Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mgartner0622

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 6, 2010
1,018
0
Colorado, USA
Hello All,

I'm trying to set up my brother's computer for him, and own both retail copies of OS X Tiger, and Leopard.

The iMac has a 128MB Video Card (ATi X1600 I think) as well as RAM that I installed to take it to its maximum, 2.5GB.
It has a new high speed seagate black 500GB hard disk installed (by me)

I'm wondering the best operating system to install, features are not really that important to me.

What the computer is used for:
Web Browsing
Apple Mail
Microsoft Office 2008
Adobe Photoshop CS3
Gaming (Older PowerPC games like Star Wars KOTOR, and a few racing games)
iTunes w/ 32GB Libray (Including the Occasional rental and all the movies)
I'm wondering which OS would provide the best framerates, and general performace on this aging but still great mac.

Thank you for your time.
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
Leopard. It is still supported by Apple, gets supported by most new applications, and works very well on G5 machines.
 

PowerGamerX

macrumors 6502a
Aug 9, 2009
673
1
Here's my rule.

Leopard for everything with the following:

1ghz G4 or Better
80gb HDD
1gb of ram

Tiger for everything less.
 

Hrududu

macrumors 68020
Jul 25, 2008
2,299
627
Central US
Absolutely no reason to NOT run Leopard on it. More than meets the requirements to run it and run it well.
 

sysiphus

macrumors 6502a
May 7, 2006
816
1
Any G5 with adequate RAM (2GB+) should be very nice on Leopard. Unless you need 10.4's support for Classic mode, there's no advantage to it on that hardware. Furthermore, there's only going to be more and more software that's 10.5 only.
 

raysfan81

macrumors 6502a
Oct 6, 2009
598
2
Any G5 with adequate RAM (2GB+) should be very nice on Leopard. Unless you need 10.4's support for Classic mode, there's no advantage to it on that hardware. Furthermore, there's only going to be more and more software that's 10.5 only.

I think it should run well 1gb+ but 2gb is nice to have
 

sysiphus

macrumors 6502a
May 7, 2006
816
1
I think it should run well 1gb+ but 2gb is nice to have

It'll run, but if the user is doing much in the way of multitasking, the computer will be jumping to virtual memory consistently on 1GB. Given that the RAM should be accessible for ~$40 or so, I'd do it in a heartbeat if that iMac were going to be my main computer.
 

mgartner0622

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 6, 2010
1,018
0
Colorado, USA
Thank you for your input everyone...
Since I don't need the classic enviroment any longer, Leopard it is!
Thanks again!

-Matt
 

PowerGamerX

macrumors 6502a
Aug 9, 2009
673
1
Thank you for your input everyone...
Since I don't need the classic enviroment any longer, Leopard it is!
Thanks again!

-Matt

Glad you upgraded the hard drive in that thing. It seemed like it was starting to get a little sore.

Don't forget all the nice parental controls in Leopard too xD
 

smc333

macrumors regular
Jan 24, 2010
114
3
Boston, MA
Plus you get Safari 5 on Leopard (which I don't think came to PPC 10.4). So that adds a little extra life to a Leopard install.
 

mgartner0622

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 6, 2010
1,018
0
Colorado, USA
Yep, i've installed leopard now!
Thanks for the help again everyone.

I also replaced the default wallpaper with the snow leopard one.
without looking at about this Mac, it looks exactly like an early Intel :D
 

MacHamster68

macrumors 68040
Sep 17, 2009
3,251
5
there is only 1 reason not to upgrade to leopard and for me its a very important one ...leopard has no classic support , so no OS9 games :(
and still most reputable programs have osx tiger as minimum requirement
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.