Next-Generation iPod Model Number List Revealed?

[BlizzardBomb]

Title says it all really.

iPod Part Numbers (http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/09/sources_reveal_apples_new_ipod_lineup_with_part_numbers.html)
Gizmodo link if AppleInsider one is down... (http://gizmodo.com/5355566/apple-part-numbers-confirm-new-ipod-classic-nano-and-shuffles-in-colors)

[MacRumors]

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/09/next-generation-ipod-model-number-list-revealed/)

AppleInsider reports (http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/09/sources_reveal_apples_new_ipod_lineup_with_part_numbers.html) on a tip from a reliable source who has also in the past provided reliable information to MacRumors detailing the forthcoming iPod model updates to be introduced today.

The list includes iPod nano models in both 8 GB and 16 GB capacities, each available in the same nine colors currently available in existing models. Also included are 160 GB iPod classic models in the same silver and black colors found on existing models, but increased in capacity from the current 120 GB offerings. Finally, iPod shuffle models in 2 GB and 4 GB capacities are listed in several colors. It is unclear whether the new iPod shuffle models correspond to the latest version (http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/) introduced in March in 4 GB capacities in silver and black or to earlier-generation models that have continued to be offered in 1 GB capacities in multiple colors.

There is no mention of the iPod touch in the alleged list of updated models, an omission that may be related to last-minute production problems (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/07/its-only-rock-and-roll-banner-and-last-minute-ipod-production-problems/) with camera modules.MC027LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - SILVER
MC031LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - BLACK
MC034LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - PURPLE
MC037LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - BLUE
MC040LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - GREEN
MC043LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - YELLOW
MC046LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - ORANGE
MC049LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - RED
MC050LL/A - IPOD NANO 8GB - PINK
MC060LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - SILVER
MC062LL/A - IPOD NANO 1[6]GB - BLACK
MC064LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - PURPLE
MC066LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - BLUE
MC068LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - GREEN
MC070LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - YELLOW
MC072LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - ORANGE
MC074LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - RED
MC075LL/A - IPOD NANO 16GB - PINK
MC293LL/A - IPOD CLASSIC 160GB - SILVER
MC297LL/A - IPOD CLASSIC 160GB - BLACK
MC306LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - SILVER
MC307LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - GREEN
MC323LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - BLACK
MC328LL/A- IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - BLUE
MC331LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 4GB - PINK
MC381LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - GREEN
MC384LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - BLUE
MC387LL/A - IPOD SHUFFLE 2GB - PINKApple briefly slashed prices (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/09/apple-slashes-ipod-prices-prior-to-media-event/) on its existing iPod touch, iPod nano, and iPod classic models earlier today before the online store was taken down.

Article Link: Next-Generation iPod Model Number List Revealed? (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/09/next-generation-ipod-model-number-list-revealed/)

[creon]

The Shuffle now has colors. My world is finally complete. :rolleyes:

I guess there is no need for a funeral for the iPod classic as we thought.

[corinhorn]

let the complaining start, or worsen

[Clark Gable]

would still like to see a 128gb ssd classic though

[BlizzardBomb]

Ha, just this second posted this. 160 GB classic is great news.

[trekkie604]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)

Hopefully there is more to this event than just a capacity bump to last year's models....

[Hellhammer]

So just 40GB bigger Classic and Shuffle with more colors + today's price cut? I hope there's something else too...

[zw-gator]

This confirms that the ipod Touch will be delayed

[ss957916]

I'm beginning to seriously wonder if this refresh really needs an event. Bump in memory, a few models get cameras (major yawn) and perhaps a new iTunes (major yawn with a little bit of dribble).

I could understand it if there was a new ATV or some brand new product or major new function - but a camera? Pah!!

[travisjacques]

the suspense is killllling me.:D

[BlizzardBomb]

would still like to see a 128gb ssd classic though

That would cost $500 and be a niche product. Flash is still too expensive above 100 GBs. 64 GBs on a touch is all we'll be getting this year I think.

[elhungarian]

Man I hope the touches aren't more than 1-2 weeks out.

[Surely]

There'd better be a camera on the new shuffle.:mad:;)

[Eduardo1971]

Wow-they will continue the Classic! Not only that but at 160 GB's!:)

I'm buying one!!!

[talkingfuture]

It'll be interesting to see the shuffle colours and whether they tweak the controls at all.

[Nams42]

I will be VERY disappointed if they don't unveil the iPod touch today. Don't care if it doesn't ship for awhile. I want to see what it's like NOW!

[creon]

There'd better be a camera on the new shuffle.:mad:;)

It comes separately where you have to plug it in to the headphone jack ;).

[goinskiing]

There's something fishy going on with the touch...

[nemaslov]

Crap!! Back to a 160 classic? Come on what about 240 or 360? It certainly is possible. I mean you can buy modified 5 Gen version at 240GB. There is an audience for a larger HD version.

[nemaslov]

Ha, just this second posted this. 160 GB classic is great news.

They used to make an 160. Thought they would finally go to 240.

[corinhorn]

Crap!! Back to a 160 classic? Come on what about 240 or 360? It certainly is possible. Yeah, but I don't think it is possible in a single-platter drive.

[creon]

Crap!! Back to a 160 classic? Come on what about 240 or 360? It certainly is possible. I mean you can buy modified 5 Gen version at 240GB. There is an audience for a larger HD version.

You couldn't even listen to that many song without the battery dying. I really do not see a point for such a large HD.

Plus, do you know how much time it would require to listen to that many songs? The price for a 360 would be ridiculous.

[BlizzardBomb]

Crap!! Back to a 160 classic? Come on what about 240 or 360? It certainly is possible. I mean you can buy modified 5 Gen version at 240GB. There is an audience for a larger HD version.

240 GB 1.8" Hard Drives are dual-platter. This means that it is substantially thicker, heavier and more power-hungry than the single-platter versions. There is an audience for over 160 GBs, but it's very very small, and not worth the R & D and production costs over such a small market. Let's face it, you could easily sync what you need and remove what you don't need with 160 GBs.

[Dagless]

160gb is a good (re)step forward. Depending on how substantial the iPod Touch updates are today I might just get one to replace my old iPod 5.5G.

[M87]

I owned two of the original 160GB Classics. One was defective right out of the box and the other one lasted about a year before it crapped out. Those were the only iPods I ever had any problems with. In both cases the audio output was heavily distorted. Is that why they discontinued them for a while? I hope these ones will be more reliable.

[PeterQVenkman]

Man I hope the touches aren't more than 1-2 weeks out.

I have been waiting to get one for a while. I want it!

[Master Chief]

I knew it:

https://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/51/20080903/swdlp.apple.com/images/en_US/iTunes_enUS_Dwdl_09092009.gif

Now be smart and download iTunes 9 like I did!!!!!!!!!

[zorinlynx]

You couldn't even listen to that many song without the battery dying. I really do not see a point for such a large HD.

Plus, do you know how much time it would require to listen to that many songs? The price for a 360 would be ridiculous.

The idea is to be able to have your ENTIRE music collection with you, instead of having to pick and choose what you have on your iPod.

I moved from an iPod Classic to a 16GB Nano and have been regretting the lack of space despite the tiny form factor. I'm actually considering selling the Nano and moving back to the Classic. Being able to have your ENTIRE collection with you is awesome, especially when you're on a road trip and want to play obscure tracks for friends in the car. :)

[sushi]

would still like to see a 128gb ssd classic though
Probably too expensive at this point in time.

Give it a year. :)

[goinskiing]

Just one hour! Then all the rumors can be put to rest...

[Povilas]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)

Hopefully there is more to this event than just a capacity bump to last year's models....

Must be, because Apple needs no event for just minor upgrades. Something must be.

[Clark Gable]

You couldn't even listen to that many song without the battery dying. I really do not see a point for such a large HD.

Plus, do you know how much time it would require to listen to that many songs? The price for a 360 would be ridiculous.

some people have more then a 10 cd library and that dont like the ipod touch touch because its real annoying to be constantly pulling it out to do anything with it besides turn the volume up and down

[zachplaysguitar]

Just one hour! Then all the rumors can be put to rest...

For about 7.2 seconds then all the new/unanswered ones come flying in and people will find something else to complain about:rolleyes:

[Beric]

For about 7.2 seconds then all the new/unanswered ones come flying in and people will find something else to complain about:rolleyes:

I'm already complaining and I haven't even seen the new iPods. ;)

[andrew0122]

I will be VERY disappointed if they don't unveil the iPod touch today. Don't care if it doesn't ship for awhile. I want to see what it's like NOW!

They will unveil the iPod Touch today. There isn't a doubt in my mind. The way it works: (EXTREMELY SIMPLIFIED)
1) Apple creates a design for a product.
2) Apple sends this design to various product manufactures, or at least what parts they need with order quantities.
3) Parts are shipped to assembly plant in China and are assembled. (This is when an EXTREMELY diluted extract of Jobs' sweat is sprayed to each product giving it that amazing new unboxing smell. Can't stress enough just how diluted his sweat is. If ingested in 1:1 ratio. . . It could render that man impotent.)
4) Working prototypes are sent back to Apple for inspection. (Most likely what we will see Jobs pull out of his pocket today.)
5) 1-2 Weeks should start seeing iPod Touch in stores. (If not sooner.)

[JonHimself]

There's something fishy going on with the touch...

How's this for fishy, dropping the iPod Touch all together, new tablet replaces the iPod Touch for the netbook-ish device, iPhone is sold without having to get a contract so if people really want the iPhone w/o the phone and bills they can buy it... craaaazy haha.

[Hairball]

Hopefully the event will live up to the hype, although "analysts" on CNBC don't seem to think it will.:confused:

[Revival Cr8tive]

Ummm... Surely 'Slashed' prices would equate Apple practically giving them away? Id hardly call $20 off slashing prices... lol..

Other than that keep up the good work!

[Small White Car]

Crap!! Back to a 160 classic? Come on what about 240 or 360? It certainly is possible. I mean you can buy modified 5 Gen version at 240GB. There is an audience for a larger HD version.

Not enough of an audience to matter, though.

They used to have a 120 and a 160 and then they dropped the 160. Tells you which one was selling more, doesn't it?

They're raising it now because they can get the 160 drives cheaper and thinner than before, but the fact is that not many people want even 160 GB.

If they did it wouldn't have been dropped in the first place.

[corinhorn]

Just one hour! Then all the rumors can be put to rest... . . . . and a new round of complaints can start.

[bommai]

There'd better be a camera on the new shuffle.:mad:;)

You have to shake to take a picture. Oh wait;)

[neoelectronaut]

Seriously tempted to get one of those 160GB iPods.

My 1G iPod Touch is nice and all, but the app store isn't all it's cracked up to be and 32GB is seriously limiting the amount of media I can put on this thing.

[Clark Gable]

Not enough of an audience to matter, though.

They used to have a 120 and a 160 and then they dropped the 160. Tells you which one was selling more, doesn't it?

They're raising it now because they can get the 160 drives cheaper and thinner than before, but the fact is that not many people want even 160 GB.

If they did it wouldn't have been dropped in the first place.

actually it was an 80 and 160. then they did the small redesign of the case and made it 120gb

[kcjohn]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2044/2413811053_3727e6dee9.jpg

[fabian9]

some people have more then a 10 cd library and that dont like the ipod touch touch because its real annoying to be constantly pulling it out to do anything with it besides turn the volume up and down

Just out of interest, what can you do with an iPod Classic without pulling it out of your pocket?

I used to own one and was able to skip songs and press the play/pause button. Changing volume worked through jeans with thin fabric, but not with thicker fabric. Of course you could put your hand in the pocket to change volume etc but that's already half way to getting it out!

As far as I'm concerned, I can change tracks and play/pause on my iPhone with the Apple Headphones with mic (which also works on the iPod Touch AFAIK?). And I control the volume by pressing the buttons through my trousers...

So I don't understand how the Classic has any advantages over the Touch in that respect?

[BlizzardBomb]

actually it was an 80 and 160. then they did the small redesign of the case and made it 120gb

I don't even think there was a redesign. There was a slim classic and a fat classic. Keep the slim, shove a new Hard Drive in it and presto!

[The Samurai]

*Can see a lot of people getting disappointed today*

[Beric]

I don't even think there was a redesign. There was a slim classic and a fat classic. Keep the slim, shove a new Hard Drive in it and presto!

Yup. Exactly what happened.

[Dagless]

How's this for fishy, dropping the iPod Touch all together, new tablet replaces the iPod Touch for the netbook-ish device, iPhone is sold without having to get a contract so if people really want the iPhone w/o the phone and bills they can buy it... craaaazy haha.

But unfortunately then you get the bad side of the iPhone, less capacity and thicker/heavier design!

[aznkid25]

I knew it:

https://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/51/20080903/swdlp.apple.com/images/en_US/iTunes_enUS_Dwdl_09092009.gif

Now be smart and download iTunes 9 like I did!!!!!!!!!

How did you find that image?

[iZac]

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/528.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile/7A341 Safari/528.16)

Hopefully there is more to this event than just a capacity bump to last year's models....

Other than a camera, and some tweaks, i recon they're going to keep the design of these models drifting along. The iPhone too got an arguably modest update (visually) so perhaps Apple are just trying to keep their new designs close to their chest until the economy picks up.

[JacobC1983]

I am glad there is still a classic. too bad the hard drive isn't bigger.. but like will go on

[michael31986]

What about 32gb iPod nano. I thought that was going to be a given. They have been upping the nano since they came out! No hope for 64gb nano. Next year?

[John.B]

Apple briefly slashed prices (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/09/apple-slashes-ipod-prices-prior-to-media-event/) on its existing iPod touch, iPod nano, and iPod classic models earlier today before the online store was taken down.
If nothing else, it proves that they don't have to take the store(s) down to change prices or content. ;)

[Clark Gable]

I don't even think there was a redesign. There was a slim classic and a fat classic. Keep the slim, shove a new Hard Drive in it and presto!

yeah the 80 was slimmer than the 160 but those were flat platic looking and the 120 was more of a rounded edge metal case.

80 and 160 cases were like this

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/88/Ipod_5th_Generation_white.jpg/465px-Ipod_5th_Generation_white.jpg

120 is like this

http://ipodgoogleandmore.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/ipod-classic_5.jpg

[BlizzardBomb]

What about 32gb iPod nano. I thought that was going to be a given. They have been upping the nano since they came out! No hope for 64gb nano. Next year?

I was semi-hoping for a bump too, but really, the nano isn't the product of choice for audiophiles and people with large libraries. That and Apple wants to force you to the next model up where there's more profit. It's all about the money. Maybe a 32 GB nano next year.

[lostngone]

I wanna see Steve Jobs and bask in the great reality distortion field...

I swear the SJRDF is like a drug... I freakin need it!!!!

[nemaslov]

You couldn't even listen to that many song without the battery dying. I really do not see a point for such a large HD.

Plus, do you know how much time it would require to listen to that many songs? The price for a 360 would be ridiculous.

There are many who use their classics not as a portable walking Pod but for DJing, or at studios, work, home where its plugged into stereos. I have more than 160GB of music and yes I can't listen to it all at once, but I want my entire collection (especially when I travel) with me so I can choose.

I have a 160 and many of us are not opposed to a ticker pod since it's not about portability.

[BlizzardBomb]

yeah the 80 was slimmer than the 160 but those were flat platic looking and the 120 was more of a rounded edge metal case.

80 and 160 cases were like this

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/88/Ipod_5th_Generation_white.jpg/465px-Ipod_5th_Generation_white.jpg

120 is like this

http://ipodgoogleandmore.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/ipod-classic_5.jpg

Trust me, I have a 80 GB metal iPod classic sitting on my desk ;)

When in doubt, time travel (http://web.archive.org/web/20080319081008/www.apple.com/ipodclassic/specs.html)!

[Compile 'em all]

I knew it:

https://a248.e.akamai.net/7/248/51/20080903/swdlp.apple.com/images/en_US/iTunes_enUS_Dwdl_09092009.gif

Now be smart and download iTunes 9 like I did!!!!!!!!!

nice find!

Now post a link to itunes 9 :p

[ozzyman500]

Looking forward to iTunes 9.

[QCassidy352]

*Can see a lot of people getting disappointed today*

yes, I'm seeing this event being very disappointing and the howling on MR being pretty loud. Time to avoid this site for the next day or two...

[Clark Gable]

Trust me, I have a 80 GB metal iPod classic sitting on my desk ;)

When in doubt, time travel (http://web.archive.org/web/20080319081008/www.apple.com/ipodclassic/specs.html)!

still was a small redesign after the plasticy type classic the 160 and 80gb started out with

[John.B]

You couldn't even listen to that many song without the battery dying. I really do not see a point for such a large HD.

Plus, do you know how much time it would require to listen to that many songs? The price for a 360 would be ridiculous.
FWIW, I know two people who rip all their CDs to Apple Lossless format. In that case, 120/160 GB isn't really that large and the Classic becomes the manditory iPod of choice.

[Bjohnson33]

Ha, just this second posted this. 160 GB classic is great news.

I wonder how many people still buy the classic? I'm sure it has its fans, but it just seems so outdated when compared to the touch.

[Pigumon]

You couldn't even listen to that many song without the battery dying. I really do not see a point for such a large HD.

Plus, do you know how much time it would require to listen to that many songs? The price for a 360 would be ridiculous.

Way to think right smack dab in the center of the inside of the box. I'm so sick of hearing people say this same thing over and over. "you could never listen to that many songs".

LISTEN TO ME RIGHT NOW. It's not about listening to EVERY song at once, it's about listening to ANY song at once! I have my entire music collection on my ipod 40GB, I can choose any song from my collection ANY time I want. I can shuffle through my collection whenever I feel like it. I hear songs I forgot about that I wouldn't even think of "syncing". It's the main reason i still have a 5 year old ipod instead of a touch. I'm hoping that changes today (or at least soon).

[Micjose]

wow! that's all!?:eek:

their better be something amazing! :rolleyes:

[shaunymac]

Way to think right smack dab in the center of the inside of the box. I'm so sick of hearing people say this same thing over and over. "you could never listen to that many songs".

LISTEN TO ME RIGHT NOW. It's not about listening to EVERY song at once, it's about listening to ANY song at once! I have my entire music collection on my ipod 40GB, I can choose any song from my collection ANY time I want. I can shuffle through my collection whenever I feel like it. I hear songs I forgot about that I wouldn't even think of "syncing". It's the main reason i still have a 5 year old ipod instead of a touch. I'm hoping that changes today (or at least soon).

That's it. That right there is the reason why people want storage capacity. I have been eyeing ipod photo's/ipod video's because they offered enough storage for my library. However, I just got a 32gb iPhone two days ago and for now it will suffice. That is until I start loading it up with apps. Esp. if I buy that tomtom app I am on the fence about. I believe it is about 7 gigs or so.

[twoodcc]

i guess we'll find out about the ipods real soon.

[michael31986]

I was semi-hoping for a bump too, but really, the nano isn't the product of choice for audiophiles and people with large libraries. That and Apple wants to force you to the next model up where there's more profit. It's all about the money. Maybe a 32 GB nano next year.

yea, but they always bump every ipod. i mean except for the classic last year, but that was a diff story. ugh i really wanted a 32gb nano so that way i had more confirmation that next year there would be a 64gb ipod nano. i wanna get rid of my classic.

[Master Chief]

How did you find that image?
That is actually pretty easy, if you know how Apple works – they need to forward everything to servers all around the globe, and that's where I step in to get software from (sometimes up to a day ahead of the official release).

p.s. I cannot provide a direct download link, for obvious reasons ;)

[John.B]

I have my entire music collection on my ipod 40GB, I can choose any song from my collection ANY time I want. I can shuffle through my collection whenever I feel like it. I hear songs I forgot about that I wouldn't even think of "syncing". It's the main reason i still have a 5 year old ipod instead of a touch. I'm hoping that changes today (or at least soon).
There's a new 64GB Touch at your local :apple: store with your name on it.

[charlituna]

There is no mention of the iPod touch in the alleged list of updated models, an omission that may be related to last-minute production problems (http://www.macrumors.com/2009/09/07/its-only-rock-and-roll-banner-and-last-minute-ipod-production-problems/) with camera modules.



or there was never any intention, despite rumors, to put the camera on the touch because then it would be one decent VoIP app away from cutting into iphone sales

[Bjohnson33]

would still like to see a 128gb ssd classic though

That would be really cool, but I'd say we're a year or two away from having something like that become a reality. The prices for memory are dropping quickly though - the sooner we get there, the better!

[Bjohnson33]

. . . . and a new round of complaints can start.

Funny because it's true! Although, now that they've been announced, I haven't heard too many complaints so far. You'll never please everyone all of the time, and I guess that's doubly true for Apple products!

[Bjohnson33]

What about 32gb iPod nano. I thought that was going to be a given. They have been upping the nano since they came out! No hope for 64gb nano. Next year?

I think a 32gb nano would be an awesome product for someone looking for an iPod mainly dedicated to playing music. If the apps are a big draw, the Touch is a great purchase, but if music is the main concern, 32 gigs holds a heck of a lot of music - probably far more than 90% of the population has in their collection. With the addition of the Nike+ pedometer and (unreleased) heart rate monitor, it's a pretty compelling little MP3 player.