PDA

View Full Version : Talk about naked news...




Thomas Veil
Nov 17, 2004, 12:02 PM
We've got one of those cheesy "Action News" stations in our town. You know: hyped-up promos, screaming graphics, sensational stories....

But they've never sunk to this level (http://www.cleveland.com/entertainment/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/entertainment/1100687727159092.xml) before:


Channel 19 said it was about art. But viewers could be forgiven for thinking it was about seeing a naked news honey on television.

Anchor/reporter Sharon Reed appeared seminude and nude although the camera caught her from afar and from the rear in a heavily promoted story on WOIO Channel 19's 11 p.m. newscast Monday. Reed participated in Spencer Tunick's nude photo installation in downtown Cleveland in June, and narrated a first-person story.

Yes, it was a sweeps month stunt, news director Steve Doerr acknowledged. It paid off in a big way. Glimpses of Reed taking off her bra drew in the highest audience for the 11 p.m. newscast in the station's history. November is one of the "sweeps" months when audiences are measured to set advertising rates.

Reed was shown from the waist up wearing a bra, which she took off (though not much of her breasts were visible). Later, she walked away from the camera, fully nude. Other participants in the installation, which created images from masses of nude bodies, were also shown.

Audience advisories aired before the piece, and in his introduction, anchor David Wittman warned, "This is a true account no blurred images this time!"

The idea came from general manager Bill Applegate's desire to cover the Tunick event in a different way, Doerr said.

Reed said she considered it an important story. "I'm my own person. I don't do anything I don't want to do for any job, or anything," she said.
*Sigh* I know local news has gone "happy", and that some are downright tabloid, but for God's sake, then, why don't they just stop presenting themselves as news? Edward R. Murrow is probably spinning in his crypt at the thought that these people classify themselves in the same business that he was in.



daveL
Nov 17, 2004, 12:29 PM
So, where are the pics :-)

emw
Nov 17, 2004, 12:32 PM
So, where are the pics :-)

None from the show, I don't think. Here's a promo shot. (http://www.woio.com/Global/story.asp?S=802126&nav=0rd19Kwb)

blackfox
Nov 17, 2004, 12:37 PM
In all seriousness, this reminds me of a snippet I caught (somewhere) of Russian News, where the woman anchor slowly undresses while reading the news. The Weatherwoman takes it to a whole new level...

At the risk of drawing comparisons where none should be made, there is some worrisome parallels between the direction both the countries seem to be making and the ends they go to to placate their citizens. It is not far from throwing Christians to the Lions (or gladiators) as Roman society deteriorated.

Take what you will.

radhak
Nov 17, 2004, 12:40 PM
I don't like such posts. I think I want to report this to the moderators : how come you did not post this before the news aired? Do you realize the heart-burn you have given so many of us, for missing such important coverage? :mad:

:D :D :D

mactastic
Nov 17, 2004, 12:52 PM
So now news broadcasts aren't allowed before 9pm either... ;)

Thomas Veil
Nov 17, 2004, 01:15 PM
The Weatherwoman takes it to a whole new level...
Can't wait to hear how she reports the phase of the moon... ;)

skunk
Nov 17, 2004, 01:48 PM
Isn't there a Canadian outfit which does Naked News on a daily basis?

kettle
Nov 17, 2004, 02:13 PM
Didn't "live tv" in the UK used to do "The Naked News"?

Lyle
Nov 17, 2004, 02:37 PM
We've got one of those cheesy "Action News" stations in our town. You know: hyped-up promos, screaming graphics, sensational stories....

But they've never sunk to this level (http://www.cleveland.com/entertainment/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/entertainment/1100687727159092.xml) before:Egads. I remember that a few years ago, our local NBC affiliate aired an expose (no pun intended) about local strip clubs and they had one of the news babes go undercover (again, no pun intended -- really!) as an "exotic dancer". I don't think it came down to her actually taking off anything, but the story was obviously meant to titilate (OK, that one was intended).

skunk
Nov 17, 2004, 05:21 PM
Try "titillate": it's more fun. :rolleyes:

Surely she must have taken something off? Maybe she just had a really raunchy reporter's outfit...

Lyle
Nov 17, 2004, 06:37 PM
Try "titillate": it's more fun. :rolleyes:Ack, the one time I don't check my spelling and skunk's watching. :)

Surely she must have taken something off? Maybe she just had a really raunchy reporter's outfit...Well, yes, I think she had on some kind of skimpy outfit. Or maybe I'm remembering it wrong, and she was going undercover as a prostitute down on Governor's Drive. At any rate, I'm pretty sure it's not a story she highlights on her resume these days.

Chappers
Nov 18, 2004, 05:04 AM
Sad - just plain sad.

Thomas Veil
Nov 18, 2004, 03:56 PM
Oh, Lord, it made the national news (http://channels.netscape.com/ns/tv/story.jsp?floc=FF-APO-1110&idq=/ff/story/0001%2F20041117%2F2124059010.htm).

What a joke this TV station is.