PDA

View Full Version : Well Fancy That!




skunk
Oct 23, 2004, 08:35 PM
http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?&idq=/ff/story/0002/20041022/1924647171.htm&photoid=20041021BAG116&floc=NW_1-T
U.S.-Backed Iraq Government Losing Support -Survey

By Deborah Zabarenko

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Support among Iraqis for the U.S.-appointed government in Baghdad has plunged since it was installed this summer, a U.S. survey released on Friday said.

The survey brought unwelcome news for the Bush administration as it fights to build stability before elections in January. It also indicated that Iraqis are most strongly influenced by their religious, rather than secular, leaders.

The survey, carried out at the end of September, showed popular support for interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi dropped more than 20 percentage points since July. Washington formally handed sovereignty to Iraq at the end of June.

Just over 45 percent of those surveyed said Allawi had been effective since taking office in June, down from over 66 percent in July, and support for his government plummeted from 62 percent to 43 percent over the same period.

The survey was carried out by the International Republican Institute, a government-funded body that promotes democracy around the world and which is helping oversee efforts to build political parties in Iraq.

It found religious leaders carry more political weight than tribal leaders, the government or political parties with potential Iraqi voters.

The Washington Post, reporting figures not publicly released by the institute, said the survey also found that the most popular politician in Iraq was Abdel Aziz Hakim, leader of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq.

Fifty-one percent said they want him in the national assembly, which will pick a new government.

Allawi was second, with 47 percent of Iraqis supporting him for a seat in the new parliament if elections were held now, and rebel Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr was a close third, with 46 percent, the newspaper said. An institute spokesman would not confirm the Post figures.

ISLAMIC POWER

President Bush said on Monday he would grudgingly accept an Islamic fundamentalist government in Iraq, if the Iraqi people voted to create one in free elections.

"I would be disappointed, but democracy is democracy," Bush said in an Associated Press interview, when asked whether Iraqis might prefer an Islamic government to secular rule. "If that's what the people choose, that's what the people choose."

Forty percent of respondents in the survey said a cleric's endorsement of a candidate would make them more inclined to vote for that candidate, a greater percentage than for political parties, tribal leaders and the government combined.

More than 45 percent of Iraqis believe their country is heading in the wrong direction, up from 31 percent 10 weeks ago; 55 percent do not believe the interim government represents their interests.

Bush, facing a tough re-election fight on Nov. 2, portrays the conflict in Iraq as part of the struggle against terrorism but Democratic challenger John Kerry condemns the prosecution of the war and says it was a distraction from the battle against terrorists.

A senior Bush administration official played down the survey results, saying much depends on how questions are framed and on the events of the day.

The official said the poll showed some "positive trends" and an "underlying optimism for the future." The official said 64.6 percent of those surveyed believe their lives will be better in the future.

The Bush administration plans to spend more than $30 million on strategic advice, training and polling data to what it deems "moderate and democratic" Iraqi political parties with candidates running in the country's upcoming elections.
Everything seems to be going according to plan. Whose plan is another question...



Blue Velvet
Oct 23, 2004, 08:39 PM
Maybe it's one of Baldrick's cunning plans...


"President Bush said on Monday he would grudgingly accept an Islamic fundamentalist government in Iraq."

That's damned good of him considering he won't be around in either a week or so or maybe in a few years time...

skunk
Oct 23, 2004, 08:41 PM
I just LOVE that "Democracy is democracy" line: how on earth would he know? :confused:

skunk
Oct 23, 2004, 08:43 PM
Maybe it's one of Baldrick's cunning plans...
Yup. Everything's coming up turnips... ;)

Thomas Veil
Oct 23, 2004, 09:01 PM
This war seems to be proving that nothing is so bad in Iraq that it can't get worse.

pseudobrit
Oct 24, 2004, 12:08 AM
I think Bush should be president of Iraq and we should get someone else.

Axeon
Oct 24, 2004, 12:14 AM
I think the problem with the currently installed Iraqi government (currently now referred to as "Windows") is that its diversity of citizens (now referred to as "software") don't seem to support the political legitimacy ("drivers") of the current government given the political culture and socialization shaped under past regimes ("prior OS versions").

It'd be really nice if these Windows users found a better OS that handles drivers compatible with all of the software.

Apple. Think Different.

Thomas Veil
Oct 24, 2004, 01:47 AM
I think Bush should be president of Iraq and we should get someone else.
Best idea I've heard all month. :)

blackfox
Oct 24, 2004, 02:01 AM
I think Bush should be president of Iraq and we should get someone else.
I think the Iraqis have gone through enough...

Perhaps we should fly the whole country's population over here and let them participate in our Democracy to get a feel for it. With the US as the de-facto Leadership over there, they certainly have a vested interest.

We can teach them such valuable lessons such as an Islamic government is allowable, if acheived by Democratic means, but a Liberal government is not.

and so on...

solvs
Oct 24, 2004, 04:36 AM
Gee, you mean they don't like the government we've forced upon them? Like we weren't greeted as liberators, and there were no WMDs? Or ties to Al Qaida?

Maybe France and Germany could invade us, and liberate us from our despotic leader because we have WMDs and ties to Bin Laden. I'm sure Britain would join them. Blair's popularity would suddenly rise up quite a bit. Then they could install Kerry as a puppet while killing thousands of us and saying our system will be just as good as theirs, even if they are having problems. Then, when we protest them, they'll lock us in prisons and abuse our naked bodies with guard dogs. I'll sure they'll act sorry though, even if they never actually say it.

Not that Bush is as bad as Saddam, but... then again, Saddam was not Bin Laden.