PDA

View Full Version : In the Evolutionary Race, Humans went the extra Mile.




Xtremehkr
Nov 18, 2004, 12:24 AM
Article (http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-running18nov18,0,6723919.story?coll=la-home-headlines)

Humanity was born to run.

More than by brain size or tool-making ability, the human species was set apart from its ancestors by the ability to jog mile after lung-stabbing mile with greater endurance than any other primate, according to research published today in the journal Nature.

Indeed, human beings evolved as the cross-country stars of a primordial runner's world 2 million years before the advent of jogging shoes, tracksuits and arthroscopic knee surgery.

Mounting a challenge to the conventional wisdom about human origins, researchers at Harvard University and the University of Utah concluded that the ability to run long distances was the driving force shaping the modern human anatomy.

Such running ability could have given early humans a survival edge in scavenging on the open savannas of Africa.

The earliest humans, the researchers said, were marathon men and women from the tips of their distinctively short toes and long Achilles tendons to the tops of their biomechanically balanced heads.

"We have gone all this time somehow missing this truly important aspect of humans — this [long-distance running] behavior and its impact on the design of the human body," said University of Utah biologist Dennis Bramble, who co-wrote the study.

"Primates don't do distance running," Bramble said. "We should have recognized that humans are very odd."

In a detailed biomechanical analysis, Bramble and colleague Daniel Lieberman at Harvard University suggested that distance running was not a minor byproduct of the ability to walk upright on two legs.

It ultimately led to the development of the large brain that sets modern humans apart from all other creatures.

If natural selection had not favored running, Bramble said, "We would still look a lot like apes."

The researchers compared human anatomy to early apes and hominids and found telling differences.

Take the distinctive bulge of the buttocks at the back of the human silhouette. Humans have large, well-muscled buttocks that help stabilize the body during running.

The muscles connect the femur — the large bone in each upper leg — to the trunk and keep the body from over-balancing with each step.

Great apes, by contrast, have narrow hips and no rump to speak of.

Chimpanzees and gorillas walk on their knuckles. Humans have a lengthy arm-swinging stride, as long in proportion for a human runner as that of a galloping horse.

Long ligaments and tendons — including the Achilles tendon — serve as springs that store and release mechanical energy during running. The Achilles tendon on an ape is a mere stub.

The researchers also identified other anatomical features:

A more balanced head with a flatter face, smaller teeth and short snout, compared with prehuman species. That makes it easier to balance the head during the up and down shocks of running.

A ligament that runs from the back of the skull and neck down to the thoracic vertebrae. It acts as a shock absorber and helps the arms and shoulders counterbalance the head during running.

Wide shoulders that allow the body to rotate during running. A narrow trunk, waist and pelvis allow the upper body to counteract the movement of the legs.

The stiff arch of the human foot. That allows a runner to push off the ground more efficiently and utilize ligaments on the bottom of the feet as springs. Humans also have an enlarged heel bone for better shock absorption, as well as shorter toes.

The new theory immediately stirred a scholarly controversy among experts in biomechanics, human origins and comparative anatomy.

"I question whether endurance running was the evolutionary turning point that helped morph us into our modern form," said anthropologist Ken Mowbray at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. "I think a lot of other things had to take place."

But Richard Klein, an expert in human origins at Stanford University, said: "I think they make a strong case that, from the beginning, an important advantage of modern bipedalism was that it facilitated long-distance running."

Until now, the importance of running as an evolutionary force has been lost in the debate over why humanity's early ancestors first evolved their upright stance, said Christopher Ruff, director of the Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution at Johns Hopkins University.

Randall Susman, an expert in comparative early human anatomy at the State University of New York at Stonybrook, said that humanity's pathetic performance as a sprinter made the ability easy to overlook.

People are so slow in the short run that almost any dog can chase down a fleeing human being, as many postal carriers have learned from experience.

When it comes to long-distance running, however, a healthy human jogger can outrun most animals, sustaining a pace of 15 miles a day or more for extended periods of time.

"That is an astonishing capability," said Lieberman, who specializes in biological anthropology at Harvard. "Most animals can't do that.

"Generations of anthropologists have focused on walking and left running completely out of the picture," he said. "But there are a lot of features of our bodies that only make sense in terms of running."

The muscles, tendons and bone structures necessary for efficient long-distance running are quite different from those needed for steady walking.

"We don't appreciate how dramatic the differences between walking and running are because the transition between them is so smooth," Bramble said. "But the biomechanics are fundamentally different."


Something to think about.



blackfox
Nov 18, 2004, 02:26 AM
I read about this today. Pretty fascinating stuff, especially as I have been a long-distance runner since jr. high.

That said, unless you meant to imply we should all run to Canada, I am not sure it is political.

I'm sure we'll try our best though...

zimv20
Nov 18, 2004, 02:34 AM
I am not sure it is political.

I'm sure we'll try our best though...
i wonder if bush believes in evolution

Chappers
Nov 18, 2004, 05:02 AM
As a theory this doesn't quite make sense. If any old dog can chase down a human in a sprint then the ability to run long distance is useless.

Being able to stand up must be more important because you can see any potential predators coming - it works for mear cats.

Chappers
Nov 18, 2004, 05:09 AM
i wonder if bush believes in evolution

He certainly hasn't experience it

amnesiac1984
Nov 18, 2004, 05:20 AM
As a theory this doesn't quite make sense. If any old dog can chase down a human in a sprint then the ability to run long distance is useless.


It is not useful for evading prey so much as it is useful for hunting. I saw a program about the early humans who used to track prey for miles and miles and miles until it was just too warn out and died of exhaustion.

Chappers
Nov 18, 2004, 05:56 AM
Good point.

pseudobrit
Nov 18, 2004, 08:19 AM
The reason we can run long distances is 'cause God wanted us to and made us that way.

Don't panic
Nov 18, 2004, 09:50 AM
The reason we can run long distances is 'cause God wanted us to and made us that way.

that's right, so we can chase them pesky liberals that don't want to make any donations.

themadchemist
Nov 18, 2004, 01:07 PM
Why is hard science from Nature in the political discussion? Is it because it says that dirty word, "evolution?"

Ugh.

pseudobrit
Nov 18, 2004, 01:26 PM
Why is hard science from Nature in the political discussion?

It was always here because God put it here.

emw
Nov 18, 2004, 01:43 PM
It was always here because God put it here.

And you're bound and determined to keep it here. But I suppose that's God's will, right? ;)

More OT, I think we are quickly devolving from long-distance running to long-term eating. I would be interested in knowing what percentage of the adult US population, at least, can run a mile in less than 10 minutes, or run it at all.

IJ Reilly
Nov 18, 2004, 01:59 PM
I only run when someone is chasing me. I call this the ultimate evolutionary development.

pseudobrit
Nov 18, 2004, 02:27 PM
And you're bound and determined to keep it here. But I suppose that's God's will, right? ;)

More OT, I think we are quickly devolving from long-distance running to long-term eating. I would be interested in knowing what percentage of the adult US population, at least, can run a mile in less than 10 minutes, or run it at all.

I hate running. I can do it, but I hate it. It wrecks my skeletal system.

Put me on skates or a bike and I can zip around for hours, though...

that's evolution

emw
Nov 18, 2004, 02:35 PM
I hate running. I can do it, but I hate it. It wrecks my skeletal system.

Put me on skates or a bike and I can zip around for hours, though...

that's evolution

I see your point. If only we could evolve wheels on our feet and cut out the middle man.

pseudobrit
Nov 19, 2004, 09:07 AM
I see your point. If only we could evolve wheels on our feet and cut out the middle man.

Or blades.