View Full Version : New 21.5 iMac model 1 or model 2
mt0trip
Oct 23, 2009, 10:28 AM
Not certain, which 21.5 imac to get. I am not a gamer, but do want to do photo editing, music, video editiing, DVD creation. Do I need the better graphics card that comes with the 21.5 level 2 or is the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics good enough for what I want to do?
Hellhammer
Oct 23, 2009, 01:04 PM
If you're video editing is something with iMovie, 9400M will be fine
danners
Oct 23, 2009, 10:54 PM
I was thinking the same thing... i have a macbook with the nivida 9400 and some of the basic editing i find takes a loooong time so i dont know how well it would go with a desktop.
maclook
Oct 23, 2009, 10:59 PM
I was thinking the same thing... i have a macbook with the nivida 9400 and some of the basic editing i find takes a loooong time so i dont know how well it would go with a desktop.
what do you use? im wondering how it does with final cut pro or adobe premiere
The Samurai
Oct 24, 2009, 10:14 AM
The ATI graphics card would be beneficial for which kind of apps?
opera57
Oct 24, 2009, 02:58 PM
Yea model 1 will be fine unless you are doing gaming really. The 9400m is actually quite a capable chip and will be able to manage some casual gaming anyway, and will definitely be able to manage everything you want to do! http://www.scottty.com/imgs/signature_silverapple.jpg
cloudmac
Oct 24, 2009, 03:08 PM
I ordered the mod 2 21.5" with the 3.33, 8 Ram and ATI card. I think the model one would handle most of what I do but decided to try and future proof the machine for at least 2-3 years. Never sure what I might be doing with it 2 years from now.
stonemann
Oct 24, 2009, 03:20 PM
The ATI graphics card would be beneficial for which kind of apps?
According to the Apple website:
"The ATI Radeon HD 4670 graphics processor delivers up to 4x faster performance than the NVIDIA GeForce 9400M — ideal for 3D games and graphics-intensive applications."
Whether the graphics card plus the extra hard drive space justifies an additional £250 is a tough call. That's the only difference as far as I can tell.
zedsdead
Oct 24, 2009, 03:37 PM
I recommend the upper model. The graphics card is a nice addition, plus the extra hard drive space will come in handy. It may sound like a lot now, but wait a few years.
danners
Oct 25, 2009, 02:16 AM
what do you use? im wondering how it does with final cut pro or adobe premiere
late 08 aluminium macbook
stonemann
Oct 25, 2009, 07:13 AM
Am leaning towards the higher end of the two base models myself with the ATI 4670 card. I noticed that for an extra £150 it's possible to either get a faster processor - 3.33GHZ as opposed to 3.06GHZ. Alternatively, for the same money it's possible to double RAM from to 8GB to 16GB.
My question is which is the better investment: a faster processor or double the RAM? I'm particularly interested in how this would affect, say, video editing.
J&JPolangin
Oct 25, 2009, 08:02 AM
Am leaning towards the higher end of the two base models myself with the ATI 4670 card. I noticed that for an extra £150 it's possible to either get a faster processor - 3.33GHZ as opposed to 3.06GHZ. Alternatively, for the same money it's possible to double RAM from to 8GB to 16GB.
My question is which is the better investment: a faster processor or double the RAM? I'm particularly interested in how this would affect, say, video editing.
...double the RAM will be a better investment than moving from the 3.06 ---> 3.33 CPU... if they are the same price....
zedsdead
Oct 25, 2009, 08:05 AM
...double the RAM will be a better investment than moving from the 3.06 ---> 3.33 CPU... if they are the same price....
I disagree. You can always add the RAM later, but you are stuck with the CPU. Most people will do fine with 4 gigs of RAM right now.
Fiete5401
Oct 25, 2009, 08:24 AM
I disagree. You can always add the RAM later, but you are stuck with the CPU. Most people will do fine with 4 gigs of RAM right now.
That's exactly the point why upgrading a processor makes much more sense than upgrading RAM.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.