PDA

View Full Version : Iraq is worse off than before the war began, GAO reports




zimv20
Jun 30, 2004, 09:04 AM
link (http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/9041465.htm)


Iraq is worse off than before the war began, GAO reports

By Seth Borenstein
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - In a few key areas - electricity, the judicial system and overall security - the Iraq that America handed back to its residents Monday is worse off than before the war began last year, according to calculations in a new General Accounting Office report released Tuesday.

The 105-page report by Congress' investigative arm offers a bleak assessment of Iraq after 14 months of U.S. military occupation. Among its findings:

-In 13 of Iraq's 18 provinces, electricity was available fewer hours per day on average last month than before the war. Nearly 20 million of Iraq's 26 million people live in those provinces.

-Only $13.7 billion of the $58 billion pledged and allocated worldwide to rebuild Iraq has been spent, with another $10 billion about to be spent. The biggest chunk of that money has been used to run Iraq's ministry operations.

-The country's court system is more clogged than before the war, and judges are frequent targets of assassination attempts.

-The new Iraqi civil defense, police and overall security units are suffering from mass desertions, are poorly trained and ill-equipped.

-The number of what the now-disbanded Coalition Provisional Authority called significant insurgent attacks skyrocketed from 411 in February to 1,169 in May.

The report was released on the same day that the CPA's inspector general issued three reports that highlighted serious management difficulties at the CPA. The reports found that the CPA wasted millions of dollars at a Hilton resort hotel in Kuwait because it didn't have guidelines for who could stay there, lost track of how many employees it had in Iraq and didn't track reconstruction projects funded by international donors to ensure they didn't duplicate U.S. projects.

Both the GAO report and the CPA report said that the CPA was seriously understaffed for the gargantuan task of rebuilding Iraq. The GAO report suggested the agency needed three times more employees than what it had. The CPA report said the agency believed it had 1,196 employees, when it was authorized to have 2,117. But the inspector general said CPA's records were so disorganized that it couldn't verify its actual number of employees.

GAO Comptroller General David Walker blamed insurgent attacks for many of the problems in Iraq. "The unstable security environment has served to slow down our rebuilding and reconstruction efforts and it's going to be of critical importance to provide more stable security," Walker told Knight Ridder Newspapers in a telephone interview Tuesday.

"There are a number of significant questions that need to be asked and answered dealing with the transition (to self-sovereignty)," Walker said. "A lot has been accomplished and a lot remains to be done."

The GAO report is the first government assessment of conditions in Iraq at the end of the U.S. occupation. It outlined what it called "key challenges that will affect the political transition" in 10 specific areas.

The GAO gave a draft of the report to several different government agencies, but only the CPA offered a major comment: It said the report "was not sufficiently critical of the judicial reconstruction effort."

(more)



mactastic
Jun 30, 2004, 09:16 AM
And the big winner is..... Halliburton!

Surprise surprise...

Stelliform
Jun 30, 2004, 08:16 PM
No one said a Saddamectomy wasn't a painful procedure.

Voltron
Jun 30, 2004, 08:21 PM
link (http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/9041465.htm)

-The country's court system is more clogged than before the war, and judges are frequent targets of assassination attempts.

The number of what the now-disbanded Coalition Provisional Authority called significant insurgent attacks skyrocketed from 411 in February to 1,169 in May.


So I'm to assume your saying things would've been better leaving Saddam in charge?
I thought we expanded the electrical grid to include more of Iraq than has ever been powered?

Oh wait maybe this has something to do with it?

BAGHDAD, Iraq – Saboteurs blew up a key northern oil pipeline Wednesday, forcing a 10 percent cut on the national power grid as demand for electricity rises with the advent of Iraq's broiling summer heat.

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/nation_world/story.asp?ID=9813

Terrorist are trying to win our war against terrorism. Naturally they would do their best to make sure Iraq is ungovernable.

zimv20
Jun 30, 2004, 09:09 PM
So I'm to assume your saying things would've been better leaving Saddam in charge?

i do not recall saying that. please allow for some grey area between "we could have done better" and "we should have left saddam in charge"

IJ Reilly
Jun 30, 2004, 09:21 PM
i do not recall saying that. please allow for some grey area between "we could have done better" and "we should have left saddam in charge"

Grey areas? What are those?

Voltron
Jun 30, 2004, 09:31 PM
i do not recall saying that. please allow for some grey area between "we could have done better" and "we should have left saddam in charge"
We may have been able to do better.

blackfox
Jun 30, 2004, 09:38 PM
You know, in fairness, you can argue the point of this thread either way...that yes, toppling a whole system of governance in a country is bound to make things more of a mess than under the old system (however flawed), and certainly we could have done a better job as liberators/occupiers...This is all in the past, though, and imo the only relevance it has is at the polls in November...the real question is how the US is going to handle things now, after the transfer of power to the Iraqis, and how much of that action is going to be based on domestic election politics instead of the real necessities over there...I worry that things are only going to get worse till after the election.

zimv20
Jun 30, 2004, 09:38 PM
We may have been able to do better.
i think a lot of people are under the impression that, over the past year, the US has made great strides in returing iraq to normalcy. this report provides evidence that says otherwise.

so while it may be true that 'we may have been able to do better,' i bet very few knew it was this bad and would be outraged if, say, the report were covered in the nightly news (i didn't see it on the early evening abcnews).

pseudobrit
Jun 30, 2004, 09:54 PM
If you listen to mainstream media outlets, the general "buzz" you get is a warm and fuzzy feeling of progress being hampered by pesky "terrorists".

Add it to the growning column of Bush administration cock-ups.