12" Comparison

[dav]

What do you think? (I know it has been asked many times :rolleyes: )

http://members.lycos.co.uk/xdesign2k/community/pics/2004-08-21%2012%2037%2036%20pm%20-%20ibook.jpg

http://members.lycos.co.uk/xdesign2k/community/pics/2004-08-21%2012%2037%2059%20pm%20-%20powerbook.jpg

Is it worth $217 (EDU Pricing)?

Powerbook Advantages:

.25 GHz (Post (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=998666&postcount=19))

333MHz vs 266Mhz RAM

167MHz vs 133MHz System Bus

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 with 64MB of DDR SDRAM vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 with 32MB of DDR SDRAM

DVI vs VGA (Both can be spanned, iBook requires simple hack)

Classic environment, Acrobat Reader, Art Directors Toolkit, FileMaker Pro Trial, GraphicConverter, OmniGraffle, OmniOutliner, QuickBooks for Mac New User Edition vs AppleWorks, Quicken 2004 for Mac, World Book 2004 Edition, Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater 4, Deimos Rising, Sound Studio (Correct me if I am wrong on these)

Exterior Styling (I prefer iBook personally)

edit CoreImage for upcoming Mac OS?

edit Audio-In on Powerbook (Post (http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=998730&postcount=22))




Just to give some people persepective...

(Tell me if anything needs to be added/corrected, I am not perfect :rolleyes: )

-dav

[Daveman Deluxe]

Well, you haven't told us what YOUR needs are. For me, the extra money is worth it since I'm a casual gamer and the GeForce FX5200 is a better graphics card than the Radeon 9200. (emphasis on CASUAL gamer :D )

[Chaszmyr]

The big differences between the iBook and the PowerBook are not in the specs. They are:
1: The PowerBook is a much nicer, more professional looking machine.
2: The PowerBook natively supports using an additional monitor.


(I was deciding between these same two machines not so long ago and ultimately I went with the PowerBook becuase it's a great looking aluminum laptop, and the iBook looks and feels like a cheap piece of plastic to me)

[dav]

Well, you haven't told us what YOUR needs are. For me, the extra money is worth it since I'm a casual gamer and the GeForce FX5200 is a better graphics card than the Radeon 9200. (emphasis on CASUAL gamer :D )

I am just pointing it out this for other people.. I think I am already set on the iBook because its exterior is more appealing (I know, it is all opinion)

[mulletman13]

If you're going with the PB I definately reccommend getting the refurbed one for $50 cheaper. Same computer, and it had everything fixed/replaced... and they are essentially brand new computers. Same warranty as well :)

Then you can maybe put that $50 for more RAM because it will definately be needed.

[Finiksa]

1: The PowerBook is a much nicer, more professional looking machine.
Your opinion only, Not. A. Fact.

[dav]

Why don't we just leave it at the exterior is different. Any everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion :D

[Cordless_Drill]

Through some poor eBay planning, I have both a new Powerbook AND a new iBook right now. I've been playing with them both during the past few days. Granted, we're talking about a 15 PB and a 14 iBook, but I think the comparisons will hold ...

The PB is better in some ways. The keyboard really stands out to me. It's more firm and it has a better feel to it. Those pseudo-metallic keys are a pleasure to type with (I write for a living) and that makes the PB fun. I must point out, though, that the PB keys seem to be bigger (wider) than the iBook. I'm moving up from a Pismo, and the iBook's keys seem to be of a more appropriate size. If that makes sense...

Still, the iBook "seems" damn near as fast as the PB. On XBench, the iBook was in the 106 range while the PB was more like 124. I can tell that apps open more quickly on the PB, but who really cares? I don't.

**Safari is smokin on both. That's about all I'm doing.

**Airport reception is not very good on the PB; a little better on the iBook.

**There's a major difference in battery life. The iBook is far superior, at least for me.

**The sound quality is totally in the PB's favor. I'm not sure why, but the PB sounds really excellent for me. The iBook's speakers are horrible. I'm not complaining because I understand things have to be cut to make that price point, but the iBook speakers are very disappointing.

Unless you really have a boner for the PB -- and I'd certainly understand if you did -- I'd go with the iBook. It's 95% as good for less money.

Buy a 512 ram module and an express with the "savings".

[paxtonandrew]

I had the same problem when I was looking for a new computer. I decided that a notebook would be a better computer, especially as my new role at work saw me moving from one practice to another. I looked at the iBooks, and tried to see whether I needed a 12 or 14 inch, and the 14-inch won over (then) as a 12 inch seemed too small. The product updates 'happened' and I then started looking at a PowerBook. It seemed the right combinations of speed and portability. I have never regretted my purchase, especially as I have been away form home for 2 weeks now (sitting in my hotel room in Adelaide, typing) and the computer works. The iBook's graphics card won't do core image, but the 12-inch powerBook will. This means that when Tiger arrives, there will be no eye-candy, and there will be limited capabilities when the next OSX arrives.

In other words, it would be better for you to buy the low-end PowerBook, rather than the iBook. The power difference may be minimal, but the question remains, how much of a power-user are you? If you are a great power-user, get the PowerBook. it will be more able to run the next OS's than the iBook.

[alexf]

One important factor no one has mentioned: from what I have heard, the iBook is far superior when it comes to durability and case strength (even if some people like the aluminum look more).

I believe the casing material is the same as or similar to that used for bullet proof glass and I have heard stories of iBooks being dropped from fairly good heights without internal damage.

The PowerBook, however nice it looks, it rather fragile and is made of aluminum, one of the softer metals.

This alone may be a great deciding factor - for me at least durability would be very important (although I've never been rough on computers, accidents do happen).

[beatle888]

217 for all that extra stuff.....go with the pb but do as one post suggested, go with a refurb for 50 bucks less. that will be a no brainer if you ask me. the video card is much better and this makes a huge difference even in photoshop. quartz extreme dumps the 2d graphics to your vid card so that upgrade is really worth it. faster memory, faster bus, better feel, better resale value.

i have a 667 ti and im happy with it. ive had it for three years and do flash design as well as graphics and i only have 512 of ram. sure theres faster systems but this is just fine for most tasks. i will however get a dual g5 PowerMac when i can afford it.

after having a laptop instead of a desktop i can now say (for me) that a laptop is for convenience, with the ability to do some pretty intensive work. but for serious money making i'd like a PM.

Just consider what you want it to do and for how long. If i wasnt a graphics professional than i would say any laptop would be fine. if games are important than get an xbox or ps2.

[Brother Michael]

and the iBook looks and feels like a cheap piece of plastic to me)

:(

No, I can see where you are coming from with that, I thought the same thing myself. But after you hold one and use it for a while, it's nicer than your think.

I actually rather like the iBook case a lot now. Matched my car and my cell phone.

Mike

[oingoboingo]

Remember that the Radeon 9200 in the iBook is not going to support hardware acceleration of CoreImage and CoreVideo graphics routines in the upcoming Mac OS X 10.4 release. The nVidia GeForce FX 5200 in the 12" PowerBook is fully supported (as well as having 64MB of VRAM instead of 32MB). Something to think about if you're planning on keeping your notebook for a few years...

One other thing. I upgraded from the Rev B 1GHz 12" PowerBook a while back to my current Rev C 1.33GHz 12" PowerBook. The extra performance provided by the 33% higher clocked G4 (and the 167MHz FSB instead of 133MHz) is definitely noticeable. Of course it doesn't feel twice as fast or anything like that, but that extra 333MHz makes enough of a difference that you can really notice it when performing most day-to-day tasks. I imagine the difference between the old 1GHz 12" PowerBook and the new 1.33GHz 12" PowerBook would be similar to the difference between the 1GHz 12" iBook and the 1.33GHz 12" PowerBook.

[beatle888]

Remember that the Radeon 9200 in the iBook is not going to support hardware acceleration of CoreImage and CoreVideo graphics routines in the upcoming Mac OS X 10.4 release. The nVidia GeForce FX 5200 in the 12" PowerBook is fully supported (as well as having 64MB of VRAM instead of 32MB). Something to think about if you're planning on keeping your notebook for a few years...

it will still be able to use the coreimage effects, it will just have to depend on the CPU more than the GPU.

[oingoboingo]

it will still be able to use the coreimage effects, it will just have to depend on the CPU more than the GPU.

Yep that's right. I said it won't support hardware accelerated CoreImage and CoreVideo routines. All the eye-candy effects won't be able to be offloaded to the GPU on a Radeon 9200-equipped iBook, and will consume CPU resources instead.

[TyroneShoes]

One important factor no one has mentioned: from what I have heard, the iBook is far superior when it comes to durability and case strength (even if some people like the aluminum look more).

I believe the casing material is the same as or similar to that used for bullet proof glass and I have heard stories of iBooks being dropped from fairly good heights without internal damage.

The PowerBook, however nice it looks, it rather fragile and is made of aluminum, one of the softer metals...

"What you have heard" may not resemble any variety of truth, however. As someone who's owned both, here is my insight:

I slid my ivory iBook (at 19 months old) from a desktop onto a vinyl floor. Once. It did not survive. I got a 12" PB to replace it just over a year ago. I was a little dismayed by heat warp and it took me a while to warm up to it, but it is significantly faster and came with AirPort and Bluetooth, both of which I would still be pining for had my 'book survived (60 G is a lot better than 15, too).

The best feature and biggest difference is that the keyboard is much nicer on the PB, which I found surprising. The PB KB is tight and elegant, while the iB KB was cheap and sloppy. The PB is thinner, but the thicker iB fits in your hand much better (I carry mine into meetings regularly). My first iB battery needed replacing after a year. My PB is now 14 months old, and the battery is still holding up well.

I think the ABS case on the iB is over-rated, because even though mine still hasn't got a scratch on it, it transferred the shock of my single lapse in carefulness in toto to the logic board, and it now sits on the dustheap of history. The aluminum case of my PB has a tiny dent in one corner (how did that happen?) but still works just fine. I think the aluminum might even act as a crumple zone, a benefit you will not get from an ABS iB.

[Abstract]

The iBook plastic is more durable than aluminium. Actually, any decent plastic is generally going to be more durable than aluminium, unless it was a thick sheet, but it isn't in this case. Aluminium just dents. An iBook's plastic will generally take a hit much better.

However, seeing as how I don't throw it into a backpack with just a sleeve over it, or march with it through Iraq, I'm quite certain that it'll be fine unless something very unexpected (ie: car crash) were to happen to me. I never even use it on my lap. I always use it on a nice, large desk somewhere (bedroom, library, research lab), so the aluminium is fine.

And as for which one I'd get: well, I'd get the PB if I were a student, seeing as how the price difference is somewhat small if you get student pricing, but if you're out of school, the price difference is larger because the edu discount on a 12" iBook is less than the discount on a 12" PB. Basically, the price difference actually narrows when you have edu pricing.

And both notebooks look good, IMO. I like my PB, but the iBook looks good as well, kinda like a large iPod or something. :)

[superbovine]

The big differences between the iBook and the PowerBook are not in the specs. They are:
1: The PowerBook is a much nicer, more professional looking machine.
2: The PowerBook natively supports using an additional monitor.


(I was deciding between these same two machines not so long ago and ultimately I went with the PowerBook becuase it's a great looking aluminum laptop, and the iBook looks and feels like a cheap piece of plastic to me)

i don't know about you, but the specs are different.

[svejar]

For the record - the iBook is 1,07 GHz, So that narrows the CPU difference down to 0,25 GHz.

I own the iBook, but I tried the PB as well. The Airport reception was better on the iBook, so was the noise level. This could be a one-off thing, but I could hear the fan on the PB once in a while. It didn't really annoy me, but the iBook I tried was silent.

About the dual mirroring thing: I threw away my desktop computer due to lack of space, so I'm not exactly looking for a new monitor to complement this sexy little beast. In other words: I don't care.

You say that you like the exterior of the iBook better. In that case I would say that the only thing to consider is the CPU and graphic card. They are a little better on the PB. But I also have to say that none of these machines are gaming beasts. I've played some games on my iBook:


Hearts of Iron
Civ III
C&C Generals
Caesar III (old one, but very good!)
Alpha Centauri
Unreal Tournament (the original, and still the best!)


Generals could do with a bit more oooomph, but it's definately playable.

As for programs, I'm using:


Dreamweaver
Photoshop CS
Office 2004
InDesign CS
@


I think the question is: can the current PB do anything that the iBook can't? To me the question is "no". Sure, there are a programs that will suffer on a 12" iBook, but they will have a hard time on the PB as well. It's more or less the same machine, with a few extra tricks up it's sleeve.

Good luck!

[Abstract]

I agree. People have this perception that the 12" and 14" iBooks are slow, while the 12" PB is fast. They ask if the iBook is going to be too slow for what they do, and I tell them "No" while most others say "get the 12 inch PB", which is a more expensive iBook. I bought the 12" PB for the better keyboard (my opinion). If you didn't notice the difference, you'll be happy with the iBook.

About the 12" PB being more "future-proof" than iBooks: If one becomes obsolete, the other will be at the same time, and a 0.33GHz difference in a G4 processor isn't going to make one more futureproof than the other.

CoreImage advantages are arguable. Since the 12" PB will have poor CoreImage performance with it's nVidia 5200, the 12" PB won't be much better anyway. All Macs, including iBooks, without a compatible video card will get CoreImage function, but the CPU will handle all the processing instead of the GPU. It won't slow things down or anything. The 12" Powerbook won't be in a much better position even if it has a CoreImage compatible card. The 12" PB's GPU will only be able to handle a chunk of the processing, while the CPU still has to handle the rest. This is my interpretation of how it all works, but regardless, the 12" PB will only be slightly better off.

[oingoboingo]

CoreImage advantages are arguable. Since the 12" PB will have poor CoreImage performance with it's nVidia 5200, the 12" PB won't be much better anyway.

Have you used CoreImage apps on a 12" PowerBook and an iBook? Without the OS X 10.4 shipping, I don't see how you can make the claim that a) the FX 5200 will do a poor job, and b) the 12" iBook will only be marginally affected by lack of hardware CoreImage support. The few facts we have at hand at the moment are that the FX 5200 will support hardware acceleration of CoreImage, and the Radeon 9200 will not. Maybe you've had access through ADC to early release developer's code or something...if you have, I'd love to hear about the performance of CoreImage apps on the various GPUs that it can take advantage of.

All Macs, including iBooks, without a compatible video card will get CoreImage function, but the CPU will handle all the processing instead of the GPU. It won't slow things down or anything. The 12" Powerbook won't be in a much better position even if it has a CoreImage compatible card. The 12" PB's GPU will only be able to handle a chunk of the processing, while the CPU still has to handle the rest. This is my interpretation of how it all works, but regardless, the 12" PB will only be slightly better off.

I could be wrong, but my interpretation from reading this page:

http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/core.html

was that CoreImage API calls are able to produce results so quickly and in come cases in real-time, because they make heavy use of the custom-designed video hardware present in most recent GPUs. The CPU is not required to perform all the calculations that it previously needed to to produce the various graphical effects; these calls can be completely offloaded to the GPU, which can perform them faster than the CPU, and which also frees up the CPU to do other work. From the page linked above:

"Core Video provides a modern foundation for video services in Mac OS X Tiger. It provides a bridge between QuickTime and the GPU for hardware-accelerated video processing. This highly-optimized pipeline for video presentation increases performance and reduces CPU load, freeing up resources for other operations." (emphasis mine)

My reading of that is that having a CoreImage supported GPU will most definitely speed things up compared to a non-CoreImage supported GPU. The CPU will be freed up to process other tasks, rather than being busy emulating CoreImage API calls. Given two systems with identical CPUs, a system with hardware accelerated CoreImage support will outperform a system without hardware support.

Apologies if you have some 12" PowerBook and 12" iBook CoreImage benchmark data at hand (via ADC or wherever) that shows that the FX 5200 really provides little to no advantage. If you do have this information, I'd love to take a look at it...I'm keen to know how my 1.33GHz 12" PowerBook is going to handle Mac OS X 10.4 and the eye-candy improvements CoreImage and CoreVideo will bring.

[oingoboingo]

(Tell me if anything needs to be added/corrected, I am not perfect :rolleyes: )

-dav

One other minor thing (and this may be very very minor, depending on your needs). The PowerBook has an audio-in jack. The iBook does not. You'll need to buy a USB audio-in dongle if you want to plug your guitar or mic in for GarageBand or something like that. Of course if you don't want to play around with GarageBand (or something similar), that missing port probably makes no difference whatsoever.

[Abstract]

I'm not an ADC member. I only heard that the nVidia 5200 isn't going to provide the performance boost you seem to be hoping for. The more advanced chips will do a much better job with CoreImage.

You're right that between 2 computers with the same CPU and hardware, one with and one without a CoreImage capable video card, that the one with the CoreImage capable video card is going to be faster, but again, I hear the nVidia isn't going to be able to take advantage of CoreImage as you'd hope.

[oingoboingo]

I'm not an ADC member. I only heard that the nVidia 5200 isn't going to provide the performance boost you seem to be hoping for. The more advanced chips will do a much better job with CoreImage.

You're right that between 2 computers with the same CPU and hardware, one with and one without a CoreImage capable video card, that the one with the CoreImage capable video card is going to be faster, but again, I hear the nVidia isn't going to be able to take advantage of CoreImage as you'd hope.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the GeForce FX 5200 didn't do as good a job as something like a Radeon 9600 or 9800. After all, the FX 5200 isn't exactly what you'd call a stellar performer when it comes to OpenGL gaming. I was just wondering if you had some information that showed the FX 5200 running CoreImage acceleration like a total dog. Oh well...leisurely CoreImage hardware acceleration still has to be better than no hardware acceleration at all.

[chugach]

I'm in the market and haven't decided between iBook or PB 12". I see many articles/posts regarding the PB overheat/warping problems, and the iBook recall to replace the logic board. Out of all of the PowerBooks or iBooks sold, I wonder what percentage of owners have these issues. Are these horror stories posted by a very vocal minority? I understand that the Rev C PB's have less issues with heat than it's predecessors (although I am now reading about people installing latest sys updates experiencing higher temps after the upgrade). I would hope that the boxed, new iBooks are currently shipping with 'good' logic boards...

Between the 12" iBook or Powerbook, is one more likely to be free of the chronic manufacturing problems than the other? How many of you are covered by extended Apple Care?

[fedora]

i dont see how core image would would help the average user (non pro). All i can see it doing is speeding up and getting a better image when using photshop and other similar apps and because the ibook is sold as the non-pro laptop in apple's line i carnt see this as a good reason to choose a powerbook over an ibook. And the rotating sticky effect in dashboard works on the ibook but the ripple effect seems not to work.

[dav]

i dont see how core image would would help the average user (non pro). All i can see it doing is speeding up and getting a better image when using photshop and other similar apps and because the ibook is sold as the non-pro laptop in apple's line i carnt see this as a good reason to choose a powerbook over an ibook. And the rotating sticky effect in dashboard works on the ibook but the ripple effect seems not to work.

The general consensus is that CoreImage is necessary to get all the eye candy that tiger will offer. That is what I am picking up...

[Finiksa]

I would hope that the boxed, new iBooks are currently shipping with 'good' logic boards...
The logic board problem only affects G3 iBooks, current G4 models have no known logic board flaws.

The PB warping problem is pretty rare I think, at least the serious warping. A friend of mine has a 12" Rev A. which though it hasn't warped and become unstable, the aluminium has started to separate in a couple of places around fame edges. I think that's the mostly likely problem to occur and less likely with the current models since they're reinforced.

[dav]

I see many articles/posts regarding the PB overheat/warping problems, and the iBook recall to replace the logic board.

Both of my friends have 12" powerbooks, never any heat issues. Sometimes it just gets a little warm.

I think the heat issues refer to Rev A or the old TiBooks

[C-Mezak]

From what Ive been hearing here and elsewhere, this is a good time to buy an apple laptop. Theyve reached maturity as products. The next round of laptops will probably be a major update that will get a lot of people buying, but not me. My revC pb is running beautifully. It's wise to wait until Apple's line evolvs a bit after a major change. That's where it is right now.

As to whether you ought to get an ibook or pb . . . well many people claim to have been able to treat their ibooks terribly and have them live through it all. The casing is rock solid and while it wont remain beautiful, it will definitely take a beating. But on the other hand, the powerbook feels much more solid to me when Im using it. The keyboard is much much nicer than that of the ibook.

The powerbooks has plenty of perks, so unless you need the extra eternal-durability of the ibook, I say go for the pb.

charlie

[Lancetx]

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the GeForce FX 5200 didn't do as good a job as something like a Radeon 9600 or 9800. After all, the FX 5200 isn't exactly what you'd call a stellar performer when it comes to OpenGL gaming. I was just wondering if you had some information that showed the FX 5200 running CoreImage acceleration like a total dog. Oh well...leisurely CoreImage hardware acceleration still has to be better than no hardware acceleration at all.

I agree with you and that's why I personally wouldn't buy any new Mac today that didn't have a CoreImage compatible GPU. But that's just my opinion. :)

[beatle888]

As for programs, I'm using:


Dreamweaver
Photoshop CS
Office 2004
InDesign CS
@


Good luck!

i dont know...i guess the performance of a 12 powermac isnt that much more but if i were running InDesign i would want the fastest computer i could afford..assuming one was using it with large images for business purposes.
sorry i use InDesign all the time at work and couldnt imagine trying to get anything done with that program on an ibook OR a 12 power mac. that app is dog slow if you dont have a work station.

[QCassidy352]

Unless you really have a boner for the PB -- and I'd certainly understand if you did -- I'd go with the iBook. It's 95% as good for less money.

Buy a 512 ram module and an express with the "savings".

I disagree. The ibook is not 95% as good. The differences in specs, while modest, are not insignificant. I have a rev. B powerbook, which is nearly identical in specs to the current ibook, and I think the rev. C powerbook is a significant improvment on the rev. B. $217, while not cheap, is not really all that much money when you're talking about buying a computer that could last you years. 1 Ghz is really the bottom of the spectrum now, and requirements are always going up. You're better off spending a little more and having it last longer.

[TyroneShoes]

...I see many articles/posts regarding the PB overheat/warping problems, and the iBook recall to replace the logic board...I understand that the Rev C PB's have less issues with heat than it's predecessors (although I am now reading about people installing latest sys updates experiencing higher temps after the upgrade)...How many of you are covered by extended Apple Care?

Ex Ap Care is probably a good idea, especially on laptops and LCD displays. My iB logic board was not covered by the original logic board recall, but ended up in the 2nd group. That was a moot point, though, because well before that I had replaced it and sold it as a parts ball to a buddy. I would guess the great majority of those iB's will not ever take advantage of the replacement program for similar reasons, although knocking mine off a desk just before it died probably would have disqualified mine anyway.

When I got my PB, AAC had just come out and I somehow neglected to get about 1/4 of my mp3 library off the iB HD, so I just decided to re-encode all 200 CDs in my collection over the July 4th (2003) weekend. Within 3 days of that I noticed that the case had warped from heat, probably from the high use. There were no warnings that I might be able to prevent this by not doing this setting on a futon and using a hard desktop instead, and no indications that if I downloaded a power management update and trashed the one that shipped I also might have avoided this. Too late. Sorry, sucker.

I don't think the iB had a fan. If it did, it was a whisper fan running at low air volume. The PB fan is stronger and louder, which I assumed was because the G4 produced more heat than the G3 in my iB. Now that iB's have G4's they may have louder fans as well.

Some of the discrepancies we are seeing here about speed issues are possibly based on RAM or whether particular apps are Altivec accelerated. I have only 384 in my PB (as I did in my iB) and it seems much faster (G3 700 vs. G4 900 +Altivec). In both cases, however, once you get more than a few apps loaded there is a lot of VM paging going on...a starling amount if you open the activity monitor and check. Apple did such a superb job with VM that very little slowdown is noticeable, and I have had 9 or 10 apps open with no problems or warnings. Since all newer iB's are G4's, there might not be a lot of speed differences between new models of iB vs, PB.

[oingoboingo]

i dont see how core image would would help the average user (non pro). All i can see it doing is speeding up and getting a better image when using photshop and other similar apps and because the ibook is sold as the non-pro laptop in apple's line i carnt see this as a good reason to choose a powerbook over an ibook. And the rotating sticky effect in dashboard works on the ibook but the ripple effect seems not to work.

Since the CoreImage functions are going to be available to every single application running on Mac OS X, I think we'll start to see CoreImage-derived functionality turning up all over the place, not just in 'pro' apps like PhotoShop. I suspect we'll see non-pro apps like iPhoto, iMovie and iDVD gain a lot of extra functionality. Why would they not? With only a few simple API calls, developers will be able to implement impressive hardware accelerated image and video processing effects. This is not even mentioning whole new Mac OS X-wide features like Dashboard which take advantage of the huge leg-up provided to developers for free by the CoreImage/CoreVideo API framework. This will not be limited to 'pros'. For that matter, why wouldn't every second freeware screensaver start using fancy CoreImage effects? I think CoreImage is going to be widely spread across many classes of apps in the next few years.

The difference bewteen the specced-up 12" iBook and the 12" PowerBook is only a few hundred dollars. Personal preferences on appearances aside, a couple hundred bucks isn't much of a saving when Apple has already made it clear that a potentially core feature of Mac OS X in the future isn't going to run optimally on the iBook (not to mention the advantages that an extra 32MB of VRAM, extra 333MHz of CPU core speed, 167MHz FSB bus vs. 133MHz FSB bus, DVI-out versus VGA-out, and built in audio-in jack bring). But that's just me.

[jrober]

I had a similar dilemma 6 weeks ago. iBook or Powerbook. My observations so far are:
Get more memory: Currently I only have 256M and it is not enough. So if budget is critical get the iBook and more Ram.
Style: Very subjective but I am replacing my iMac Blue Dalmation with my PB, and the new monitors match the PB, older ones for the iBook.
Word processing, again this comes to budget the Powerbook does not have Apple Works (Big omission Apple) The iBook does. So if you need to do WP then it is a copy of Apple Works or MS Office. Either way more $'s. I didn't realise and now have to shell out.

Finally I judge from your post that you are not in the UK but in response to
How many of you are covered by extended Apple Care?
If you buy your new computers from John Lewis www.JohnLewis.com you get a free 2 year guarantee, less money than Apple Care.

[svejar]

sorry i use InDesign all the time at work and couldnt imagine trying to get anything done with that program on an ibook OR a 12 power mac. that app is dog slow if you dont have a work station.

I'mnot gonna argue with you on that, since you seem to use it on a far more professional level than me. All I can say is that I've used it to produce leaflets at work and it's no problem. Might have to do with the fact that it's mostly text and smaller image files. Actually, I find the resolution a far bigger problem than the speed.

[leftbanke7]

I was having this problem too. So I went to the CompUSA and played around with the machines. I was dead set on getting a 14" iBook before I went (lower cost, larger screen, "prettier") but it only took me 5 minutes of tinkering before I had changed my mind. The PB was so sleek compared to the iBook (the iBook in person didn't look as good as it did on the website) and the crispness of the PB screen just blew away the iBook. So two days later I ordered the 12" PB and I really really glad that I did.

My advice would be this: go try them out and then make your decision.

[dav]

Since the CoreImage functions are going to be available to every single application running on Mac OS X, I think we'll start to see CoreImage-derived functionality turning up all over the place, not just in 'pro' apps like PhotoShop...

Ah, I never thought about that. I was only thinking it would be for superfluous visual effects mainly.

Thank you for that insight.