PDA

View Full Version : Pentagon is considering extending the tours of National Guard troops in Iraq




zimv20
Jul 21, 2004, 05:17 PM
link (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-guard21jul21,1,3332329.story?coll=la-home-world)


Troops Could Stay Beyond Limit

Pentagon is considering extending the tours of National Guard troops in Iraq who are nearing the 24-month active-duty maximum.
By Mark Mazzetti
Times Staff Writer

July 21, 2004

WASHINGTON — In yet another sign of the strains on the U.S. military in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks and the Iraq war, the Pentagon for the first time is considering extending the mobilization of National Guard soldiers who will soon hit the federal limit of 24 months of active service, defense officials said Tuesday.

Initially, the decision would affect about 450 soldiers of the Arkansas National Guard who are in Iraq with the 39th Brigade Combat Team. The soldiers, mobilized after Sept. 11 and first sent to the Sinai Peninsula on a peacekeeping rotation, are the first group of National Guard troops to approach the 24-month limit that the Pentagon established days after the terrorist attacks in the United States.

Ultimately, however, waiving the limit in this case might lead to extended deployments for thousands of other reservists and National Guard members in Iraq and Afghanistan, and provide ammunition to critics in Congress who are pushing the Bush administration to increase the size of the military.


In the corridors of the Pentagon, a major concern is that the tempo of deployments since the Sept. 11 attacks will ultimately take its toll on retention and recruitment both in the active service and the reserves. Thus far, the Army has been able to meet recruiting goals for the active force, but is falling short of its 2004 target numbers for the National Guard.

There are now more than 131,000 Army National Guard troops and reservists on active duty, in most cases for 15- to 18-month stints.



Thanatoast
Jul 21, 2004, 07:15 PM
Interesting logic.

Problem: we don't have enough soldiers.

Solution A: increase size of military forces and budget

Solution B: start less wars

Any bets on which solution will prevail?

blackfox
Jul 21, 2004, 07:18 PM
On a related note, several state governors, especially out here in the Western States are worried about the effects of their National Guard membership being largely deployed overseas (in Iraq, mostly). This concern is in part due to the duties the NG of these states usually perform, notably in Wildfire prevention and control. Many of the best trained individuals for this and other important State safety tasks are now deployed out of Country. There are also many communities, particularily smaller ones, who have lost a large part of their local government (mayors, police chiefs, patrol officers etc.) to this same phenomenon. This has a great potential to put States, already reeling from cuts stemming from Budget deficits, in ever greater strain, endangering the ability of these States to adequately protect and serve their population.

Just a different facet of the problem...FWIW