Ditto! Thursday, August 12th, late night.
I'll have the camera/tripod out, taking continuous wide angle (15mm) 20 or 25 second exposures depending on atmosphere/light pollution.
Post your best ones here everyone!
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Misc Astrophotography (Shoot the ISS, etc) besides moon shots...
- Thread starter mtbdudex
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Ditto! Thursday, August 12th, late night.
I'll have the camera/tripod out, taking continuous wide angle (15mm) 20 or 25 second exposures depending on atmosphere/light pollution.
Post your best ones here everyone!
With this, does anyone know if it matters what part of the world you are in? it says look northeast around midnight when its changing from aug 12th to aug 13th, but no mention of a particular time zone or anything like that. I would really hate to miss this opportunity, and any help or thoughts are greatly appreciated.
Found my answer on this site... list best times for almost anywhere in the world. Good luck to all! =o)
http://www.tabwin.com/perseids/
Cool, thanks for the site even though it doesn't have much info for Washington State. I really want to try to see this meteor shower but dread having to travel an hour or two away from any city/town light pollution.
I live in Vegas, so i feel your pain. I'm driving about an hour an a half away and up a mountain. This will be my first time even seeing a meteor shower, I'm stoked for this.
Talk about luck and timing!
I just came back from 4 day vacation in northern part of Michigan's lower peninsula, Hillman, about 1 hr south of Mackinac bridge.
This was a test shot Tues Aug 10th of Milky Way multiple exposure I was preparing for, as the 20 sec exposure went off I saw these 2 streaks and hoped they were in my field of view.
YES! For orientation, north (Polaris) is Top/Left and just off this field of view, south is sorta bottom/RH.
This is single image shot with 15-85 @ 15mm, ISO 800, f 3.5, no stacking.
![_MG_1153%20-%20Version%202.jpg]()
Definitely active skies, in the 35 minutes I was shooting saw 9 meteorites, 1 brilliant with flower trail.
Good luck with clear skies and capturing some.
Dark skies (and no light pollution) helps.
I went outside just now here in SE Michigan, hoping to set-up camera for some images, too hazy skies so processing all the images from vacation (instead of sleeping).
I just came back from 4 day vacation in northern part of Michigan's lower peninsula, Hillman, about 1 hr south of Mackinac bridge.
This was a test shot Tues Aug 10th of Milky Way multiple exposure I was preparing for, as the 20 sec exposure went off I saw these 2 streaks and hoped they were in my field of view.
YES! For orientation, north (Polaris) is Top/Left and just off this field of view, south is sorta bottom/RH.
This is single image shot with 15-85 @ 15mm, ISO 800, f 3.5, no stacking.
Definitely active skies, in the 35 minutes I was shooting saw 9 meteorites, 1 brilliant with flower trail.
Good luck with clear skies and capturing some.
Dark skies (and no light pollution) helps.
I went outside just now here in SE Michigan, hoping to set-up camera for some images, too hazy skies so processing all the images from vacation (instead of sleeping).
Check out what you can do with a few grand in astronomy equipment over at CloudyNights, the astro forum I frequent.
The posts aren't mine, but they are pretty cool.
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthre...8874/page/4/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthre...1756/page/4/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
The posts aren't mine, but they are pretty cool.
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthre...8874/page/4/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthre...1756/page/4/view/collapsed/sb/5/o/all/fpart/1
Nice, I'm gunna see what I can get tonight. As a general rule of thumb for astrophotography, what are good apertures and ISO's to use for say, 20 second exposures?
for wide field astrophotography:
as a start:
Manual mode
wb = daylight
ISO =800 (more than that and you get sensor noise issues except on newest models like 7d)
aperture = as wide as you can get! Gather all that light
how wide? I shoot @ 15mm wide on my 15-85 lens, I've heard too wide (say 10mm) and shorter meteorite streaks don't get captured often or hard to distinguish
focus = set to infinity (different techniques to achieve)
take a test shot at 20 sec & 25 sec, see how light pollution makes your picture "glow" at horizon, go from there. More than 25 sec and you'll see star trails to begin.
If you "stack" then need to take dark frames.
(there are whole tutorials on stacking.....)
enjoy!
Milky way, star trails @ Northern Shore Lodge, Hillman Mich Aug 8 - 11 2010
From 8/8-8/11 vacation at the Northern shore lodge Hillman Michigan, http://northernshorelodge.com/index.htm
All these shots are single exposures except the star trails.
For the Milky way shots, I did take multiple shots for DSS later this weekend, will be interesting to compare the added depth/clarity DSS gives vs single exposure shown below.
I'll post those in this thread as they are done.
#1: Lodge @ night, 25 sec exposure:
![_MG_0885.jpg]()
#2: Aug 8 star trail-lodge, same framing as prior, just stacked (75) 20 second exposures. You can see some whispy clouds caused gaps in star trails.:
![Aug%208%20star%20trail-lodge.jpg]()
#3: Milky way due south with Ess lake shoreline, this is single 30 sec exposure, you can see whispy clouds here:
![_MG_0651.jpg]()
#4: Another single 30 sec exposure due south on Ess lake side, this showing more of Milky way with trees just on LH lower side, still slight clouds.
![_MG_0656.jpg]()
#5: This is Long lake side, another single 30 sec exposure, almost North slight east view of Milky way, tree on RH side for reference.
![_MG_0846.jpg]()
#6: One of my favorite shots from this nightime series, this is Long lake side, I like this shot as is....30 second exposure captured some ligh pollution even way up north.
![_MG_1148.jpg]()
#7: Another Long lake side shot, 30 sec exposure
![_MG_1151.jpg]()
#8: The Milky way directly overhead from Long lake side, it darker there than by the lodge.
![_MG_1156.jpg]()
Like I stated at start of this post, for the Milky way shots I did take multiple shots for DSS later this weekend, will be interesting to compare the added depth/clarity DSS gives vs single exposure shown above.
I'll post those in this thread as they are done.
From 8/8-8/11 vacation at the Northern shore lodge Hillman Michigan, http://northernshorelodge.com/index.htm
All these shots are single exposures except the star trails.
For the Milky way shots, I did take multiple shots for DSS later this weekend, will be interesting to compare the added depth/clarity DSS gives vs single exposure shown below.
I'll post those in this thread as they are done.
#1: Lodge @ night, 25 sec exposure:
#2: Aug 8 star trail-lodge, same framing as prior, just stacked (75) 20 second exposures. You can see some whispy clouds caused gaps in star trails.:
#3: Milky way due south with Ess lake shoreline, this is single 30 sec exposure, you can see whispy clouds here:
#4: Another single 30 sec exposure due south on Ess lake side, this showing more of Milky way with trees just on LH lower side, still slight clouds.
#5: This is Long lake side, another single 30 sec exposure, almost North slight east view of Milky way, tree on RH side for reference.
#6: One of my favorite shots from this nightime series, this is Long lake side, I like this shot as is....30 second exposure captured some ligh pollution even way up north.
#7: Another Long lake side shot, 30 sec exposure
#8: The Milky way directly overhead from Long lake side, it darker there than by the lodge.
Like I stated at start of this post, for the Milky way shots I did take multiple shots for DSS later this weekend, will be interesting to compare the added depth/clarity DSS gives vs single exposure shown above.
I'll post those in this thread as they are done.
I've identified 4 meteorites so far in my shots, for 3+ hours effort..... I saw more but not in my lens field of view.
Dew set in at 3:45 am-ish while I was in the home processing other astrophotography photos from prior shooting sessions, came out to check and had to wipe the lens, seemed the lens would stay clear only 9-12 minutes before moisture built up on it again.
I gave up at 5:30am-ish just as early morning dawn was peaking.
Went back to bed, got 75 minutes more of sleep, had to go to work.
Will post the "keepers" this weekend after some PP.
When I was up north darker skies led to much more prominent meteorite trails than the 4 I captured this morning, and I live in sorta rural / countryside area, not exactly suburbs.
fwiw, next time I'd try ISO 1600 to capture the less bright streaks better
Dew set in at 3:45 am-ish while I was in the home processing other astrophotography photos from prior shooting sessions, came out to check and had to wipe the lens, seemed the lens would stay clear only 9-12 minutes before moisture built up on it again.
I gave up at 5:30am-ish just as early morning dawn was peaking.
Went back to bed, got 75 minutes more of sleep, had to go to work.
Will post the "keepers" this weekend after some PP.
When I was up north darker skies led to much more prominent meteorite trails than the 4 I captured this morning, and I live in sorta rural / countryside area, not exactly suburbs.
fwiw, next time I'd try ISO 1600 to capture the less bright streaks better
No meteors, but more trails....
![]()
Exif Info:
Camera Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi
Exposure 20 min
Aperture f/5.6
Focal Length 18 mm
ISO Speed 100
Exif Info:
Camera Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi
Exposure 20 min
Aperture f/5.6
Focal Length 18 mm
ISO Speed 100
Mukilteo Light House Beach Park Area, WA
Nikon D50, used my 28mm f/2 and zenitar 16mm f/2.8 fisheye
@30 sec. ASA400
Saw some meteors but non in the camera field of view. Went back home after the park bench and I got wet from sprinklers. To much light pollution for longer exposers.
Nikon D50, used my 28mm f/2 and zenitar 16mm f/2.8 fisheye
@30 sec. ASA400
Saw some meteors but non in the camera field of view. Went back home after the park bench and I got wet from sprinklers. To much light pollution for longer exposers.
Attachments
Not bad. If you use a shorter exposure you could get star points, as opposed to the slight dashes...
Ok, I live in a very light polluted area of the UK, and am very jealous of some of the sky qualities in the pics so far, So anyway, I thought i'd chip in....
I've been experimenting with star trails as part of my astrophotography hobby.
I use various PC apps to assemble what I capture through the SLR, and the SLR attached to my Newtonian Reflector. There are a few good free ones around, but you have to try what your after in each app to find which produces the best results.
So Pic 1, This is a 100 frames stacked image, the advantage being you can use short exposures (8s) and combine them to enhance what the eye can't at first see. (that will make sence on pic 2), but for this pic I havent done that.
![Startrails.jpg]()
As you see, you get the star trail effect (excuse the break in the lines thats where clouds went past and I had to drop the frames, it also explains the photoshop effect you see on the right hand side, also the adjacent line is IIS going over ( that was my original target) and you can see the dotted lines which are aircraft)
So onto pic 2, the same set of 100 pictures, but this time i've opted to stack the stars by aligning them, eliminating (mostly) the rotation.
Notice how the terrible streetlight glow almost disappears and the amount of detail in the sky is dramatically improved.
![Starsaligned.jpg]()
You also get to experience how much the planet spins rather than the stars rotate.
The next pair of pics are the same 2 processes but i've managed to get an arty farty leaf in with the pole star. It was a clearer night for it!
![Startrails2_2.jpg]()
![110Stars%20Aligned.jpg]()
All this was done with just a Nikon P5100 pocket digital camera, set to take pics 8s each every 10 seconds. I can only get 110 odd pics out of it in 1 battery, and some clever free software.
http://www.astronomie.be/registax/index.html
http://deepskystacker.free.fr/english/index.html
Most of it is windows software im afraid, but I also use Starry Night Pro Plus 6 on the mac for my planning. I can connect my scope to it and it will track objects etc, with my D60 connected to the scope you can get right in there!! Focus then becomes the issue, as you connect the scope directly to the camera body and cant see sod all though the viewfinder so its a bit hit and miss.
So far i've discovered this is a very difficult form of photography....
![M92-2.jpg]()
But M92 didn't come out to badly I suppose...
I've been experimenting with star trails as part of my astrophotography hobby.
I use various PC apps to assemble what I capture through the SLR, and the SLR attached to my Newtonian Reflector. There are a few good free ones around, but you have to try what your after in each app to find which produces the best results.
So Pic 1, This is a 100 frames stacked image, the advantage being you can use short exposures (8s) and combine them to enhance what the eye can't at first see. (that will make sence on pic 2), but for this pic I havent done that.
As you see, you get the star trail effect (excuse the break in the lines thats where clouds went past and I had to drop the frames, it also explains the photoshop effect you see on the right hand side, also the adjacent line is IIS going over ( that was my original target) and you can see the dotted lines which are aircraft)
So onto pic 2, the same set of 100 pictures, but this time i've opted to stack the stars by aligning them, eliminating (mostly) the rotation.
Notice how the terrible streetlight glow almost disappears and the amount of detail in the sky is dramatically improved.
You also get to experience how much the planet spins rather than the stars rotate.
The next pair of pics are the same 2 processes but i've managed to get an arty farty leaf in with the pole star. It was a clearer night for it!
All this was done with just a Nikon P5100 pocket digital camera, set to take pics 8s each every 10 seconds. I can only get 110 odd pics out of it in 1 battery, and some clever free software.
http://www.astronomie.be/registax/index.html
http://deepskystacker.free.fr/english/index.html
Most of it is windows software im afraid, but I also use Starry Night Pro Plus 6 on the mac for my planning. I can connect my scope to it and it will track objects etc, with my D60 connected to the scope you can get right in there!! Focus then becomes the issue, as you connect the scope directly to the camera body and cant see sod all though the viewfinder so its a bit hit and miss.
So far i've discovered this is a very difficult form of photography....
But M92 didn't come out to badly I suppose...
Carnivor, I like everything you are doing and showing, thx for sharing.
Good fun stuff.
M31/Andromeda DSS 57 frames @ 10 sec, 85mm
Located M31, this is 1 of many test shots took @ 15mm trying to center it onto the frame. Centered above the peak of our home.
![_MG_3742.jpg]()
Then as I had almost centered, went to take a shot at 50mm, this effect happened....lens creep!
That what happens when you shoot almost straight up.
Kinda cool, almost Star Trek looking...
![_MG_3744.jpg]()
Here is my DSS output from those shots taken Wed 9/15 @ 5am in the morning, I'm excited at 1st capture of M31, not sure what to make of the "quality" of this capture.
Seems at 85mm lens 10 sec is slightly too much, star trailing shows somewhat, I'd try 6 second exposures next time.
57 light images shot with my 15-85 lens @ 85mm, 1600 ISO, 10 seconds each + 10 dark frames
![10%20sec%20RAW.jpg]()
cropped shows the stars as "egg shape" instead of point star due to sky rotation, I'm wondering if M31 would show more clarity at 6 seconds.
(I had 2 airplanes in these images, and forgot to delete those frames, shows in the crop as a streak.)
![10%20sec%20RAW%20-%20Version%202.jpg]()
Located M31, this is 1 of many test shots took @ 15mm trying to center it onto the frame. Centered above the peak of our home.
Then as I had almost centered, went to take a shot at 50mm, this effect happened....lens creep!
That what happens when you shoot almost straight up.
Kinda cool, almost Star Trek looking...
Here is my DSS output from those shots taken Wed 9/15 @ 5am in the morning, I'm excited at 1st capture of M31, not sure what to make of the "quality" of this capture.
Seems at 85mm lens 10 sec is slightly too much, star trailing shows somewhat, I'd try 6 second exposures next time.
57 light images shot with my 15-85 lens @ 85mm, 1600 ISO, 10 seconds each + 10 dark frames
cropped shows the stars as "egg shape" instead of point star due to sky rotation, I'm wondering if M31 would show more clarity at 6 seconds.
(I had 2 airplanes in these images, and forgot to delete those frames, shows in the crop as a streak.)
M31/Andromeda take 2
Tues 10/5 I used T1i/Canon 50mm 1.4 prime.
My method: Manual focus on Jupiter (got as small/defined circle as possible), found M31, used ISO800, 4 sec exp, f1/4 (wide open!).
133 light frames, 31 dark frames, 20 bias frames:
1 light frame with exif data for reference straight from camera:
![_MG_4351.jpg]()
A few hour later, DSS churned its magic:
(again 133 light frames, just under 9 minutes total exposure time)
![M31%2010-5-10%20v2.jpg]()
Crop of M31:
![M31%2010-5-10%20v2%20-%20Version%202.jpg]()
This is straight outta DSS - I applied 15% color saturation there to bring some color back, imported into Apple Aperture 3, no PP except slight edge sharpen.
Tues 10/5 I used T1i/Canon 50mm 1.4 prime.
My method: Manual focus on Jupiter (got as small/defined circle as possible), found M31, used ISO800, 4 sec exp, f1/4 (wide open!).
133 light frames, 31 dark frames, 20 bias frames:
1 light frame with exif data for reference straight from camera:
A few hour later, DSS churned its magic:
(again 133 light frames, just under 9 minutes total exposure time)
Crop of M31:
This is straight outta DSS - I applied 15% color saturation there to bring some color back, imported into Apple Aperture 3, no PP except slight edge sharpen.
MilkyWay: single 30 sec then CS5 vs DSS
Finally got around to processing shots I took 8-10-2010 of Milky Way while in Hillman, MI, about 1 hour away from Mackinaw bridge, very dark skies.
Below is comparison of single 30 sec exposure direct as is then with CS5 PP applied vs DSS 19 minute stacking
Here is single shot of Milkyway directly overhead 11pm-ish, taken with my T1i, Canon 15-85 at 15mm, ISO1600, 30 sec
#1 direct from camera as shot no PP
![_MG_1156%20-%20Version%202.jpg]()
#2 same shot as above, used CS5 for some PP:
(yea, that's a tree on top LH)
![_MG_1156%20-%20Version%202%20with%20CS5.jpg]()
Here is via DSS, 15mm, 57 light images @ ISO800, 20 sec each + 24 dark frames + 30 Bias frames, slight re-frame from above to not get tree in shot:
#3 DSS output (19 minutes total exposure)
![MilkyWay_8-10-2010%20v1.jpg]()
This seems to be my best direct overhead MilkyWay via DSS to date...no matter what I do that lone star gets blow bright/fuzzy in PP ( I could do some local burn to darken it I suppose)
#4 crop version just to remove some DSS edge artifacts and overexposed lone star:
![MilkyWay_8-10-2010%20v1.jpg]()
Finally got around to processing shots I took 8-10-2010 of Milky Way while in Hillman, MI, about 1 hour away from Mackinaw bridge, very dark skies.
Below is comparison of single 30 sec exposure direct as is then with CS5 PP applied vs DSS 19 minute stacking
Here is single shot of Milkyway directly overhead 11pm-ish, taken with my T1i, Canon 15-85 at 15mm, ISO1600, 30 sec
#1 direct from camera as shot no PP
#2 same shot as above, used CS5 for some PP:
(yea, that's a tree on top LH)
Here is via DSS, 15mm, 57 light images @ ISO800, 20 sec each + 24 dark frames + 30 Bias frames, slight re-frame from above to not get tree in shot:
#3 DSS output (19 minutes total exposure)
This seems to be my best direct overhead MilkyWay via DSS to date...no matter what I do that lone star gets blow bright/fuzzy in PP ( I could do some local burn to darken it I suppose)
#4 crop version just to remove some DSS edge artifacts and overexposed lone star:
Tues 10/5 I used T1i/Canon 50mm 1.4 prime.
My method: Manual focus on Jupiter (got as small/defined circle as possible), found M31, used ISO800, 4 sec exp, f1/4 (wide open!).
133 light frames, 31 dark frames, 20 bias frames:
1 light frame with exif data for reference straight from camera:
![_MG_4351.jpg]()
A few hour later, DSS churned its magic:
(again 133 light frames, just under 9 minutes total exposure time)
![M31%2010-5-10%20v2.jpg]()
Crop of M31:
![M31%2010-5-10%20v2%20-%20Version%202.jpg]()
This is straight outta DSS - I applied 15% color saturation there to bring some color back, imported into Apple Aperture 3, no PP except slight edge sharpen.
Great shots everyone, but this in particular is awesome.
Awesome shots as always!
What kind of PP did you do in CS5 for the single exposure?
About the DSS, do you need to move your camera between shots to follow the stars?
Would that stacking be possible in photoshop as well? Is there any Mac software that gets you that kind of results?
Thanks
What kind of PP did you do in CS5 for the single exposure? Histrogram stretch
http://astrochat.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13241
and
this whole paragraph from another forum
About the DSS, do you need to move your camera between shots to follow the stars? No, that is what DSS does, it aligns your shots for the earth rotation
Would that stacking be possible in photoshop as well? Yes, but for 100's of images not pratical, plus the earth rotation get tricky to align on
Is there any Mac software that gets you that kind of results? That would be sweet, but I'm not aware of any and others have searched as well. Seems astrophotography is so niche that only WinTel stuff is out there. I use VMWare Fusion and WinXP just for this........http://www.vmware.com/products/fusion/
http://astrochat.co.uk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13241
and
this whole paragraph from another forum
About the DSS, do you need to move your camera between shots to follow the stars? No, that is what DSS does, it aligns your shots for the earth rotation
Would that stacking be possible in photoshop as well? Yes, but for 100's of images not pratical, plus the earth rotation get tricky to align on
Is there any Mac software that gets you that kind of results? That would be sweet, but I'm not aware of any and others have searched as well. Seems astrophotography is so niche that only WinTel stuff is out there. I use VMWare Fusion and WinXP just for this........http://www.vmware.com/products/fusion/