PDA

View Full Version : MacPro Early 08 CPU upgrade




vicentk
Apr 18, 2010, 08:38 AM
My Mac Pro is 2 * 2.8, may I know can I upgrade to X5492 ( 3.4Ghz ) ?



Hellhammer
Apr 18, 2010, 08:56 AM
It uses the same LGA 771 socket so yeah, you should be able to do that

Umbongo
Apr 18, 2010, 09:07 AM
If I remember right there was something different on the cooling of the 3.2GHz 150W TDP systems compared to the 2.8GHz and 3.0GHz. Not sure if it will matter or not.

Dr.Pants
Apr 18, 2010, 09:47 AM
If I remember right there was something different on the cooling of the 3.2GHz 150W TDP systems compared to the 2.8GHz and 3.0GHz. Not sure if it will matter or not.

IIRC there's something about different part numbers for the motherboard and heatsinks for the 3.2 as compared to the 3.0 and the 2.8. I would check the max specs on the 2.8 mobo for TDP - other then that, the OP might have to use a fan controller for temps. I don't think its that large of an issue personally, but I could be wrong (though I still recommend fan-controlling-software in this case).

EDIT - I'm wrong, read on.

Hellhammer
Apr 18, 2010, 09:52 AM
IIRC there's something about different part numbers for the motherboard and heatsinks for the 3.2 as compared to the 3.0 and the 2.8. I would check the max specs on the 2.8 mobo for TDP - other then that, the OP might have to use a fan controller for temps. I don't think its that large of an issue personally, but I could be wrong (though I still recommend fan-controlling-software in this case).

And replace the fans and thermal paste with something better than stock ones to get a lot more efficient cooling.

Also, depending on what GPU(s) he has, but dual 150Ws are pretty power hungry too, especially when compared to 2.8GHz which are 80W

vicentk
Apr 18, 2010, 10:29 AM
If I remember right there was something different on the cooling of the 3.2GHz 150W TDP systems compared to the 2.8GHz and 3.0GHz. Not sure if it will matter or not.

The standard 2.8 is 80 watts but 3.4 is 150 watts, I afraid the heat sink can't afford.

vicentk
Apr 18, 2010, 11:20 AM
And replace the fans and thermal paste with something better than stock ones to get a lot more efficient cooling.

Also, depending on what GPU(s) he has, but dual 150Ws are pretty power hungry too, especially when compared to 2.8GHz which are 80W

My GPU is GTX285 (EVGA Mac version )

I just want using this MP more that 2 years, so I think CPU will heavy load in future.

Hellhammer
Apr 18, 2010, 11:33 AM
My GPU is GTX285 (EVGA Mac version )

I just want using this MP more that 2 years, so I think CPU will heavy load in future.

Well, 2.8GHz 8-core is very fast already. For the price you pay for 2 x X5492, you could buy a new Mac Pro, as they are/were 1500$ each.

2x150W is too hot I think, especially because it's designed for 2x80W, so it'd be almost two times hotter.

vicentk
Apr 18, 2010, 12:27 PM
Well, 2.8GHz 8-core is very fast already. For the price you pay for 2 x X5492, you could buy a new Mac Pro, as they are/were 1500$ each.

2x150W is too hot I think, especially because it's designed for 2x80W, so it'd be almost two times hotter.

Thank's your advice, so if I want keep the MP, so upgrade the HD will better ?
SSD is to expensive and less space.

Umbongo
Apr 18, 2010, 12:32 PM
Thank's your advice, so if I want keep the MP, so upgrade the HD will better ?
SSD is to expensive and less space.

SSDs are the most popular upgrade for a better computing experience at the moment, and for good reason. They don't need to be huge in size, 80GB is more than enough to store the OS and your main applications.

Hellhammer
Apr 18, 2010, 12:37 PM
Thank's your advice, so if I want keep the MP, so upgrade the HD will better ?
SSD is to expensive and less space.

You already have 4 640GB HDs in RAID0, am I right? Is it too slow for you?

nanofrog
Apr 18, 2010, 01:52 PM
My Mac Pro is 2 * 2.8, may I know can I upgrade to X5492 ( 3.4Ghz ) ?
NO.

Another member, Spacedust, has already tried them, and discovered that they won't work due to the different steppings used.

What he discovered is, models with A in the 3rd position use C0 steppings and will function, such as SLANT (E5462 used in the base model). But if it has a B (E0 stepping), then it won't, and X5492 = SLBBD.

vicentk
Apr 19, 2010, 12:19 AM
NO.

Another member, Spacedust, has already tried them, and discovered that they won't work due to the different steppings used.

What he discovered is, models with A in the 3rd position use C0 steppings and will function, such as SLANT (E5462 used in the base model). But if it has a B (E0 stepping), then it won't, and X5492 = SLBBD.
Thank your information, after I check in Intel, the faster CPU on SLANx is X5482 it is 3.2GHZ
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=33088&processor=X5482&spec-codes=SLANZ,SLBBG
So I think the faster CPU I can is X5482 only.

Spacedust
Apr 19, 2010, 08:31 AM
My Mac Pro is 2 * 2.8, may I know can I upgrade to X5492 ( 3.4Ghz ) ?

X5492 will not work ! Mac Pro 2008 is doesn't support SLB** steppings. Don't buy it ! X5482 is max and it will work (confirmed on hexus.net).

vicentk
Apr 19, 2010, 09:00 AM
X5492 will not work ! Mac Pro 2008 is doesn't support SLB** steppings. Don't buy it ! X5482 is max and it will work (confirmed on hexus.net).

Thank you again.

nanofrog
Apr 19, 2010, 02:12 PM
Thank your information, after I check in Intel, the faster CPU on SLANx is X5482 it is 3.2GHZ
http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=33088&processor=X5482&spec-codes=SLANZ,SLBBG
So I think the faster CPU I can is X5482 only.
It is, but with one stipulation: the SLANZ version ONLY, and it's listed as a Discontinued/Retired part on Intel's site (SLBBG is still in production, and what you're more likely to find, but it's the wrong stepping).

So you'd be looking at either a leftover to get the correct version (been sitting on a shelf somewhere) or used (if you're patient, you might spot a couple on ebay at a good price, but they're in demand for what you're trying to do).

gsxrq
Apr 19, 2010, 04:35 PM
i would be interested in your 2.8's if you do upgrade
they should work in my 2006 mac pro ?

666sheep
Apr 19, 2010, 05:00 PM
Nope, won't work. Only Woodcrests (5100 series) or Clovertowns (5300 series) in MP 2006.

gsxrq
Apr 20, 2010, 12:23 PM
ok thanks il look for some of them thanks

nanofrog
Apr 20, 2010, 12:27 PM
ok thanks il look for some of them thanks
X5365 is the fastest you can get for that board (3.0 GHz Quad core, 1333 MHz FSB).

vicentk
Apr 21, 2010, 09:41 AM
It is, but with one stipulation: the SLANZ version ONLY, and it's listed as a Discontinued/Retired part on Intel's site (SLBBG is still in production, and what you're more likely to find, but it's the wrong stepping).

So you'd be looking at either a leftover to get the correct version (been sitting on a shelf somewhere) or used (if you're patient, you might spot a couple on ebay at a good price, but they're in demand for what you're trying to do).

I know, so I think I need find them in 2 hand market.

nanofrog
Apr 21, 2010, 12:58 PM
I know, so I think I need find them in 2 hand market.
:cool: I was just hoping to make sure, so you didn't end up making a mistake (increased difficulty at best, and rather expensive worst case. ;)

vicentk
Apr 21, 2010, 11:23 PM
:cool: I was just hoping to make sure, so you didn't end up making a mistake (increased difficulty at best, and rather expensive worst case. ;)

My home is in Hong Kong, so I found the 2 hand market in China, after few days I found some ES model, do you think will them fit my case ?

nanofrog
Apr 22, 2010, 12:08 AM
My home is in Hong Kong, so I found the 2 hand market in China, after few days I found some ES model, do you think will them fit my case ?
ES = Engineering Samples. So long as they're the right models (family, steppings, and of course socket), they'll drop in just fine.

Ideally, it's best to avoid ES, but some have done it, and apparently with no ill effects (but who knows how hard they were run during the initial testing).

MacPhotog
Sep 21, 2010, 12:19 PM
I have an early '08 Mac Pro that came with one E5462 2.8GHz Xeon processor. I would like to upgrade the processors as much as possible.

As far as I can tell from my own research as well as the information on this thread, the best processors I can put in the machine are the Xeon X5482 3.2GHz chips.

I found a pair of them on eBay, but the seller says the steppings are "E 0 steppings". The seller describes the chips as "Intel Xeon Quad Core X5482 E S"... which sounds like they were Engineering Samples... I'm okay with that, but what about the "E 0" steppings? Will they work in the Mac Pro?

Thanks so much if anybody can answer this!

CaptainChunk
Sep 21, 2010, 12:57 PM
I have an early '08 Mac Pro that came with one E5462 2.8GHz Xeon processor. I would like to upgrade the processors as much as possible.

As far as I can tell from my own research as well as the information on this thread, the best processors I can put in the machine are the Xeon X5482 3.2GHz chips.

I found a pair of them on eBay, but the seller says the steppings are "E 0 steppings". The seller describes the chips as "Intel Xeon Quad Core X5482 E S"... which sounds like they were Engineering Samples... I'm okay with that, but what about the "E 0" steppings? Will they work in the Mac Pro?

Thanks so much if anybody can answer this!

Your question is already answered earlier in this thread. 2008s won't work with CPUs that have E0 steppings, period. Only CPUs with C0 steppings work.

vicentk
Nov 28, 2010, 07:21 AM
But after I read that site ( http://www.applecomponents.com/computers/mac-pro-early-2008/?p=all_items&pn=1&cmp=0098&per_page=30 ) , it seem the logic board is different, I'm afraid my 2.8 board the power supply parts is not enough.

Spacedust
Nov 28, 2010, 07:35 AM
But after I read that site ( http://www.applecomponents.com/computers/mac-pro-early-2008/?p=all_items&pn=1&cmp=0098&per_page=30 ) , it seem the logic board is different, I'm afraid my 2.8 board the power supply parts is not enough.

It will work. Check hexus.net article: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=11938&page=1

vicentk
Nov 28, 2010, 08:41 AM
It will work. Check hexus.net article: http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=11938&page=1

thank you, after I read this post I feel relieved.

Spacedust
Nov 28, 2010, 04:35 PM
thank you, after I read this post I feel relieved.

Don't buy X5482, because your CPU's will take 2x130W power. I've replaced my E5462's with E5472's and I still got 2x80W.

Atomic101
Nov 29, 2010, 07:02 AM
I have been looking at this upgrade myself. I run my Xeon 2.8 at 3.15 Ghz & would like to run the new processors at 3.55 as I use mine for rendering -do any of you know if the Heatsinks from a 2.8 will take it ?

Thanks andy

sixseven
Dec 10, 2011, 10:48 PM
can this cpu be running in Mac Pro 3.1 / 2008 / Serial ID CK811115XYL?

http://ark.intel.com/products/34446/Intel-Xeon-Processor-X5450-(12M-Cache-3_00-GHz-1333-MHz-FSB)

nanofrog
Dec 11, 2011, 11:16 AM
can this cpu be running in Mac Pro 3.1 / 2008 / Serial ID CK811115XYL?

http://ark.intel.com/products/34446/Intel-Xeon-Processor-X5450-(12M-Cache-3_00-GHz-1333-MHz-FSB)
If you find one with a SLASB code, then Yes (means C0 stepping).

There is another, SLBBE, which uses an E0 stepping which will not work (BTW, both codes are production releases, not Engineering Samples which you'd be best to avoid - those start with a Q).

But I have to ask... Why use that particular CPUID? :confused: