PDA

View Full Version : i5 vs i7 - What are they?




Oskar1921
Mar 5, 2010, 10:30 AM
I've tried to find this via a search but just can't pin it down. I'm new here and constantly see references to i5 & i7 iMacs. What is the difference and how can you tell. Thanks.



miles01110
Mar 5, 2010, 10:32 AM
Really?

http://www.google.com/search?q=i5+i7+processor&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

MacDawg
Mar 5, 2010, 10:32 AM
Try this article (http://www.pcworld.com/article/171556/intels_new_core_i7_and_core_i5_processors_explained.html)

spinnerlys
Mar 5, 2010, 10:33 AM
ARTICLE (http://www.brighthub.com/computing/hardware/articles/48391.aspx)
via SEARCH (http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=i5+vs+i7&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&redir_esc=&ei=DzKRS5uSCIr0_Abuv9zsDA)

THREADS (http://www.google.com/cse?cx=011016119145480959114%3Akuv1aq0hily&ie=UTF-8&q=i5+vs+i7+site%3Aforums.macrumors.com&hl=en&as_qdr=all&meta=)

MROOGLE (http://mroogle.edesignuk.com/)

TMRaven
Mar 5, 2010, 10:35 AM
i5 and i7 are quad core processors of intel's newest nehalem architecture, which is a newer and improved cpu architecture compared to the core2duos.

Nehalem provides on average 20% more cpu prowess per clock speed compared to older architecture, and also has other features such as hyperthreading and turboboosting-- which is essentially the cpu overclocking itself if not all cores are being used.

i5 is a quad core and supports turbo boost, but no hyperthreading.
i7 is a quad core and supports both turbo boost and hyperthreading, it also has a slightly higher clock than i5.

A lot of programs don't support hyperthreading right now, but for stuff like video encoding, you will really see a difference.

Hellhammer
Mar 5, 2010, 10:38 AM
They are both Intel's CPUs. They are just code names for different products. The main difference is that i5 has Hyper-Threading disabled while i7 has it enabled. i7 also runs at higher clock speeds.

Dr.Pants
Mar 5, 2010, 10:40 AM
I've tried to find this via a search but just can't pin it down. I'm new here and constantly see references to i5 & i7 iMacs. What is the difference and how can you tell. Thanks.

The difference between the i5 and i7 iMacs and the older C2D iMacs is that the i5/i7 models use quad core processors from a much newer architecture then C2D (dual-core). You can tell by going into System Profiler and looking at the processor.

The difference between i5 and an i7 processor is that the i7 model is a slightly higher clock speed and hyperthreads as compared to the i5.

EDIT - next time Hellhammer I won't take a couple extra minutes to post ;)

Eric S.
Mar 5, 2010, 10:47 AM
The main difference is that i5 has Hyper-Threading disabled while i7 has it enabled.

That is true of Lynnfield i5's, but not Clarkdale or Arrandale.

Hellhammer
Mar 5, 2010, 10:53 AM
That is true of Lynnfield i5's, but not Clarkdale or Arrandale.

You owned me :D Was thinking about iMacs but you're right. In Clarkdale and Arrandale it only stands for mid-level and high-end (i3 being the low-end).

BornAgainMac
Mar 5, 2010, 11:07 AM
Is the i3 the new Celeron?

Hellhammer
Mar 5, 2010, 11:31 AM
Is the i3 the new Celeron?

Yeah, you can think like it is:

i3 = Celeron
i5 = Pentium
i7 = Core 2 Duo

It may not be the "right" way of thinking it because Core 2 Duo and Core ix are the same Core family so... I would think that:

i3 = E7xxx
i5 = E8xxx, Q8xxx
i7 = E8xxx, Q9xxx

I doubt there's a "right" way of seeing this as Intel naming system is so confusing

Eric S.
Mar 5, 2010, 12:13 PM
Was thinking about iMacs but you're right.

Well hopefully we'll see Arrandale in Macs real soon now. :)

panzer06
Mar 5, 2010, 01:39 PM
I was surprised to find all the mobile i5 chips are dual core. I didn't know the iMac uses the desktop version.

Cheers,

mystikjoe
Mar 5, 2010, 01:44 PM
I've tried to find this via a search but just can't pin it down. I'm new here and constantly see references to i5 & i7 iMacs. What is the difference and how can you tell. Thanks.

the difference is bragging rights to say you have the i7!

i've yet to see a single instance that i can tell the difference in speed between the 2. i had the i5 for 3 weeks and now the i7 for a week. either one is a winner!

Hellhammer
Mar 5, 2010, 01:46 PM
I was surprised to find all the mobile i5 chips are dual core. I didn't know the iMac uses the desktop version.

Cheers,

iMacs didn't before the last update. All 32nm CPUs are dual-core for now but Gulftown is coming in few weeks and it's six-core and Lynnfield might go 32nm later on this year. Maybe Intel had problems making a 32nm quad core CPU so they decided to kept all consumer CPUs dual core and gave Hyper-Threading a try as well or something like that.

Badger^2
Mar 5, 2010, 03:15 PM
I've tried to find this via a search but just can't pin it down. I'm new here and constantly see references to i5 & i7 iMacs. What is the difference and how can you tell. Thanks.

I agree, really?

Straight from the horses mouth: http://www.apple.com/imac/performance.html

JackLeBoul
Mar 5, 2010, 03:49 PM
Coming from a Mac Pro and bought an iMac (i5+8GB ram) for the wife and kids one I did notice a few observations.

- Great machine for its price
- Handy to have everything "on the table" without cables
- Fast CPUs
- Relatively "cheap" ram upgrades

But the bottleneck with this machine is the HD. Yes it is 1TB 7'000 rpm etc etc,
but it is the slowest thing on the machine. Using Aperture 3 or iMovie, one does wait for the HD quite often to react. Unfortunately, the new iMacs have a new thermal heat sensor plugged in to the HD, which makes it very difficult to uppgrade to SSD or "non" compatible HD's.

http://blog.macsales.com/2751-proprietary-cable-can-put-the-brakes-on-upgrading-late-09-imacs

Again, the choise of CPU will be in fact secondary to the overall speed of the machine IMHO.

Jack

Badger^2
Mar 5, 2010, 04:56 PM
But the bottleneck with this machine is the HD. Yes it is 1TB 7'000 rpm etc etc, but it is the slowest thing on the machine. Using Aperture 3 or iMovie, one does wait for the HD quite often to react. Unfortunately, the new iMacs have a new thermal heat sensor plugged in to the HD, which makes it very difficult to uppgrade to SSD or "non" compatible HD's.
Jack

So then put a SSD in the optical bay?

http://www.mcetech.com/optibay/

or http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=8942262&postcount=250

I rarely use my optical drive in my iMac. Got a perfectly good (and much faster) external.

JackLeBoul
Mar 6, 2010, 06:54 AM
Badger^2,

On MCE site they mention MacBook Pro as compatible systems.
I did not see the new iMac's. I guess you tried it out and it worked?

Jack

niuniu
Mar 6, 2010, 07:15 AM
Is Hyper threading useful for new games? Or is not supported there either?

Raima
Mar 6, 2010, 07:19 AM
Not all intel i5s are quad core. The i5 processor apple has selected to use in the iMac is a quad core.

Hellhammer
Mar 6, 2010, 07:19 AM
Is Hyper threading useful for new games? Or is not supported there either?

I think not. There aren't many games that supports quad-core so I doubt they support HT yet. New games supports quad-core though and I think in future they support HT as well. Game industry is always little behind other software industry

mystikjoe
Mar 6, 2010, 11:50 AM
Badger^2,

On MCE site they mention MacBook Pro as compatible systems.
I did not see the new iMac's. I guess you tried it out and it worked?

Jack

it works fine although you can find other ones for half that price that do the same thing!

glhiii
Mar 6, 2010, 12:10 PM
I can't believe Apple has such powerful machines and doesn't let you upgrade the hard disk -- at least they could have a SATA input.

niuniu
Mar 6, 2010, 12:16 PM
I think not. There aren't many games that supports quad-core so I doubt they support HT yet. New games supports quad-core though and I think in future they support HT as well. Game industry is always little behind other software industry

I checked this out after you replied, you're right, and there's even a lot of articles on the net about games performing Worse with HT turned on (due to some sort of latency).

Think I won't lose sleep if the new MBPs come with i5 only

JackLeBoul
Mar 6, 2010, 12:36 PM
I can't believe Apple has such powerful machines and doesn't let you upgrade the hard disk -- at least they could have a SATA input.

What has changed is that the heat sensor is now part of the HD enclosure.
That means if the new HD or SSD does not have this cable plug-in, the fans will go overdrive. This is only on the latest iMac's.

There have been some hacks done, i.e. "short-circuit" the sensor cable, but this is not recommend. If the machine would fail for any reason and Apple guys would see this immediately and your warranty would be gone.

NOW ! Many Mac SSD and HD distributors are of-course working on this and I would not be surprised we will see some modified SSD's and compatible fast HD with the heat sensor cable plug-in.

Eric S.
Mar 6, 2010, 12:39 PM
Think I won't lose sleep if the new MBPs come with i5 only

The MBPs will likely have Arrandale i5s and i7s, which are dual-core, four-thread (in other words, they have hyperthreading).

niuniu
Mar 6, 2010, 12:46 PM
The MBPs will likely have Arrandale i5s and i7s, which are dual-core, four-thread (in other words, they have hyperthreading).

Ah right yeah. We can turn HT off though if we want?

Eric S.
Mar 6, 2010, 12:59 PM
Ah right yeah. We can turn HT off though if we want?

If that's possible I'm not aware of it. There can't be many reasons for wanting fewer processor threads available.