View Full Version : Facebook poll asking whether or not Obama should be assassinated found and pulled
iPhone 62S
Sep 29, 2009, 11:44 AM
SAN FRANCISCO - The U.S. Secret Service is trying to identify the people who launched an online poll at Facebook asking whether U.S. President Barack Obama should be assassinated.
Facebook on Monday shot down the user-generated poll, which was titled "Should Obama be killed?" and offered answer choices of yes, no, maybe, and "If he cuts my health care."
"Once we found out about it, we worked with Facebook to have it removed," Secret Service spokesman Malcolm Wiley told AFP.
"We are certainly investigating; just like we would with any threat case."
More than 750 Facebook users had reportedly cast votes by the time the poll was yanked from the wildly popular online social networking community.
"This is sick and sad," a Facebook user with the screen name Cocoa Fly said in a posting as the poll fueled passionate online exchanges at the website.
"All of this anti-Obama rage is pure racism."
The poll was created over the weekend using a third-party application that lets users conduct their own surveys, according to Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt.
"People were usually doing trivial polls like asking friends where they should go for dinner or what they thought of a certain movie," Schnitt said of the application.
"Then there was the offensive one created by an individual user."
Facebook had to shut down the program to get rid of the Obama poll since surveys using the software were controlled by the outside developer.
The application will remain disabled until the developer assures Facebook that the controversial survey has been removed and there are policies and procedures for handling such concerns in the future, according to Schnitt.
"Of course we are offended by the content of the poll but objectionable ideas are in the world and, unfortunately, manifest on Facebook," Schnitt told AFP.
"We felt we dealt with it in a responsible way by removing it as quick as we were notified."
Schnitt declined to discuss the Secret Service investigation.
Link (http://www.calgaryherald.com/technology/Facebook+yanks+poll+asking+whether+kill+Obama/2046622/story.html)
Personally, I think pulling it and especially the secret service investigation is stupid. Would people have reacted this way if a random Facebook poll had asked this about Bush? The comment about it being "racism" is just utterly stupid too.
Peterkro
Sep 29, 2009, 11:46 AM
Whether.
Unspoken Demise
Sep 29, 2009, 11:48 AM
Whether.
Haha.
Anways, to stay on topic, thats a really mean-spirited poll. I certainly hope the creator doesnt get sent "away" somewhere, but that was kind of mean. Assassination is not funny, regardless of political beliefs, unless you're playing Gaurdian in GoW, or you hit a guy from behind in Halo.
yg17
Sep 29, 2009, 11:51 AM
Personally, I think pulling it and especially the secret service investigation is stupid. Would people have reacted this way if a random Facebook poll had asked this about Bush? The comment about it being "racism" is just utterly stupid too.
Yes, it would've been the same. The Secret Service does not take talk of assassinating the president lightly.
bruinsrme
Sep 29, 2009, 11:53 AM
Racism????
I agree. Its tiring hearng about everything being pointed back to racism.
First off why should he be assasinated. What about all the white men supporting him and voting for his policies?
The secret service has to investigate and determine the threat level.
leekohler
Sep 29, 2009, 12:05 PM
Yes, it would've been the same. The Secret Service does not take talk of assassinating the president lightly.
It would have been more intense.
diamond.g
Sep 29, 2009, 12:07 PM
I kinda wonder if the programmers will "accidentally" leak the poll results...
yg17
Sep 29, 2009, 12:10 PM
I kinda wonder if the programmers will "accidentally" leak the poll results...
I believe about 5% voted yes.
The developer of the app posted a diary on Daily Kos with information and explaining what happened. Whether you like dKos or not, it's a good read: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/9/28/787366/-Facts-from-the-developer-of-the-Facebook-Poll-Application
Macaddicttt
Sep 29, 2009, 12:38 PM
Personally, I think pulling it and especially the secret service investigation is stupid. Would people have reacted this way if a random Facebook poll had asked this about Bush? The comment about it being "racism" is just utterly stupid too.
It is illegal to threaten the president or vice-president so anyone who voted "yes" committed a crime, and I can assure you that people would have reacted exactly the same way if this had been asked about Bush.
And yes, the comment about racism is stupid, but then again it was quoted from a random Facebook user named "Coco Fly" so...
iPhone 62S
Sep 29, 2009, 12:44 PM
It is illegal to threaten the president or vice-president so anyone who voted "yes" committed a crime, and I can assure you that people would have reacted exactly the same way if this had been asked about Bush.
And yes, the comment about racism is stupid, but then again it was quoted from a random Facebook user named "Coco Fly" so...
I believe the question wasen't "will you go out and kill the president", but "do you think he should be assissinated?" and while I certainly agree that Obama shouldn't be assassinated, it was a just a poll on Facebook! Odds are, the guy who created it did so out of boredom, and people who voted yes did so for a joke.
Rt&Dzine
Sep 29, 2009, 12:55 PM
I believe the question wasen't "will you go out and kill the president", but "do you think he should be assissinated?" and while I certainly agree that Obama shouldn't be assassinated, it was a just a poll on Facebook! Odds are, the guy who created it did so out of boredom, and people who voted yes did so for a joke.
It doesn't matter. They always have to take "joking" and speculations about assassinating the President seriously. It doesn't matter who the President is.
Eraserhead
Sep 29, 2009, 01:01 PM
It doesn't matter. They always have to take "joking" and speculations about assassinating the President seriously. It doesn't matter who the President is.
Exactly.
It'd also be pretty sick if the same was done about Bush.
yg17
Sep 29, 2009, 01:07 PM
I believe the question wasen't "will you go out and kill the president", but "do you think he should be assissinated?" and while I certainly agree that Obama shouldn't be assassinated, it was a just a poll on Facebook! Odds are, the guy who created it did so out of boredom, and people who voted yes did so for a joke.
How does the Secret Service know if it was a dumb joke done out of boredom without investigating it?
You don't joke about assassinating the president for the same reasons you don't jokingly say "I have a bomb!" while in line at airport security.
bradl
Sep 29, 2009, 01:17 PM
It is illegal to threaten the president or vice-president so anyone who voted "yes" committed a crime, and I can assure you that people would have reacted exactly the same way if this had been asked about Bush.
Very illegal at that. I had such an incident happen at my university, in the computer lab I worked at, while I was working.
Back in the Windows 3.1 days, someone had logged into their university account (via telnet), checked their email, accidentally clicked on the background (bringing Windows to the foreground), didn't know what he did, and opened up another telnet session to his account. He checked his mail, logged out, and left, forgetting he still had his other session open.
Someone came up, saw that it was open, went into his mail, and emailed a very detailed version of 'I will kill you' to president at whitehouse.gov... within 10 minutes, the FBI and SS were were there investigating. Eventually, they did find the guy, and arrested him (funnily enough, in a political science class).
Clinton was president at the time. But this sure as hell is not stupid, and not a joke; it is very serious.
The people liked Lincoln even less, and look at what happened. It is because of stupidity like this that the SS was asked to protect the President (interestingly enough, after McKinley was assassinated).
The OP should go back and read history, and then really see how naive his comment is.
BL.
ucfgrad93
Sep 29, 2009, 01:29 PM
Yes, it would've been the same. The Secret Service does not take talk of assassinating the president lightly.
Nor should they. This was a stupid poll, and I'm glad they are investigating.
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 02:20 PM
It is illegal to threaten the president or vice-president so anyone who voted "yes" committed a crime, and I can assure you that people would have reacted exactly the same way if this had been asked about Bush.
And yes, the comment about racism is stupid, but then again it was quoted from a random Facebook user named "Coco Fly" so...
Its not an illegal threat to vote yes in a poll like that, nor is it to query. Its just ****ing stupid.
leekohler
Sep 29, 2009, 02:23 PM
I'm surprised it took this long for someone to post this poll. The extreme right have been so predictable thus far. This won't be the last of this, BTW. There will be more of this now. They will say they're being "silenced". :rolleyes:
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 02:27 PM
I'm surprised it took this long for someone to post this poll. The extreme right have been so predictable thus far. This won't be the last of this, BTW. There will be more of this now. They will say they're being "silenced". :rolleyes:
Anyone who says they are silenced for taking down an idiotic facebook poll would be an idiot. Anyone who says they would/are going to assassinate the president (which isn't what is being said here) should be stuck in jail for a year at least.
Shivetya
Sep 29, 2009, 02:34 PM
Racism????
I agree. Its tiring hearng about everything being pointed back to racism.
First off why should he be assasinated. What about all the white men supporting him and voting for his policies?
The secret service has to investigate and determine the threat level.
Claims of racism are going to be very common, simply because it is far easier to brand your opponent than debate him.
As for assassination, he is our President and I would expect the SS to take it seriously.
leekohler
Sep 29, 2009, 02:37 PM
Claims of racism are going to be very common, simply because it is far easier to brand your opponent than debate him.
What's to debate when people are talking assassination?
themoonisdown09
Sep 29, 2009, 02:42 PM
And yes, the comment about racism is stupid, but then again it was quoted from a random Facebook user named "Coco Fly" so...
Oops... I think I need to change my pants on that one because I laughed pretty hard!
bradl
Sep 29, 2009, 03:33 PM
Its not an illegal threat to vote yes in a poll like that, nor is it to query. Its just ****ing stupid.
I absolutely can not believe that you just stated that you would condone (even the legality of) anyone asking if the POTUS should be assassinated. Do you even realize where you are and what you are saying? This has absolutely nothing to do with any 1st Amendment rights to free speech. This is talking about asking if the leader of this country should be KILLED.
Do you know what happened at the end of the US Civil War, and the ramifications of it thereafter?
Anyone who says they are silenced for taking down an idiotic facebook poll would be an idiot. Anyone who says they would/are going to assassinate the president (which isn't what is being said here) should be stuck in jail for a year at least.
The person that did it at my university computer lab in Nebraska got 5 years just based on the threat. Treason carried another 5.
BL.
XnavxeMiyyep
Sep 29, 2009, 03:34 PM
I can see how it would be investigated, but the people who voted yes shouldn't actually get in any trouble.
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 04:31 PM
I absolutely can not believe that you just stated that you would condone (even the legality of) anyone asking if the POTUS should be assassinated. Do you even realize where you are and what you are saying? This has absolutely nothing to do with any 1st Amendment rights to free speech. This is talking about asking if the leader of this country should be KILLED.
disputing the illegality has nothing to do with condoning actions. Even a conditional remark could falter as a threat to your life.
The person that did it at my university computer lab in Nebraska got 5 years just based on the threat. Treason carried another 5.
BL.
asking if someone should be killed in the manner that it was done does not constitute a threat to ones life. If it were a "vote here and I will do x action depending on the results" it would have been.
Needless to say the SS is going to be visiting your house to make sure you aren't a crazy **** with more plans. We won't see charges unlessthat is the case.
bradl
Sep 29, 2009, 04:50 PM
disputing the illegality has nothing to do with condoning actions. Even a conditional remark could falter as a threat to your life.
And when it concerns the POTUS, his/her family, the VPOTUS and his/her family, it should and MUST be investigated, especially if it is broadcast out through a public medium, like the Internet. In cases like this, even a conditional remark on the life of the POTUS has to be investigated, regardless of legality.
asking if someone should be killed in the manner that it was done does not constitute a threat to ones life. If it were a "vote here and I will do x action depending on the results" it would have been.
Needless to say the SS is going to be visiting your house to make sure you aren't a crazy **** with more plans. We won't see charges unlessthat is the case.
Obviously, the FBI, SS, and previous precedent-setting arrests disagree:
Abu Ali (still detained and awaiting trial on charges of conspiracy to assassinate Bush).
Squeaky Fromme (just completed 30+ year sentence for conspiracy to assassinate Ford).
George Andreas Atzerodt (executed for conspiracy to assassinate Johnson).
BL.
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 04:53 PM
Abu Ali (still detained and awaiting trial on charges of conspiracy to assassinate Bush).
Squeaky Fromme (just completed 30+ year sentence for conspiracy to assassinate Ford).
George Andreas Atzerodt (executed for conspiracy to assassinate Johnson).
BL.
This facebook poll does not constitute a conspiracy to assassinate the president. :)
Abu Ali: "is an American who was convicted of providing material support to the al Qaeda terrorist network and conspiracy to assassinate President George W. Bush."
Squeaky Fromme: "She was sentenced to life imprisonment for attempting to assassinate U.S. President Gerald Ford in 1975."
George Andreas Atzerodt: "was a conspirator, with John Wilkes Booth, in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. He was executed along with the other co-conspirators by hanging."
bradl
Sep 29, 2009, 04:56 PM
This facebook poll does not constitute a conspiracy to assassinate the president. :)
And I suppose sending email regarding the same thing doesn't either.. :confused: :rolleyes:
BL.
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 04:59 PM
And I suppose sending email regarding the same thing doesn't either.. :confused: :rolleyes:
BL.
It depends on the content of the email. If it says "I am going to ...." it would be a threat. (I am not even going to use the string of words together, I don't need the FBI knocking on my door).
Once again we won't see charges brought unless the kid who started the facebook poll has other information alluding to the fact he was planning something sinister. The thought that simply casting a vote in the poll would get you put in jail is laughable.
bradl
Sep 29, 2009, 05:03 PM
It depends on the content of the email. If it says "I am going to ...." it would be a threat. (I am not even going to use the string of words together, I don't need the FBI knocking on my door).
Once again we won't see charges brought unless the kid who started the facebook poll has other information alluding to the fact he was planning something sinister. The thought that simply casting a vote in the poll would get you put in jail is laughable.
You're not getting it. My concern isn't with casting a vote on this stupid poll...
It's the fact that someone put the poll up to begin with. The reasoning behind that person putting up that poll needs to be investigated.
BL.
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 05:06 PM
You're not getting it. My concern isn't with casting a vote on this stupid poll...
It's the fact that someone put the poll up to begin with. The reasoning behind that person putting up that poll needs to be investigated.
BL.
It will be investigated, and depending how old the kid is (assuming it is a kid, I would think something this dumb could only come from someone immature) he should get his ass beat by his parents after the investigation is through. This person just put a target on themselves for life.
yg17
Sep 29, 2009, 05:12 PM
The thought that simply casting a vote in the poll would get you put in jail is laughable.
No, but everyone who voted yes should be getting a visit from the Secret Service.
Zombie Acorn
Sep 29, 2009, 05:14 PM
No, but everyone who voted yes should be getting a visit from the Secret Service.
No argument there, they can follow up with a psychological evaluation also as far as I am concerned.
NT1440
Sep 29, 2009, 05:54 PM
Yawn. Don't we have bigger issues right now? Of course some nutjob is going to put up something like this, thats to be expected with the sheer levels of stupidity we have going around right now.
caligurl
Sep 29, 2009, 06:14 PM
Personally, I think pulling it and especially the secret service investigation is stupid. Would people have reacted this way if a random Facebook poll had asked this about Bush?
it still would have been pulled an investigated by the SS as a threat to a president....
caligurl
Sep 29, 2009, 06:22 PM
I can see how it would be investigated, but the people who voted yes shouldn't actually get in any trouble.
and i doubt they will.... the originator of the poll is the one who will be punished...
Tomorrow
Sep 29, 2009, 09:28 PM
and i doubt they will.... the originator of the poll is the one who will be punished...
Maybe.
As I understand it, it's against the law to threaten the President. As I understand it, the poll simply asked a question.
bobber205
Sep 29, 2009, 10:39 PM
Maybe.
As I understand it, it's against the law to threaten the President. As I understand it, the poll simply asked a question.
If you were in a crowd of people and asked someone in the crowd "should we (the crowd) kill you?" that would be considered a threat.
Tomorrow
Sep 29, 2009, 10:41 PM
If you were in a crowd of people and asked someone in the crowd "should we (the crowd) kill you?" that would be considered a threat.
The President was not in that crowd. He wasn't threatened, at least not directly.
Doesn't mean there were no hostilities expressed.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.