Cyborg
Jul 21, 2004, 04:32 AM
Howdy,
I have been comparing two different Conservative movements: the Neo-Conservatives (George Bush and friends) and the Paleo-Conservatives (Pat Buchanan, Jared Taylor, Samuel Francis, Jeff Rense, Justin Raimondo, Kevin MacDonald, etc.) Interestingly, the Paleos have a very different perspective than the Neos regarding foreign policy. Here are two articles from the Paleo perspective:
The following is from http://www.amconmag.com/
March 24, 2003 issue
Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative
Whose War?
A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest.
by Patrick J. Buchanan
The War Party may have gotten its war. But it has also gotten something it did not bargain for. Its membership lists and associations have been exposed and its motives challenged. In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: “Can you assure American viewers ... that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?”
Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party is not amused. Finding themselves in an unanticipated firefight, our neoconservative friends are doing what comes naturally, seeking student deferments from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group. People who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly in the schoolyard of politics. Not so.
Complete text at http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
___________________________________________
The following is from http://www.vdare.com/
September 18, 2003
Thinking About Neoconservatism
By Kevin MacDonald
Over the last year, there’s been a torrent of articles on neoconservatism raising (usually implicitly) some vexing issues: Are neoconservatives different from other conservatives? Is neoconservatism a Jewish movement? Is it “anti-Semitic” to say so?
The dispute between the neocons and more traditional conservatives — “paleoconservatives” — is especially important because the latter now find themselves on the outside, looking in on the conservative power structure.
Complete text at http://www.vdare.com/misc/macdonald_neoconservatism.htm
I have been comparing two different Conservative movements: the Neo-Conservatives (George Bush and friends) and the Paleo-Conservatives (Pat Buchanan, Jared Taylor, Samuel Francis, Jeff Rense, Justin Raimondo, Kevin MacDonald, etc.) Interestingly, the Paleos have a very different perspective than the Neos regarding foreign policy. Here are two articles from the Paleo perspective:
The following is from http://www.amconmag.com/
March 24, 2003 issue
Copyright © 2003 The American Conservative
Whose War?
A neoconservative clique seeks to ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America’s interest.
by Patrick J. Buchanan
The War Party may have gotten its war. But it has also gotten something it did not bargain for. Its membership lists and associations have been exposed and its motives challenged. In a rare moment in U.S. journalism, Tim Russert put this question directly to Richard Perle: “Can you assure American viewers ... that we’re in this situation against Saddam Hussein and his removal for American security interests? And what would be the link in terms of Israel?”
Suddenly, the Israeli connection is on the table, and the War Party is not amused. Finding themselves in an unanticipated firefight, our neoconservative friends are doing what comes naturally, seeking student deferments from political combat by claiming the status of a persecuted minority group. People who claim to be writing the foreign policy of the world superpower, one would think, would be a little more manly in the schoolyard of politics. Not so.
Complete text at http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
___________________________________________
The following is from http://www.vdare.com/
September 18, 2003
Thinking About Neoconservatism
By Kevin MacDonald
Over the last year, there’s been a torrent of articles on neoconservatism raising (usually implicitly) some vexing issues: Are neoconservatives different from other conservatives? Is neoconservatism a Jewish movement? Is it “anti-Semitic” to say so?
The dispute between the neocons and more traditional conservatives — “paleoconservatives” — is especially important because the latter now find themselves on the outside, looking in on the conservative power structure.
Complete text at http://www.vdare.com/misc/macdonald_neoconservatism.htm
