Plutonique9
Aug 23, 2004, 07:16 PM
I used to love running an extremely refined OS9 operating system & having dedicated extension sets to squeeze out every last bit of performance I could from my Mac. If I was using audio/music applications I would only have extensions & control panels that were absolutley necessary for my needs, same was true for graphics and video....or games.
But of course, OS X is the inevitable direction I must & have been taking. I don't really have top of the line hardware (500mhz G3 Pismo) but it's enough to do what i need to do (Audio, Photoshop, basic Video).
One thing that bugs me about OSX, however, is that there isn't too much you can do to tweak performance (Operating System-wise). Sure, I got 1gb RAM and turn off all the eye candy and font smoothing and shadowing......but there is still all those damn "Background Processes" that bug me.
If anyones installed "ProcessWizard", it will show you all the processes & applications that are running in OS X. When looking in the "Non User Processes", there is a list of about 30 processes which are running. If I was running Windows 2000, I could easily select which processes I would want to load at startup but I haven't been able to figure out how to do this with OS X. Yeah, you can kill individual processes through "ProcessWizard".....but I really don't want to have to go through that tedious routine everytime i startup my Powerbook.
Isn't there any utilities that are available which will allow me to control which background processes will load when I boot OS X? I'm positive that they are all consuming resources (no matter how negliable) and that they are not all necessary all the time, so I would really love to trim the excess fat. While this isn't to critical for stuff like Photoshop, for realtime applications (such as low latency audio, midi and Audio applications) timing is very critical and I think that i could improve the situation on my slowish Powerbook if i could scale it down, just like OS 9. Also on that matter, what about extensions or .kexts? There are 191 .kext files in my OS X extensions folder. Doesn't that have some sought of impact on performance, or does it make 0% difference having hardware extensions that don't apply to your specific mac occupying that folder?
Thanks, any insight would be appreciated.
p
But of course, OS X is the inevitable direction I must & have been taking. I don't really have top of the line hardware (500mhz G3 Pismo) but it's enough to do what i need to do (Audio, Photoshop, basic Video).
One thing that bugs me about OSX, however, is that there isn't too much you can do to tweak performance (Operating System-wise). Sure, I got 1gb RAM and turn off all the eye candy and font smoothing and shadowing......but there is still all those damn "Background Processes" that bug me.
If anyones installed "ProcessWizard", it will show you all the processes & applications that are running in OS X. When looking in the "Non User Processes", there is a list of about 30 processes which are running. If I was running Windows 2000, I could easily select which processes I would want to load at startup but I haven't been able to figure out how to do this with OS X. Yeah, you can kill individual processes through "ProcessWizard".....but I really don't want to have to go through that tedious routine everytime i startup my Powerbook.
Isn't there any utilities that are available which will allow me to control which background processes will load when I boot OS X? I'm positive that they are all consuming resources (no matter how negliable) and that they are not all necessary all the time, so I would really love to trim the excess fat. While this isn't to critical for stuff like Photoshop, for realtime applications (such as low latency audio, midi and Audio applications) timing is very critical and I think that i could improve the situation on my slowish Powerbook if i could scale it down, just like OS 9. Also on that matter, what about extensions or .kexts? There are 191 .kext files in my OS X extensions folder. Doesn't that have some sought of impact on performance, or does it make 0% difference having hardware extensions that don't apply to your specific mac occupying that folder?
Thanks, any insight would be appreciated.
p
