PDA

View Full Version : muzzle lifted, bob kerrey talks about about 9/11 hearings' findings




zimv20
Nov 10, 2004, 05:51 AM
link (http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0411/08/pzn.01.html)

excerpt from paula zahn interview:

KERREY: That's correct, because the president had a case, a very simple case to make: I am the commander in chief. I won the war in Afghanistan, even though John Kerry supported it, even though, by the way, there's a credible case that the president's own negligence prior to 9/11 at least in part contributed to the disaster in the first place.

ZAHN: How so?

KERREY: Well, the 9/11 report says in chapter eight -- now that it's beyond the campaign, so the promise I had to keep this out of the campaign is over.

The 9/11 report in chapter eight says that, in the summer of 2001, the government ignored repeated warnings by the CIA, ignored, and didn't do anything to harden our border security, didn't do anything to harden airport country, didn't do anything to engage local law enforcement, didn't do anything to round up INS and consular offices and say we have to shut this down, and didn't warn the American people.

The famous presidential daily briefing on August 6, we say in the report that the briefing officers believed that there was a considerable sense of urgency and it was current. So there was a case to be made that wasn't made.

(CROSSTALK)

ZAHN: But what we continue to hear from this administration is that the threat was much too diffuse. There was no way you could zero in on the fact that al Qaeda was going to use jets as bombs and ram them into buildings.

KERREY: That is a straw man.

The president says, if I had only known that 19 Islamic men would come into the United States of America and on the morning of 11 September hijack four American aircraft, fly two into the World Trade Center, one into the Pentagon, and one into an unknown Pennsylvania that crashed in Shanksville, I would have moved heaven and earth. That's what he said.

Mr. President, you don't need to know that. This is an Islamic jihadist movement that has been organized since the early 1990s, declared war on the United States twice, in '96 and '98. You knew they were in the United States. You were warned by the CIA. You knew in July they were inside the United States. You were told again by briefing officers in August that it was a dire threat.

And what did you do? Nothing, so far as we could see on the 9/11 Commission. Now, that's in the report. And we took an oath not to talk about it during the campaign, I think correctly so, to increase the capacity of that commission's report to be heard by the people's Congress.

But the report, I think, it's difficult for a challenger. If I had been the challenger, it's difficult to make that case when you are running against an incumbent. He can stand back and say, oh, you're just grousing.



Thomas Veil
Nov 10, 2004, 07:24 AM
Well, it's stuff we all knew -- stuff Richard Clarke and Paul O'Neill have been saying for months -- except now it's got an official stamp on it.

The other thing was, a story that came out literally the night before the election was an excerpt from the new bin Laden tape, in which our buddy Osama states that the purpose of his jihad is to bankrupt the United States by making us spend all our money chasing him down. He as much as said that Bush has been playing right into his hands.

Actually, more than playing into his hands, since we're wasting billions in a country that didn't house al Qaeda, something Bush knew going in.

Hard to think of a more incompetent way for a president to fight terrorism. Which, of course, is why we re-elected him.

I get dizzy trying to figure that out. :confused:

Chip NoVaMac
Nov 10, 2004, 08:45 AM
it seems that the report was not used in the campaign, since it would have caused many more to question the role of all politicians in the election. Two years from now, it will be forgotten.