PDA

View Full Version : Iraq In Transition Show a Hit On Iraqi TV




vniow
Aug 8, 2004, 03:04 PM
BAGHDAD -- Hoda Mohammed Jassem responded with stony disbelief when television crew members arrived at her war-damaged house, thrust a microphone under her nose and announced they were going to rebuild her home.

But her 17-year-old daughter, Abeer Al-Zubair, caught on, and as the TV camera rolled, she broke into a delighted smile.

"I'm feeling like I'm dreaming," she said as a big orange truck piled high with bricks, tools and workmen trundled around the corner to begin reconstructing the family's house.

Welcome to Iraq's first home-improvement show--with an Iraqi twist. Think "This Old House" or "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition," except that all the wrecks selected to be featured in this version were destroyed by war, and they belong to people too poor to rebuild them.

"Materials and Labor," as the show is called, airs Friday nights on Al Sharqiya, Iraq's first privately owned TV station, and it's proving to be a big hit. Initial funding for the show came from wealthy donors, and now viewers are being asked to send in contributions.

The homes don't only get new walls, roofs and windows. The revamp includes furniture, fixtures, curtains, carpets, a TV and even plants--everything needed for a family whose home was wrecked by war to start anew.

Just as important, says producer Ali Hanoon, is that the show attempts to capture the lifting spirits of the families as their lives are put back together.

"It's not just a house that we are rebuilding. We are restoring also the psychological well-being of the family," he said. "Our message is that there is still hope."

It's shot fly-on-the-wall style, following every step in the makeover from the moment the family is informed about its good luck to the settling-in process.

The show's bubbly host, Shaima Emad Zubair, features prominently. With her henna-red hair tucked into a white baseball cap, she pitches in to shovel concrete and mix plaster. "In my own home I do nothing," she says, marveling at her own energy. "I have a maid."

There are no viewership figures, but Zubair cites her experiences as proof of the show's popularity. She already was well-known, as the host of a show on state TV under Saddam Hussein's regime. But since "Materials and Labor" went on the air three months ago, she is recognized everywhere.

"My fame has exploded," she said. "It's because we show the reality of life for ordinary Iraqi people."

Reality has intruded more than once. As the team was leaving a house in the volatile Aadhamiya neighborhood, a bomb exploded nearby. A week after that house was finished, one of its new windows was shattered in a firefight between U.S. soldiers and insurgents.

The show's workers installed another window.

"It's a very unstable neighborhood, and it's not out of the question that the house will be destroyed again," Hanoon said. "If that happens, we will rebuild it again."

The first two houses were selected by the team, which scoured neighborhoods on the pretext of preparing a report on war damage. The next homes are being chosen from submissions by viewers, who are invited to apply by e-mail.

The show can't hope to rebuild all the thousands of homes damaged during the war. The program's staff members have focused on houses destroyed during last year's U.S.-led invasion because an American compensation program excludes damage that occurred before the end of combat operations May 1, 2003, said Majid al Samarraee, who selects the houses.

"There are three criteria," he said. "The family has to own the home, they have to have been in it when it was hit, and the damage must have caused problems for their lives."

Jassem's family fit the bill. Her home in the Shalchiya neighborhood was wrecked in April 2003 when American soldiers blew up a truck full of munitions on the street in what they said would be a controlled explosion. But Jassem's home caught fire, and the family fled in panic. Footage of the house before it was rebuilt shows buckled walls, piles of rubble and a drooping ceiling fan that melted in the blaze.

Jassem's husband died a month before the blast, and she had no money to spend on repairs. She and her five children had to move in with neighbors.

Now, freshly unveiled, her white painted house has a smart new kitchen, new furniture and a manicured lawn with a sprinkler, miniature roses and geraniums.

"Before when I breathed it felt like there were stones in the air. Now I can smell only sweetness," Jassem, 49, exclaimed to the cameras as her new house was revealed. "Great countries came here, but they could do nothing for us. Every night I sleep, I thank God for Al Sharqiya."

Al Samarraee wants the show to do more than just make over a few homes. Millions of Iraqis are still waiting for the reconstruction that was promised them, and he hopes to galvanize the government into taking action.

"Nobody has helped these people," he said. "We are a TV station and we did something. It's like we're encouraging the new government to do more."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0408030227aug03,1,3035066.story



zimv20
Aug 8, 2004, 03:11 PM
they will assimilate

skunk
Aug 8, 2004, 03:14 PM
Ahhh! Bless! It's Good News Week!

amnesiac1984
Aug 8, 2004, 09:03 PM
The program's staff members have focused on houses destroyed during last year's U.S.-led invasion because an American compensation program excludes damage that occurred before the end of combat operations May 1, 2003, said Majid al Samarraee, who selects the house

Well that nice of them. It won't cover the houses destroyed during the most intense part of the bombings. Am I reading this right?.

Leo Hubbard
Aug 8, 2004, 10:05 PM
Well that nice of them. It won't cover the houses destroyed during the most intense part of the bombings. Am I reading this right?.
Sounds to me like they are financed by private enterprise ventures not the government, so what is wrong with them setting the criteria for which houses they rebuild themselves their own way?

amnesiac1984
Aug 9, 2004, 03:38 PM
Sounds to me like they are financed by private enterprise ventures not the government, so what is wrong with them setting the criteria for which houses they rebuild themselves their own way?

read the quote. Its funded by American compensation programs. It's a good thing what they are doing but i think compensation should cover all events after march 2003 when the war started and all the main destruction happened.

because an American compensation program excludes damage that occurred before the end of combat operations May 1, 2003,

why?

skunk
Aug 9, 2004, 04:30 PM
why?
Because the war was an Act of God, of course.

amnesiac1984
Aug 11, 2004, 05:38 AM
leo, what have you got to say in defense of this policy? What does fox have to say about it?

Leo Hubbard
Aug 11, 2004, 06:36 AM
leo, what have you got to say in defense of this policy? What does fox have to say about it?
I don't know what Fox has to say about it.
I'm not sure which policy that you mean.
If you are talking about some stupid tv show, limiting itself to which houses get paid to be rebuilt and which ones don't, I don't think it is a good policy for the US to pay for the tv show at all. It should be paid for by a private enterprise.

I don't think the US should get into the business of financially rewarding those we have gone to war with. I understand it wasn't the civilians fault, but if we only go to war when we can afford to rebuild them then we would have fewer wars in our own best interests. That should not be a criteria that is looked at prior to a war. That is the price they paid for their freedom. That is the price they paid for not rebelling on their own and fighting their own damn war.

amnesiac1984
Aug 11, 2004, 08:42 AM
I don't know what Fox has to say about it.
I'm not sure which policy that you mean.
If you are talking about some stupid tv show, limiting itself to which houses get paid to be rebuilt and which ones don't, I don't think it is a good policy for the US to pay for the tv show at all. It should be paid for by a private enterprise.

i'm talking about the compensation programs that don't cover houses destroyed during the war. The TV show is a good idea IMHO because it lets eveyone see what they are doing. But the real issue is that houses are being rebuilt (paid for by US compensation and rightly so) but only ones destroyed since after the combat operations, why?

I don't think the US should get into the business of financially rewarding those we have gone to war with. I understand it wasn't the civilians fault, but if we only go to war when we can afford to rebuild them then we would have fewer wars in our own best interests. That should not be a criteria that is looked at prior to a war. That is the price they paid for their freedom. That is the price they paid for not rebelling on their own and fighting their own damn war.

Financially rewarding? What the ****? If the US war machine had been in the least bit competent or if they had decided on a much more low key precise sub-war then they wouldn't have all these ruined civilians houses.

Look, you've got to wake up Leo. You live in the richest country in the world, which in itself is a damned privilege. You can't sit their and tell other countries they need to look after their own and fight their own wars when they clearly haven't got the means to do it. Its our responsibility as rich nations to help the poorer ones to bring some equality into the world. Isn't that the goal that mankind should be aiming towards? Now that sounds like I'm justifying the war on Iraq. I'm not, the iraq war was the biggest farce in the name of world peace in my living memory. (Not long).
I'm not sure if any of this makes sense, but I'm Ill and I've just quite my job.

I'm just gonna finish by saying that the world is becoming an increasingly divided place between those who are materialistic and those who aren't. The materialistic people look to work hard and look after their own so they can live in comfort, in doing so they shut themselves off from the world and its uncomfortableness, they compete for resources to increase their own comfort and the comfort of those around them. meanwhile people starve and wars and social disease are rife with the ones who aren't able to keep up. The less materialistic people realise that we shouldn't be competing, because in the end we all want the same thing. They find happiness in others and in this beautiful world we live in, the problem is they can't because everyone is competing around them, and institutions exist that serve no purpose but to add more numbers onto some other numbers in a bank account, things that don't actually mean ANYTHING, that people devote their entire energy and lives too. In turn ****ing those less fortunate over.

Whatever I'm sick and tired and going to go sleep/

rant off