I got as soon as iTools was released, have been used as a major sales argument. I still remember the "I'm meateater@mac.com" ads.

It would have been just fine if one had to pay for only the additional .Mac services (that are great anyway) such as antivirus, iCal etc. But having people sign up and go tell others about their new mac.com e-mail address and then later charge money for it is ridiculous. It's the same dirty trick that the "free" hosting service namezero.com used. But for a large, trustworthy company like Apple, it's just not right.

Now to my question. Can I expect Apple to free the original services, leaving parts of .Mac free (the same that were free initially) and other parts not?

Because otherwise, I am probably going to have to switch to another platform, where I will not be dependent on any company's fees and charges. And no, the platform I talk about is not Windows.

It seems Apple concentrates a lot on having Windows users switch to Macs. Unfortunately, I have the impression a lot of people look at Apple from another point of view now. Even Microsoft does not use dirty tricks like this on their end-users. Beware not to make people switch to the "opposite" side instead of Mac OS.

If not all of the original iTools services (iDisk, homepage, e-mail) revert to being free of charge, my suggestion to Apple would be to at least offer mail forwarding so that a user's digital life is not "destroyed" because of the change of e-mail address.

Remember, not only other humans send mails to mac.com addresses. For example, I've used my mac.com mail address to sign up for a lot of other services on the Internet, of which a lot uses the mail address as a security check, sending passwords to the e-mail address.

So as it is now, people have only two choices:

1) Money to Apple, and then people can "Extend their digital life"
2) No money to Apple, and then people will _destroy_ their digital life because of them being dependent on the Mac.com e-mail address.

So, it's either Extend or Destroy. What's missing is an option for "Leave as it is now". You're forcing people to lose something. Not everyone needs the extra services that you get for your $100.

Also, I recommended the mac.com mail service to a lot of friends to whom I'll have to explain that they'll have to pay in order to keep their addresses.

I've tried to keep this mail in a sober and somewhat friendly tone, but I must admit that I am both angry and disappointed about this move. Until now, I've distanced Apple and Microsoft by their marketing techniques. But it seems Apple is not that much better...

Regards

--

madamimadam
Jul 17, 2002, 09:48 PM
Taken From Something I Posted On Another Thread:
Oh, the hardcore fans are the bigest bunch of wankers on the face of the earth (minus M$ fans). EVERY SINGLE TIME there is a MacWorld the whole community has to bitch about something. Everyone goes on about how much they love Apple but when Apple makes a change everyone bitches about it.

If you don't like this offer, well, no one is stopping you finding free servers but I assure you that none will offer you what Apple is.


Update: Check Out This Link (http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm)

Faeylyn
Jul 18, 2002, 01:13 AM
Tired of the whining? Go to:

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/MUAMW/petition.html

aggemam
Jul 18, 2002, 10:39 AM
Originally posted by madamimadamtimallen
Taken From Something I Posted On Another Thread:
Oh, the hardcore fans are the bigest bunch of wankers on the face of the earth (minus M$ fans). EVERY SINGLE TIME there is a MacWorld the whole community has to bitch about something. Everyone goes on about how much they love Apple but when Apple makes a change everyone bitches about it.

This is the first time I've complained about an Apple announcement, and it's because their are forcing us to buy their services because people are dependent of their e-mail addresses.

Digital identities should be respected - also by Apple.


Where do you think all the money is coming from for iTools???? We are in a huge down turn in the computer industry and Apple now has over 1 million iTools subscribers which they expected to reach 2 million very soon. Now do the math; if you assume a hard drive is 120MB then you can get 4 accounts on one drive. 2 000 000 / 4 = 500 000 drives. 500 000 drives at around $US150 a drive (assume they would be getting good drives at a discount rate) would be $US75 000 000 and they still have not bought the servers ect.

I don't get your calculations. If everybody actually used 30MB each, it would be 4096 accounts on one drive, not just 4. I guess you meant 120 GB, not MB? So it would be 489 drives.

One of my key points are that not everyone needs their 100 MB disk space etc. I need only around 100 bytes of config lines that set up their servers to forward my mail so that I still get my mail. They should - at least - offer this to their existing customer base (at least)!


Apple is offering us 100MB storage, 15MB email, Virex, back up and sync ability plus more for 2/3 of the cost of the drive. They need one drive per person to give us this and we get it for $US100 per year.


No, they do not need one drive per person - why do you think so? The $100 might be a fair price for all of the .Mac services, but my point is that a lot of people, including me, simply don't need all of the services.


If you don't like this offer, well, no one is stopping you finding free servers but I assure you that none will offer you what Apple is.

Yes - Apple is stopping me. They started out with a free service - got a lot of customers to sign up, and now that the customers relies on their mail address, they begin charging. The same way drug dealers attract customers. The same way namezero.com did it. But a large, trustworthy company like Apple should not do a thing like this.

--
Christian

Rower_CPU
Jul 18, 2002, 10:53 AM
This issue wil be moot once Apple gets the mechanics in place for converting to the free email only option for users.

It's documented in their FAQs and help system, just not in place yet.

Those who wish to keep their iDisks, Homepage, etc can pay and those who just want email will get it for free.

aggemam
Jul 18, 2002, 10:56 AM
OK, that is the right direction.

madamimadam
Jul 18, 2002, 06:30 PM
Originally posted by aggemam


This is the first time I've complained about an Apple announcement, and it's because their are forcing us to buy their services because people are dependent of their e-mail addresses.

Digital identities should be respected - also by Apple.



I don't get your calculations. If everybody actually used 30MB each, it would be 4096 accounts on one drive, not just 4. I guess you meant 120 GB, not MB? So it would be 489 drives.

One of my key points are that not everyone needs their 100 MB disk space etc. I need only around 100 bytes of config lines that set up their servers to forward my mail so that I still get my mail. They should - at least - offer this to their existing customer base (at least)!



No, they do not need one drive per person - why do you think so? The $100 might be a fair price for all of the .Mac services, but my point is that a lot of people, including me, simply don't need all of the services.



Yes - Apple is stopping me. They started out with a free service - got a lot of customers to sign up, and now that the customers relies on their mail address, they begin charging. The same way drug dealers attract customers. The same way namezero.com did it. But a large, trustworthy company like Apple should not do a thing like this.

--
Christian [/B]

Ok, I would like to officially admit I completely ********* the calculations.

Saying that, let's get past the figures and to the point. You sound like Apple owes you a living; have you not noticed that the computer economy is in a slum; are you on some other world? I am sure Apple had all intention to keep the service free but when it comes down to it, they are a business and a business needs to aim to keep creating growth. The only way you are going to find and email and web service that you are totally happy with is if you host your own server.

Everyone is bitching about how expensive it is but I am yet to see anyone who is bitching show stats on another service that is cheaper. If this is expensive for what you get, PROVE IT. Show me a package with the same features as in .mac for less.

On a lighter note... would be good if Apple was a dealer, they would be pricey but would have the best **** out there
;)

Update: Check Out This Link (http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm)

strider42
Jul 18, 2002, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by madamimadamtimallen

Everyone is bitching about how expensive it is but I am yet to see anyone who is bitching show stats on another service that is cheaper. If this is expensive for what you get, PROVE IT. Show me a package with the same features as in .mac for less.
;)

You miss the point. I don't want those features. all I want is email. If thats the only thing I use, I'm getting charged 100 bucks for a frigging email account. I'm willing to pay for a good email account, but not that much. Its not that the package is a bad deal, its that you have to buy the whole package.

And there is a lot to be said for people who are getting screwed by having to change their email accounts (or pay 100 bucks for services they dnot' want or need). I have my email in so many places I don't even remember them all, and I need to change them all if apple doesn't allow the email to be separate from the rest of the package.

Whats more, it seems like it would be a good business model for apple. How many of the 2 million itools users are going to pay 100 bucks a year for all these services. Probably nowhere near two million. how many would pay for just email if it was reasonably priced (say 10-20 bucks a year), probably a lot more. Considering the email doesn't cost that much for apple compared to the rest of the services that suck up expensive bandwith, I think this is doable and perhaps even more profitable. What it generates in good will is immeasureable.

madamimadam
Jul 18, 2002, 07:28 PM
Originally posted by strider42


You miss the point. I don't want those features. all I want is email. If thats the only thing I use, I'm getting charged 100 bucks for a frigging email account. I'm willing to pay for a good email account, but not that much. Its not that the package is a bad deal, its that you have to buy the whole package.

And there is a lot to be said for people who are getting screwed by having to change their email accounts (or pay 100 bucks for services they dnot' want or need). I have my email in so many places I don't even remember them all, and I need to change them all if apple doesn't allow the email to be separate from the rest of the package.

Whats more, it seems like it would be a good business model for apple. How many of the 2 million itools users are going to pay 100 bucks a year for all these services. Probably nowhere near two million. how many would pay for just email if it was reasonably priced (say 10-20 bucks a year), probably a lot more. Considering the email doesn't cost that much for apple compared to the rest of the services that suck up expensive bandwith, I think this is doable and perhaps even more profitable. What it generates in good will is immeasureable.

I won't debate with you that it would not be a bad idea for Apple to sell just email at low cost.... I would not go that option but it would be smart for them..... but from the start Apple has offered a package not just an email address. If you want just an email address that will not change and be low cost, talk to your ISP for f***s sake. In fact, depending on your ISP, you can probably get a reliable account for free. Apple is not there to give your ISP a hand by taking some of their pop bandwidth, they are there to offer the best in industry tools.


Update: Check Out This Link (http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm)

strider42
Jul 18, 2002, 07:40 PM
Originally posted by madamimadamtimallen

If you want just an email address that will not change and be low cost, talk to your ISP for f***s sake. In fact, depending on your ISP, you can probably get a reliable account for free. Apple is not there to give your ISP a hand by taking some of their pop bandwidth, they are there to offer the best in industry tools.

There in lies my piont exactly. My ISP has changed often, as I have moved various times and gotten a different cable company to provide my email (since the same companies to cover the same areas). I can't rely on ISP email for anything. Doing so ties you to your ISP, which ic even worse than the .mac situation.

On top of that, since I share a house with other people, the ISP isn't even in my name, which makes it a little bit of a hassle to go setup another email account because I'm not the person who's name is on the account. And like I said, I don't want an ISP email.

I used mac.com because I liked it better than hotmail or yahoo. And I was able to get a user name that wasn't followed by a random string of numbers because all the good ones were taken already. I will go to yahoo if I want, but I see nothing wrong with suggesting that apple offer the email as a low cost option. I ahve no problem paying for services I use.

And as for apple not being there to help my ISP, you're right. They are, however, there to keep me as a user, and making me pay 100 bucks for a ismple email account is nto the way to foster goodwill. I'm not saying I'd switch over somethign as trivial as this, but apple does have a responsibility to its users. Any company that stays in business knows that.

So in short, I reserve my right to suggest to apple they allow me to simply use the services I want to use. There is nothing wrong with my perspective on it. I'm not trying to freeload, expecting a free lunch or anything like that. I think most of the peopel upset about this have the same perspective as I do on the matter. If all we want is email, allow us to just get email.

madamimadam
Jul 18, 2002, 08:54 PM
Originally posted by strider42


There in lies my piont exactly. My ISP has changed often, as I have moved various times and gotten a different cable company to provide my email (since the same companies to cover the same areas). I can't rely on ISP email for anything. Doing so ties you to your ISP, which ic even worse than the .mac situation.

On top of that, since I share a house with other people, the ISP isn't even in my name, which makes it a little bit of a hassle to go setup another email account because I'm not the person who's name is on the account. And like I said, I don't want an ISP email.

I used mac.com because I liked it better than hotmail or yahoo. And I was able to get a user name that wasn't followed by a random string of numbers because all the good ones were taken already. I will go to yahoo if I want, but I see nothing wrong with suggesting that apple offer the email as a low cost option. I ahve no problem paying for services I use.

And as for apple not being there to help my ISP, you're right. They are, however, there to keep me as a user, and making me pay 100 bucks for a ismple email account is nto the way to foster goodwill. I'm not saying I'd switch over somethign as trivial as this, but apple does have a responsibility to its users. Any company that stays in business knows that.

So in short, I reserve my right to suggest to apple they allow me to simply use the services I want to use. There is nothing wrong with my perspective on it. I'm not trying to freeload, expecting a free lunch or anything like that. I think most of the peopel upset about this have the same perspective as I do on the matter. If all we want is email, allow us to just get email.

Did you even read the link above or were you too busy sounding like a d1ckhead??

If you keep changing ISP (which I doubt) then just pay a company to set up a redirect address. For example, you can buy just the email address anything@strider42.com which redirects whatever your email address is. This way, you just have to change where it redirects to when you get a new email. And don't give me this crap about how hard it is because it is not in your name, get off your lazy arse and pick up a phone.

I will say again, you are NOT paying $100 for an email account. You pay $100 for all the services... if you don't use them, that does not mean you are paying $100 for email it means you are paying for services you are not using.


Update: Check Out This Link (http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm)

awrc
Jul 18, 2002, 09:43 PM
For people looking for alternative e-mail addresses that aren't likely to change, there's always pobox.com - they just do forwarding (at $15/yr) but they've been around for six or seven years and seem determined to stick to their original niche so they're probably a fairly safe bet to continue to be around (of course, the very fact that I've said this has probably doomed them). Oh, they also do authenticated outgoing SMTP if your ISP's servers won't relay mail unless it's from their own domain.

My pobox.com address has pointed to four or five different ISPs over the years. Even though I no longer *need* it (since I've got my own domain) I keep it around for stuff I don't want to use my "home" e-mail address on.

There's also spamcop.net - more expensive at $30/yr but they offer POP/IMAP, webmail and industrial-strength configurable spam filtering. Only thing they don't provide is an outgoing SMTP server - you need to use your ISP for that. Mailsmith has built-in support for Spamcop reporting too :) I have as much of my mail as possible forwarded through this address, which in turn forwards to a "disinfected" POP account on my own domain.

I've still not completely given up on .mac yet though - while I'm ignoring all of the petitions (there aren't any that I completely agree with and some of the grammar and spelling is so bad I wouldn't want my name associated with it :D) However, I've sent my feedback in on both this and the 10.2 upgrade issues.

I figure I've done my bit, got my .mac escape route planned if I need it, and can now sit back and watch the seemingly neverending battle between the "I bought a Mac so Apple owes me software for life" extremists and the "I sold my first-born for body parts and gave the proceeds to Steve Jobs Who Can Do No Wrong" extremists.

strider42
Jul 18, 2002, 11:49 PM
Originally posted by madamimadamtimallen


Did you even read the link above or were you too busy sounding like a d1ckhead??

If you keep changing ISP (which I doubt) then just pay a company to set up a redirect address. For example, you can buy just the email address anything@strider42.com which redirects whatever your email address is. This way, you just have to change where it redirects to when you get a new email. And don't give me this crap about how hard it is because it is not in your name, get off your lazy arse and pick up a phone.

I will say again, you are NOT paying $100 for an email account. You pay $100 for all the services... if you don't use them, that does not mean you are paying $100 for email it means you are paying for services you are not using.

Whats wrong with you?

I'm just having a discussion that had no personal attacks in it, and you start calling people names.

Yes, I'm fully aware I have the option to set up a domain like that. I'm not sure about all the ins and outs of it yet, but its somethign I may look into.

How difficult it is isn't so much the issue so much as going through the hassle. I have a lot of thigns tied to my email I don't want to change. People I don't talk to often have my current email, and if I forget someone, they won't be able to contact me. This is a big thing for plenty of people. And I can't pick up my phone to deal with my ISP, my roommate has to do it since its all in his name, and he's never around.

That doesn't change the fact I need to change my email address when apple gave us all the impression we wouldn't have to.

And if i don't use the other services, then I am paying 100 bucks for an email address if I want to keep my mac.com email. There is no way to keep my email without buying the other services currently. For an analogy, if I only want basic cable TV, I pay for it. If my provider suddenly changed and said I had to buy digital service with all the channels for 100 bucks a month, I wouldn't be very happy abobut that. I don't want those services, but what choice would I have (I know, its not a perfect analogy, but you get the idea).

So stop being so self righteous. I just want to be able to keep my current email address without paying for extras. If that won't be possible, I'll deal with it. That doesn't mean I can't make the suggestion.

Thus my suggestion that apple need only make the mac.com email free or low cost. The I'll be paying a reasonable amount for the only service I use.

And yes, I have changed my ISP at least 5 times over the last few years. a non ISP dependant email is essential for just this reason.

Whats wrong with people that they have to resort to name calling in the middle of a discussion. I totally understood everything you said, I was just giving a different perspective. chill out man and read what I said. I don't think my points are unreasonable.

madamimadam
Jul 19, 2002, 12:48 AM
Originally posted by strider42


Whats wrong with you?

I'm just having a discussion that had no personal attacks in it, and you start calling people names.

Yes, I'm fully aware I have the option to set up a domain like that. I'm not sure about all the ins and outs of it yet, but its somethign I may look into.

How difficult it is isn't so much the issue so much as going through the hassle. I have a lot of thigns tied to my email I don't want to change. People I don't talk to often have my current email, and if I forget someone, they won't be able to contact me. This is a big thing for plenty of people. And I can't pick up my phone to deal with my ISP, my roommate has to do it since its all in his name, and he's never around.

That doesn't change the fact I need to change my email address when apple gave us all the impression we wouldn't have to.

And if i don't use the other services, then I am paying 100 bucks for an email address if I want to keep my mac.com email. There is no way to keep my email without buying the other services currently. For an analogy, if I only want basic cable TV, I pay for it. If my provider suddenly changed and said I had to buy digital service with all the channels for 100 bucks a month, I wouldn't be very happy abobut that. I don't want those services, but what choice would I have (I know, its not a perfect analogy, but you get the idea).

So stop being so self righteous. I just want to be able to keep my current email address without paying for extras. If that won't be possible, I'll deal with it. That doesn't mean I can't make the suggestion.

Thus my suggestion that apple need only make the mac.com email free or low cost. The I'll be paying a reasonable amount for the only service I use.

And yes, I have changed my ISP at least 5 times over the last few years. a non ISP dependant email is essential for just this reason.

Whats wrong with people that they have to resort to name calling in the middle of a discussion. I totally understood everything you said, I was just giving a different perspective. chill out man and read what I said. I don't think my points are unreasonable.

Your posts are un-*****-reasonable because you won't read the ***** link above. You said "read what (you) said" but you won't read what I said.

http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm

READ THE ***** LINK MORON!!!!!!

**Breathe in, breath out**

madamimadam
Jul 19, 2002, 01:00 AM
I could do with one of those Blue Pepsis right about now to go along with about 50 Hrs worth of sleep.

strider42
Jul 19, 2002, 01:20 AM
Originally posted by madamimadamtimallen


Your posts are un-*****-reasonable because you won't read the ***** link above. You said "read what (you) said" but you won't read what I said.

http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm
http://help.apple.com/mac/5/help/mail/pgs/mac43.htm

READ THE ***** LINK MORON!!!!!!

**Breathe in, breath out**


Am I missing something. I read the link and it says that I need a mac.com membership to add other email address to it. So either I need to buy it (which I don't want to do) or I need to find someone else to do it and then be dependant on them to keep paying for their membership. I'm not looking for a workaround. I'd like apple to offer email only accounts to their customers without playing games.

If I'm missing something, just let me, have a discussion about, don't be so obnoxious. Seriously, why be so adversarial when I'm just saying all I want is to keep my email account.

Jeeze, this place is starting to sound like maccentral.

recurve
Jul 19, 2002, 01:35 AM
I have similar sentiments with those who believe we deserve a better Email solution from Apple.

Here is a link to a free service for people who simply happen to live in Florida, Georgia, or Alabama (for comparison purposes):
http://www.tfn.net/TFN/Register/

Below is a copy of a long message I sent to Apple:

I am outraged that Apple has discontinued iTools.

At the bare minimum you should provide a free lifetime mail forwarding
service for all current iTools members.

$100 is what I roughly paid for OS 9.
$100 is what I roughly paid for OS X.
$3000 is what I roughly paid for my Titanium PowerBook.
$30 is what I paid for QuickTime 5 (which now doesn't work in v6)
$500 is what I paid to be an ADC select member (developer member).
Total is $3730

I remember that the major reason to upgrade to OS 9 was to make use of
iTools. It was explained during the Keynote of that year that as a
benefit of choosing the Mac platform we get iTools. The product was
touted as being a "free" service but we had to purchase OS 9 or buy a
new Mac with OS 9 or later to make use of iTools.

The current policy regarding the demise of iTools is unacceptable. I
have a large number of contacts who regard my recurve@mac.com address as
a lifetime address. Now that Apple has suckered me into giving out this
address to so many people and printing so many business cards with this
address on it you've trapped me. You are forcing me to pay $50 for the
first year and then $100 for every year after that. I don't even want
the level of services you are providing with the new .Mac offering. I
feel tricked and cheated. I feel that Apple is trying to suck all the
money you can out of me. It's the same with QuickTime 6, I'm not even
that excited about Mpeg-4 and now you've taken away my ability to edit
and save QuickTime 5 content without buying a new registration code.
Why can't I keep QuickTime 5 pro?

Below I list three possible approaches which Apple can take if they
really care about me:

1) Keep the iTools services and additionally offer the .Mac services.
Anyone who buys an Apple operating system will be able to use the iTools
services free for one year. Anyone who buys an Apple computer will get
to use iTools services free for three years. Anyone who holds an ADC
membership can have free iTools service for one year. Charge $25 per
year for those people who want to keep their iTools service but haven't
purchased a new operating system or new computer or registered for an
ADC account.

2) Allow all current iTools members to have a forwarding box free of
charge. This does not require our messages to be stored at Apple. It
allows us to avoid pestering our business and personal contacts and keep
one e-mail address for the rest of our life. It also makes life easier
when subscribing to listserves (I subscribe to eight different ones).
When we do change our Email providers we only need to log into Apple's
website and update the forwarding information.

3) Allow us to purchase full fledged Email services for $10 per year.

If Apple does not take any of the above mentioned steps to rectify this
situation then I'll take this as you just don't care about me. Please
don't make me regret adopting iTools. Had I known things would turn out
this way I would have paid for the Mail.com Email services (instead of
using iTools) before I started building so many business and personal
contacts. Please don't make me regret I chose recurve@mac.com to be my
"prestigious" Email address.

I chose the Mac because I don't want to be hassled. I value a company
that provides me with good clear solutions. This is the first time I've
been hassled by Apple and my first computer was the Macintosh 512kE.
Why are you hassling me now?!?

Sincerely,
Aaron Rosenzweig
recurve@mac.com
http://homepage.mac.com/~recurve/

madamimadam
Jul 19, 2002, 03:29 AM
Originally posted by strider42



Am I missing something. I read the link and it says that I need a mac.com membership to add other email address to it. So either I need to buy it (which I don't want to do) or I need to find someone else to do it and then be dependant on them to keep paying for their membership. I'm not looking for a workaround. I'd like apple to offer email only accounts to their customers without playing games.

If I'm missing something, just let me, have a discussion about, don't be so obnoxious. Seriously, why be so adversarial when I'm just saying all I want is to keep my email account.

Jeeze, this place is starting to sound like maccentral.

It talks about converting a TRIAL account to an EMAIL ONLY account. Read the front page of www.macrumors.com ... the news report is there now.

strider42
Jul 19, 2002, 03:53 AM
Originally posted by madamimadamtimallen


It talks about converting a TRIAL account to an EMAIL ONLY account. Read the front page of www.macrumors.com ... the news report is there now.

From what I've read, no one has been able to do this conversion, and there is conflicting information. And when I read that, it says to me you have to have a .mac account and then you can add the email only account for 10 bucks. You can't, as far as I can tell, get the email by itself. You absolutely have to have at least one .mac account for 100 bucks. Maybe I'm still missing something, but that how it appears to be. There is no way to get the email by itself.

I quote: "You must have a full .Mac member, who has purchased an additional email-only account, include your converted account as part of their membership."

my email only account is tied to a full .mac membership. If I don't want that membership, someone else must do the conversion for me. If thats so, if they decided to no longer use .mac, my account would also be forfeit.

So I must still be a friggin moron, cause I'm reading it and it simply restates the exact thing I don't like about the situation.

mmmdreg
Jul 20, 2002, 06:14 AM
Since Apple (through RAILhead) stated that email-only accounts were 10$ i think, you should be able to choose what parts of .mac you want to use and just get charged on the IMO..