Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

wrldwzrd89

macrumors G5
Original poster
Jun 6, 2003
12,110
77
Solon, OH
1. Size

KompoZer: ~20MB
Aptana Studio Eclipse Plug-in (requires Eclipse, ~170MB): ~30MB
Aptana Studio Standalone: ~200 MB

Advantage: KompoZer

2. WYSIWYG

KompoZer: Supported, but a bit buggy still
Aptana Studio: No support yet, proposed for a future release but not yet accepted

Advantage: KompoZer

3. Extensibility

KompoZer: No plugin support
Aptana Studio: Can leverage many Eclipse plugins, and has plugins unique to it

Advantage: Aptana Studio

4. Reliability

KompoZer: Still in beta, has known CSS issues
Aptana Studio: Considered production quality

Advantage: Aptana Studio

5. Price

KompoZer: Free
Aptana Studio: Free

Advantage: Tie

Overall: Tie
 

angelwatt

Moderator emeritus
Aug 16, 2005
7,852
9
USA
They're a tie if you equally weight each of those categories, but they aren't really equal. Which one is better really depends on what you need. Aptana is more development focused whereas Kompozer is content focused. I have both installed and use them occasionally, but for different purposes.

I find Aptana a little too buggy on Mac, though it's OK on Windows, but resource hungry and sluggish even on powerful machines. I hope they improve it as it has a lot of potential, but for now I feel using it is a bit of a chore.

Kompozer had potential, but seeing as development is essentially nonexistent I can see it fading into the background as soon as something else comes along. I'm hoping something else will eventually come along that's open source like it. Until then, I'll stick with BBEdit for most of the design and development.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.