PDA

View Full Version : UK: If you thought the MPs were "expensive"…




arkitect
Dec 21, 2009, 09:31 AM
Have a look at the House of Lords…
More than 100 peers claim £50k expenses. :rolleyes:

A hundred and three peers claimed more than £50,000 in expenses last year, according to House of Lords figures.

The amounts were released in a table of claims made between April 2008 and March 2009. Crossbencher Lord Laird, claimed the most at £73,804.

Labour's Baroness Adams, who did not speak in the Lords during the year, got the second most £66,896.

There were 134 official "sitting days" and average daily attendance was 400. Peers' claims totalled £19m overall.

Members of the House of Lords, apart from some ministers, do not get a salary, but can claim expenses for overnight stays, daily subsistence - such as food and drink - office costs and travel.
BBC Link (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8424381.stm)
Please remind me again: What is that they do exactly?



colourfastt
Dec 21, 2009, 10:22 AM
I just love how the Commons considers itself so superiour that it can vote the Peers out of existence. Sort of like the US House of Representatives voting to abolish the Senate.

zap2
Dec 21, 2009, 10:31 AM
I just love how the Commons considers itself so superiour that it can vote the Peers out of existence. Sort of like the US House of Representatives voting to abolish the Senate.

Not really....House and Senate are both elected....the house of Lords not so much.

Honestly, I don't get why they are still there...they don't do all that much...certainly not worth the money they seem to be spending.(this is just one American's perspective)